Cargando…

Decrease in short‐latency afferent inhibition during corticomotor postexercise depression following repetitive finger movement

INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to clarify cortical circuit mechanisms contributing to corticomotor excitability during postexercise depression (PED) following repetitive nonfatiguing movement. We investigated changes in short‐latency afferent inhibition (SAI) and short‐interval intracortical inhibit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Miyaguchi, Shota, Kojima, Sho, Sasaki, Ryoki, Kotan, Shinichi, Kirimoto, Hikari, Tamaki, Hiroyuki, Onishi, Hideaki
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5516614/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28729946
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/brb3.744
_version_ 1783251193954304000
author Miyaguchi, Shota
Kojima, Sho
Sasaki, Ryoki
Kotan, Shinichi
Kirimoto, Hikari
Tamaki, Hiroyuki
Onishi, Hideaki
author_facet Miyaguchi, Shota
Kojima, Sho
Sasaki, Ryoki
Kotan, Shinichi
Kirimoto, Hikari
Tamaki, Hiroyuki
Onishi, Hideaki
author_sort Miyaguchi, Shota
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to clarify cortical circuit mechanisms contributing to corticomotor excitability during postexercise depression (PED) following repetitive nonfatiguing movement. We investigated changes in short‐latency afferent inhibition (SAI) and short‐interval intracortical inhibition (SICI) by paired‐pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) during PED. METHODS: A total of 16 healthy subjects performed repetitive abduction movements of the right index finger at 2.0 Hz for 6 min at 10% maximum voluntary contraction. We measured SAI evoked by pairing ulnar nerve stimulation with TMS (interstimulus interval, 22 ms) before and during PED (n = 10, experiment 1). We also measured SICI evoked by paired TMS (interstimulus interval, 2 ms) at 80% resting motor threshold (n = 10, experiment 2), and at 80% active motor threshold (n = 8, experiment 3) before and during PED. RESULTS: Single motor evoked potential amplitude significantly decreased 1–2 min after the movement task in all experiments, indicating reliable PED induction. In experiment 1, SAI significantly decreased (disinhibited) 1–2 min during PED, whereas in experiments 2 and 3, SICI showed no significant change during PED. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that cholinergic inhibitory circuit activity decreases during PED following repetitive nonfatiguing movement, whereas GABA(A) circuit activity remains stable.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5516614
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55166142017-07-20 Decrease in short‐latency afferent inhibition during corticomotor postexercise depression following repetitive finger movement Miyaguchi, Shota Kojima, Sho Sasaki, Ryoki Kotan, Shinichi Kirimoto, Hikari Tamaki, Hiroyuki Onishi, Hideaki Brain Behav Original Research INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to clarify cortical circuit mechanisms contributing to corticomotor excitability during postexercise depression (PED) following repetitive nonfatiguing movement. We investigated changes in short‐latency afferent inhibition (SAI) and short‐interval intracortical inhibition (SICI) by paired‐pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) during PED. METHODS: A total of 16 healthy subjects performed repetitive abduction movements of the right index finger at 2.0 Hz for 6 min at 10% maximum voluntary contraction. We measured SAI evoked by pairing ulnar nerve stimulation with TMS (interstimulus interval, 22 ms) before and during PED (n = 10, experiment 1). We also measured SICI evoked by paired TMS (interstimulus interval, 2 ms) at 80% resting motor threshold (n = 10, experiment 2), and at 80% active motor threshold (n = 8, experiment 3) before and during PED. RESULTS: Single motor evoked potential amplitude significantly decreased 1–2 min after the movement task in all experiments, indicating reliable PED induction. In experiment 1, SAI significantly decreased (disinhibited) 1–2 min during PED, whereas in experiments 2 and 3, SICI showed no significant change during PED. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that cholinergic inhibitory circuit activity decreases during PED following repetitive nonfatiguing movement, whereas GABA(A) circuit activity remains stable. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-06-09 /pmc/articles/PMC5516614/ /pubmed/28729946 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/brb3.744 Text en © 2017 The Authors. Brain and Behavior published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Miyaguchi, Shota
Kojima, Sho
Sasaki, Ryoki
Kotan, Shinichi
Kirimoto, Hikari
Tamaki, Hiroyuki
Onishi, Hideaki
Decrease in short‐latency afferent inhibition during corticomotor postexercise depression following repetitive finger movement
title Decrease in short‐latency afferent inhibition during corticomotor postexercise depression following repetitive finger movement
title_full Decrease in short‐latency afferent inhibition during corticomotor postexercise depression following repetitive finger movement
title_fullStr Decrease in short‐latency afferent inhibition during corticomotor postexercise depression following repetitive finger movement
title_full_unstemmed Decrease in short‐latency afferent inhibition during corticomotor postexercise depression following repetitive finger movement
title_short Decrease in short‐latency afferent inhibition during corticomotor postexercise depression following repetitive finger movement
title_sort decrease in short‐latency afferent inhibition during corticomotor postexercise depression following repetitive finger movement
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5516614/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28729946
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/brb3.744
work_keys_str_mv AT miyaguchishota decreaseinshortlatencyafferentinhibitionduringcorticomotorpostexercisedepressionfollowingrepetitivefingermovement
AT kojimasho decreaseinshortlatencyafferentinhibitionduringcorticomotorpostexercisedepressionfollowingrepetitivefingermovement
AT sasakiryoki decreaseinshortlatencyafferentinhibitionduringcorticomotorpostexercisedepressionfollowingrepetitivefingermovement
AT kotanshinichi decreaseinshortlatencyafferentinhibitionduringcorticomotorpostexercisedepressionfollowingrepetitivefingermovement
AT kirimotohikari decreaseinshortlatencyafferentinhibitionduringcorticomotorpostexercisedepressionfollowingrepetitivefingermovement
AT tamakihiroyuki decreaseinshortlatencyafferentinhibitionduringcorticomotorpostexercisedepressionfollowingrepetitivefingermovement
AT onishihideaki decreaseinshortlatencyafferentinhibitionduringcorticomotorpostexercisedepressionfollowingrepetitivefingermovement