Cargando…

An observational study: Effects of tenting of the abdominal wall on peak airway pressure in robotic radical prostatectomy surgery

BACKGROUND: Robotic radical prostatectomy (RRP) is associated with various anesthetic challenges due to pneumoperitoneum and deep Trendelenburg position. Tenting of the abdominal wall done in RRP surgery causes decrease in peak airway pressure leading to better ventilation. Herein, we aimed to descr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kakde, Avinash Sahebarav, Wagh, Harshal D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5516488/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28757826
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/sja.SJA_560_16
_version_ 1783251169639923712
author Kakde, Avinash Sahebarav
Wagh, Harshal D.
author_facet Kakde, Avinash Sahebarav
Wagh, Harshal D.
author_sort Kakde, Avinash Sahebarav
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Robotic radical prostatectomy (RRP) is associated with various anesthetic challenges due to pneumoperitoneum and deep Trendelenburg position. Tenting of the abdominal wall done in RRP surgery causes decrease in peak airway pressure leading to better ventilation. Herein, we aimed to describe the effects of tenting of the abdominal wall on peak airway pressure in RRP surgery performed in deep Trendelenburg position. METHODS: One hundred patients admitted for RRP in Kokilaben Dhirubhai Ambani Hospital of American Society of Anesthesiologists 1 and 2 physical status were included in the study. After undergoing preanesthesia work-up, patients received general anesthesia. Peak airway pressures were recorded after induction of general anesthesia, after insufflation of CO(2), after giving Trendelenburg position, and after tenting of the abdominal wall with robotic arms. RESULTS: Mean peak airway pressure recording after induction in supine position was 19.5 ± 2.3 cm of H(2)O, after insufflation of CO(2) in supine position was 26.3 ± 2.6 cm of H(2)O, after giving steep head low was 34.1 ± 3.4 cm of H(2)O, and after tenting of the abdominal wall with robotic arms was 29.5 ± 2.5 cm of H(2)O. P value is highly statistically significant (P = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Tenting of the abdominal wall during RRP is beneficial as it decreases peak airway pressure and helps in better ventilation and thus reduces the ill effects of raised peak airway pressure and intra-abdominal pressures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5516488
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55164882017-07-28 An observational study: Effects of tenting of the abdominal wall on peak airway pressure in robotic radical prostatectomy surgery Kakde, Avinash Sahebarav Wagh, Harshal D. Saudi J Anaesth Original Article BACKGROUND: Robotic radical prostatectomy (RRP) is associated with various anesthetic challenges due to pneumoperitoneum and deep Trendelenburg position. Tenting of the abdominal wall done in RRP surgery causes decrease in peak airway pressure leading to better ventilation. Herein, we aimed to describe the effects of tenting of the abdominal wall on peak airway pressure in RRP surgery performed in deep Trendelenburg position. METHODS: One hundred patients admitted for RRP in Kokilaben Dhirubhai Ambani Hospital of American Society of Anesthesiologists 1 and 2 physical status were included in the study. After undergoing preanesthesia work-up, patients received general anesthesia. Peak airway pressures were recorded after induction of general anesthesia, after insufflation of CO(2), after giving Trendelenburg position, and after tenting of the abdominal wall with robotic arms. RESULTS: Mean peak airway pressure recording after induction in supine position was 19.5 ± 2.3 cm of H(2)O, after insufflation of CO(2) in supine position was 26.3 ± 2.6 cm of H(2)O, after giving steep head low was 34.1 ± 3.4 cm of H(2)O, and after tenting of the abdominal wall with robotic arms was 29.5 ± 2.5 cm of H(2)O. P value is highly statistically significant (P = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Tenting of the abdominal wall during RRP is beneficial as it decreases peak airway pressure and helps in better ventilation and thus reduces the ill effects of raised peak airway pressure and intra-abdominal pressures. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5516488/ /pubmed/28757826 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/sja.SJA_560_16 Text en Copyright: © 2017 Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Kakde, Avinash Sahebarav
Wagh, Harshal D.
An observational study: Effects of tenting of the abdominal wall on peak airway pressure in robotic radical prostatectomy surgery
title An observational study: Effects of tenting of the abdominal wall on peak airway pressure in robotic radical prostatectomy surgery
title_full An observational study: Effects of tenting of the abdominal wall on peak airway pressure in robotic radical prostatectomy surgery
title_fullStr An observational study: Effects of tenting of the abdominal wall on peak airway pressure in robotic radical prostatectomy surgery
title_full_unstemmed An observational study: Effects of tenting of the abdominal wall on peak airway pressure in robotic radical prostatectomy surgery
title_short An observational study: Effects of tenting of the abdominal wall on peak airway pressure in robotic radical prostatectomy surgery
title_sort observational study: effects of tenting of the abdominal wall on peak airway pressure in robotic radical prostatectomy surgery
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5516488/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28757826
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/sja.SJA_560_16
work_keys_str_mv AT kakdeavinashsahebarav anobservationalstudyeffectsoftentingoftheabdominalwallonpeakairwaypressureinroboticradicalprostatectomysurgery
AT waghharshald anobservationalstudyeffectsoftentingoftheabdominalwallonpeakairwaypressureinroboticradicalprostatectomysurgery
AT kakdeavinashsahebarav observationalstudyeffectsoftentingoftheabdominalwallonpeakairwaypressureinroboticradicalprostatectomysurgery
AT waghharshald observationalstudyeffectsoftentingoftheabdominalwallonpeakairwaypressureinroboticradicalprostatectomysurgery