Cargando…

Determining predictability and accuracy of thermal and electrical dental pulp tests: An in vivo study

INTRODUCTION: Pulp sensitivity testing, even with its limitations and shortcomings, has been and still remains a very helpful aid in endodontic diagnosis. Pulp sensitivity tests extrapolate pulpal health from the sensory response. The aim of the present study was to identify the sensitivity, specifi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Salgar, Avinash Ramchandra, Singh, Shishir H., Podar, Rajesh S., Kulkarni, Gaurav P., Babel, Shashank N.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5514810/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28761253
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.209067
_version_ 1783250887880212480
author Salgar, Avinash Ramchandra
Singh, Shishir H.
Podar, Rajesh S.
Kulkarni, Gaurav P.
Babel, Shashank N.
author_facet Salgar, Avinash Ramchandra
Singh, Shishir H.
Podar, Rajesh S.
Kulkarni, Gaurav P.
Babel, Shashank N.
author_sort Salgar, Avinash Ramchandra
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Pulp sensitivity testing, even with its limitations and shortcomings, has been and still remains a very helpful aid in endodontic diagnosis. Pulp sensitivity tests extrapolate pulpal health from the sensory response. The aim of the present study was to identify the sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values (NPVs) of thermal and electrical tests of pulp sensitivity. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Pulp tests studied were two cold and heat tests respectively and electrical test. A total of 330 teeth were tested: 198 teeth with vital pulp and 132 teeth with necrotic pulps (disease prevalence of 40%). The ideal standard was established by observing bleeding within the pulp chamber. RESULTS: Sensitivity values of the diagnostic tests were 0.89 and 0.94 for cold test, 0.84 and 0.87 for the heat tests, and 0.75 for electrical pulp test and the specificity values of the diagnostic tests were 0.91 and 0.93 for the cold tests, 0.86 and 0.84 for the heat tests, and 0.90 for electrical pulp test. The NPVs were 0.91 and 0.96 for the cold tests, 0.89 and 0.91 for the heat tests, and 0.84 for electrical pulp test. The positive predictive values were 0.89 and 0.90 for the cold tests, 0.80 and 0.79 for the heat tests and 0.88 for electrical pulp test. The highest accuracy (0.9393) was observed with cold test (icy spray). CONCLUSIONS: The cold test done with icy spray was the most accurate method for sensitivity testing.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5514810
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55148102017-07-31 Determining predictability and accuracy of thermal and electrical dental pulp tests: An in vivo study Salgar, Avinash Ramchandra Singh, Shishir H. Podar, Rajesh S. Kulkarni, Gaurav P. Babel, Shashank N. J Conserv Dent Original Research Article INTRODUCTION: Pulp sensitivity testing, even with its limitations and shortcomings, has been and still remains a very helpful aid in endodontic diagnosis. Pulp sensitivity tests extrapolate pulpal health from the sensory response. The aim of the present study was to identify the sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values (NPVs) of thermal and electrical tests of pulp sensitivity. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Pulp tests studied were two cold and heat tests respectively and electrical test. A total of 330 teeth were tested: 198 teeth with vital pulp and 132 teeth with necrotic pulps (disease prevalence of 40%). The ideal standard was established by observing bleeding within the pulp chamber. RESULTS: Sensitivity values of the diagnostic tests were 0.89 and 0.94 for cold test, 0.84 and 0.87 for the heat tests, and 0.75 for electrical pulp test and the specificity values of the diagnostic tests were 0.91 and 0.93 for the cold tests, 0.86 and 0.84 for the heat tests, and 0.90 for electrical pulp test. The NPVs were 0.91 and 0.96 for the cold tests, 0.89 and 0.91 for the heat tests, and 0.84 for electrical pulp test. The positive predictive values were 0.89 and 0.90 for the cold tests, 0.80 and 0.79 for the heat tests and 0.88 for electrical pulp test. The highest accuracy (0.9393) was observed with cold test (icy spray). CONCLUSIONS: The cold test done with icy spray was the most accurate method for sensitivity testing. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5514810/ /pubmed/28761253 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.209067 Text en Copyright: © 2017 Journal of Conservative Dentistry http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Research Article
Salgar, Avinash Ramchandra
Singh, Shishir H.
Podar, Rajesh S.
Kulkarni, Gaurav P.
Babel, Shashank N.
Determining predictability and accuracy of thermal and electrical dental pulp tests: An in vivo study
title Determining predictability and accuracy of thermal and electrical dental pulp tests: An in vivo study
title_full Determining predictability and accuracy of thermal and electrical dental pulp tests: An in vivo study
title_fullStr Determining predictability and accuracy of thermal and electrical dental pulp tests: An in vivo study
title_full_unstemmed Determining predictability and accuracy of thermal and electrical dental pulp tests: An in vivo study
title_short Determining predictability and accuracy of thermal and electrical dental pulp tests: An in vivo study
title_sort determining predictability and accuracy of thermal and electrical dental pulp tests: an in vivo study
topic Original Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5514810/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28761253
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.209067
work_keys_str_mv AT salgaravinashramchandra determiningpredictabilityandaccuracyofthermalandelectricaldentalpulptestsaninvivostudy
AT singhshishirh determiningpredictabilityandaccuracyofthermalandelectricaldentalpulptestsaninvivostudy
AT podarrajeshs determiningpredictabilityandaccuracyofthermalandelectricaldentalpulptestsaninvivostudy
AT kulkarnigauravp determiningpredictabilityandaccuracyofthermalandelectricaldentalpulptestsaninvivostudy
AT babelshashankn determiningpredictabilityandaccuracyofthermalandelectricaldentalpulptestsaninvivostudy