Cargando…
Disrupted latent inhibition in individuals at ultra high-risk for developing psychosis
The addition of off-the-shelf cognitive measures to established prodromal criteria has resulted in limited improvement in the prediction of conversion to psychosis. Tests that assess cognitive processes central to schizophrenia might better identify those at highest risk. The latent inhibition parad...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5514297/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28740818 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scog.2016.07.003 |
_version_ | 1783250818181365760 |
---|---|
author | Kraus, Michael Rapisarda, Attilio Lam, Max Thong, Jamie Y.J. Lee, Jimmy Subramaniam, Mythily Collinson, Simon L. Chong, Siow Ann Keefe, Richard S.E. |
author_facet | Kraus, Michael Rapisarda, Attilio Lam, Max Thong, Jamie Y.J. Lee, Jimmy Subramaniam, Mythily Collinson, Simon L. Chong, Siow Ann Keefe, Richard S.E. |
author_sort | Kraus, Michael |
collection | PubMed |
description | The addition of off-the-shelf cognitive measures to established prodromal criteria has resulted in limited improvement in the prediction of conversion to psychosis. Tests that assess cognitive processes central to schizophrenia might better identify those at highest risk. The latent inhibition paradigm assesses a subject's tendency to ignore irrelevant stimuli, a process integral to healthy perceptual and cognitive function that has been hypothesized to be a key deficit underlying the development of schizophrenia. In this study, 142 young people at ultra high-risk for developing psychosis and 105 controls were tested on a within-subject latent inhibition paradigm. Additionally, we later inquired about the strategy that each subject employed to complete the test, and further investigated the relationship between reported strategy and the extent of latent inhibition exhibited. Unlike controls, ultra high-risk subjects did not demonstrate a significant latent inhibition effect. This difference between groups became greater when controlling for strategy. The lack of latent inhibition effect in our ultra high-risk sample suggests that individuals at ultra high-risk for psychosis are impaired in their allocation of attentional resources based on past predictive value of repeated stimuli. This fundamental deficit in the allocation of attention may contribute to the broader array of cognitive impairments and clinical symptoms displayed by individuals at ultra high-risk for psychosis. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5514297 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55142972017-07-24 Disrupted latent inhibition in individuals at ultra high-risk for developing psychosis Kraus, Michael Rapisarda, Attilio Lam, Max Thong, Jamie Y.J. Lee, Jimmy Subramaniam, Mythily Collinson, Simon L. Chong, Siow Ann Keefe, Richard S.E. Schizophr Res Cogn Article The addition of off-the-shelf cognitive measures to established prodromal criteria has resulted in limited improvement in the prediction of conversion to psychosis. Tests that assess cognitive processes central to schizophrenia might better identify those at highest risk. The latent inhibition paradigm assesses a subject's tendency to ignore irrelevant stimuli, a process integral to healthy perceptual and cognitive function that has been hypothesized to be a key deficit underlying the development of schizophrenia. In this study, 142 young people at ultra high-risk for developing psychosis and 105 controls were tested on a within-subject latent inhibition paradigm. Additionally, we later inquired about the strategy that each subject employed to complete the test, and further investigated the relationship between reported strategy and the extent of latent inhibition exhibited. Unlike controls, ultra high-risk subjects did not demonstrate a significant latent inhibition effect. This difference between groups became greater when controlling for strategy. The lack of latent inhibition effect in our ultra high-risk sample suggests that individuals at ultra high-risk for psychosis are impaired in their allocation of attentional resources based on past predictive value of repeated stimuli. This fundamental deficit in the allocation of attention may contribute to the broader array of cognitive impairments and clinical symptoms displayed by individuals at ultra high-risk for psychosis. Elsevier 2016-08-17 /pmc/articles/PMC5514297/ /pubmed/28740818 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scog.2016.07.003 Text en © 2016 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Kraus, Michael Rapisarda, Attilio Lam, Max Thong, Jamie Y.J. Lee, Jimmy Subramaniam, Mythily Collinson, Simon L. Chong, Siow Ann Keefe, Richard S.E. Disrupted latent inhibition in individuals at ultra high-risk for developing psychosis |
title | Disrupted latent inhibition in individuals at ultra high-risk for developing psychosis |
title_full | Disrupted latent inhibition in individuals at ultra high-risk for developing psychosis |
title_fullStr | Disrupted latent inhibition in individuals at ultra high-risk for developing psychosis |
title_full_unstemmed | Disrupted latent inhibition in individuals at ultra high-risk for developing psychosis |
title_short | Disrupted latent inhibition in individuals at ultra high-risk for developing psychosis |
title_sort | disrupted latent inhibition in individuals at ultra high-risk for developing psychosis |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5514297/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28740818 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scog.2016.07.003 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT krausmichael disruptedlatentinhibitioninindividualsatultrahighriskfordevelopingpsychosis AT rapisardaattilio disruptedlatentinhibitioninindividualsatultrahighriskfordevelopingpsychosis AT lammax disruptedlatentinhibitioninindividualsatultrahighriskfordevelopingpsychosis AT thongjamieyj disruptedlatentinhibitioninindividualsatultrahighriskfordevelopingpsychosis AT leejimmy disruptedlatentinhibitioninindividualsatultrahighriskfordevelopingpsychosis AT subramaniammythily disruptedlatentinhibitioninindividualsatultrahighriskfordevelopingpsychosis AT collinsonsimonl disruptedlatentinhibitioninindividualsatultrahighriskfordevelopingpsychosis AT chongsiowann disruptedlatentinhibitioninindividualsatultrahighriskfordevelopingpsychosis AT keeferichardse disruptedlatentinhibitioninindividualsatultrahighriskfordevelopingpsychosis |