Cargando…

Concomitant contraceptive implant and efavirenz use in women living with HIV: perspectives on current evidence and policy implications for family planning and HIV treatment guidelines

Introduction: Preventing unintended pregnancies is important among all women, including those living with HIV. Increasing numbers of women, including HIV-positive women, choose progestin-containing subdermal implants, which are one of the most effective forms of contraception. However, drug–drug int...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Patel, Rena C., Morroni, Chelsea, Scarsi, Kimberly K., Sripipatana, Tabitha, Kiarie, James, Cohen, Craig R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Taylor & Francis 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5515020/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28530033
http://dx.doi.org/10.7448/IAS.20.1.21396
_version_ 1783250932519141376
author Patel, Rena C.
Morroni, Chelsea
Scarsi, Kimberly K.
Sripipatana, Tabitha
Kiarie, James
Cohen, Craig R.
author_facet Patel, Rena C.
Morroni, Chelsea
Scarsi, Kimberly K.
Sripipatana, Tabitha
Kiarie, James
Cohen, Craig R.
author_sort Patel, Rena C.
collection PubMed
description Introduction: Preventing unintended pregnancies is important among all women, including those living with HIV. Increasing numbers of women, including HIV-positive women, choose progestin-containing subdermal implants, which are one of the most effective forms of contraception. However, drug–drug interactions between contraceptive hormones and efavirenz-based antiretroviral therapy (ART) may reduce implant effectiveness. We present four inter-related perspectives on this issue. Discussion: First, as a case study, we discuss how limited data prompted country-level guidance against the use of implants among women concomitantly using efavirenz in South Africa and its subsequent negative effects on the use of implants in general. Second, we discuss the existing clinical data on this topic, including the observational study from Kenya showing women using implants plus efavirenz-based ART had three-fold higher rates of pregnancy than women using implants plus nevirapine-based ART. However, the higher rates of pregnancy in the implant plus efavirenz group were still lower than the pregnancy rates among women using common alternative contraceptive methods, such as injectables. Third, we discuss the four pharmacokinetic studies that show 50–70% reductions in plasma progestin concentrations in women concurrently using efavirenz-based ART as compared to women not on any ART. These pharmacokinetic studies provide the biologic basis for the clinical findings. Fourth, we discuss how data on this topic have marked implications for both family planning and HIV programmes and policies globally. Conclusion: This controversy underlines the importance of integrating family planning services into routine HIV care, counselling women appropriately on increased risk of pregnancy with concomitant implant and efavirenz use, and expanding contraceptive method mix for all women. As global access to ART expands, greater research is needed to explore implant effectiveness when used concomitantly with newer ART regimens. Data on how HIV-positive women and their partners choose contraceptives, as well as information from providers on how they present and counsel patients on contraceptive options are needed to help guide policy and service delivery. Lastly, greater collaboration between HIV and reproductive health experts at all levels are needed to develop successful strategies to ensure the best HIV and reproductive health outcomes for women living with HIV.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5515020
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Taylor & Francis
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55150202017-07-26 Concomitant contraceptive implant and efavirenz use in women living with HIV: perspectives on current evidence and policy implications for family planning and HIV treatment guidelines Patel, Rena C. Morroni, Chelsea Scarsi, Kimberly K. Sripipatana, Tabitha Kiarie, James Cohen, Craig R. J Int AIDS Soc Commentary Introduction: Preventing unintended pregnancies is important among all women, including those living with HIV. Increasing numbers of women, including HIV-positive women, choose progestin-containing subdermal implants, which are one of the most effective forms of contraception. However, drug–drug interactions between contraceptive hormones and efavirenz-based antiretroviral therapy (ART) may reduce implant effectiveness. We present four inter-related perspectives on this issue. Discussion: First, as a case study, we discuss how limited data prompted country-level guidance against the use of implants among women concomitantly using efavirenz in South Africa and its subsequent negative effects on the use of implants in general. Second, we discuss the existing clinical data on this topic, including the observational study from Kenya showing women using implants plus efavirenz-based ART had three-fold higher rates of pregnancy than women using implants plus nevirapine-based ART. However, the higher rates of pregnancy in the implant plus efavirenz group were still lower than the pregnancy rates among women using common alternative contraceptive methods, such as injectables. Third, we discuss the four pharmacokinetic studies that show 50–70% reductions in plasma progestin concentrations in women concurrently using efavirenz-based ART as compared to women not on any ART. These pharmacokinetic studies provide the biologic basis for the clinical findings. Fourth, we discuss how data on this topic have marked implications for both family planning and HIV programmes and policies globally. Conclusion: This controversy underlines the importance of integrating family planning services into routine HIV care, counselling women appropriately on increased risk of pregnancy with concomitant implant and efavirenz use, and expanding contraceptive method mix for all women. As global access to ART expands, greater research is needed to explore implant effectiveness when used concomitantly with newer ART regimens. Data on how HIV-positive women and their partners choose contraceptives, as well as information from providers on how they present and counsel patients on contraceptive options are needed to help guide policy and service delivery. Lastly, greater collaboration between HIV and reproductive health experts at all levels are needed to develop successful strategies to ensure the best HIV and reproductive health outcomes for women living with HIV. Taylor & Francis 2017-05-11 /pmc/articles/PMC5515020/ /pubmed/28530033 http://dx.doi.org/10.7448/IAS.20.1.21396 Text en © 2017 Patel RC et al; licensee International AIDS Society. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative CommonsAttribution 3.0 Unported (CC BY 3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction inany medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Commentary
Patel, Rena C.
Morroni, Chelsea
Scarsi, Kimberly K.
Sripipatana, Tabitha
Kiarie, James
Cohen, Craig R.
Concomitant contraceptive implant and efavirenz use in women living with HIV: perspectives on current evidence and policy implications for family planning and HIV treatment guidelines
title Concomitant contraceptive implant and efavirenz use in women living with HIV: perspectives on current evidence and policy implications for family planning and HIV treatment guidelines
title_full Concomitant contraceptive implant and efavirenz use in women living with HIV: perspectives on current evidence and policy implications for family planning and HIV treatment guidelines
title_fullStr Concomitant contraceptive implant and efavirenz use in women living with HIV: perspectives on current evidence and policy implications for family planning and HIV treatment guidelines
title_full_unstemmed Concomitant contraceptive implant and efavirenz use in women living with HIV: perspectives on current evidence and policy implications for family planning and HIV treatment guidelines
title_short Concomitant contraceptive implant and efavirenz use in women living with HIV: perspectives on current evidence and policy implications for family planning and HIV treatment guidelines
title_sort concomitant contraceptive implant and efavirenz use in women living with hiv: perspectives on current evidence and policy implications for family planning and hiv treatment guidelines
topic Commentary
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5515020/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28530033
http://dx.doi.org/10.7448/IAS.20.1.21396
work_keys_str_mv AT patelrenac concomitantcontraceptiveimplantandefavirenzuseinwomenlivingwithhivperspectivesoncurrentevidenceandpolicyimplicationsforfamilyplanningandhivtreatmentguidelines
AT morronichelsea concomitantcontraceptiveimplantandefavirenzuseinwomenlivingwithhivperspectivesoncurrentevidenceandpolicyimplicationsforfamilyplanningandhivtreatmentguidelines
AT scarsikimberlyk concomitantcontraceptiveimplantandefavirenzuseinwomenlivingwithhivperspectivesoncurrentevidenceandpolicyimplicationsforfamilyplanningandhivtreatmentguidelines
AT sripipatanatabitha concomitantcontraceptiveimplantandefavirenzuseinwomenlivingwithhivperspectivesoncurrentevidenceandpolicyimplicationsforfamilyplanningandhivtreatmentguidelines
AT kiariejames concomitantcontraceptiveimplantandefavirenzuseinwomenlivingwithhivperspectivesoncurrentevidenceandpolicyimplicationsforfamilyplanningandhivtreatmentguidelines
AT cohencraigr concomitantcontraceptiveimplantandefavirenzuseinwomenlivingwithhivperspectivesoncurrentevidenceandpolicyimplicationsforfamilyplanningandhivtreatmentguidelines