Cargando…

Long-term effectiveness of mailed nicotine replacement therapy: study protocol of a randomized controlled trial 5-year follow-up

BACKGROUND: Our group recently completed a randomized controlled trial, evaluating the efficacy of providing 5 weeks of free nicotine replacement therapy (NRT; in the form of the nicotine patch) by expedited postal mail without behavioral assistance to regular adult smokers interested in receiving i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kushnir, Vladyslav, Selby, Peter, Zawertailo, Laurie, Tyndale, Rachel F., Leatherdale, Scott T., Cunningham, John A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5516338/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28720080
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-017-4586-z
_version_ 1783251144135409664
author Kushnir, Vladyslav
Selby, Peter
Zawertailo, Laurie
Tyndale, Rachel F.
Leatherdale, Scott T.
Cunningham, John A.
author_facet Kushnir, Vladyslav
Selby, Peter
Zawertailo, Laurie
Tyndale, Rachel F.
Leatherdale, Scott T.
Cunningham, John A.
author_sort Kushnir, Vladyslav
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Our group recently completed a randomized controlled trial, evaluating the efficacy of providing 5 weeks of free nicotine replacement therapy (NRT; in the form of the nicotine patch) by expedited postal mail without behavioral assistance to regular adult smokers interested in receiving it. The findings revealed that mailed provision of nicotine patches resulted in more than a doubling of quit rates at a six-month follow-up compared to a no intervention control group. While this trial provided evidence for the effectiveness of mailed nicotine patches in promoting cessation, the findings speak only to the short term effectiveness of this approach. As relapse to smoking is known to occur beyond the 6 month period, it is important to evaluate whether the net benefit of NRT in naturalistic settings can be maintained long-term. The present study aims to perform a 5-year follow-up survey of participants in the original trial to evaluate the long-term effectiveness of mailed NRT. METHODS/DESIGN: Trained interviewers will contact participants in the randomized controlled trial 5 years post-enrollment. A total of 924 participants will be eligible to be contacted. Interviewers will first assess participants’ smoking status and their level of nicotine dependence. Participants reporting not currently smoking will be asked whether they have smoked tobacco, even a puff, in the last 30 days (primary outcome measure: 30-day point prevalence abstinence), past 6 months (secondary outcome measure: prolonged 6-month abstinence), and since the 8-week follow-up survey (secondary outcome measure: > 4 year continuous abstinence). Interviewers will be blind to experimental condition at the time the primary outcome measure will be assessed. It is hypothesized that participants who received nicotine patches at baseline will display significantly higher quit rates at the 5-year follow-up as compared to participants who did not receive nicotine patches at baseline. DISCUSSION: If the study finds that the mailed distribution of free NRT is effective at promoting long-term cessation, it would provide further evidence to move forward with policies designed to make NRT treatment readily and freely available to smokers who request it. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01429129, Registered 2 September 2011; NCT03097445, Registered 25 March 2017.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5516338
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55163382017-07-20 Long-term effectiveness of mailed nicotine replacement therapy: study protocol of a randomized controlled trial 5-year follow-up Kushnir, Vladyslav Selby, Peter Zawertailo, Laurie Tyndale, Rachel F. Leatherdale, Scott T. Cunningham, John A. BMC Public Health Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Our group recently completed a randomized controlled trial, evaluating the efficacy of providing 5 weeks of free nicotine replacement therapy (NRT; in the form of the nicotine patch) by expedited postal mail without behavioral assistance to regular adult smokers interested in receiving it. The findings revealed that mailed provision of nicotine patches resulted in more than a doubling of quit rates at a six-month follow-up compared to a no intervention control group. While this trial provided evidence for the effectiveness of mailed nicotine patches in promoting cessation, the findings speak only to the short term effectiveness of this approach. As relapse to smoking is known to occur beyond the 6 month period, it is important to evaluate whether the net benefit of NRT in naturalistic settings can be maintained long-term. The present study aims to perform a 5-year follow-up survey of participants in the original trial to evaluate the long-term effectiveness of mailed NRT. METHODS/DESIGN: Trained interviewers will contact participants in the randomized controlled trial 5 years post-enrollment. A total of 924 participants will be eligible to be contacted. Interviewers will first assess participants’ smoking status and their level of nicotine dependence. Participants reporting not currently smoking will be asked whether they have smoked tobacco, even a puff, in the last 30 days (primary outcome measure: 30-day point prevalence abstinence), past 6 months (secondary outcome measure: prolonged 6-month abstinence), and since the 8-week follow-up survey (secondary outcome measure: > 4 year continuous abstinence). Interviewers will be blind to experimental condition at the time the primary outcome measure will be assessed. It is hypothesized that participants who received nicotine patches at baseline will display significantly higher quit rates at the 5-year follow-up as compared to participants who did not receive nicotine patches at baseline. DISCUSSION: If the study finds that the mailed distribution of free NRT is effective at promoting long-term cessation, it would provide further evidence to move forward with policies designed to make NRT treatment readily and freely available to smokers who request it. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01429129, Registered 2 September 2011; NCT03097445, Registered 25 March 2017. BioMed Central 2017-07-18 /pmc/articles/PMC5516338/ /pubmed/28720080 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-017-4586-z Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Kushnir, Vladyslav
Selby, Peter
Zawertailo, Laurie
Tyndale, Rachel F.
Leatherdale, Scott T.
Cunningham, John A.
Long-term effectiveness of mailed nicotine replacement therapy: study protocol of a randomized controlled trial 5-year follow-up
title Long-term effectiveness of mailed nicotine replacement therapy: study protocol of a randomized controlled trial 5-year follow-up
title_full Long-term effectiveness of mailed nicotine replacement therapy: study protocol of a randomized controlled trial 5-year follow-up
title_fullStr Long-term effectiveness of mailed nicotine replacement therapy: study protocol of a randomized controlled trial 5-year follow-up
title_full_unstemmed Long-term effectiveness of mailed nicotine replacement therapy: study protocol of a randomized controlled trial 5-year follow-up
title_short Long-term effectiveness of mailed nicotine replacement therapy: study protocol of a randomized controlled trial 5-year follow-up
title_sort long-term effectiveness of mailed nicotine replacement therapy: study protocol of a randomized controlled trial 5-year follow-up
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5516338/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28720080
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-017-4586-z
work_keys_str_mv AT kushnirvladyslav longtermeffectivenessofmailednicotinereplacementtherapystudyprotocolofarandomizedcontrolledtrial5yearfollowup
AT selbypeter longtermeffectivenessofmailednicotinereplacementtherapystudyprotocolofarandomizedcontrolledtrial5yearfollowup
AT zawertailolaurie longtermeffectivenessofmailednicotinereplacementtherapystudyprotocolofarandomizedcontrolledtrial5yearfollowup
AT tyndalerachelf longtermeffectivenessofmailednicotinereplacementtherapystudyprotocolofarandomizedcontrolledtrial5yearfollowup
AT leatherdalescottt longtermeffectivenessofmailednicotinereplacementtherapystudyprotocolofarandomizedcontrolledtrial5yearfollowup
AT cunninghamjohna longtermeffectivenessofmailednicotinereplacementtherapystudyprotocolofarandomizedcontrolledtrial5yearfollowup