Cargando…

Anisotropic Porous Biodegradable Scaffolds for Musculoskeletal Tissue Engineering

It has been generally accepted that tissue engineered constructs should closely resemble the in-vivo mechanical and structural properties of the tissues they are intended to replace. However, most scaffolds produced so far were isotropic porous scaffolds with non-characterized mechanical properties,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: de Mulder, Eric L.W., Buma, Pieter, Hannink, Gerjon
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Molecular Diversity Preservation International 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5513390/
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma2041674
_version_ 1783250651752431616
author de Mulder, Eric L.W.
Buma, Pieter
Hannink, Gerjon
author_facet de Mulder, Eric L.W.
Buma, Pieter
Hannink, Gerjon
author_sort de Mulder, Eric L.W.
collection PubMed
description It has been generally accepted that tissue engineered constructs should closely resemble the in-vivo mechanical and structural properties of the tissues they are intended to replace. However, most scaffolds produced so far were isotropic porous scaffolds with non-characterized mechanical properties, different from those of the native healthy tissue. Tissues that are formed into these scaffolds are initially formed in the isotropic porous structure and since most tissues have significant anisotropic extracellular matrix components and concomitant mechanical properties, the formed tissues have no structural and functional relationships with the native tissues. The complete regeneration of tissues requires a second differentiation step after resorption of the isotropic scaffold. It is doubtful if the required plasticity for this remains present in already final differentiated tissue. It would be much more efficacious if the newly formed tissues in the scaffold could differentiate directly into the anisotropic organization of the native tissues. Therefore, anisotropic scaffolds that enable such a direct differentiation might be extremely helpful to realize this goal. Up to now, anisotropic scaffolds have been fabricated using modified conventional techniques, solid free-form fabrication techniques, and a few alternative methods. In this review we present the current status and discuss the procedures that are currently being used for anisotropic scaffold fabrication.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5513390
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher Molecular Diversity Preservation International
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55133902017-07-28 Anisotropic Porous Biodegradable Scaffolds for Musculoskeletal Tissue Engineering de Mulder, Eric L.W. Buma, Pieter Hannink, Gerjon Materials (Basel) Review It has been generally accepted that tissue engineered constructs should closely resemble the in-vivo mechanical and structural properties of the tissues they are intended to replace. However, most scaffolds produced so far were isotropic porous scaffolds with non-characterized mechanical properties, different from those of the native healthy tissue. Tissues that are formed into these scaffolds are initially formed in the isotropic porous structure and since most tissues have significant anisotropic extracellular matrix components and concomitant mechanical properties, the formed tissues have no structural and functional relationships with the native tissues. The complete regeneration of tissues requires a second differentiation step after resorption of the isotropic scaffold. It is doubtful if the required plasticity for this remains present in already final differentiated tissue. It would be much more efficacious if the newly formed tissues in the scaffold could differentiate directly into the anisotropic organization of the native tissues. Therefore, anisotropic scaffolds that enable such a direct differentiation might be extremely helpful to realize this goal. Up to now, anisotropic scaffolds have been fabricated using modified conventional techniques, solid free-form fabrication techniques, and a few alternative methods. In this review we present the current status and discuss the procedures that are currently being used for anisotropic scaffold fabrication. Molecular Diversity Preservation International 2009-10-29 /pmc/articles/PMC5513390/ http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma2041674 Text en © 2009 by the authors. Licensee Molecular Diversity Preservation International, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open-access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/).
spellingShingle Review
de Mulder, Eric L.W.
Buma, Pieter
Hannink, Gerjon
Anisotropic Porous Biodegradable Scaffolds for Musculoskeletal Tissue Engineering
title Anisotropic Porous Biodegradable Scaffolds for Musculoskeletal Tissue Engineering
title_full Anisotropic Porous Biodegradable Scaffolds for Musculoskeletal Tissue Engineering
title_fullStr Anisotropic Porous Biodegradable Scaffolds for Musculoskeletal Tissue Engineering
title_full_unstemmed Anisotropic Porous Biodegradable Scaffolds for Musculoskeletal Tissue Engineering
title_short Anisotropic Porous Biodegradable Scaffolds for Musculoskeletal Tissue Engineering
title_sort anisotropic porous biodegradable scaffolds for musculoskeletal tissue engineering
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5513390/
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma2041674
work_keys_str_mv AT demulderericlw anisotropicporousbiodegradablescaffoldsformusculoskeletaltissueengineering
AT bumapieter anisotropicporousbiodegradablescaffoldsformusculoskeletaltissueengineering
AT hanninkgerjon anisotropicporousbiodegradablescaffoldsformusculoskeletaltissueengineering