Cargando…

Temporal Microbial Community Dynamics in Microbial Electrolysis Cells – Influence of Acetate and Propionate Concentration

Microbial electrolysis cells (MECs) are widely considered as a next generation wastewater treatment system. However, fundamental insight on the temporal dynamics of microbial communities associated with MEC performance under different organic types with varied loading concentrations is still unknown...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hari, Ananda Rao, Venkidusamy, Krishnaveni, Katuri, Krishna P., Bagchi, Samik, Saikaly, Pascal E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5517442/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28775719
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2017.01371
_version_ 1783251285355528192
author Hari, Ananda Rao
Venkidusamy, Krishnaveni
Katuri, Krishna P.
Bagchi, Samik
Saikaly, Pascal E.
author_facet Hari, Ananda Rao
Venkidusamy, Krishnaveni
Katuri, Krishna P.
Bagchi, Samik
Saikaly, Pascal E.
author_sort Hari, Ananda Rao
collection PubMed
description Microbial electrolysis cells (MECs) are widely considered as a next generation wastewater treatment system. However, fundamental insight on the temporal dynamics of microbial communities associated with MEC performance under different organic types with varied loading concentrations is still unknown, nevertheless this knowledge is essential for optimizing this technology for real-scale applications. Here, the temporal dynamics of anodic microbial communities associated with MEC performance was examined at low (0.5 g COD/L) and high (4 g COD/L) concentrations of acetate or propionate, which are important intermediates of fermentation of municipal wastewaters and sludge. The results showed that acetate-fed reactors exhibited higher performance in terms of maximum current density (I: 4.25 ± 0.23 A/m(2)), coulombic efficiency (CE: 95 ± 8%), and substrate degradation rate (98.8 ± 1.2%) than propionate-fed reactors (I: 2.7 ± 0.28 A/m(2); CE: 68 ± 9.5%; substrate degradation rate: 84 ± 13%) irrespective of the concentrations tested. Despite of the repeated sampling of the anodic biofilm over time, the high-concentration reactors demonstrated lower and stable performance in terms of current density (I: 1.1 ± 0.14 to 4.2 ± 0.21 A/m(2)), coulombic efficiency (CE: 44 ± 4.1 to 103 ± 7.2%) and substrate degradation rate (64.9 ± 6.3 to 99.7 ± 0.5%), while the low-concentration reactors produced higher and dynamic performance (I: 1.1 ± 0.12 to 4.6 ± 0.1 A/m(2); CE: 52 ± 2.5 to 105 ± 2.7%; substrate degradation rate: 87.2 ± 0.2 to 99.9 ± 0.06%) with the different substrates tested. Correlating reactor’s performance with temporal dynamics of microbial communities showed that relatively similar anodic microbial community composition but with varying relative abundances was observed in all the reactors despite differences in the substrate and concentrations tested. Particularly, Geobacter was the predominant bacteria on the anode biofilm of all MECs over time suggesting its possible role in maintaining functional stability of MECs fed with low and high concentrations of acetate and propionate. Taken together, these results provide new insights on the microbial community dynamics and its correlation to performance in MECs fed with different concentrations of acetate and propionate, which are important volatile fatty acids in wastewater.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5517442
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55174422017-08-03 Temporal Microbial Community Dynamics in Microbial Electrolysis Cells – Influence of Acetate and Propionate Concentration Hari, Ananda Rao Venkidusamy, Krishnaveni Katuri, Krishna P. Bagchi, Samik Saikaly, Pascal E. Front Microbiol Microbiology Microbial electrolysis cells (MECs) are widely considered as a next generation wastewater treatment system. However, fundamental insight on the temporal dynamics of microbial communities associated with MEC performance under different organic types with varied loading concentrations is still unknown, nevertheless this knowledge is essential for optimizing this technology for real-scale applications. Here, the temporal dynamics of anodic microbial communities associated with MEC performance was examined at low (0.5 g COD/L) and high (4 g COD/L) concentrations of acetate or propionate, which are important intermediates of fermentation of municipal wastewaters and sludge. The results showed that acetate-fed reactors exhibited higher performance in terms of maximum current density (I: 4.25 ± 0.23 A/m(2)), coulombic efficiency (CE: 95 ± 8%), and substrate degradation rate (98.8 ± 1.2%) than propionate-fed reactors (I: 2.7 ± 0.28 A/m(2); CE: 68 ± 9.5%; substrate degradation rate: 84 ± 13%) irrespective of the concentrations tested. Despite of the repeated sampling of the anodic biofilm over time, the high-concentration reactors demonstrated lower and stable performance in terms of current density (I: 1.1 ± 0.14 to 4.2 ± 0.21 A/m(2)), coulombic efficiency (CE: 44 ± 4.1 to 103 ± 7.2%) and substrate degradation rate (64.9 ± 6.3 to 99.7 ± 0.5%), while the low-concentration reactors produced higher and dynamic performance (I: 1.1 ± 0.12 to 4.6 ± 0.1 A/m(2); CE: 52 ± 2.5 to 105 ± 2.7%; substrate degradation rate: 87.2 ± 0.2 to 99.9 ± 0.06%) with the different substrates tested. Correlating reactor’s performance with temporal dynamics of microbial communities showed that relatively similar anodic microbial community composition but with varying relative abundances was observed in all the reactors despite differences in the substrate and concentrations tested. Particularly, Geobacter was the predominant bacteria on the anode biofilm of all MECs over time suggesting its possible role in maintaining functional stability of MECs fed with low and high concentrations of acetate and propionate. Taken together, these results provide new insights on the microbial community dynamics and its correlation to performance in MECs fed with different concentrations of acetate and propionate, which are important volatile fatty acids in wastewater. Frontiers Media S.A. 2017-07-20 /pmc/articles/PMC5517442/ /pubmed/28775719 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2017.01371 Text en Copyright © 2017 Hari, Venkidusamy, Katuri, Bagchi and Saikaly. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Microbiology
Hari, Ananda Rao
Venkidusamy, Krishnaveni
Katuri, Krishna P.
Bagchi, Samik
Saikaly, Pascal E.
Temporal Microbial Community Dynamics in Microbial Electrolysis Cells – Influence of Acetate and Propionate Concentration
title Temporal Microbial Community Dynamics in Microbial Electrolysis Cells – Influence of Acetate and Propionate Concentration
title_full Temporal Microbial Community Dynamics in Microbial Electrolysis Cells – Influence of Acetate and Propionate Concentration
title_fullStr Temporal Microbial Community Dynamics in Microbial Electrolysis Cells – Influence of Acetate and Propionate Concentration
title_full_unstemmed Temporal Microbial Community Dynamics in Microbial Electrolysis Cells – Influence of Acetate and Propionate Concentration
title_short Temporal Microbial Community Dynamics in Microbial Electrolysis Cells – Influence of Acetate and Propionate Concentration
title_sort temporal microbial community dynamics in microbial electrolysis cells – influence of acetate and propionate concentration
topic Microbiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5517442/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28775719
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2017.01371
work_keys_str_mv AT harianandarao temporalmicrobialcommunitydynamicsinmicrobialelectrolysiscellsinfluenceofacetateandpropionateconcentration
AT venkidusamykrishnaveni temporalmicrobialcommunitydynamicsinmicrobialelectrolysiscellsinfluenceofacetateandpropionateconcentration
AT katurikrishnap temporalmicrobialcommunitydynamicsinmicrobialelectrolysiscellsinfluenceofacetateandpropionateconcentration
AT bagchisamik temporalmicrobialcommunitydynamicsinmicrobialelectrolysiscellsinfluenceofacetateandpropionateconcentration
AT saikalypascale temporalmicrobialcommunitydynamicsinmicrobialelectrolysiscellsinfluenceofacetateandpropionateconcentration