Cargando…
Selecting and implementing overview methods: implications from five exemplar overviews
BACKGROUND: Overviews of systematic reviews are an increasingly popular method of evidence synthesis; there is a lack of clear guidance for completing overviews and a number of methodological challenges. At the UK Cochrane Symposium 2016, methodological challenges of five overviews were explored. Us...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5516331/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28720141 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-017-0534-3 |
_version_ | 1783251142455590912 |
---|---|
author | Pollock, Alex Campbell, Pauline Brunton, Ginny Hunt, Harriet Estcourt, Lise |
author_facet | Pollock, Alex Campbell, Pauline Brunton, Ginny Hunt, Harriet Estcourt, Lise |
author_sort | Pollock, Alex |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Overviews of systematic reviews are an increasingly popular method of evidence synthesis; there is a lack of clear guidance for completing overviews and a number of methodological challenges. At the UK Cochrane Symposium 2016, methodological challenges of five overviews were explored. Using data from these five overviews, practical implications to support methodological decision making of authors writing protocols for future overviews are proposed. METHODS: Methods, and their justification, from the five exemplar overviews were tabulated and compared with areas of debate identified within current literature. Key methodological challenges and implications for development of overview protocols were generated and synthesised into a list, discussed and refined until there was consensus. RESULTS: Methodological features of three Cochrane overviews, one overview of diagnostic test accuracy and one mixed methods overview have been summarised. Methods of selection of reviews and data extraction were similar. Either the AMSTAR or ROBIS tool was used to assess quality of included reviews. The GRADE approach was most commonly used to assess quality of evidence within the reviews. Eight key methodological challenges were identified from the exemplar overviews. There was good agreement between our findings and emerging areas of debate within a recent published synthesis. Implications for development of protocols for future overviews were identified. CONCLUSIONS: Overviews are a relatively new methodological innovation, and there are currently substantial variations in the methodological approaches used within different overviews. There are considerable methodological challenges for which optimal solutions are not necessarily yet known. Lessons learnt from five exemplar overviews highlight a number of methodological decisions which may be beneficial to consider during the development of an overview protocol. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13643-017-0534-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5516331 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55163312017-07-20 Selecting and implementing overview methods: implications from five exemplar overviews Pollock, Alex Campbell, Pauline Brunton, Ginny Hunt, Harriet Estcourt, Lise Syst Rev Methodology BACKGROUND: Overviews of systematic reviews are an increasingly popular method of evidence synthesis; there is a lack of clear guidance for completing overviews and a number of methodological challenges. At the UK Cochrane Symposium 2016, methodological challenges of five overviews were explored. Using data from these five overviews, practical implications to support methodological decision making of authors writing protocols for future overviews are proposed. METHODS: Methods, and their justification, from the five exemplar overviews were tabulated and compared with areas of debate identified within current literature. Key methodological challenges and implications for development of overview protocols were generated and synthesised into a list, discussed and refined until there was consensus. RESULTS: Methodological features of three Cochrane overviews, one overview of diagnostic test accuracy and one mixed methods overview have been summarised. Methods of selection of reviews and data extraction were similar. Either the AMSTAR or ROBIS tool was used to assess quality of included reviews. The GRADE approach was most commonly used to assess quality of evidence within the reviews. Eight key methodological challenges were identified from the exemplar overviews. There was good agreement between our findings and emerging areas of debate within a recent published synthesis. Implications for development of protocols for future overviews were identified. CONCLUSIONS: Overviews are a relatively new methodological innovation, and there are currently substantial variations in the methodological approaches used within different overviews. There are considerable methodological challenges for which optimal solutions are not necessarily yet known. Lessons learnt from five exemplar overviews highlight a number of methodological decisions which may be beneficial to consider during the development of an overview protocol. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13643-017-0534-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-07-18 /pmc/articles/PMC5516331/ /pubmed/28720141 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-017-0534-3 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Methodology Pollock, Alex Campbell, Pauline Brunton, Ginny Hunt, Harriet Estcourt, Lise Selecting and implementing overview methods: implications from five exemplar overviews |
title | Selecting and implementing overview methods: implications from five exemplar overviews |
title_full | Selecting and implementing overview methods: implications from five exemplar overviews |
title_fullStr | Selecting and implementing overview methods: implications from five exemplar overviews |
title_full_unstemmed | Selecting and implementing overview methods: implications from five exemplar overviews |
title_short | Selecting and implementing overview methods: implications from five exemplar overviews |
title_sort | selecting and implementing overview methods: implications from five exemplar overviews |
topic | Methodology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5516331/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28720141 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-017-0534-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pollockalex selectingandimplementingoverviewmethodsimplicationsfromfiveexemplaroverviews AT campbellpauline selectingandimplementingoverviewmethodsimplicationsfromfiveexemplaroverviews AT bruntonginny selectingandimplementingoverviewmethodsimplicationsfromfiveexemplaroverviews AT huntharriet selectingandimplementingoverviewmethodsimplicationsfromfiveexemplaroverviews AT estcourtlise selectingandimplementingoverviewmethodsimplicationsfromfiveexemplaroverviews |