Cargando…

Prognostic value of circulating endothelial cells in metastatic colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND: There is urgent need for improved staging in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). In this study, we evaluated the prognostic value of circulating endothelial cells (CEC) in comparison with circulating tumor cells (CTC) in patients with mCRC amenable for potentially curative...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rahbari, Nuh N, Schölch, Sebastian, Bork, Ulrich, Kahlert, Christoph, Schneider, Martin, Rahbari, Mohammad, Büchler, Markus W, Weitz, Jürgen, Reissfelder, Christoph
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Impact Journals LLC 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5514924/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28415583
http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.16397
_version_ 1783250911305400320
author Rahbari, Nuh N
Schölch, Sebastian
Bork, Ulrich
Kahlert, Christoph
Schneider, Martin
Rahbari, Mohammad
Büchler, Markus W
Weitz, Jürgen
Reissfelder, Christoph
author_facet Rahbari, Nuh N
Schölch, Sebastian
Bork, Ulrich
Kahlert, Christoph
Schneider, Martin
Rahbari, Mohammad
Büchler, Markus W
Weitz, Jürgen
Reissfelder, Christoph
author_sort Rahbari, Nuh N
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: There is urgent need for improved staging in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). In this study, we evaluated the prognostic value of circulating endothelial cells (CEC) in comparison with circulating tumor cells (CTC) in patients with mCRC amenable for potentially curative surgery. METHODS: A total of 140 patients were enrolled prospectively. CTC and CEC were measured with the CellSearch System (Veridex, NJ, USA). Cut-off values were determined using ROC analyses. Prognostic factors were identified by Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS: ROC analyses revealed ≥ 21 CEC as cut-off levels for detection, which was present in 68 (49%). CEC detection was associated with female gender (p = 0.03) only, whereas CTC detection was associated with presence of the primary tumor (p = 0.007), metastasis size (p < 0.001), bilobar liver metastases (p = 0.02), CEA (p < 0.001) and CA 19-9 levels (p < 0.001). On multivariate analysis only CEC detection (HR 1.81; p = 0.03) and preoperative CA19-9 levels (HR 2.28, p = 0.005) were revealed as independent predictors of poor survival. CONCLUSIONS: CEC are of stronger prognostic value than CTC. Further studies are required to validate these results and to evaluate CEC as predictive biomarker for systemic therapy alone as well as in combination with other markers such as CA19-9.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5514924
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Impact Journals LLC
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55149242017-07-24 Prognostic value of circulating endothelial cells in metastatic colorectal cancer Rahbari, Nuh N Schölch, Sebastian Bork, Ulrich Kahlert, Christoph Schneider, Martin Rahbari, Mohammad Büchler, Markus W Weitz, Jürgen Reissfelder, Christoph Oncotarget Research Paper BACKGROUND: There is urgent need for improved staging in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). In this study, we evaluated the prognostic value of circulating endothelial cells (CEC) in comparison with circulating tumor cells (CTC) in patients with mCRC amenable for potentially curative surgery. METHODS: A total of 140 patients were enrolled prospectively. CTC and CEC were measured with the CellSearch System (Veridex, NJ, USA). Cut-off values were determined using ROC analyses. Prognostic factors were identified by Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS: ROC analyses revealed ≥ 21 CEC as cut-off levels for detection, which was present in 68 (49%). CEC detection was associated with female gender (p = 0.03) only, whereas CTC detection was associated with presence of the primary tumor (p = 0.007), metastasis size (p < 0.001), bilobar liver metastases (p = 0.02), CEA (p < 0.001) and CA 19-9 levels (p < 0.001). On multivariate analysis only CEC detection (HR 1.81; p = 0.03) and preoperative CA19-9 levels (HR 2.28, p = 0.005) were revealed as independent predictors of poor survival. CONCLUSIONS: CEC are of stronger prognostic value than CTC. Further studies are required to validate these results and to evaluate CEC as predictive biomarker for systemic therapy alone as well as in combination with other markers such as CA19-9. Impact Journals LLC 2017-03-21 /pmc/articles/PMC5514924/ /pubmed/28415583 http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.16397 Text en Copyright: © 2017 Rahbari et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) (CC-BY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Paper
Rahbari, Nuh N
Schölch, Sebastian
Bork, Ulrich
Kahlert, Christoph
Schneider, Martin
Rahbari, Mohammad
Büchler, Markus W
Weitz, Jürgen
Reissfelder, Christoph
Prognostic value of circulating endothelial cells in metastatic colorectal cancer
title Prognostic value of circulating endothelial cells in metastatic colorectal cancer
title_full Prognostic value of circulating endothelial cells in metastatic colorectal cancer
title_fullStr Prognostic value of circulating endothelial cells in metastatic colorectal cancer
title_full_unstemmed Prognostic value of circulating endothelial cells in metastatic colorectal cancer
title_short Prognostic value of circulating endothelial cells in metastatic colorectal cancer
title_sort prognostic value of circulating endothelial cells in metastatic colorectal cancer
topic Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5514924/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28415583
http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.16397
work_keys_str_mv AT rahbarinuhn prognosticvalueofcirculatingendothelialcellsinmetastaticcolorectalcancer
AT scholchsebastian prognosticvalueofcirculatingendothelialcellsinmetastaticcolorectalcancer
AT borkulrich prognosticvalueofcirculatingendothelialcellsinmetastaticcolorectalcancer
AT kahlertchristoph prognosticvalueofcirculatingendothelialcellsinmetastaticcolorectalcancer
AT schneidermartin prognosticvalueofcirculatingendothelialcellsinmetastaticcolorectalcancer
AT rahbarimohammad prognosticvalueofcirculatingendothelialcellsinmetastaticcolorectalcancer
AT buchlermarkusw prognosticvalueofcirculatingendothelialcellsinmetastaticcolorectalcancer
AT weitzjurgen prognosticvalueofcirculatingendothelialcellsinmetastaticcolorectalcancer
AT reissfelderchristoph prognosticvalueofcirculatingendothelialcellsinmetastaticcolorectalcancer