Cargando…
Validity and reliability of the Finnish version of the Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale‐29
BACKGROUND: The Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale‐29 (MSIS‐29) has been increasingly used to evaluate the self‐perceived impact of multiple sclerosis (MS) on a patient. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the psychometric properties of the Finnish version of MSIS‐29 in patients with MS....
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5516600/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28729932 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/brb3.725 |
_version_ | 1783251190568452096 |
---|---|
author | Rosti‐Otajärvi, Eija Hämäläinen, Päivi Wiksten, Anna Hakkarainen, Tanja Ruutiainen, Juhani |
author_facet | Rosti‐Otajärvi, Eija Hämäläinen, Päivi Wiksten, Anna Hakkarainen, Tanja Ruutiainen, Juhani |
author_sort | Rosti‐Otajärvi, Eija |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale‐29 (MSIS‐29) has been increasingly used to evaluate the self‐perceived impact of multiple sclerosis (MS) on a patient. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the psychometric properties of the Finnish version of MSIS‐29 in patients with MS. METHODS: A total of 553 patients with MS completed the MSIS‐29 and self‐administered questionnaires capturing information on demographics, disease characteristics and severity, perceived quality of life (EuroQol 5D‐3L instrument), and fatigue (Fatigue Severity Scale). RESULTS: The data quality for MSIS‐29 was excellent, with 99.5% computable scores for the MSIS‐29 physical scale and 99.3% for the MSIS‐29 psychological scale. Floor and ceiling effects were minimal. Excellent Cronbach's alpha values of 0.97 and 0.90 were seen for MSIS‐29 physical and psychological subscales, respectively. The physical subscale showed highest correlations with measures of physical functioning, such as disease severity and the mobility domain of the quality of life. Similarly, the psychological subscale showed highest correlations with self‐reported fatigue and the anxiety/depression domains of the quality of life. MSIS‐29 physical scores related strongly to disease severity, whereas the MSIS‐29 psychological scores increased in mild disease but declined in more severe disease forms. CONCLUSION: The Finnish version of MSIS‐29 has satisfactory psychometric properties. Consistent with the previous recommendations, the use of two MSIS‐29 subscale scores instead of a total score was supported. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5516600 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55166002017-07-20 Validity and reliability of the Finnish version of the Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale‐29 Rosti‐Otajärvi, Eija Hämäläinen, Päivi Wiksten, Anna Hakkarainen, Tanja Ruutiainen, Juhani Brain Behav Original Research BACKGROUND: The Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale‐29 (MSIS‐29) has been increasingly used to evaluate the self‐perceived impact of multiple sclerosis (MS) on a patient. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the psychometric properties of the Finnish version of MSIS‐29 in patients with MS. METHODS: A total of 553 patients with MS completed the MSIS‐29 and self‐administered questionnaires capturing information on demographics, disease characteristics and severity, perceived quality of life (EuroQol 5D‐3L instrument), and fatigue (Fatigue Severity Scale). RESULTS: The data quality for MSIS‐29 was excellent, with 99.5% computable scores for the MSIS‐29 physical scale and 99.3% for the MSIS‐29 psychological scale. Floor and ceiling effects were minimal. Excellent Cronbach's alpha values of 0.97 and 0.90 were seen for MSIS‐29 physical and psychological subscales, respectively. The physical subscale showed highest correlations with measures of physical functioning, such as disease severity and the mobility domain of the quality of life. Similarly, the psychological subscale showed highest correlations with self‐reported fatigue and the anxiety/depression domains of the quality of life. MSIS‐29 physical scores related strongly to disease severity, whereas the MSIS‐29 psychological scores increased in mild disease but declined in more severe disease forms. CONCLUSION: The Finnish version of MSIS‐29 has satisfactory psychometric properties. Consistent with the previous recommendations, the use of two MSIS‐29 subscale scores instead of a total score was supported. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-05-17 /pmc/articles/PMC5516600/ /pubmed/28729932 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/brb3.725 Text en © 2017 The Authors. Brain and Behavior published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Rosti‐Otajärvi, Eija Hämäläinen, Päivi Wiksten, Anna Hakkarainen, Tanja Ruutiainen, Juhani Validity and reliability of the Finnish version of the Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale‐29 |
title | Validity and reliability of the Finnish version of the Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale‐29 |
title_full | Validity and reliability of the Finnish version of the Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale‐29 |
title_fullStr | Validity and reliability of the Finnish version of the Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale‐29 |
title_full_unstemmed | Validity and reliability of the Finnish version of the Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale‐29 |
title_short | Validity and reliability of the Finnish version of the Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale‐29 |
title_sort | validity and reliability of the finnish version of the multiple sclerosis impact scale‐29 |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5516600/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28729932 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/brb3.725 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rostiotajarvieija validityandreliabilityofthefinnishversionofthemultiplesclerosisimpactscale29 AT hamalainenpaivi validityandreliabilityofthefinnishversionofthemultiplesclerosisimpactscale29 AT wikstenanna validityandreliabilityofthefinnishversionofthemultiplesclerosisimpactscale29 AT hakkarainentanja validityandreliabilityofthefinnishversionofthemultiplesclerosisimpactscale29 AT ruutiainenjuhani validityandreliabilityofthefinnishversionofthemultiplesclerosisimpactscale29 |