Cargando…

Validity and reliability of the Finnish version of the Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale‐29

BACKGROUND: The Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale‐29 (MSIS‐29) has been increasingly used to evaluate the self‐perceived impact of multiple sclerosis (MS) on a patient. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the psychometric properties of the Finnish version of MSIS‐29 in patients with MS....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rosti‐Otajärvi, Eija, Hämäläinen, Päivi, Wiksten, Anna, Hakkarainen, Tanja, Ruutiainen, Juhani
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5516600/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28729932
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/brb3.725
_version_ 1783251190568452096
author Rosti‐Otajärvi, Eija
Hämäläinen, Päivi
Wiksten, Anna
Hakkarainen, Tanja
Ruutiainen, Juhani
author_facet Rosti‐Otajärvi, Eija
Hämäläinen, Päivi
Wiksten, Anna
Hakkarainen, Tanja
Ruutiainen, Juhani
author_sort Rosti‐Otajärvi, Eija
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale‐29 (MSIS‐29) has been increasingly used to evaluate the self‐perceived impact of multiple sclerosis (MS) on a patient. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the psychometric properties of the Finnish version of MSIS‐29 in patients with MS. METHODS: A total of 553 patients with MS completed the MSIS‐29 and self‐administered questionnaires capturing information on demographics, disease characteristics and severity, perceived quality of life (EuroQol 5D‐3L instrument), and fatigue (Fatigue Severity Scale). RESULTS: The data quality for MSIS‐29 was excellent, with 99.5% computable scores for the MSIS‐29 physical scale and 99.3% for the MSIS‐29 psychological scale. Floor and ceiling effects were minimal. Excellent Cronbach's alpha values of 0.97 and 0.90 were seen for MSIS‐29 physical and psychological subscales, respectively. The physical subscale showed highest correlations with measures of physical functioning, such as disease severity and the mobility domain of the quality of life. Similarly, the psychological subscale showed highest correlations with self‐reported fatigue and the anxiety/depression domains of the quality of life. MSIS‐29 physical scores related strongly to disease severity, whereas the MSIS‐29 psychological scores increased in mild disease but declined in more severe disease forms. CONCLUSION: The Finnish version of MSIS‐29 has satisfactory psychometric properties. Consistent with the previous recommendations, the use of two MSIS‐29 subscale scores instead of a total score was supported.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5516600
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55166002017-07-20 Validity and reliability of the Finnish version of the Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale‐29 Rosti‐Otajärvi, Eija Hämäläinen, Päivi Wiksten, Anna Hakkarainen, Tanja Ruutiainen, Juhani Brain Behav Original Research BACKGROUND: The Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale‐29 (MSIS‐29) has been increasingly used to evaluate the self‐perceived impact of multiple sclerosis (MS) on a patient. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the psychometric properties of the Finnish version of MSIS‐29 in patients with MS. METHODS: A total of 553 patients with MS completed the MSIS‐29 and self‐administered questionnaires capturing information on demographics, disease characteristics and severity, perceived quality of life (EuroQol 5D‐3L instrument), and fatigue (Fatigue Severity Scale). RESULTS: The data quality for MSIS‐29 was excellent, with 99.5% computable scores for the MSIS‐29 physical scale and 99.3% for the MSIS‐29 psychological scale. Floor and ceiling effects were minimal. Excellent Cronbach's alpha values of 0.97 and 0.90 were seen for MSIS‐29 physical and psychological subscales, respectively. The physical subscale showed highest correlations with measures of physical functioning, such as disease severity and the mobility domain of the quality of life. Similarly, the psychological subscale showed highest correlations with self‐reported fatigue and the anxiety/depression domains of the quality of life. MSIS‐29 physical scores related strongly to disease severity, whereas the MSIS‐29 psychological scores increased in mild disease but declined in more severe disease forms. CONCLUSION: The Finnish version of MSIS‐29 has satisfactory psychometric properties. Consistent with the previous recommendations, the use of two MSIS‐29 subscale scores instead of a total score was supported. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-05-17 /pmc/articles/PMC5516600/ /pubmed/28729932 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/brb3.725 Text en © 2017 The Authors. Brain and Behavior published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Rosti‐Otajärvi, Eija
Hämäläinen, Päivi
Wiksten, Anna
Hakkarainen, Tanja
Ruutiainen, Juhani
Validity and reliability of the Finnish version of the Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale‐29
title Validity and reliability of the Finnish version of the Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale‐29
title_full Validity and reliability of the Finnish version of the Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale‐29
title_fullStr Validity and reliability of the Finnish version of the Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale‐29
title_full_unstemmed Validity and reliability of the Finnish version of the Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale‐29
title_short Validity and reliability of the Finnish version of the Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale‐29
title_sort validity and reliability of the finnish version of the multiple sclerosis impact scale‐29
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5516600/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28729932
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/brb3.725
work_keys_str_mv AT rostiotajarvieija validityandreliabilityofthefinnishversionofthemultiplesclerosisimpactscale29
AT hamalainenpaivi validityandreliabilityofthefinnishversionofthemultiplesclerosisimpactscale29
AT wikstenanna validityandreliabilityofthefinnishversionofthemultiplesclerosisimpactscale29
AT hakkarainentanja validityandreliabilityofthefinnishversionofthemultiplesclerosisimpactscale29
AT ruutiainenjuhani validityandreliabilityofthefinnishversionofthemultiplesclerosisimpactscale29