Cargando…
Examining the effects of HIV self-testing compared to standard HIV testing services: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Introduction: HIV self-testing (HIVST) is a discreet and convenient way to reach people with HIV who do not know their status, including many who may not otherwise test. To inform World Health Organization (WHO) guidance, we assessed the effect of HIVST on uptake and frequency of testing, as well as...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Taylor & Francis
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5515051/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28530049 http://dx.doi.org/10.7448/IAS.20.1.21594 |
_version_ | 1783250940078325760 |
---|---|
author | Johnson, Cheryl C Kennedy, Caitlin Fonner, Virginia Siegfried, Nandi Figueroa, Carmen Dalal, Shona Sands, Anita Baggaley, Rachel |
author_facet | Johnson, Cheryl C Kennedy, Caitlin Fonner, Virginia Siegfried, Nandi Figueroa, Carmen Dalal, Shona Sands, Anita Baggaley, Rachel |
author_sort | Johnson, Cheryl C |
collection | PubMed |
description | Introduction: HIV self-testing (HIVST) is a discreet and convenient way to reach people with HIV who do not know their status, including many who may not otherwise test. To inform World Health Organization (WHO) guidance, we assessed the effect of HIVST on uptake and frequency of testing, as well as identification of HIV-positive persons, linkage to care, social harm, and risk behaviour. Methods: We systematically searched for studies comparing HIVST to standard HIV testing until 1 June 2016. Meta-analyses of studies reporting comparable outcomes were conducted using a random-effects model for relative risks (RR) and 95% confidence intervals. The quality of evidence was evaluated using GRADE. Results: After screening 638 citations, we identified five randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing HIVST to standard HIV testing services among 4,145 total participants from four countries. All offered free oral-fluid rapid tests for HIVST and were among men. Meta-analysis of three RCTs showed HIVST doubled uptake of testing among men (RR = 2.12; 95% CI: 1.51, 2.98). Meta-analysis of two RCTs among men who have sex with men showed frequency of testing nearly doubled (Rate ratio = 1.88; 95% CI: 1.17; 3.01), resulting in two more tests in a 12–15-month period (Mean difference = 2.13; 95% CI: 1.59, 2.66). Meta-analysis of two RCTs showed HIVST also doubled the likelihood of an HIV-positive diagnosis (RR = 2.02; 95% CI: 0.37, 10.76, 5.32). Across all RCTs, there was no indication of harm attributable to HIVST and potential increases in risk-taking behaviour appeared to be minimal. Conclusions: HIVST is associated with increased uptake and frequency of testing in RCTs. Such increases, particularly among those at risk who may not otherwise test, will likely identify more HIV-positive individuals as compared to standard testing services alone. However, further research on how to support linkage to confirmatory testing, prevention, treatment and care services is needed. WHO now recommends HIVST as an additional HIV testing approach. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5515051 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Taylor & Francis |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55150512017-07-26 Examining the effects of HIV self-testing compared to standard HIV testing services: a systematic review and meta-analysis Johnson, Cheryl C Kennedy, Caitlin Fonner, Virginia Siegfried, Nandi Figueroa, Carmen Dalal, Shona Sands, Anita Baggaley, Rachel J Int AIDS Soc Review Article Introduction: HIV self-testing (HIVST) is a discreet and convenient way to reach people with HIV who do not know their status, including many who may not otherwise test. To inform World Health Organization (WHO) guidance, we assessed the effect of HIVST on uptake and frequency of testing, as well as identification of HIV-positive persons, linkage to care, social harm, and risk behaviour. Methods: We systematically searched for studies comparing HIVST to standard HIV testing until 1 June 2016. Meta-analyses of studies reporting comparable outcomes were conducted using a random-effects model for relative risks (RR) and 95% confidence intervals. The quality of evidence was evaluated using GRADE. Results: After screening 638 citations, we identified five randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing HIVST to standard HIV testing services among 4,145 total participants from four countries. All offered free oral-fluid rapid tests for HIVST and were among men. Meta-analysis of three RCTs showed HIVST doubled uptake of testing among men (RR = 2.12; 95% CI: 1.51, 2.98). Meta-analysis of two RCTs among men who have sex with men showed frequency of testing nearly doubled (Rate ratio = 1.88; 95% CI: 1.17; 3.01), resulting in two more tests in a 12–15-month period (Mean difference = 2.13; 95% CI: 1.59, 2.66). Meta-analysis of two RCTs showed HIVST also doubled the likelihood of an HIV-positive diagnosis (RR = 2.02; 95% CI: 0.37, 10.76, 5.32). Across all RCTs, there was no indication of harm attributable to HIVST and potential increases in risk-taking behaviour appeared to be minimal. Conclusions: HIVST is associated with increased uptake and frequency of testing in RCTs. Such increases, particularly among those at risk who may not otherwise test, will likely identify more HIV-positive individuals as compared to standard testing services alone. However, further research on how to support linkage to confirmatory testing, prevention, treatment and care services is needed. WHO now recommends HIVST as an additional HIV testing approach. Taylor & Francis 2017-05-15 /pmc/articles/PMC5515051/ /pubmed/28530049 http://dx.doi.org/10.7448/IAS.20.1.21594 Text en © 2017 Johnson CC et al; licensee International AIDS Society http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported (CC BY 3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Review Article Johnson, Cheryl C Kennedy, Caitlin Fonner, Virginia Siegfried, Nandi Figueroa, Carmen Dalal, Shona Sands, Anita Baggaley, Rachel Examining the effects of HIV self-testing compared to standard HIV testing services: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title | Examining the effects of HIV self-testing compared to standard HIV testing services: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full | Examining the effects of HIV self-testing compared to standard HIV testing services: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Examining the effects of HIV self-testing compared to standard HIV testing services: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Examining the effects of HIV self-testing compared to standard HIV testing services: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_short | Examining the effects of HIV self-testing compared to standard HIV testing services: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort | examining the effects of hiv self-testing compared to standard hiv testing services: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5515051/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28530049 http://dx.doi.org/10.7448/IAS.20.1.21594 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT johnsoncherylc examiningtheeffectsofhivselftestingcomparedtostandardhivtestingservicesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT kennedycaitlin examiningtheeffectsofhivselftestingcomparedtostandardhivtestingservicesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT fonnervirginia examiningtheeffectsofhivselftestingcomparedtostandardhivtestingservicesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT siegfriednandi examiningtheeffectsofhivselftestingcomparedtostandardhivtestingservicesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT figueroacarmen examiningtheeffectsofhivselftestingcomparedtostandardhivtestingservicesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT dalalshona examiningtheeffectsofhivselftestingcomparedtostandardhivtestingservicesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT sandsanita examiningtheeffectsofhivselftestingcomparedtostandardhivtestingservicesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT baggaleyrachel examiningtheeffectsofhivselftestingcomparedtostandardhivtestingservicesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |