Cargando…
Effect of the Duck Skin on Quality Characteristics of Duck Hams
This study was conducted to investigate the effect of duck skin on cooking loss, emulsion stability, pH, color, protein solubility, texture profile analysis (TPA), apparent viscosity, and sensory characteristics of press type duck ham with different ratio of duck breast meat and duck skin. Five duck...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Korean Society for Food Science of Animal Resources
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5516062/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28747821 http://dx.doi.org/10.5851/kosfa.2017.37.3.360 |
_version_ | 1783251091661520896 |
---|---|
author | Kim, Dong-Hyun Kim, Tae-Kyung Kim, Young-Boong Sung, Jung-Min Jang, YoungJin Shim, Jae-Yun Han, Sung-Gu Choi, Yun-Sang |
author_facet | Kim, Dong-Hyun Kim, Tae-Kyung Kim, Young-Boong Sung, Jung-Min Jang, YoungJin Shim, Jae-Yun Han, Sung-Gu Choi, Yun-Sang |
author_sort | Kim, Dong-Hyun |
collection | PubMed |
description | This study was conducted to investigate the effect of duck skin on cooking loss, emulsion stability, pH, color, protein solubility, texture profile analysis (TPA), apparent viscosity, and sensory characteristics of press type duck ham with different ratio of duck breast meat and duck skin. Five duck ham formulations were produced with the following compositions: T1 (duck breast 70% + duck skin 30%), T2 (duck breast 60% + duck skin 40%), T3 (duck breast 50% + duck skin 50%), T4 (duck breast 40% + duck skin 60%), and T5 (duck breast 30% + duck skin 70%). The cooking loss and fat separation were lower in T1, and the total expressible fluid separations were lower in T1 and T2 than others. The pH ranged from 6.48 to 6.59, with the highest values in T4 and T5. T5 had the highest CIE L*-value, and T1 and T2 had the highest CIE a*-values; however, CIE b*-values did not differ significantly between the duck ham samples. The protein solubility and TPA (hardness, springiness, cohesiveness, gumminess, and chewiness) were the highest in T1. T1 and T2 had higher scores for color, tenderness, and overall acceptability. T1, T2, and T3 showed significantly higher values, but there were no significant differences for flavor and juiciness. Regarding apparent viscosity properties, T1 and T2 had higher viscosity values than the other formulations. In conclusion, the T1 (duck breast 70% + duck skin 30%) and T2 (duck breast 60% + duck skin 40%) duck hams show the highest quality characteristics. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5516062 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Korean Society for Food Science of Animal Resources |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55160622017-07-26 Effect of the Duck Skin on Quality Characteristics of Duck Hams Kim, Dong-Hyun Kim, Tae-Kyung Kim, Young-Boong Sung, Jung-Min Jang, YoungJin Shim, Jae-Yun Han, Sung-Gu Choi, Yun-Sang Korean J Food Sci Anim Resour Article This study was conducted to investigate the effect of duck skin on cooking loss, emulsion stability, pH, color, protein solubility, texture profile analysis (TPA), apparent viscosity, and sensory characteristics of press type duck ham with different ratio of duck breast meat and duck skin. Five duck ham formulations were produced with the following compositions: T1 (duck breast 70% + duck skin 30%), T2 (duck breast 60% + duck skin 40%), T3 (duck breast 50% + duck skin 50%), T4 (duck breast 40% + duck skin 60%), and T5 (duck breast 30% + duck skin 70%). The cooking loss and fat separation were lower in T1, and the total expressible fluid separations were lower in T1 and T2 than others. The pH ranged from 6.48 to 6.59, with the highest values in T4 and T5. T5 had the highest CIE L*-value, and T1 and T2 had the highest CIE a*-values; however, CIE b*-values did not differ significantly between the duck ham samples. The protein solubility and TPA (hardness, springiness, cohesiveness, gumminess, and chewiness) were the highest in T1. T1 and T2 had higher scores for color, tenderness, and overall acceptability. T1, T2, and T3 showed significantly higher values, but there were no significant differences for flavor and juiciness. Regarding apparent viscosity properties, T1 and T2 had higher viscosity values than the other formulations. In conclusion, the T1 (duck breast 70% + duck skin 30%) and T2 (duck breast 60% + duck skin 40%) duck hams show the highest quality characteristics. Korean Society for Food Science of Animal Resources 2017 2017-06-30 /pmc/articles/PMC5516062/ /pubmed/28747821 http://dx.doi.org/10.5851/kosfa.2017.37.3.360 Text en Copyright © 2017, Korean Society for Food Science of Animal Resources http://creativecommons.org/licences/by-nc/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licences/by-nc/3.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Article Kim, Dong-Hyun Kim, Tae-Kyung Kim, Young-Boong Sung, Jung-Min Jang, YoungJin Shim, Jae-Yun Han, Sung-Gu Choi, Yun-Sang Effect of the Duck Skin on Quality Characteristics of Duck Hams |
title | Effect of the Duck Skin on Quality Characteristics of Duck Hams |
title_full | Effect of the Duck Skin on Quality Characteristics of Duck Hams |
title_fullStr | Effect of the Duck Skin on Quality Characteristics of Duck Hams |
title_full_unstemmed | Effect of the Duck Skin on Quality Characteristics of Duck Hams |
title_short | Effect of the Duck Skin on Quality Characteristics of Duck Hams |
title_sort | effect of the duck skin on quality characteristics of duck hams |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5516062/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28747821 http://dx.doi.org/10.5851/kosfa.2017.37.3.360 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kimdonghyun effectoftheduckskinonqualitycharacteristicsofduckhams AT kimtaekyung effectoftheduckskinonqualitycharacteristicsofduckhams AT kimyoungboong effectoftheduckskinonqualitycharacteristicsofduckhams AT sungjungmin effectoftheduckskinonqualitycharacteristicsofduckhams AT jangyoungjin effectoftheduckskinonqualitycharacteristicsofduckhams AT shimjaeyun effectoftheduckskinonqualitycharacteristicsofduckhams AT hansunggu effectoftheduckskinonqualitycharacteristicsofduckhams AT choiyunsang effectoftheduckskinonqualitycharacteristicsofduckhams |