Cargando…
Decrease in short‐latency afferent inhibition during corticomotor postexercise depression following repetitive finger movement
INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to clarify cortical circuit mechanisms contributing to corticomotor excitability during postexercise depression (PED) following repetitive nonfatiguing movement. We investigated changes in short‐latency afferent inhibition (SAI) and short‐interval intracortical inhibit...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5516614/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28729946 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/brb3.744 |
_version_ | 1783251193954304000 |
---|---|
author | Miyaguchi, Shota Kojima, Sho Sasaki, Ryoki Kotan, Shinichi Kirimoto, Hikari Tamaki, Hiroyuki Onishi, Hideaki |
author_facet | Miyaguchi, Shota Kojima, Sho Sasaki, Ryoki Kotan, Shinichi Kirimoto, Hikari Tamaki, Hiroyuki Onishi, Hideaki |
author_sort | Miyaguchi, Shota |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to clarify cortical circuit mechanisms contributing to corticomotor excitability during postexercise depression (PED) following repetitive nonfatiguing movement. We investigated changes in short‐latency afferent inhibition (SAI) and short‐interval intracortical inhibition (SICI) by paired‐pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) during PED. METHODS: A total of 16 healthy subjects performed repetitive abduction movements of the right index finger at 2.0 Hz for 6 min at 10% maximum voluntary contraction. We measured SAI evoked by pairing ulnar nerve stimulation with TMS (interstimulus interval, 22 ms) before and during PED (n = 10, experiment 1). We also measured SICI evoked by paired TMS (interstimulus interval, 2 ms) at 80% resting motor threshold (n = 10, experiment 2), and at 80% active motor threshold (n = 8, experiment 3) before and during PED. RESULTS: Single motor evoked potential amplitude significantly decreased 1–2 min after the movement task in all experiments, indicating reliable PED induction. In experiment 1, SAI significantly decreased (disinhibited) 1–2 min during PED, whereas in experiments 2 and 3, SICI showed no significant change during PED. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that cholinergic inhibitory circuit activity decreases during PED following repetitive nonfatiguing movement, whereas GABA(A) circuit activity remains stable. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5516614 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55166142017-07-20 Decrease in short‐latency afferent inhibition during corticomotor postexercise depression following repetitive finger movement Miyaguchi, Shota Kojima, Sho Sasaki, Ryoki Kotan, Shinichi Kirimoto, Hikari Tamaki, Hiroyuki Onishi, Hideaki Brain Behav Original Research INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to clarify cortical circuit mechanisms contributing to corticomotor excitability during postexercise depression (PED) following repetitive nonfatiguing movement. We investigated changes in short‐latency afferent inhibition (SAI) and short‐interval intracortical inhibition (SICI) by paired‐pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) during PED. METHODS: A total of 16 healthy subjects performed repetitive abduction movements of the right index finger at 2.0 Hz for 6 min at 10% maximum voluntary contraction. We measured SAI evoked by pairing ulnar nerve stimulation with TMS (interstimulus interval, 22 ms) before and during PED (n = 10, experiment 1). We also measured SICI evoked by paired TMS (interstimulus interval, 2 ms) at 80% resting motor threshold (n = 10, experiment 2), and at 80% active motor threshold (n = 8, experiment 3) before and during PED. RESULTS: Single motor evoked potential amplitude significantly decreased 1–2 min after the movement task in all experiments, indicating reliable PED induction. In experiment 1, SAI significantly decreased (disinhibited) 1–2 min during PED, whereas in experiments 2 and 3, SICI showed no significant change during PED. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that cholinergic inhibitory circuit activity decreases during PED following repetitive nonfatiguing movement, whereas GABA(A) circuit activity remains stable. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-06-09 /pmc/articles/PMC5516614/ /pubmed/28729946 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/brb3.744 Text en © 2017 The Authors. Brain and Behavior published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Miyaguchi, Shota Kojima, Sho Sasaki, Ryoki Kotan, Shinichi Kirimoto, Hikari Tamaki, Hiroyuki Onishi, Hideaki Decrease in short‐latency afferent inhibition during corticomotor postexercise depression following repetitive finger movement |
title | Decrease in short‐latency afferent inhibition during corticomotor postexercise depression following repetitive finger movement |
title_full | Decrease in short‐latency afferent inhibition during corticomotor postexercise depression following repetitive finger movement |
title_fullStr | Decrease in short‐latency afferent inhibition during corticomotor postexercise depression following repetitive finger movement |
title_full_unstemmed | Decrease in short‐latency afferent inhibition during corticomotor postexercise depression following repetitive finger movement |
title_short | Decrease in short‐latency afferent inhibition during corticomotor postexercise depression following repetitive finger movement |
title_sort | decrease in short‐latency afferent inhibition during corticomotor postexercise depression following repetitive finger movement |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5516614/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28729946 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/brb3.744 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT miyaguchishota decreaseinshortlatencyafferentinhibitionduringcorticomotorpostexercisedepressionfollowingrepetitivefingermovement AT kojimasho decreaseinshortlatencyafferentinhibitionduringcorticomotorpostexercisedepressionfollowingrepetitivefingermovement AT sasakiryoki decreaseinshortlatencyafferentinhibitionduringcorticomotorpostexercisedepressionfollowingrepetitivefingermovement AT kotanshinichi decreaseinshortlatencyafferentinhibitionduringcorticomotorpostexercisedepressionfollowingrepetitivefingermovement AT kirimotohikari decreaseinshortlatencyafferentinhibitionduringcorticomotorpostexercisedepressionfollowingrepetitivefingermovement AT tamakihiroyuki decreaseinshortlatencyafferentinhibitionduringcorticomotorpostexercisedepressionfollowingrepetitivefingermovement AT onishihideaki decreaseinshortlatencyafferentinhibitionduringcorticomotorpostexercisedepressionfollowingrepetitivefingermovement |