Cargando…
The tip-of-the-tongue state and curiosity
Theories of study time allocation and of curiosity suggest that people are most engaged with and want to devote their time to materials that are not completely mastered but also are not so difficult that they might be impossible. Their curiosity is thought to be triggered by items that are almost kn...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5514176/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28776003 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41235-017-0065-4 |
_version_ | 1783250796792512512 |
---|---|
author | Metcalfe, Janet Schwartz, Bennett L. Bloom, Paul A. |
author_facet | Metcalfe, Janet Schwartz, Bennett L. Bloom, Paul A. |
author_sort | Metcalfe, Janet |
collection | PubMed |
description | Theories of study time allocation and of curiosity suggest that people are most engaged with and want to devote their time to materials that are not completely mastered but also are not so difficult that they might be impossible. Their curiosity is thought to be triggered by items that are almost known, or are in what is sometimes called the region of proximal learning. Answers that are on the tip-of-the-tongue (TOT)—not immediately recallable but nevertheless evoking a feeling of imminent recall—seem, intuitively, to be materials that have this characteristic of being almost, but not quite, fully known. We therefore, hypothesized that people would be particularly curious to see the answers to questions for which the answers were on the tips of their tongues. To test the TOT curiosity hypothesis, we gave participants 82 general information questions and quickly asked whether the answers were or were not on the tips of their tongues and whether they wanted to see the answers later. Overwhelmingly, items that were accompanied by a TOT feeling were those which evoked participants’ curiosity, regardless of whether the feeling occurred in conjunction with an error of commission, an error of omission, or even with the correct answer. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s41235-017-0065-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5514176 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55141762017-08-01 The tip-of-the-tongue state and curiosity Metcalfe, Janet Schwartz, Bennett L. Bloom, Paul A. Cogn Res Princ Implic Original Article Theories of study time allocation and of curiosity suggest that people are most engaged with and want to devote their time to materials that are not completely mastered but also are not so difficult that they might be impossible. Their curiosity is thought to be triggered by items that are almost known, or are in what is sometimes called the region of proximal learning. Answers that are on the tip-of-the-tongue (TOT)—not immediately recallable but nevertheless evoking a feeling of imminent recall—seem, intuitively, to be materials that have this characteristic of being almost, but not quite, fully known. We therefore, hypothesized that people would be particularly curious to see the answers to questions for which the answers were on the tips of their tongues. To test the TOT curiosity hypothesis, we gave participants 82 general information questions and quickly asked whether the answers were or were not on the tips of their tongues and whether they wanted to see the answers later. Overwhelmingly, items that were accompanied by a TOT feeling were those which evoked participants’ curiosity, regardless of whether the feeling occurred in conjunction with an error of commission, an error of omission, or even with the correct answer. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s41235-017-0065-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2017-07-18 /pmc/articles/PMC5514176/ /pubmed/28776003 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41235-017-0065-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Metcalfe, Janet Schwartz, Bennett L. Bloom, Paul A. The tip-of-the-tongue state and curiosity |
title | The tip-of-the-tongue state and curiosity |
title_full | The tip-of-the-tongue state and curiosity |
title_fullStr | The tip-of-the-tongue state and curiosity |
title_full_unstemmed | The tip-of-the-tongue state and curiosity |
title_short | The tip-of-the-tongue state and curiosity |
title_sort | tip-of-the-tongue state and curiosity |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5514176/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28776003 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41235-017-0065-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT metcalfejanet thetipofthetonguestateandcuriosity AT schwartzbennettl thetipofthetonguestateandcuriosity AT bloompaula thetipofthetonguestateandcuriosity AT metcalfejanet tipofthetonguestateandcuriosity AT schwartzbennettl tipofthetonguestateandcuriosity AT bloompaula tipofthetonguestateandcuriosity |