Cargando…

Effect of the Duck Skin on Quality Characteristics of Duck Hams

This study was conducted to investigate the effect of duck skin on cooking loss, emulsion stability, pH, color, protein solubility, texture profile analysis (TPA), apparent viscosity, and sensory characteristics of press type duck ham with different ratio of duck breast meat and duck skin. Five duck...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, Dong-Hyun, Kim, Tae-Kyung, Kim, Young-Boong, Sung, Jung-Min, Jang, YoungJin, Shim, Jae-Yun, Han, Sung-Gu, Choi, Yun-Sang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Society for Food Science of Animal Resources 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5516062/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28747821
http://dx.doi.org/10.5851/kosfa.2017.37.3.360
_version_ 1783251091661520896
author Kim, Dong-Hyun
Kim, Tae-Kyung
Kim, Young-Boong
Sung, Jung-Min
Jang, YoungJin
Shim, Jae-Yun
Han, Sung-Gu
Choi, Yun-Sang
author_facet Kim, Dong-Hyun
Kim, Tae-Kyung
Kim, Young-Boong
Sung, Jung-Min
Jang, YoungJin
Shim, Jae-Yun
Han, Sung-Gu
Choi, Yun-Sang
author_sort Kim, Dong-Hyun
collection PubMed
description This study was conducted to investigate the effect of duck skin on cooking loss, emulsion stability, pH, color, protein solubility, texture profile analysis (TPA), apparent viscosity, and sensory characteristics of press type duck ham with different ratio of duck breast meat and duck skin. Five duck ham formulations were produced with the following compositions: T1 (duck breast 70% + duck skin 30%), T2 (duck breast 60% + duck skin 40%), T3 (duck breast 50% + duck skin 50%), T4 (duck breast 40% + duck skin 60%), and T5 (duck breast 30% + duck skin 70%). The cooking loss and fat separation were lower in T1, and the total expressible fluid separations were lower in T1 and T2 than others. The pH ranged from 6.48 to 6.59, with the highest values in T4 and T5. T5 had the highest CIE L*-value, and T1 and T2 had the highest CIE a*-values; however, CIE b*-values did not differ significantly between the duck ham samples. The protein solubility and TPA (hardness, springiness, cohesiveness, gumminess, and chewiness) were the highest in T1. T1 and T2 had higher scores for color, tenderness, and overall acceptability. T1, T2, and T3 showed significantly higher values, but there were no significant differences for flavor and juiciness. Regarding apparent viscosity properties, T1 and T2 had higher viscosity values than the other formulations. In conclusion, the T1 (duck breast 70% + duck skin 30%) and T2 (duck breast 60% + duck skin 40%) duck hams show the highest quality characteristics.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5516062
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Korean Society for Food Science of Animal Resources
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55160622017-07-26 Effect of the Duck Skin on Quality Characteristics of Duck Hams Kim, Dong-Hyun Kim, Tae-Kyung Kim, Young-Boong Sung, Jung-Min Jang, YoungJin Shim, Jae-Yun Han, Sung-Gu Choi, Yun-Sang Korean J Food Sci Anim Resour Article This study was conducted to investigate the effect of duck skin on cooking loss, emulsion stability, pH, color, protein solubility, texture profile analysis (TPA), apparent viscosity, and sensory characteristics of press type duck ham with different ratio of duck breast meat and duck skin. Five duck ham formulations were produced with the following compositions: T1 (duck breast 70% + duck skin 30%), T2 (duck breast 60% + duck skin 40%), T3 (duck breast 50% + duck skin 50%), T4 (duck breast 40% + duck skin 60%), and T5 (duck breast 30% + duck skin 70%). The cooking loss and fat separation were lower in T1, and the total expressible fluid separations were lower in T1 and T2 than others. The pH ranged from 6.48 to 6.59, with the highest values in T4 and T5. T5 had the highest CIE L*-value, and T1 and T2 had the highest CIE a*-values; however, CIE b*-values did not differ significantly between the duck ham samples. The protein solubility and TPA (hardness, springiness, cohesiveness, gumminess, and chewiness) were the highest in T1. T1 and T2 had higher scores for color, tenderness, and overall acceptability. T1, T2, and T3 showed significantly higher values, but there were no significant differences for flavor and juiciness. Regarding apparent viscosity properties, T1 and T2 had higher viscosity values than the other formulations. In conclusion, the T1 (duck breast 70% + duck skin 30%) and T2 (duck breast 60% + duck skin 40%) duck hams show the highest quality characteristics. Korean Society for Food Science of Animal Resources 2017 2017-06-30 /pmc/articles/PMC5516062/ /pubmed/28747821 http://dx.doi.org/10.5851/kosfa.2017.37.3.360 Text en Copyright © 2017, Korean Society for Food Science of Animal Resources http://creativecommons.org/licences/by-nc/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licences/by-nc/3.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Article
Kim, Dong-Hyun
Kim, Tae-Kyung
Kim, Young-Boong
Sung, Jung-Min
Jang, YoungJin
Shim, Jae-Yun
Han, Sung-Gu
Choi, Yun-Sang
Effect of the Duck Skin on Quality Characteristics of Duck Hams
title Effect of the Duck Skin on Quality Characteristics of Duck Hams
title_full Effect of the Duck Skin on Quality Characteristics of Duck Hams
title_fullStr Effect of the Duck Skin on Quality Characteristics of Duck Hams
title_full_unstemmed Effect of the Duck Skin on Quality Characteristics of Duck Hams
title_short Effect of the Duck Skin on Quality Characteristics of Duck Hams
title_sort effect of the duck skin on quality characteristics of duck hams
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5516062/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28747821
http://dx.doi.org/10.5851/kosfa.2017.37.3.360
work_keys_str_mv AT kimdonghyun effectoftheduckskinonqualitycharacteristicsofduckhams
AT kimtaekyung effectoftheduckskinonqualitycharacteristicsofduckhams
AT kimyoungboong effectoftheduckskinonqualitycharacteristicsofduckhams
AT sungjungmin effectoftheduckskinonqualitycharacteristicsofduckhams
AT jangyoungjin effectoftheduckskinonqualitycharacteristicsofduckhams
AT shimjaeyun effectoftheduckskinonqualitycharacteristicsofduckhams
AT hansunggu effectoftheduckskinonqualitycharacteristicsofduckhams
AT choiyunsang effectoftheduckskinonqualitycharacteristicsofduckhams