Cargando…

Management approach for recurrent brain metastases following upfront radiosurgery may affect risk of subsequent radiation necrosis

PURPOSE: Many patients treated with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) alone as initial treatment require 1 or more subsequent salvage therapies. This study aimed to determine if commonly used salvage strategies are associated with differing risks of radiation necrosis (RN). METHODS AND MATERIALS: All...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rae, Ali, Gorovets, Daniel, Rava, Paul, Ebner, Daniel, Cielo, Deus, Kinsella, Timothy J., DiPetrillo, Thomas A., Hepel, Jaroslaw T.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5514163/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28740900
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.adro.2016.08.007
_version_ 1783250793944580096
author Rae, Ali
Gorovets, Daniel
Rava, Paul
Ebner, Daniel
Cielo, Deus
Kinsella, Timothy J.
DiPetrillo, Thomas A.
Hepel, Jaroslaw T.
author_facet Rae, Ali
Gorovets, Daniel
Rava, Paul
Ebner, Daniel
Cielo, Deus
Kinsella, Timothy J.
DiPetrillo, Thomas A.
Hepel, Jaroslaw T.
author_sort Rae, Ali
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Many patients treated with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) alone as initial treatment require 1 or more subsequent salvage therapies. This study aimed to determine if commonly used salvage strategies are associated with differing risks of radiation necrosis (RN). METHODS AND MATERIALS: All patients treated with upfront SRS alone for brain metastases at our institution were retrospectively analyzed. Salvage treatment details were obtained for brain failures. Patients who underwent repeat SRS to the same lesion were excluded. RN was determined based on pathological confirmation or advanced brain imaging consistent with RN in a symptomatic patient. Patients were grouped according to salvage treatment and rates of RN were compared via Fisher's exact tests. RESULTS: Of 284 patients treated with upfront SRS alone, 132 received salvage therapy and 44 received multiple salvage treatments. This included 31 repeat SRS alone, 58 whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT) alone, 28 SRS and WBRT, 7 surgery alone, and 8 surgery with adjuvant radiation. With a median follow-up of 10 months, the rate of RN among all patients was 3.17% (9/284), salvaged patients 4.55% (6/132), and never salvaged patients 1.97% (3/152). Receiving salvage therapy did not significantly increase RN risk (P = .31). Of the patients requiring salvage treatments, the highest RN rate was among patients that had both salvage SRS and WBRT (delivered as separate salvage therapies) (6/28, 21.42%). RN rate in this group was significantly higher than in those treated with repeat SRS alone (0/31), WBRT alone (0/58), surgery alone (0/7), and surgery with adjuvant radiation (0/8). Comparing salvage WBRT doses <30 Gy versus ≥30 Gy revealed no effect of dose on RN rate. Additionally, among patients who received multiple SRS treatments, number of treated lesions was not predictive of RN incidence. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that initial management approach for recurrent brain metastasis after upfront SRS does not affect the rate of RN. However, the risk of RN significantly increases when patients are treated with both repeat SRS and salvage WBRT. Methods to improve prediction of toxicity and optimize patient selection for salvage treatments are needed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5514163
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55141632017-07-24 Management approach for recurrent brain metastases following upfront radiosurgery may affect risk of subsequent radiation necrosis Rae, Ali Gorovets, Daniel Rava, Paul Ebner, Daniel Cielo, Deus Kinsella, Timothy J. DiPetrillo, Thomas A. Hepel, Jaroslaw T. Adv Radiat Oncol Scientific Article PURPOSE: Many patients treated with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) alone as initial treatment require 1 or more subsequent salvage therapies. This study aimed to determine if commonly used salvage strategies are associated with differing risks of radiation necrosis (RN). METHODS AND MATERIALS: All patients treated with upfront SRS alone for brain metastases at our institution were retrospectively analyzed. Salvage treatment details were obtained for brain failures. Patients who underwent repeat SRS to the same lesion were excluded. RN was determined based on pathological confirmation or advanced brain imaging consistent with RN in a symptomatic patient. Patients were grouped according to salvage treatment and rates of RN were compared via Fisher's exact tests. RESULTS: Of 284 patients treated with upfront SRS alone, 132 received salvage therapy and 44 received multiple salvage treatments. This included 31 repeat SRS alone, 58 whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT) alone, 28 SRS and WBRT, 7 surgery alone, and 8 surgery with adjuvant radiation. With a median follow-up of 10 months, the rate of RN among all patients was 3.17% (9/284), salvaged patients 4.55% (6/132), and never salvaged patients 1.97% (3/152). Receiving salvage therapy did not significantly increase RN risk (P = .31). Of the patients requiring salvage treatments, the highest RN rate was among patients that had both salvage SRS and WBRT (delivered as separate salvage therapies) (6/28, 21.42%). RN rate in this group was significantly higher than in those treated with repeat SRS alone (0/31), WBRT alone (0/58), surgery alone (0/7), and surgery with adjuvant radiation (0/8). Comparing salvage WBRT doses <30 Gy versus ≥30 Gy revealed no effect of dose on RN rate. Additionally, among patients who received multiple SRS treatments, number of treated lesions was not predictive of RN incidence. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that initial management approach for recurrent brain metastasis after upfront SRS does not affect the rate of RN. However, the risk of RN significantly increases when patients are treated with both repeat SRS and salvage WBRT. Methods to improve prediction of toxicity and optimize patient selection for salvage treatments are needed. Elsevier 2016-08-24 /pmc/articles/PMC5514163/ /pubmed/28740900 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.adro.2016.08.007 Text en © 2016 The Authors on behalf of the American Society for Radiation Oncology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Scientific Article
Rae, Ali
Gorovets, Daniel
Rava, Paul
Ebner, Daniel
Cielo, Deus
Kinsella, Timothy J.
DiPetrillo, Thomas A.
Hepel, Jaroslaw T.
Management approach for recurrent brain metastases following upfront radiosurgery may affect risk of subsequent radiation necrosis
title Management approach for recurrent brain metastases following upfront radiosurgery may affect risk of subsequent radiation necrosis
title_full Management approach for recurrent brain metastases following upfront radiosurgery may affect risk of subsequent radiation necrosis
title_fullStr Management approach for recurrent brain metastases following upfront radiosurgery may affect risk of subsequent radiation necrosis
title_full_unstemmed Management approach for recurrent brain metastases following upfront radiosurgery may affect risk of subsequent radiation necrosis
title_short Management approach for recurrent brain metastases following upfront radiosurgery may affect risk of subsequent radiation necrosis
title_sort management approach for recurrent brain metastases following upfront radiosurgery may affect risk of subsequent radiation necrosis
topic Scientific Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5514163/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28740900
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.adro.2016.08.007
work_keys_str_mv AT raeali managementapproachforrecurrentbrainmetastasesfollowingupfrontradiosurgerymayaffectriskofsubsequentradiationnecrosis
AT gorovetsdaniel managementapproachforrecurrentbrainmetastasesfollowingupfrontradiosurgerymayaffectriskofsubsequentradiationnecrosis
AT ravapaul managementapproachforrecurrentbrainmetastasesfollowingupfrontradiosurgerymayaffectriskofsubsequentradiationnecrosis
AT ebnerdaniel managementapproachforrecurrentbrainmetastasesfollowingupfrontradiosurgerymayaffectriskofsubsequentradiationnecrosis
AT cielodeus managementapproachforrecurrentbrainmetastasesfollowingupfrontradiosurgerymayaffectriskofsubsequentradiationnecrosis
AT kinsellatimothyj managementapproachforrecurrentbrainmetastasesfollowingupfrontradiosurgerymayaffectriskofsubsequentradiationnecrosis
AT dipetrillothomasa managementapproachforrecurrentbrainmetastasesfollowingupfrontradiosurgerymayaffectriskofsubsequentradiationnecrosis
AT hepeljaroslawt managementapproachforrecurrentbrainmetastasesfollowingupfrontradiosurgerymayaffectriskofsubsequentradiationnecrosis