Cargando…

Direct observation of hand hygiene can show differences in staff compliance: Do we need to evaluate the accuracy for patient safety?

Background: Direct observation of hand hygiene is the standard practice recommended by the World Health Organization to monitor its compliance. Objective: To evaluate the accuracy of hand hygiene observation performed by units' observers. Methods: A descriptive study was carried out in seven pa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Guanche Garcell, Humberto, Villanueva Arias, Ariadna, Ramírez Miranda, Fernando, Rubiera Jimenez, Reynol, Alfonso Serrano, Ramón N.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: HBKU Press 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5514426/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28785534
http://dx.doi.org/10.5339/qmj.2017.1
_version_ 1783250836712849408
author Guanche Garcell, Humberto
Villanueva Arias, Ariadna
Ramírez Miranda, Fernando
Rubiera Jimenez, Reynol
Alfonso Serrano, Ramón N.
author_facet Guanche Garcell, Humberto
Villanueva Arias, Ariadna
Ramírez Miranda, Fernando
Rubiera Jimenez, Reynol
Alfonso Serrano, Ramón N.
author_sort Guanche Garcell, Humberto
collection PubMed
description Background: Direct observation of hand hygiene is the standard practice recommended by the World Health Organization to monitor its compliance. Objective: To evaluate the accuracy of hand hygiene observation performed by units' observers. Methods: A descriptive study was carried out in seven patient care units in a 75-bed community hospital in Qatar. Four trained nurses performed hand hygiene observation in May 2016, any day of the week and in different shifts, following the same methodology as routine units' observers. Hand hygiene opportunities were registered, including hand hygiene moments, staff category, and actions (handrubs, hand washing, missed hand hygiene, and gloves without hand hygiene). Results: During January–May 2016, routine monitoring reported 25,319 opportunities with a compliance of 89.2%, and 91.6% for nurses, 89.6% for physicians, and 85.1% for ancillary staff. Trained external observers reported 815 opportunities and compliance of 54.7%, with the highest compliance observed after blood and body fluid exposure (80.0%) and after patient contact (85.5%), and the lowest figures before patient contact (34.2%) and before aseptic procedure (34.0%). Conclusion: This study provides essential information about the accuracy of the monitoring procedure and the compliance of hand hygiene that requires immediate action to protect patients and staff from healthcare-associated infections.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5514426
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher HBKU Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55144262017-08-07 Direct observation of hand hygiene can show differences in staff compliance: Do we need to evaluate the accuracy for patient safety? Guanche Garcell, Humberto Villanueva Arias, Ariadna Ramírez Miranda, Fernando Rubiera Jimenez, Reynol Alfonso Serrano, Ramón N. Qatar Med J Research Article Background: Direct observation of hand hygiene is the standard practice recommended by the World Health Organization to monitor its compliance. Objective: To evaluate the accuracy of hand hygiene observation performed by units' observers. Methods: A descriptive study was carried out in seven patient care units in a 75-bed community hospital in Qatar. Four trained nurses performed hand hygiene observation in May 2016, any day of the week and in different shifts, following the same methodology as routine units' observers. Hand hygiene opportunities were registered, including hand hygiene moments, staff category, and actions (handrubs, hand washing, missed hand hygiene, and gloves without hand hygiene). Results: During January–May 2016, routine monitoring reported 25,319 opportunities with a compliance of 89.2%, and 91.6% for nurses, 89.6% for physicians, and 85.1% for ancillary staff. Trained external observers reported 815 opportunities and compliance of 54.7%, with the highest compliance observed after blood and body fluid exposure (80.0%) and after patient contact (85.5%), and the lowest figures before patient contact (34.2%) and before aseptic procedure (34.0%). Conclusion: This study provides essential information about the accuracy of the monitoring procedure and the compliance of hand hygiene that requires immediate action to protect patients and staff from healthcare-associated infections. HBKU Press 2017-07-18 /pmc/articles/PMC5514426/ /pubmed/28785534 http://dx.doi.org/10.5339/qmj.2017.1 Text en © 2017 Guanche Garcell, Villanueva Arias, Ramírez Miranda, Rubiera Jimenez, Alfonso Serrano, licensee HBKU Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution license CC BY 4.0, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Guanche Garcell, Humberto
Villanueva Arias, Ariadna
Ramírez Miranda, Fernando
Rubiera Jimenez, Reynol
Alfonso Serrano, Ramón N.
Direct observation of hand hygiene can show differences in staff compliance: Do we need to evaluate the accuracy for patient safety?
title Direct observation of hand hygiene can show differences in staff compliance: Do we need to evaluate the accuracy for patient safety?
title_full Direct observation of hand hygiene can show differences in staff compliance: Do we need to evaluate the accuracy for patient safety?
title_fullStr Direct observation of hand hygiene can show differences in staff compliance: Do we need to evaluate the accuracy for patient safety?
title_full_unstemmed Direct observation of hand hygiene can show differences in staff compliance: Do we need to evaluate the accuracy for patient safety?
title_short Direct observation of hand hygiene can show differences in staff compliance: Do we need to evaluate the accuracy for patient safety?
title_sort direct observation of hand hygiene can show differences in staff compliance: do we need to evaluate the accuracy for patient safety?
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5514426/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28785534
http://dx.doi.org/10.5339/qmj.2017.1
work_keys_str_mv AT guanchegarcellhumberto directobservationofhandhygienecanshowdifferencesinstaffcompliancedoweneedtoevaluatetheaccuracyforpatientsafety
AT villanuevaariasariadna directobservationofhandhygienecanshowdifferencesinstaffcompliancedoweneedtoevaluatetheaccuracyforpatientsafety
AT ramirezmirandafernando directobservationofhandhygienecanshowdifferencesinstaffcompliancedoweneedtoevaluatetheaccuracyforpatientsafety
AT rubierajimenezreynol directobservationofhandhygienecanshowdifferencesinstaffcompliancedoweneedtoevaluatetheaccuracyforpatientsafety
AT alfonsoserranoramonn directobservationofhandhygienecanshowdifferencesinstaffcompliancedoweneedtoevaluatetheaccuracyforpatientsafety