Cargando…
An observational study: Effects of tenting of the abdominal wall on peak airway pressure in robotic radical prostatectomy surgery
BACKGROUND: Robotic radical prostatectomy (RRP) is associated with various anesthetic challenges due to pneumoperitoneum and deep Trendelenburg position. Tenting of the abdominal wall done in RRP surgery causes decrease in peak airway pressure leading to better ventilation. Herein, we aimed to descr...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5516488/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28757826 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/sja.SJA_560_16 |
_version_ | 1783251169639923712 |
---|---|
author | Kakde, Avinash Sahebarav Wagh, Harshal D. |
author_facet | Kakde, Avinash Sahebarav Wagh, Harshal D. |
author_sort | Kakde, Avinash Sahebarav |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Robotic radical prostatectomy (RRP) is associated with various anesthetic challenges due to pneumoperitoneum and deep Trendelenburg position. Tenting of the abdominal wall done in RRP surgery causes decrease in peak airway pressure leading to better ventilation. Herein, we aimed to describe the effects of tenting of the abdominal wall on peak airway pressure in RRP surgery performed in deep Trendelenburg position. METHODS: One hundred patients admitted for RRP in Kokilaben Dhirubhai Ambani Hospital of American Society of Anesthesiologists 1 and 2 physical status were included in the study. After undergoing preanesthesia work-up, patients received general anesthesia. Peak airway pressures were recorded after induction of general anesthesia, after insufflation of CO(2), after giving Trendelenburg position, and after tenting of the abdominal wall with robotic arms. RESULTS: Mean peak airway pressure recording after induction in supine position was 19.5 ± 2.3 cm of H(2)O, after insufflation of CO(2) in supine position was 26.3 ± 2.6 cm of H(2)O, after giving steep head low was 34.1 ± 3.4 cm of H(2)O, and after tenting of the abdominal wall with robotic arms was 29.5 ± 2.5 cm of H(2)O. P value is highly statistically significant (P = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Tenting of the abdominal wall during RRP is beneficial as it decreases peak airway pressure and helps in better ventilation and thus reduces the ill effects of raised peak airway pressure and intra-abdominal pressures. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5516488 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55164882017-07-28 An observational study: Effects of tenting of the abdominal wall on peak airway pressure in robotic radical prostatectomy surgery Kakde, Avinash Sahebarav Wagh, Harshal D. Saudi J Anaesth Original Article BACKGROUND: Robotic radical prostatectomy (RRP) is associated with various anesthetic challenges due to pneumoperitoneum and deep Trendelenburg position. Tenting of the abdominal wall done in RRP surgery causes decrease in peak airway pressure leading to better ventilation. Herein, we aimed to describe the effects of tenting of the abdominal wall on peak airway pressure in RRP surgery performed in deep Trendelenburg position. METHODS: One hundred patients admitted for RRP in Kokilaben Dhirubhai Ambani Hospital of American Society of Anesthesiologists 1 and 2 physical status were included in the study. After undergoing preanesthesia work-up, patients received general anesthesia. Peak airway pressures were recorded after induction of general anesthesia, after insufflation of CO(2), after giving Trendelenburg position, and after tenting of the abdominal wall with robotic arms. RESULTS: Mean peak airway pressure recording after induction in supine position was 19.5 ± 2.3 cm of H(2)O, after insufflation of CO(2) in supine position was 26.3 ± 2.6 cm of H(2)O, after giving steep head low was 34.1 ± 3.4 cm of H(2)O, and after tenting of the abdominal wall with robotic arms was 29.5 ± 2.5 cm of H(2)O. P value is highly statistically significant (P = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Tenting of the abdominal wall during RRP is beneficial as it decreases peak airway pressure and helps in better ventilation and thus reduces the ill effects of raised peak airway pressure and intra-abdominal pressures. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5516488/ /pubmed/28757826 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/sja.SJA_560_16 Text en Copyright: © 2017 Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Kakde, Avinash Sahebarav Wagh, Harshal D. An observational study: Effects of tenting of the abdominal wall on peak airway pressure in robotic radical prostatectomy surgery |
title | An observational study: Effects of tenting of the abdominal wall on peak airway pressure in robotic radical prostatectomy surgery |
title_full | An observational study: Effects of tenting of the abdominal wall on peak airway pressure in robotic radical prostatectomy surgery |
title_fullStr | An observational study: Effects of tenting of the abdominal wall on peak airway pressure in robotic radical prostatectomy surgery |
title_full_unstemmed | An observational study: Effects of tenting of the abdominal wall on peak airway pressure in robotic radical prostatectomy surgery |
title_short | An observational study: Effects of tenting of the abdominal wall on peak airway pressure in robotic radical prostatectomy surgery |
title_sort | observational study: effects of tenting of the abdominal wall on peak airway pressure in robotic radical prostatectomy surgery |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5516488/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28757826 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/sja.SJA_560_16 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kakdeavinashsahebarav anobservationalstudyeffectsoftentingoftheabdominalwallonpeakairwaypressureinroboticradicalprostatectomysurgery AT waghharshald anobservationalstudyeffectsoftentingoftheabdominalwallonpeakairwaypressureinroboticradicalprostatectomysurgery AT kakdeavinashsahebarav observationalstudyeffectsoftentingoftheabdominalwallonpeakairwaypressureinroboticradicalprostatectomysurgery AT waghharshald observationalstudyeffectsoftentingoftheabdominalwallonpeakairwaypressureinroboticradicalprostatectomysurgery |