Cargando…

Familiarization Protocol Influences Reproducibility of 20-km Cycling Time-Trial Performance in Novice Participants

Introduction: Exercise performance is reproducible in experienced athletes; however, less trained participants exhibit greater variability in performance and pacing. To reduce variability, it is common practice to complete a familiarization prior to experimental testing. However, there are no clear...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hibbert, Andrew W., Billaut, François, Varley, Matthew C., Polman, Remco C. J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5517464/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28775692
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2017.00488
_version_ 1783251290535493632
author Hibbert, Andrew W.
Billaut, François
Varley, Matthew C.
Polman, Remco C. J.
author_facet Hibbert, Andrew W.
Billaut, François
Varley, Matthew C.
Polman, Remco C. J.
author_sort Hibbert, Andrew W.
collection PubMed
description Introduction: Exercise performance is reproducible in experienced athletes; however, less trained participants exhibit greater variability in performance and pacing. To reduce variability, it is common practice to complete a familiarization prior to experimental testing. However, there are no clear guidelines for familiarizing novice participants to a cycling time-trial (TT), and research findings from novice populations may still be influenced by learning effects. Accordingly, the aims of this study were to establish the variability between TTs after administering differing familiarization protocols (duration or type) and to establish the number of familiarization trials required to limit variability over multiple trials. Methods: Thirty recreationally active participants, with no prior experience of a TT, performed a 20-km cycling TT on five separate occasions, after completing either a full (FF, 20-km TT, n = 10), a half (HF, 10-km TT, n = 10) or an equipment familiarization (EF, 5-min cycling, n = 10). Results: Variability of TT duration across five TTs was the lowest after completing FF (P = 0.69, η(p)(2) = 0.05) compared to HF (P = 0.08, η(p)(2) = 0.26) and EF (P = 0.07, η(p)(2) = 0.21). In the FF group after TT2, the effect size for changes in TT duration was small (d < 0.49). There were large differences between later TTs in HF (d = 1.02, TT3-TT4) and EF (d = 1.12, TT4-TT5). The variability in mean power output profiles between trials was lowest within FF, with a similar pacing profile reproduced between TT3-TT5. Discussion: Familiarization of the exercise protocol influenced reproducibility of pacing and performance over multiple, maximal TTs, with best results obtained after a full experience of the exercise compared to HF and EF. The difference of TT1 to later TTs indicates that one familiarization is not adequate in reducing the variability of performance for novice participants. After the FF and an additional TT, performance changes between TTs were small, however, a reproducible pacing profile was not developed until after the FF and two additional TTs. These findings indicate that a minimum of three full familiarizations are necessary for novice participants to limit systematic error before experimental testing.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5517464
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55174642017-08-03 Familiarization Protocol Influences Reproducibility of 20-km Cycling Time-Trial Performance in Novice Participants Hibbert, Andrew W. Billaut, François Varley, Matthew C. Polman, Remco C. J. Front Physiol Physiology Introduction: Exercise performance is reproducible in experienced athletes; however, less trained participants exhibit greater variability in performance and pacing. To reduce variability, it is common practice to complete a familiarization prior to experimental testing. However, there are no clear guidelines for familiarizing novice participants to a cycling time-trial (TT), and research findings from novice populations may still be influenced by learning effects. Accordingly, the aims of this study were to establish the variability between TTs after administering differing familiarization protocols (duration or type) and to establish the number of familiarization trials required to limit variability over multiple trials. Methods: Thirty recreationally active participants, with no prior experience of a TT, performed a 20-km cycling TT on five separate occasions, after completing either a full (FF, 20-km TT, n = 10), a half (HF, 10-km TT, n = 10) or an equipment familiarization (EF, 5-min cycling, n = 10). Results: Variability of TT duration across five TTs was the lowest after completing FF (P = 0.69, η(p)(2) = 0.05) compared to HF (P = 0.08, η(p)(2) = 0.26) and EF (P = 0.07, η(p)(2) = 0.21). In the FF group after TT2, the effect size for changes in TT duration was small (d < 0.49). There were large differences between later TTs in HF (d = 1.02, TT3-TT4) and EF (d = 1.12, TT4-TT5). The variability in mean power output profiles between trials was lowest within FF, with a similar pacing profile reproduced between TT3-TT5. Discussion: Familiarization of the exercise protocol influenced reproducibility of pacing and performance over multiple, maximal TTs, with best results obtained after a full experience of the exercise compared to HF and EF. The difference of TT1 to later TTs indicates that one familiarization is not adequate in reducing the variability of performance for novice participants. After the FF and an additional TT, performance changes between TTs were small, however, a reproducible pacing profile was not developed until after the FF and two additional TTs. These findings indicate that a minimum of three full familiarizations are necessary for novice participants to limit systematic error before experimental testing. Frontiers Media S.A. 2017-07-20 /pmc/articles/PMC5517464/ /pubmed/28775692 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2017.00488 Text en Copyright © 2017 Hibbert, Billaut, Varley and Polman. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Physiology
Hibbert, Andrew W.
Billaut, François
Varley, Matthew C.
Polman, Remco C. J.
Familiarization Protocol Influences Reproducibility of 20-km Cycling Time-Trial Performance in Novice Participants
title Familiarization Protocol Influences Reproducibility of 20-km Cycling Time-Trial Performance in Novice Participants
title_full Familiarization Protocol Influences Reproducibility of 20-km Cycling Time-Trial Performance in Novice Participants
title_fullStr Familiarization Protocol Influences Reproducibility of 20-km Cycling Time-Trial Performance in Novice Participants
title_full_unstemmed Familiarization Protocol Influences Reproducibility of 20-km Cycling Time-Trial Performance in Novice Participants
title_short Familiarization Protocol Influences Reproducibility of 20-km Cycling Time-Trial Performance in Novice Participants
title_sort familiarization protocol influences reproducibility of 20-km cycling time-trial performance in novice participants
topic Physiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5517464/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28775692
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2017.00488
work_keys_str_mv AT hibbertandreww familiarizationprotocolinfluencesreproducibilityof20kmcyclingtimetrialperformanceinnoviceparticipants
AT billautfrancois familiarizationprotocolinfluencesreproducibilityof20kmcyclingtimetrialperformanceinnoviceparticipants
AT varleymatthewc familiarizationprotocolinfluencesreproducibilityof20kmcyclingtimetrialperformanceinnoviceparticipants
AT polmanremcocj familiarizationprotocolinfluencesreproducibilityof20kmcyclingtimetrialperformanceinnoviceparticipants