Cargando…
Prognostic value of circulating endothelial cells in metastatic colorectal cancer
BACKGROUND: There is urgent need for improved staging in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). In this study, we evaluated the prognostic value of circulating endothelial cells (CEC) in comparison with circulating tumor cells (CTC) in patients with mCRC amenable for potentially curative...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Impact Journals LLC
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5514924/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28415583 http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.16397 |
_version_ | 1783250911305400320 |
---|---|
author | Rahbari, Nuh N Schölch, Sebastian Bork, Ulrich Kahlert, Christoph Schneider, Martin Rahbari, Mohammad Büchler, Markus W Weitz, Jürgen Reissfelder, Christoph |
author_facet | Rahbari, Nuh N Schölch, Sebastian Bork, Ulrich Kahlert, Christoph Schneider, Martin Rahbari, Mohammad Büchler, Markus W Weitz, Jürgen Reissfelder, Christoph |
author_sort | Rahbari, Nuh N |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: There is urgent need for improved staging in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). In this study, we evaluated the prognostic value of circulating endothelial cells (CEC) in comparison with circulating tumor cells (CTC) in patients with mCRC amenable for potentially curative surgery. METHODS: A total of 140 patients were enrolled prospectively. CTC and CEC were measured with the CellSearch System (Veridex, NJ, USA). Cut-off values were determined using ROC analyses. Prognostic factors were identified by Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS: ROC analyses revealed ≥ 21 CEC as cut-off levels for detection, which was present in 68 (49%). CEC detection was associated with female gender (p = 0.03) only, whereas CTC detection was associated with presence of the primary tumor (p = 0.007), metastasis size (p < 0.001), bilobar liver metastases (p = 0.02), CEA (p < 0.001) and CA 19-9 levels (p < 0.001). On multivariate analysis only CEC detection (HR 1.81; p = 0.03) and preoperative CA19-9 levels (HR 2.28, p = 0.005) were revealed as independent predictors of poor survival. CONCLUSIONS: CEC are of stronger prognostic value than CTC. Further studies are required to validate these results and to evaluate CEC as predictive biomarker for systemic therapy alone as well as in combination with other markers such as CA19-9. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5514924 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Impact Journals LLC |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55149242017-07-24 Prognostic value of circulating endothelial cells in metastatic colorectal cancer Rahbari, Nuh N Schölch, Sebastian Bork, Ulrich Kahlert, Christoph Schneider, Martin Rahbari, Mohammad Büchler, Markus W Weitz, Jürgen Reissfelder, Christoph Oncotarget Research Paper BACKGROUND: There is urgent need for improved staging in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). In this study, we evaluated the prognostic value of circulating endothelial cells (CEC) in comparison with circulating tumor cells (CTC) in patients with mCRC amenable for potentially curative surgery. METHODS: A total of 140 patients were enrolled prospectively. CTC and CEC were measured with the CellSearch System (Veridex, NJ, USA). Cut-off values were determined using ROC analyses. Prognostic factors were identified by Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS: ROC analyses revealed ≥ 21 CEC as cut-off levels for detection, which was present in 68 (49%). CEC detection was associated with female gender (p = 0.03) only, whereas CTC detection was associated with presence of the primary tumor (p = 0.007), metastasis size (p < 0.001), bilobar liver metastases (p = 0.02), CEA (p < 0.001) and CA 19-9 levels (p < 0.001). On multivariate analysis only CEC detection (HR 1.81; p = 0.03) and preoperative CA19-9 levels (HR 2.28, p = 0.005) were revealed as independent predictors of poor survival. CONCLUSIONS: CEC are of stronger prognostic value than CTC. Further studies are required to validate these results and to evaluate CEC as predictive biomarker for systemic therapy alone as well as in combination with other markers such as CA19-9. Impact Journals LLC 2017-03-21 /pmc/articles/PMC5514924/ /pubmed/28415583 http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.16397 Text en Copyright: © 2017 Rahbari et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) (CC-BY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Paper Rahbari, Nuh N Schölch, Sebastian Bork, Ulrich Kahlert, Christoph Schneider, Martin Rahbari, Mohammad Büchler, Markus W Weitz, Jürgen Reissfelder, Christoph Prognostic value of circulating endothelial cells in metastatic colorectal cancer |
title | Prognostic value of circulating endothelial cells in metastatic colorectal cancer |
title_full | Prognostic value of circulating endothelial cells in metastatic colorectal cancer |
title_fullStr | Prognostic value of circulating endothelial cells in metastatic colorectal cancer |
title_full_unstemmed | Prognostic value of circulating endothelial cells in metastatic colorectal cancer |
title_short | Prognostic value of circulating endothelial cells in metastatic colorectal cancer |
title_sort | prognostic value of circulating endothelial cells in metastatic colorectal cancer |
topic | Research Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5514924/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28415583 http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.16397 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rahbarinuhn prognosticvalueofcirculatingendothelialcellsinmetastaticcolorectalcancer AT scholchsebastian prognosticvalueofcirculatingendothelialcellsinmetastaticcolorectalcancer AT borkulrich prognosticvalueofcirculatingendothelialcellsinmetastaticcolorectalcancer AT kahlertchristoph prognosticvalueofcirculatingendothelialcellsinmetastaticcolorectalcancer AT schneidermartin prognosticvalueofcirculatingendothelialcellsinmetastaticcolorectalcancer AT rahbarimohammad prognosticvalueofcirculatingendothelialcellsinmetastaticcolorectalcancer AT buchlermarkusw prognosticvalueofcirculatingendothelialcellsinmetastaticcolorectalcancer AT weitzjurgen prognosticvalueofcirculatingendothelialcellsinmetastaticcolorectalcancer AT reissfelderchristoph prognosticvalueofcirculatingendothelialcellsinmetastaticcolorectalcancer |