Cargando…

Examining the effects of HIV self-testing compared to standard HIV testing services: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Introduction: HIV self-testing (HIVST) is a discreet and convenient way to reach people with HIV who do not know their status, including many who may not otherwise test. To inform World Health Organization (WHO) guidance, we assessed the effect of HIVST on uptake and frequency of testing, as well as...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Johnson, Cheryl C, Kennedy, Caitlin, Fonner, Virginia, Siegfried, Nandi, Figueroa, Carmen, Dalal, Shona, Sands, Anita, Baggaley, Rachel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Taylor & Francis 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5515051/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28530049
http://dx.doi.org/10.7448/IAS.20.1.21594
_version_ 1783250940078325760
author Johnson, Cheryl C
Kennedy, Caitlin
Fonner, Virginia
Siegfried, Nandi
Figueroa, Carmen
Dalal, Shona
Sands, Anita
Baggaley, Rachel
author_facet Johnson, Cheryl C
Kennedy, Caitlin
Fonner, Virginia
Siegfried, Nandi
Figueroa, Carmen
Dalal, Shona
Sands, Anita
Baggaley, Rachel
author_sort Johnson, Cheryl C
collection PubMed
description Introduction: HIV self-testing (HIVST) is a discreet and convenient way to reach people with HIV who do not know their status, including many who may not otherwise test. To inform World Health Organization (WHO) guidance, we assessed the effect of HIVST on uptake and frequency of testing, as well as identification of HIV-positive persons, linkage to care, social harm, and risk behaviour. Methods: We systematically searched for studies comparing HIVST to standard HIV testing until 1 June 2016. Meta-analyses of studies reporting comparable outcomes were conducted using a random-effects model for relative risks (RR) and 95% confidence intervals. The quality of evidence was evaluated using GRADE. Results: After screening 638 citations, we identified five randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing HIVST to standard HIV testing services among 4,145 total participants from four countries. All offered free oral-fluid rapid tests for HIVST and were among men. Meta-analysis of three RCTs showed HIVST doubled uptake of testing among men (RR = 2.12; 95% CI: 1.51, 2.98). Meta-analysis of two RCTs among men who have sex with men showed frequency of testing nearly doubled (Rate ratio = 1.88; 95% CI: 1.17; 3.01), resulting in two more tests in a 12–15-month period (Mean difference = 2.13; 95% CI: 1.59, 2.66). Meta-analysis of two RCTs showed HIVST also doubled the likelihood of an HIV-positive diagnosis (RR = 2.02; 95% CI: 0.37, 10.76, 5.32). Across all RCTs, there was no indication of harm attributable to HIVST and potential increases in risk-taking behaviour appeared to be minimal. Conclusions: HIVST is associated with increased uptake and frequency of testing in RCTs. Such increases, particularly among those at risk who may not otherwise test, will likely identify more HIV-positive individuals as compared to standard testing services alone. However, further research on how to support linkage to confirmatory testing, prevention, treatment and care services is needed. WHO now recommends HIVST as an additional HIV testing approach.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5515051
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Taylor & Francis
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55150512017-07-26 Examining the effects of HIV self-testing compared to standard HIV testing services: a systematic review and meta-analysis Johnson, Cheryl C Kennedy, Caitlin Fonner, Virginia Siegfried, Nandi Figueroa, Carmen Dalal, Shona Sands, Anita Baggaley, Rachel J Int AIDS Soc Review Article Introduction: HIV self-testing (HIVST) is a discreet and convenient way to reach people with HIV who do not know their status, including many who may not otherwise test. To inform World Health Organization (WHO) guidance, we assessed the effect of HIVST on uptake and frequency of testing, as well as identification of HIV-positive persons, linkage to care, social harm, and risk behaviour. Methods: We systematically searched for studies comparing HIVST to standard HIV testing until 1 June 2016. Meta-analyses of studies reporting comparable outcomes were conducted using a random-effects model for relative risks (RR) and 95% confidence intervals. The quality of evidence was evaluated using GRADE. Results: After screening 638 citations, we identified five randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing HIVST to standard HIV testing services among 4,145 total participants from four countries. All offered free oral-fluid rapid tests for HIVST and were among men. Meta-analysis of three RCTs showed HIVST doubled uptake of testing among men (RR = 2.12; 95% CI: 1.51, 2.98). Meta-analysis of two RCTs among men who have sex with men showed frequency of testing nearly doubled (Rate ratio = 1.88; 95% CI: 1.17; 3.01), resulting in two more tests in a 12–15-month period (Mean difference = 2.13; 95% CI: 1.59, 2.66). Meta-analysis of two RCTs showed HIVST also doubled the likelihood of an HIV-positive diagnosis (RR = 2.02; 95% CI: 0.37, 10.76, 5.32). Across all RCTs, there was no indication of harm attributable to HIVST and potential increases in risk-taking behaviour appeared to be minimal. Conclusions: HIVST is associated with increased uptake and frequency of testing in RCTs. Such increases, particularly among those at risk who may not otherwise test, will likely identify more HIV-positive individuals as compared to standard testing services alone. However, further research on how to support linkage to confirmatory testing, prevention, treatment and care services is needed. WHO now recommends HIVST as an additional HIV testing approach. Taylor & Francis 2017-05-15 /pmc/articles/PMC5515051/ /pubmed/28530049 http://dx.doi.org/10.7448/IAS.20.1.21594 Text en © 2017 Johnson CC et al; licensee International AIDS Society http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported (CC BY 3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Article
Johnson, Cheryl C
Kennedy, Caitlin
Fonner, Virginia
Siegfried, Nandi
Figueroa, Carmen
Dalal, Shona
Sands, Anita
Baggaley, Rachel
Examining the effects of HIV self-testing compared to standard HIV testing services: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title Examining the effects of HIV self-testing compared to standard HIV testing services: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Examining the effects of HIV self-testing compared to standard HIV testing services: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Examining the effects of HIV self-testing compared to standard HIV testing services: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Examining the effects of HIV self-testing compared to standard HIV testing services: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Examining the effects of HIV self-testing compared to standard HIV testing services: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort examining the effects of hiv self-testing compared to standard hiv testing services: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5515051/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28530049
http://dx.doi.org/10.7448/IAS.20.1.21594
work_keys_str_mv AT johnsoncherylc examiningtheeffectsofhivselftestingcomparedtostandardhivtestingservicesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT kennedycaitlin examiningtheeffectsofhivselftestingcomparedtostandardhivtestingservicesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT fonnervirginia examiningtheeffectsofhivselftestingcomparedtostandardhivtestingservicesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT siegfriednandi examiningtheeffectsofhivselftestingcomparedtostandardhivtestingservicesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT figueroacarmen examiningtheeffectsofhivselftestingcomparedtostandardhivtestingservicesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT dalalshona examiningtheeffectsofhivselftestingcomparedtostandardhivtestingservicesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT sandsanita examiningtheeffectsofhivselftestingcomparedtostandardhivtestingservicesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT baggaleyrachel examiningtheeffectsofhivselftestingcomparedtostandardhivtestingservicesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis