Cargando…

Variation in tissue-specific gene expression among natural populations

BACKGROUND: Variation in gene expression is extensive among tissues, individuals, strains, populations and species. The interactions among these sources of variation are relevant for physiological studies such as disease or toxic stress; for example, it is common for pathologies such as cancer, hear...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Whitehead, Andrew, Crawford, Douglas L
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2005
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC551533/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15693942
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/gb-2005-6-2-r13
_version_ 1782122461891919872
author Whitehead, Andrew
Crawford, Douglas L
author_facet Whitehead, Andrew
Crawford, Douglas L
author_sort Whitehead, Andrew
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Variation in gene expression is extensive among tissues, individuals, strains, populations and species. The interactions among these sources of variation are relevant for physiological studies such as disease or toxic stress; for example, it is common for pathologies such as cancer, heart failure and metabolic disease to be associated with changes in tissue-specific gene expression or changes in metabolic gene expression. But how conserved these differences are among outbred individuals and among populations has not been well documented. To address this we examined the expression of a selected suite of 192 metabolic genes in brain, heart and liver in three populations of the teleost fish Fundulus heteroclitus using a highly replicated experimental design. RESULTS: Half of the genes (48%) were differentially expressed among individuals within a population-tissue group and 76% were differentially expressed among tissues. Differences among tissues reflected well established tissue-specific metabolic requirements, suggesting that these measures of gene expression accurately reflect changes in proteins and their phenotypic effects. Remarkably, only a small subset (31%) of tissue-specific differences was consistent in all three populations. CONCLUSIONS: These data indicate that many tissue-specific differences in gene expression are unique to one population and thus are unlikely to contribute to fundamental differences between tissue types. We suggest that those subsets of treatment-specific gene expression patterns that are conserved between taxa are most likely to be functionally related to the physiological state in question.
format Text
id pubmed-551533
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2005
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-5515332005-03-03 Variation in tissue-specific gene expression among natural populations Whitehead, Andrew Crawford, Douglas L Genome Biol Research BACKGROUND: Variation in gene expression is extensive among tissues, individuals, strains, populations and species. The interactions among these sources of variation are relevant for physiological studies such as disease or toxic stress; for example, it is common for pathologies such as cancer, heart failure and metabolic disease to be associated with changes in tissue-specific gene expression or changes in metabolic gene expression. But how conserved these differences are among outbred individuals and among populations has not been well documented. To address this we examined the expression of a selected suite of 192 metabolic genes in brain, heart and liver in three populations of the teleost fish Fundulus heteroclitus using a highly replicated experimental design. RESULTS: Half of the genes (48%) were differentially expressed among individuals within a population-tissue group and 76% were differentially expressed among tissues. Differences among tissues reflected well established tissue-specific metabolic requirements, suggesting that these measures of gene expression accurately reflect changes in proteins and their phenotypic effects. Remarkably, only a small subset (31%) of tissue-specific differences was consistent in all three populations. CONCLUSIONS: These data indicate that many tissue-specific differences in gene expression are unique to one population and thus are unlikely to contribute to fundamental differences between tissue types. We suggest that those subsets of treatment-specific gene expression patterns that are conserved between taxa are most likely to be functionally related to the physiological state in question. BioMed Central 2005 2005-01-26 /pmc/articles/PMC551533/ /pubmed/15693942 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/gb-2005-6-2-r13 Text en Copyright © 2005 Whitehead and Crawford; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
spellingShingle Research
Whitehead, Andrew
Crawford, Douglas L
Variation in tissue-specific gene expression among natural populations
title Variation in tissue-specific gene expression among natural populations
title_full Variation in tissue-specific gene expression among natural populations
title_fullStr Variation in tissue-specific gene expression among natural populations
title_full_unstemmed Variation in tissue-specific gene expression among natural populations
title_short Variation in tissue-specific gene expression among natural populations
title_sort variation in tissue-specific gene expression among natural populations
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC551533/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15693942
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/gb-2005-6-2-r13
work_keys_str_mv AT whiteheadandrew variationintissuespecificgeneexpressionamongnaturalpopulations
AT crawforddouglasl variationintissuespecificgeneexpressionamongnaturalpopulations