Cargando…
Evaluation of climate‐related carbon turnover processes in global vegetation models for boreal and temperate forests
Turnover concepts in state‐of‐the‐art global vegetation models (GVMs) account for various processes, but are often highly simplified and may not include an adequate representation of the dominant processes that shape vegetation carbon turnover rates in real forest ecosystems at a large spatial scale...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5516177/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28192628 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13660 |
_version_ | 1783251115588976640 |
---|---|
author | Thurner, Martin Beer, Christian Ciais, Philippe Friend, Andrew D. Ito, Akihiko Kleidon, Axel Lomas, Mark R. Quegan, Shaun Rademacher, Tim T. Schaphoff, Sibyll Tum, Markus Wiltshire, Andy Carvalhais, Nuno |
author_facet | Thurner, Martin Beer, Christian Ciais, Philippe Friend, Andrew D. Ito, Akihiko Kleidon, Axel Lomas, Mark R. Quegan, Shaun Rademacher, Tim T. Schaphoff, Sibyll Tum, Markus Wiltshire, Andy Carvalhais, Nuno |
author_sort | Thurner, Martin |
collection | PubMed |
description | Turnover concepts in state‐of‐the‐art global vegetation models (GVMs) account for various processes, but are often highly simplified and may not include an adequate representation of the dominant processes that shape vegetation carbon turnover rates in real forest ecosystems at a large spatial scale. Here, we evaluate vegetation carbon turnover processes in GVMs participating in the Inter‐Sectoral Impact Model Intercomparison Project (ISI‐MIP, including HYBRID4, JeDi, JULES, LPJml, ORCHIDEE, SDGVM, and VISIT) using estimates of vegetation carbon turnover rate (k) derived from a combination of remote sensing based products of biomass and net primary production (NPP). We find that current model limitations lead to considerable biases in the simulated biomass and in k (severe underestimations by all models except JeDi and VISIT compared to observation‐based average k), likely contributing to underestimation of positive feedbacks of the northern forest carbon balance to climate change caused by changes in forest mortality. A need for improved turnover concepts related to frost damage, drought, and insect outbreaks to better reproduce observation‐based spatial patterns in k is identified. As direct frost damage effects on mortality are usually not accounted for in these GVMs, simulated relationships between k and winter length in boreal forests are not consistent between different regions and strongly biased compared to the observation‐based relationships. Some models show a response of k to drought in temperate forests as a result of impacts of water availability on NPP, growth efficiency or carbon balance dependent mortality as well as soil or litter moisture effects on leaf turnover or fire. However, further direct drought effects such as carbon starvation (only in HYBRID4) or hydraulic failure are usually not taken into account by the investigated GVMs. While they are considered dominant large‐scale mortality agents, mortality mechanisms related to insects and pathogens are not explicitly treated in these models. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5516177 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55161772017-08-02 Evaluation of climate‐related carbon turnover processes in global vegetation models for boreal and temperate forests Thurner, Martin Beer, Christian Ciais, Philippe Friend, Andrew D. Ito, Akihiko Kleidon, Axel Lomas, Mark R. Quegan, Shaun Rademacher, Tim T. Schaphoff, Sibyll Tum, Markus Wiltshire, Andy Carvalhais, Nuno Glob Chang Biol Primary Research Articles Turnover concepts in state‐of‐the‐art global vegetation models (GVMs) account for various processes, but are often highly simplified and may not include an adequate representation of the dominant processes that shape vegetation carbon turnover rates in real forest ecosystems at a large spatial scale. Here, we evaluate vegetation carbon turnover processes in GVMs participating in the Inter‐Sectoral Impact Model Intercomparison Project (ISI‐MIP, including HYBRID4, JeDi, JULES, LPJml, ORCHIDEE, SDGVM, and VISIT) using estimates of vegetation carbon turnover rate (k) derived from a combination of remote sensing based products of biomass and net primary production (NPP). We find that current model limitations lead to considerable biases in the simulated biomass and in k (severe underestimations by all models except JeDi and VISIT compared to observation‐based average k), likely contributing to underestimation of positive feedbacks of the northern forest carbon balance to climate change caused by changes in forest mortality. A need for improved turnover concepts related to frost damage, drought, and insect outbreaks to better reproduce observation‐based spatial patterns in k is identified. As direct frost damage effects on mortality are usually not accounted for in these GVMs, simulated relationships between k and winter length in boreal forests are not consistent between different regions and strongly biased compared to the observation‐based relationships. Some models show a response of k to drought in temperate forests as a result of impacts of water availability on NPP, growth efficiency or carbon balance dependent mortality as well as soil or litter moisture effects on leaf turnover or fire. However, further direct drought effects such as carbon starvation (only in HYBRID4) or hydraulic failure are usually not taken into account by the investigated GVMs. While they are considered dominant large‐scale mortality agents, mortality mechanisms related to insects and pathogens are not explicitly treated in these models. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-04-05 2017-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5516177/ /pubmed/28192628 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13660 Text en © 2017 The Authors. Global Change Biology Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial‐NoDerivs (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Primary Research Articles Thurner, Martin Beer, Christian Ciais, Philippe Friend, Andrew D. Ito, Akihiko Kleidon, Axel Lomas, Mark R. Quegan, Shaun Rademacher, Tim T. Schaphoff, Sibyll Tum, Markus Wiltshire, Andy Carvalhais, Nuno Evaluation of climate‐related carbon turnover processes in global vegetation models for boreal and temperate forests |
title | Evaluation of climate‐related carbon turnover processes in global vegetation models for boreal and temperate forests |
title_full | Evaluation of climate‐related carbon turnover processes in global vegetation models for boreal and temperate forests |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of climate‐related carbon turnover processes in global vegetation models for boreal and temperate forests |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of climate‐related carbon turnover processes in global vegetation models for boreal and temperate forests |
title_short | Evaluation of climate‐related carbon turnover processes in global vegetation models for boreal and temperate forests |
title_sort | evaluation of climate‐related carbon turnover processes in global vegetation models for boreal and temperate forests |
topic | Primary Research Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5516177/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28192628 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13660 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT thurnermartin evaluationofclimaterelatedcarbonturnoverprocessesinglobalvegetationmodelsforborealandtemperateforests AT beerchristian evaluationofclimaterelatedcarbonturnoverprocessesinglobalvegetationmodelsforborealandtemperateforests AT ciaisphilippe evaluationofclimaterelatedcarbonturnoverprocessesinglobalvegetationmodelsforborealandtemperateforests AT friendandrewd evaluationofclimaterelatedcarbonturnoverprocessesinglobalvegetationmodelsforborealandtemperateforests AT itoakihiko evaluationofclimaterelatedcarbonturnoverprocessesinglobalvegetationmodelsforborealandtemperateforests AT kleidonaxel evaluationofclimaterelatedcarbonturnoverprocessesinglobalvegetationmodelsforborealandtemperateforests AT lomasmarkr evaluationofclimaterelatedcarbonturnoverprocessesinglobalvegetationmodelsforborealandtemperateforests AT queganshaun evaluationofclimaterelatedcarbonturnoverprocessesinglobalvegetationmodelsforborealandtemperateforests AT rademachertimt evaluationofclimaterelatedcarbonturnoverprocessesinglobalvegetationmodelsforborealandtemperateforests AT schaphoffsibyll evaluationofclimaterelatedcarbonturnoverprocessesinglobalvegetationmodelsforborealandtemperateforests AT tummarkus evaluationofclimaterelatedcarbonturnoverprocessesinglobalvegetationmodelsforborealandtemperateforests AT wiltshireandy evaluationofclimaterelatedcarbonturnoverprocessesinglobalvegetationmodelsforborealandtemperateforests AT carvalhaisnuno evaluationofclimaterelatedcarbonturnoverprocessesinglobalvegetationmodelsforborealandtemperateforests |