Cargando…
Direct observation of hand hygiene can show differences in staff compliance: Do we need to evaluate the accuracy for patient safety?
Background: Direct observation of hand hygiene is the standard practice recommended by the World Health Organization to monitor its compliance. Objective: To evaluate the accuracy of hand hygiene observation performed by units' observers. Methods: A descriptive study was carried out in seven pa...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
HBKU Press
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5514426/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28785534 http://dx.doi.org/10.5339/qmj.2017.1 |
_version_ | 1783250836712849408 |
---|---|
author | Guanche Garcell, Humberto Villanueva Arias, Ariadna Ramírez Miranda, Fernando Rubiera Jimenez, Reynol Alfonso Serrano, Ramón N. |
author_facet | Guanche Garcell, Humberto Villanueva Arias, Ariadna Ramírez Miranda, Fernando Rubiera Jimenez, Reynol Alfonso Serrano, Ramón N. |
author_sort | Guanche Garcell, Humberto |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: Direct observation of hand hygiene is the standard practice recommended by the World Health Organization to monitor its compliance. Objective: To evaluate the accuracy of hand hygiene observation performed by units' observers. Methods: A descriptive study was carried out in seven patient care units in a 75-bed community hospital in Qatar. Four trained nurses performed hand hygiene observation in May 2016, any day of the week and in different shifts, following the same methodology as routine units' observers. Hand hygiene opportunities were registered, including hand hygiene moments, staff category, and actions (handrubs, hand washing, missed hand hygiene, and gloves without hand hygiene). Results: During January–May 2016, routine monitoring reported 25,319 opportunities with a compliance of 89.2%, and 91.6% for nurses, 89.6% for physicians, and 85.1% for ancillary staff. Trained external observers reported 815 opportunities and compliance of 54.7%, with the highest compliance observed after blood and body fluid exposure (80.0%) and after patient contact (85.5%), and the lowest figures before patient contact (34.2%) and before aseptic procedure (34.0%). Conclusion: This study provides essential information about the accuracy of the monitoring procedure and the compliance of hand hygiene that requires immediate action to protect patients and staff from healthcare-associated infections. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5514426 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | HBKU Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55144262017-08-07 Direct observation of hand hygiene can show differences in staff compliance: Do we need to evaluate the accuracy for patient safety? Guanche Garcell, Humberto Villanueva Arias, Ariadna Ramírez Miranda, Fernando Rubiera Jimenez, Reynol Alfonso Serrano, Ramón N. Qatar Med J Research Article Background: Direct observation of hand hygiene is the standard practice recommended by the World Health Organization to monitor its compliance. Objective: To evaluate the accuracy of hand hygiene observation performed by units' observers. Methods: A descriptive study was carried out in seven patient care units in a 75-bed community hospital in Qatar. Four trained nurses performed hand hygiene observation in May 2016, any day of the week and in different shifts, following the same methodology as routine units' observers. Hand hygiene opportunities were registered, including hand hygiene moments, staff category, and actions (handrubs, hand washing, missed hand hygiene, and gloves without hand hygiene). Results: During January–May 2016, routine monitoring reported 25,319 opportunities with a compliance of 89.2%, and 91.6% for nurses, 89.6% for physicians, and 85.1% for ancillary staff. Trained external observers reported 815 opportunities and compliance of 54.7%, with the highest compliance observed after blood and body fluid exposure (80.0%) and after patient contact (85.5%), and the lowest figures before patient contact (34.2%) and before aseptic procedure (34.0%). Conclusion: This study provides essential information about the accuracy of the monitoring procedure and the compliance of hand hygiene that requires immediate action to protect patients and staff from healthcare-associated infections. HBKU Press 2017-07-18 /pmc/articles/PMC5514426/ /pubmed/28785534 http://dx.doi.org/10.5339/qmj.2017.1 Text en © 2017 Guanche Garcell, Villanueva Arias, Ramírez Miranda, Rubiera Jimenez, Alfonso Serrano, licensee HBKU Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution license CC BY 4.0, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Guanche Garcell, Humberto Villanueva Arias, Ariadna Ramírez Miranda, Fernando Rubiera Jimenez, Reynol Alfonso Serrano, Ramón N. Direct observation of hand hygiene can show differences in staff compliance: Do we need to evaluate the accuracy for patient safety? |
title | Direct observation of hand hygiene can show differences in staff compliance: Do we need to evaluate the accuracy for patient safety? |
title_full | Direct observation of hand hygiene can show differences in staff compliance: Do we need to evaluate the accuracy for patient safety? |
title_fullStr | Direct observation of hand hygiene can show differences in staff compliance: Do we need to evaluate the accuracy for patient safety? |
title_full_unstemmed | Direct observation of hand hygiene can show differences in staff compliance: Do we need to evaluate the accuracy for patient safety? |
title_short | Direct observation of hand hygiene can show differences in staff compliance: Do we need to evaluate the accuracy for patient safety? |
title_sort | direct observation of hand hygiene can show differences in staff compliance: do we need to evaluate the accuracy for patient safety? |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5514426/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28785534 http://dx.doi.org/10.5339/qmj.2017.1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT guanchegarcellhumberto directobservationofhandhygienecanshowdifferencesinstaffcompliancedoweneedtoevaluatetheaccuracyforpatientsafety AT villanuevaariasariadna directobservationofhandhygienecanshowdifferencesinstaffcompliancedoweneedtoevaluatetheaccuracyforpatientsafety AT ramirezmirandafernando directobservationofhandhygienecanshowdifferencesinstaffcompliancedoweneedtoevaluatetheaccuracyforpatientsafety AT rubierajimenezreynol directobservationofhandhygienecanshowdifferencesinstaffcompliancedoweneedtoevaluatetheaccuracyforpatientsafety AT alfonsoserranoramonn directobservationofhandhygienecanshowdifferencesinstaffcompliancedoweneedtoevaluatetheaccuracyforpatientsafety |