Cargando…

Ejection fraction in myocardial perfusion imaging assessed with a dynamic phantom: comparison between IQ-SPECT and LEHR

BACKGROUND: Developments in single photon emission tomography instrumentation and reconstruction methods present a potential for decreasing acquisition times. One of such recent options for myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) is IQ-SPECT. This study was motivated by the inconsistency in the reported...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hippeläinen, Eero, Mäkelä, Teemu, Kaasalainen, Touko, Kaleva, Erna
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5517386/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28726076
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40658-017-0187-2
_version_ 1783251271953678336
author Hippeläinen, Eero
Mäkelä, Teemu
Kaasalainen, Touko
Kaleva, Erna
author_facet Hippeläinen, Eero
Mäkelä, Teemu
Kaasalainen, Touko
Kaleva, Erna
author_sort Hippeläinen, Eero
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Developments in single photon emission tomography instrumentation and reconstruction methods present a potential for decreasing acquisition times. One of such recent options for myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) is IQ-SPECT. This study was motivated by the inconsistency in the reported ejection fraction (EF) and left ventricular (LV) volume results between IQ-SPECT and more conventional low-energy high-resolution (LEHR) collimation protocols. IQ-SPECT and LEHR quantitative results were compared while the equivalent number of iterations (EI) was varied. The end-diastolic (EDV) and end-systolic volumes (ESV) and the derived EF values were investigated. A dynamic heart phantom was used to produce repeatable ESVs, EDVs and EFs. Phantom performance was verified by comparing the set EF values to those measured from a gated multi-slice X-ray computed tomography (CT) scan (EF(True)). The phantom with an EF setting of 45, 55, 65 and 70% was imaged with both IQ-SPECT and LEHR protocols. The data were reconstructed with different EI, and two commonly used clinical myocardium delineation software were used to evaluate the LV volumes. RESULTS: The CT verification showed that the phantom EF settings were repeatable and accurate with the EF(True) being within 1% point from the manufacture’s nominal value. Depending on EI both MPI protocols can be made to produce correct EF estimates, but IQ-SPECT protocol produced on average 41 and 42% smaller EDV and ESV when compared to the phantom’s volumes, while LEHR protocol underestimated volumes by 24 and 21%, respectively. The volume results were largely similar between the delineation methods used. CONCLUSIONS: The reconstruction parameters can greatly affect the volume estimates obtained from perfusion studies. IQ-SPECT produces systematically smaller LV volumes than the conventional LEHR MPI protocol. The volume estimates are also software dependent.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5517386
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55173862017-08-02 Ejection fraction in myocardial perfusion imaging assessed with a dynamic phantom: comparison between IQ-SPECT and LEHR Hippeläinen, Eero Mäkelä, Teemu Kaasalainen, Touko Kaleva, Erna EJNMMI Phys Original Research BACKGROUND: Developments in single photon emission tomography instrumentation and reconstruction methods present a potential for decreasing acquisition times. One of such recent options for myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) is IQ-SPECT. This study was motivated by the inconsistency in the reported ejection fraction (EF) and left ventricular (LV) volume results between IQ-SPECT and more conventional low-energy high-resolution (LEHR) collimation protocols. IQ-SPECT and LEHR quantitative results were compared while the equivalent number of iterations (EI) was varied. The end-diastolic (EDV) and end-systolic volumes (ESV) and the derived EF values were investigated. A dynamic heart phantom was used to produce repeatable ESVs, EDVs and EFs. Phantom performance was verified by comparing the set EF values to those measured from a gated multi-slice X-ray computed tomography (CT) scan (EF(True)). The phantom with an EF setting of 45, 55, 65 and 70% was imaged with both IQ-SPECT and LEHR protocols. The data were reconstructed with different EI, and two commonly used clinical myocardium delineation software were used to evaluate the LV volumes. RESULTS: The CT verification showed that the phantom EF settings were repeatable and accurate with the EF(True) being within 1% point from the manufacture’s nominal value. Depending on EI both MPI protocols can be made to produce correct EF estimates, but IQ-SPECT protocol produced on average 41 and 42% smaller EDV and ESV when compared to the phantom’s volumes, while LEHR protocol underestimated volumes by 24 and 21%, respectively. The volume results were largely similar between the delineation methods used. CONCLUSIONS: The reconstruction parameters can greatly affect the volume estimates obtained from perfusion studies. IQ-SPECT produces systematically smaller LV volumes than the conventional LEHR MPI protocol. The volume estimates are also software dependent. Springer International Publishing 2017-07-19 /pmc/articles/PMC5517386/ /pubmed/28726076 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40658-017-0187-2 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Research
Hippeläinen, Eero
Mäkelä, Teemu
Kaasalainen, Touko
Kaleva, Erna
Ejection fraction in myocardial perfusion imaging assessed with a dynamic phantom: comparison between IQ-SPECT and LEHR
title Ejection fraction in myocardial perfusion imaging assessed with a dynamic phantom: comparison between IQ-SPECT and LEHR
title_full Ejection fraction in myocardial perfusion imaging assessed with a dynamic phantom: comparison between IQ-SPECT and LEHR
title_fullStr Ejection fraction in myocardial perfusion imaging assessed with a dynamic phantom: comparison between IQ-SPECT and LEHR
title_full_unstemmed Ejection fraction in myocardial perfusion imaging assessed with a dynamic phantom: comparison between IQ-SPECT and LEHR
title_short Ejection fraction in myocardial perfusion imaging assessed with a dynamic phantom: comparison between IQ-SPECT and LEHR
title_sort ejection fraction in myocardial perfusion imaging assessed with a dynamic phantom: comparison between iq-spect and lehr
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5517386/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28726076
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40658-017-0187-2
work_keys_str_mv AT hippelaineneero ejectionfractioninmyocardialperfusionimagingassessedwithadynamicphantomcomparisonbetweeniqspectandlehr
AT makelateemu ejectionfractioninmyocardialperfusionimagingassessedwithadynamicphantomcomparisonbetweeniqspectandlehr
AT kaasalainentouko ejectionfractioninmyocardialperfusionimagingassessedwithadynamicphantomcomparisonbetweeniqspectandlehr
AT kalevaerna ejectionfractioninmyocardialperfusionimagingassessedwithadynamicphantomcomparisonbetweeniqspectandlehr