Cargando…

Evaluation of climate‐related carbon turnover processes in global vegetation models for boreal and temperate forests

Turnover concepts in state‐of‐the‐art global vegetation models (GVMs) account for various processes, but are often highly simplified and may not include an adequate representation of the dominant processes that shape vegetation carbon turnover rates in real forest ecosystems at a large spatial scale...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Thurner, Martin, Beer, Christian, Ciais, Philippe, Friend, Andrew D., Ito, Akihiko, Kleidon, Axel, Lomas, Mark R., Quegan, Shaun, Rademacher, Tim T., Schaphoff, Sibyll, Tum, Markus, Wiltshire, Andy, Carvalhais, Nuno
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5516177/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28192628
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13660
_version_ 1783251115588976640
author Thurner, Martin
Beer, Christian
Ciais, Philippe
Friend, Andrew D.
Ito, Akihiko
Kleidon, Axel
Lomas, Mark R.
Quegan, Shaun
Rademacher, Tim T.
Schaphoff, Sibyll
Tum, Markus
Wiltshire, Andy
Carvalhais, Nuno
author_facet Thurner, Martin
Beer, Christian
Ciais, Philippe
Friend, Andrew D.
Ito, Akihiko
Kleidon, Axel
Lomas, Mark R.
Quegan, Shaun
Rademacher, Tim T.
Schaphoff, Sibyll
Tum, Markus
Wiltshire, Andy
Carvalhais, Nuno
author_sort Thurner, Martin
collection PubMed
description Turnover concepts in state‐of‐the‐art global vegetation models (GVMs) account for various processes, but are often highly simplified and may not include an adequate representation of the dominant processes that shape vegetation carbon turnover rates in real forest ecosystems at a large spatial scale. Here, we evaluate vegetation carbon turnover processes in GVMs participating in the Inter‐Sectoral Impact Model Intercomparison Project (ISI‐MIP, including HYBRID4, JeDi, JULES, LPJml, ORCHIDEE, SDGVM, and VISIT) using estimates of vegetation carbon turnover rate (k) derived from a combination of remote sensing based products of biomass and net primary production (NPP). We find that current model limitations lead to considerable biases in the simulated biomass and in k (severe underestimations by all models except JeDi and VISIT compared to observation‐based average k), likely contributing to underestimation of positive feedbacks of the northern forest carbon balance to climate change caused by changes in forest mortality. A need for improved turnover concepts related to frost damage, drought, and insect outbreaks to better reproduce observation‐based spatial patterns in k is identified. As direct frost damage effects on mortality are usually not accounted for in these GVMs, simulated relationships between k and winter length in boreal forests are not consistent between different regions and strongly biased compared to the observation‐based relationships. Some models show a response of k to drought in temperate forests as a result of impacts of water availability on NPP, growth efficiency or carbon balance dependent mortality as well as soil or litter moisture effects on leaf turnover or fire. However, further direct drought effects such as carbon starvation (only in HYBRID4) or hydraulic failure are usually not taken into account by the investigated GVMs. While they are considered dominant large‐scale mortality agents, mortality mechanisms related to insects and pathogens are not explicitly treated in these models.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5516177
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55161772017-08-02 Evaluation of climate‐related carbon turnover processes in global vegetation models for boreal and temperate forests Thurner, Martin Beer, Christian Ciais, Philippe Friend, Andrew D. Ito, Akihiko Kleidon, Axel Lomas, Mark R. Quegan, Shaun Rademacher, Tim T. Schaphoff, Sibyll Tum, Markus Wiltshire, Andy Carvalhais, Nuno Glob Chang Biol Primary Research Articles Turnover concepts in state‐of‐the‐art global vegetation models (GVMs) account for various processes, but are often highly simplified and may not include an adequate representation of the dominant processes that shape vegetation carbon turnover rates in real forest ecosystems at a large spatial scale. Here, we evaluate vegetation carbon turnover processes in GVMs participating in the Inter‐Sectoral Impact Model Intercomparison Project (ISI‐MIP, including HYBRID4, JeDi, JULES, LPJml, ORCHIDEE, SDGVM, and VISIT) using estimates of vegetation carbon turnover rate (k) derived from a combination of remote sensing based products of biomass and net primary production (NPP). We find that current model limitations lead to considerable biases in the simulated biomass and in k (severe underestimations by all models except JeDi and VISIT compared to observation‐based average k), likely contributing to underestimation of positive feedbacks of the northern forest carbon balance to climate change caused by changes in forest mortality. A need for improved turnover concepts related to frost damage, drought, and insect outbreaks to better reproduce observation‐based spatial patterns in k is identified. As direct frost damage effects on mortality are usually not accounted for in these GVMs, simulated relationships between k and winter length in boreal forests are not consistent between different regions and strongly biased compared to the observation‐based relationships. Some models show a response of k to drought in temperate forests as a result of impacts of water availability on NPP, growth efficiency or carbon balance dependent mortality as well as soil or litter moisture effects on leaf turnover or fire. However, further direct drought effects such as carbon starvation (only in HYBRID4) or hydraulic failure are usually not taken into account by the investigated GVMs. While they are considered dominant large‐scale mortality agents, mortality mechanisms related to insects and pathogens are not explicitly treated in these models. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-04-05 2017-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5516177/ /pubmed/28192628 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13660 Text en © 2017 The Authors. Global Change Biology Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial‐NoDerivs (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Primary Research Articles
Thurner, Martin
Beer, Christian
Ciais, Philippe
Friend, Andrew D.
Ito, Akihiko
Kleidon, Axel
Lomas, Mark R.
Quegan, Shaun
Rademacher, Tim T.
Schaphoff, Sibyll
Tum, Markus
Wiltshire, Andy
Carvalhais, Nuno
Evaluation of climate‐related carbon turnover processes in global vegetation models for boreal and temperate forests
title Evaluation of climate‐related carbon turnover processes in global vegetation models for boreal and temperate forests
title_full Evaluation of climate‐related carbon turnover processes in global vegetation models for boreal and temperate forests
title_fullStr Evaluation of climate‐related carbon turnover processes in global vegetation models for boreal and temperate forests
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of climate‐related carbon turnover processes in global vegetation models for boreal and temperate forests
title_short Evaluation of climate‐related carbon turnover processes in global vegetation models for boreal and temperate forests
title_sort evaluation of climate‐related carbon turnover processes in global vegetation models for boreal and temperate forests
topic Primary Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5516177/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28192628
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13660
work_keys_str_mv AT thurnermartin evaluationofclimaterelatedcarbonturnoverprocessesinglobalvegetationmodelsforborealandtemperateforests
AT beerchristian evaluationofclimaterelatedcarbonturnoverprocessesinglobalvegetationmodelsforborealandtemperateforests
AT ciaisphilippe evaluationofclimaterelatedcarbonturnoverprocessesinglobalvegetationmodelsforborealandtemperateforests
AT friendandrewd evaluationofclimaterelatedcarbonturnoverprocessesinglobalvegetationmodelsforborealandtemperateforests
AT itoakihiko evaluationofclimaterelatedcarbonturnoverprocessesinglobalvegetationmodelsforborealandtemperateforests
AT kleidonaxel evaluationofclimaterelatedcarbonturnoverprocessesinglobalvegetationmodelsforborealandtemperateforests
AT lomasmarkr evaluationofclimaterelatedcarbonturnoverprocessesinglobalvegetationmodelsforborealandtemperateforests
AT queganshaun evaluationofclimaterelatedcarbonturnoverprocessesinglobalvegetationmodelsforborealandtemperateforests
AT rademachertimt evaluationofclimaterelatedcarbonturnoverprocessesinglobalvegetationmodelsforborealandtemperateforests
AT schaphoffsibyll evaluationofclimaterelatedcarbonturnoverprocessesinglobalvegetationmodelsforborealandtemperateforests
AT tummarkus evaluationofclimaterelatedcarbonturnoverprocessesinglobalvegetationmodelsforborealandtemperateforests
AT wiltshireandy evaluationofclimaterelatedcarbonturnoverprocessesinglobalvegetationmodelsforborealandtemperateforests
AT carvalhaisnuno evaluationofclimaterelatedcarbonturnoverprocessesinglobalvegetationmodelsforborealandtemperateforests