Cargando…
A Multi‐Biomarker Disease Activity Score and the Choice of Second‐Line Therapy in Early Rheumatoid Arthritis After Methotrexate Failure
OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether the Multi‐Biomarker Disease Activity (MBDA) score predicts optimal add‐on treatment in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who were inadequate responders to MTX (MTX‐IRs). METHODS: We analyzed data from 157 MTX‐IRs (with a Disease Activity Score using the...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5516230/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27992691 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/art.40019 |
_version_ | 1783251126553935872 |
---|---|
author | Hambardzumyan, Karen Saevarsdottir, Saedis Forslind, Kristina Petersson, Ingemar F. Wallman, Johan K. Ernestam, Sofia Bolce, Rebecca J. van Vollenhoven, Ronald F. |
author_facet | Hambardzumyan, Karen Saevarsdottir, Saedis Forslind, Kristina Petersson, Ingemar F. Wallman, Johan K. Ernestam, Sofia Bolce, Rebecca J. van Vollenhoven, Ronald F. |
author_sort | Hambardzumyan, Karen |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether the Multi‐Biomarker Disease Activity (MBDA) score predicts optimal add‐on treatment in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who were inadequate responders to MTX (MTX‐IRs). METHODS: We analyzed data from 157 MTX‐IRs (with a Disease Activity Score using the erythrocyte sedimentation rate [DAS28‐ESR] >3.2) from the Swedish Pharmacotherapy (SWEFOT) trial who were randomized to receive triple therapy (MTX plus sulfasalazine plus hydroxychloroquine) versus MTX plus infliximab. The MBDA score as a predictor of the subsequent DAS28‐based response to each second‐line treatment was analyzed at randomization with the Breslow‐Day test for 2 × 2 groups, using both validated categories (low [<30], moderate [30–44], and high [>44]) and dichotomized categories (lower [≤38] versus higher [>38]). RESULTS: Among the 157 patients, 12% had a low MBDA score, 32% moderate, and 56% high. Of those with a low MBDA score, 88% responded to subsequent triple therapy, and 18% responded to MTX plus infliximab (P = 0.006); for those with a high MBDA score, the response rates were 35% and 58%, respectively (P = 0.040). When using 38 as a cutoff for the MBDA score (29% patients with lower scores versus 71% with higher scores), the differential associations with response to triple therapy versus MTX plus infliximab were 79% versus 44% and 36% versus 58%, respectively (P = 0.001). Clinical and inflammatory markers had poorer predictive capacity for response to triple therapy or MTX plus infliximab. CONCLUSION: In patients with RA who had an inadequate response to MTX, the MBDA score categories were differentially associated with response to subsequent therapies. Thus, patients with post‐MTX biochemical improvements (lower MBDA scores) were more likely to respond to triple therapy than to MTX plus infliximab. If confirmed, these results may help to improve treatment in RA. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5516230 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55162302017-08-02 A Multi‐Biomarker Disease Activity Score and the Choice of Second‐Line Therapy in Early Rheumatoid Arthritis After Methotrexate Failure Hambardzumyan, Karen Saevarsdottir, Saedis Forslind, Kristina Petersson, Ingemar F. Wallman, Johan K. Ernestam, Sofia Bolce, Rebecca J. van Vollenhoven, Ronald F. Arthritis Rheumatol Rheumatoid Arthritis OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether the Multi‐Biomarker Disease Activity (MBDA) score predicts optimal add‐on treatment in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who were inadequate responders to MTX (MTX‐IRs). METHODS: We analyzed data from 157 MTX‐IRs (with a Disease Activity Score using the erythrocyte sedimentation rate [DAS28‐ESR] >3.2) from the Swedish Pharmacotherapy (SWEFOT) trial who were randomized to receive triple therapy (MTX plus sulfasalazine plus hydroxychloroquine) versus MTX plus infliximab. The MBDA score as a predictor of the subsequent DAS28‐based response to each second‐line treatment was analyzed at randomization with the Breslow‐Day test for 2 × 2 groups, using both validated categories (low [<30], moderate [30–44], and high [>44]) and dichotomized categories (lower [≤38] versus higher [>38]). RESULTS: Among the 157 patients, 12% had a low MBDA score, 32% moderate, and 56% high. Of those with a low MBDA score, 88% responded to subsequent triple therapy, and 18% responded to MTX plus infliximab (P = 0.006); for those with a high MBDA score, the response rates were 35% and 58%, respectively (P = 0.040). When using 38 as a cutoff for the MBDA score (29% patients with lower scores versus 71% with higher scores), the differential associations with response to triple therapy versus MTX plus infliximab were 79% versus 44% and 36% versus 58%, respectively (P = 0.001). Clinical and inflammatory markers had poorer predictive capacity for response to triple therapy or MTX plus infliximab. CONCLUSION: In patients with RA who had an inadequate response to MTX, the MBDA score categories were differentially associated with response to subsequent therapies. Thus, patients with post‐MTX biochemical improvements (lower MBDA scores) were more likely to respond to triple therapy than to MTX plus infliximab. If confirmed, these results may help to improve treatment in RA. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-03-31 2017-05 /pmc/articles/PMC5516230/ /pubmed/27992691 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/art.40019 Text en © 2017, The Authors. Arthritis & Rheumatology published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American College of Rheumatology This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes. |
spellingShingle | Rheumatoid Arthritis Hambardzumyan, Karen Saevarsdottir, Saedis Forslind, Kristina Petersson, Ingemar F. Wallman, Johan K. Ernestam, Sofia Bolce, Rebecca J. van Vollenhoven, Ronald F. A Multi‐Biomarker Disease Activity Score and the Choice of Second‐Line Therapy in Early Rheumatoid Arthritis After Methotrexate Failure |
title | A Multi‐Biomarker Disease Activity Score and the Choice of Second‐Line Therapy in Early Rheumatoid Arthritis After Methotrexate Failure |
title_full | A Multi‐Biomarker Disease Activity Score and the Choice of Second‐Line Therapy in Early Rheumatoid Arthritis After Methotrexate Failure |
title_fullStr | A Multi‐Biomarker Disease Activity Score and the Choice of Second‐Line Therapy in Early Rheumatoid Arthritis After Methotrexate Failure |
title_full_unstemmed | A Multi‐Biomarker Disease Activity Score and the Choice of Second‐Line Therapy in Early Rheumatoid Arthritis After Methotrexate Failure |
title_short | A Multi‐Biomarker Disease Activity Score and the Choice of Second‐Line Therapy in Early Rheumatoid Arthritis After Methotrexate Failure |
title_sort | multi‐biomarker disease activity score and the choice of second‐line therapy in early rheumatoid arthritis after methotrexate failure |
topic | Rheumatoid Arthritis |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5516230/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27992691 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/art.40019 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hambardzumyankaren amultibiomarkerdiseaseactivityscoreandthechoiceofsecondlinetherapyinearlyrheumatoidarthritisaftermethotrexatefailure AT saevarsdottirsaedis amultibiomarkerdiseaseactivityscoreandthechoiceofsecondlinetherapyinearlyrheumatoidarthritisaftermethotrexatefailure AT forslindkristina amultibiomarkerdiseaseactivityscoreandthechoiceofsecondlinetherapyinearlyrheumatoidarthritisaftermethotrexatefailure AT peterssoningemarf amultibiomarkerdiseaseactivityscoreandthechoiceofsecondlinetherapyinearlyrheumatoidarthritisaftermethotrexatefailure AT wallmanjohank amultibiomarkerdiseaseactivityscoreandthechoiceofsecondlinetherapyinearlyrheumatoidarthritisaftermethotrexatefailure AT ernestamsofia amultibiomarkerdiseaseactivityscoreandthechoiceofsecondlinetherapyinearlyrheumatoidarthritisaftermethotrexatefailure AT bolcerebeccaj amultibiomarkerdiseaseactivityscoreandthechoiceofsecondlinetherapyinearlyrheumatoidarthritisaftermethotrexatefailure AT vanvollenhovenronaldf amultibiomarkerdiseaseactivityscoreandthechoiceofsecondlinetherapyinearlyrheumatoidarthritisaftermethotrexatefailure AT hambardzumyankaren multibiomarkerdiseaseactivityscoreandthechoiceofsecondlinetherapyinearlyrheumatoidarthritisaftermethotrexatefailure AT saevarsdottirsaedis multibiomarkerdiseaseactivityscoreandthechoiceofsecondlinetherapyinearlyrheumatoidarthritisaftermethotrexatefailure AT forslindkristina multibiomarkerdiseaseactivityscoreandthechoiceofsecondlinetherapyinearlyrheumatoidarthritisaftermethotrexatefailure AT peterssoningemarf multibiomarkerdiseaseactivityscoreandthechoiceofsecondlinetherapyinearlyrheumatoidarthritisaftermethotrexatefailure AT wallmanjohank multibiomarkerdiseaseactivityscoreandthechoiceofsecondlinetherapyinearlyrheumatoidarthritisaftermethotrexatefailure AT ernestamsofia multibiomarkerdiseaseactivityscoreandthechoiceofsecondlinetherapyinearlyrheumatoidarthritisaftermethotrexatefailure AT bolcerebeccaj multibiomarkerdiseaseactivityscoreandthechoiceofsecondlinetherapyinearlyrheumatoidarthritisaftermethotrexatefailure AT vanvollenhovenronaldf multibiomarkerdiseaseactivityscoreandthechoiceofsecondlinetherapyinearlyrheumatoidarthritisaftermethotrexatefailure |