Cargando…

Social networks as predictors of colorectal cancer screening in African Americans

BACKGROUND: Early detection can reduce colorectal cancer (CRC) mortality by 15%–33%, and screening is widely recommended for average-risk adults beginning at age 50 years. Colorectal cancer mortality rates are higher in African Americans than in whites, while screening rates are somewhat lower. Indi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Alema-Mensah, Ernest, Smith, Selina A., Claridy, Mechelle, Ede, Victor, Ansa, Benjamin, Blumenthal, Daniel S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5515378/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28730185
http://dx.doi.org/10.21633/jgpha.6.306
_version_ 1783250981211865088
author Alema-Mensah, Ernest
Smith, Selina A.
Claridy, Mechelle
Ede, Victor
Ansa, Benjamin
Blumenthal, Daniel S.
author_facet Alema-Mensah, Ernest
Smith, Selina A.
Claridy, Mechelle
Ede, Victor
Ansa, Benjamin
Blumenthal, Daniel S.
author_sort Alema-Mensah, Ernest
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Early detection can reduce colorectal cancer (CRC) mortality by 15%–33%, and screening is widely recommended for average-risk adults beginning at age 50 years. Colorectal cancer mortality rates are higher in African Americans than in whites, while screening rates are somewhat lower. Individual social networks can reduce emotional and/or logistical barriers to health-promoting but distasteful procedures such as CRC screening. The aim of this study was to examine social network interactions, and their impact on CRC screening among African Americans. We hypothesized a positive association between social network index (SNI) scores and CRC screening. METHODS: In a community intervention trial with four arms, we previously demonstrated the efficacy of a small group educational intervention to promote CRC screening among African Americans. This intervention outperformed a one-on-one educational intervention, a reduced out-of-pocket expense intervention, and a control condition. In the present analysis, we compared the SNI scores for participants in the small group intervention cohort with a comparison group comprised of the other three cohorts. Social networks were assessed using the Social Network Index developed by Cohen. RESULTS: Small group participants had a significantly higher network diversity score (Mean difference 0.71; 95% CI, 0.12–1.31; p=0.0017) than the comparison group. In the second component of the SNI score – the number of people talked to over a two week period – the small group intervention cohort also scored significantly higher than the comparison group. (Mean difference, 9.29; 95% CI, 3.963–14.6266; p=0.0004). CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggest that social interaction and support was at least partially responsible for the relatively high post-intervention screening rate in the small group intervention participants. Education in small groups could foster strong social networks. Strong and positive network diversity and a large number of people in social networks may enhance CRC screening rates among African Americans.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5515378
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55153782017-07-18 Social networks as predictors of colorectal cancer screening in African Americans Alema-Mensah, Ernest Smith, Selina A. Claridy, Mechelle Ede, Victor Ansa, Benjamin Blumenthal, Daniel S. J Ga Public Health Assoc Article BACKGROUND: Early detection can reduce colorectal cancer (CRC) mortality by 15%–33%, and screening is widely recommended for average-risk adults beginning at age 50 years. Colorectal cancer mortality rates are higher in African Americans than in whites, while screening rates are somewhat lower. Individual social networks can reduce emotional and/or logistical barriers to health-promoting but distasteful procedures such as CRC screening. The aim of this study was to examine social network interactions, and their impact on CRC screening among African Americans. We hypothesized a positive association between social network index (SNI) scores and CRC screening. METHODS: In a community intervention trial with four arms, we previously demonstrated the efficacy of a small group educational intervention to promote CRC screening among African Americans. This intervention outperformed a one-on-one educational intervention, a reduced out-of-pocket expense intervention, and a control condition. In the present analysis, we compared the SNI scores for participants in the small group intervention cohort with a comparison group comprised of the other three cohorts. Social networks were assessed using the Social Network Index developed by Cohen. RESULTS: Small group participants had a significantly higher network diversity score (Mean difference 0.71; 95% CI, 0.12–1.31; p=0.0017) than the comparison group. In the second component of the SNI score – the number of people talked to over a two week period – the small group intervention cohort also scored significantly higher than the comparison group. (Mean difference, 9.29; 95% CI, 3.963–14.6266; p=0.0004). CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggest that social interaction and support was at least partially responsible for the relatively high post-intervention screening rate in the small group intervention participants. Education in small groups could foster strong social networks. Strong and positive network diversity and a large number of people in social networks may enhance CRC screening rates among African Americans. 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5515378/ /pubmed/28730185 http://dx.doi.org/10.21633/jgpha.6.306 Text en This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No-Derivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work (“first published in the Journal of the Georgia Public Health Association…”) is properly cited with original URL and bibliographic citation information. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://www.gapha.jgpha.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
spellingShingle Article
Alema-Mensah, Ernest
Smith, Selina A.
Claridy, Mechelle
Ede, Victor
Ansa, Benjamin
Blumenthal, Daniel S.
Social networks as predictors of colorectal cancer screening in African Americans
title Social networks as predictors of colorectal cancer screening in African Americans
title_full Social networks as predictors of colorectal cancer screening in African Americans
title_fullStr Social networks as predictors of colorectal cancer screening in African Americans
title_full_unstemmed Social networks as predictors of colorectal cancer screening in African Americans
title_short Social networks as predictors of colorectal cancer screening in African Americans
title_sort social networks as predictors of colorectal cancer screening in african americans
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5515378/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28730185
http://dx.doi.org/10.21633/jgpha.6.306
work_keys_str_mv AT alemamensahernest socialnetworksaspredictorsofcolorectalcancerscreeninginafricanamericans
AT smithselinaa socialnetworksaspredictorsofcolorectalcancerscreeninginafricanamericans
AT claridymechelle socialnetworksaspredictorsofcolorectalcancerscreeninginafricanamericans
AT edevictor socialnetworksaspredictorsofcolorectalcancerscreeninginafricanamericans
AT ansabenjamin socialnetworksaspredictorsofcolorectalcancerscreeninginafricanamericans
AT blumenthaldaniels socialnetworksaspredictorsofcolorectalcancerscreeninginafricanamericans