Cargando…
Anisotropic Porous Biodegradable Scaffolds for Musculoskeletal Tissue Engineering
It has been generally accepted that tissue engineered constructs should closely resemble the in-vivo mechanical and structural properties of the tissues they are intended to replace. However, most scaffolds produced so far were isotropic porous scaffolds with non-characterized mechanical properties,...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Molecular Diversity Preservation International
2009
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5513390/ http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma2041674 |
_version_ | 1783250651752431616 |
---|---|
author | de Mulder, Eric L.W. Buma, Pieter Hannink, Gerjon |
author_facet | de Mulder, Eric L.W. Buma, Pieter Hannink, Gerjon |
author_sort | de Mulder, Eric L.W. |
collection | PubMed |
description | It has been generally accepted that tissue engineered constructs should closely resemble the in-vivo mechanical and structural properties of the tissues they are intended to replace. However, most scaffolds produced so far were isotropic porous scaffolds with non-characterized mechanical properties, different from those of the native healthy tissue. Tissues that are formed into these scaffolds are initially formed in the isotropic porous structure and since most tissues have significant anisotropic extracellular matrix components and concomitant mechanical properties, the formed tissues have no structural and functional relationships with the native tissues. The complete regeneration of tissues requires a second differentiation step after resorption of the isotropic scaffold. It is doubtful if the required plasticity for this remains present in already final differentiated tissue. It would be much more efficacious if the newly formed tissues in the scaffold could differentiate directly into the anisotropic organization of the native tissues. Therefore, anisotropic scaffolds that enable such a direct differentiation might be extremely helpful to realize this goal. Up to now, anisotropic scaffolds have been fabricated using modified conventional techniques, solid free-form fabrication techniques, and a few alternative methods. In this review we present the current status and discuss the procedures that are currently being used for anisotropic scaffold fabrication. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5513390 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2009 |
publisher | Molecular Diversity Preservation International |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55133902017-07-28 Anisotropic Porous Biodegradable Scaffolds for Musculoskeletal Tissue Engineering de Mulder, Eric L.W. Buma, Pieter Hannink, Gerjon Materials (Basel) Review It has been generally accepted that tissue engineered constructs should closely resemble the in-vivo mechanical and structural properties of the tissues they are intended to replace. However, most scaffolds produced so far were isotropic porous scaffolds with non-characterized mechanical properties, different from those of the native healthy tissue. Tissues that are formed into these scaffolds are initially formed in the isotropic porous structure and since most tissues have significant anisotropic extracellular matrix components and concomitant mechanical properties, the formed tissues have no structural and functional relationships with the native tissues. The complete regeneration of tissues requires a second differentiation step after resorption of the isotropic scaffold. It is doubtful if the required plasticity for this remains present in already final differentiated tissue. It would be much more efficacious if the newly formed tissues in the scaffold could differentiate directly into the anisotropic organization of the native tissues. Therefore, anisotropic scaffolds that enable such a direct differentiation might be extremely helpful to realize this goal. Up to now, anisotropic scaffolds have been fabricated using modified conventional techniques, solid free-form fabrication techniques, and a few alternative methods. In this review we present the current status and discuss the procedures that are currently being used for anisotropic scaffold fabrication. Molecular Diversity Preservation International 2009-10-29 /pmc/articles/PMC5513390/ http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma2041674 Text en © 2009 by the authors. Licensee Molecular Diversity Preservation International, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open-access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review de Mulder, Eric L.W. Buma, Pieter Hannink, Gerjon Anisotropic Porous Biodegradable Scaffolds for Musculoskeletal Tissue Engineering |
title | Anisotropic Porous Biodegradable Scaffolds for Musculoskeletal Tissue Engineering |
title_full | Anisotropic Porous Biodegradable Scaffolds for Musculoskeletal Tissue Engineering |
title_fullStr | Anisotropic Porous Biodegradable Scaffolds for Musculoskeletal Tissue Engineering |
title_full_unstemmed | Anisotropic Porous Biodegradable Scaffolds for Musculoskeletal Tissue Engineering |
title_short | Anisotropic Porous Biodegradable Scaffolds for Musculoskeletal Tissue Engineering |
title_sort | anisotropic porous biodegradable scaffolds for musculoskeletal tissue engineering |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5513390/ http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma2041674 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT demulderericlw anisotropicporousbiodegradablescaffoldsformusculoskeletaltissueengineering AT bumapieter anisotropicporousbiodegradablescaffoldsformusculoskeletaltissueengineering AT hanninkgerjon anisotropicporousbiodegradablescaffoldsformusculoskeletaltissueengineering |