Cargando…

Prominent differences in left ventricular performance and myocardial properties between right ventricular and left ventricular-based pacing modes in rats

Biventricular pacing is an important modality to improve left ventricular (LV) synchronization and long-term function. However, the biological effects of this treatment are far from being elucidated and existing animal models are limited and demanding. Recently, we introduced an implanted device for...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mulla, Wesam, Etzion, Sharon, Elyagon, Sigal, Gillis, Roni, Murninkas, Michael, Konstantino, Yuval, Mannhardt, Ingra, Eschenhagen, Thomas, Liel-Cohen, Noah, Etzion, Yoram
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5517524/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28725029
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-06197-w
_version_ 1783251304456388608
author Mulla, Wesam
Etzion, Sharon
Elyagon, Sigal
Gillis, Roni
Murninkas, Michael
Konstantino, Yuval
Mannhardt, Ingra
Eschenhagen, Thomas
Liel-Cohen, Noah
Etzion, Yoram
author_facet Mulla, Wesam
Etzion, Sharon
Elyagon, Sigal
Gillis, Roni
Murninkas, Michael
Konstantino, Yuval
Mannhardt, Ingra
Eschenhagen, Thomas
Liel-Cohen, Noah
Etzion, Yoram
author_sort Mulla, Wesam
collection PubMed
description Biventricular pacing is an important modality to improve left ventricular (LV) synchronization and long-term function. However, the biological effects of this treatment are far from being elucidated and existing animal models are limited and demanding. Recently, we introduced an implanted device for double-site epicardial pacing in rats and echocardiographically demonstrated favorable effects of LV and biventricular (LV-based) pacing modes typically observed in humans. Here, this new animal model was further characterized. Electrodes were implanted either on the right atria (RA) and right ventricle (RV) or on the RV and LV. Following recovery, rats were either used for invasive hemodynamic measurements (pressure-volume analysis) or exposed to sustained RV vs. biventricular tachypacing for 3 days. RV pacing compromised, while LV-based pacing modes markedly enhanced cardiac performance. Changes in LV performance were associated with prominent compensatory changes in arterial resistance. Sustained RV tachypacing increased the electrocardiogram QTc interval by 7.9 ± 3.1 ms (n = 6, p < 0.05), dispersed refractoriness between the right and left pacing sites and induced important molecular changes mainly in the early-activated septal tissue. These effects were not observed during biventricular tachypacing (n = 6). Our results demonstrate that the rat is an attractive new model to study the biological consequences of LV dyssynchrony and resynchronization.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5517524
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55175242017-07-20 Prominent differences in left ventricular performance and myocardial properties between right ventricular and left ventricular-based pacing modes in rats Mulla, Wesam Etzion, Sharon Elyagon, Sigal Gillis, Roni Murninkas, Michael Konstantino, Yuval Mannhardt, Ingra Eschenhagen, Thomas Liel-Cohen, Noah Etzion, Yoram Sci Rep Article Biventricular pacing is an important modality to improve left ventricular (LV) synchronization and long-term function. However, the biological effects of this treatment are far from being elucidated and existing animal models are limited and demanding. Recently, we introduced an implanted device for double-site epicardial pacing in rats and echocardiographically demonstrated favorable effects of LV and biventricular (LV-based) pacing modes typically observed in humans. Here, this new animal model was further characterized. Electrodes were implanted either on the right atria (RA) and right ventricle (RV) or on the RV and LV. Following recovery, rats were either used for invasive hemodynamic measurements (pressure-volume analysis) or exposed to sustained RV vs. biventricular tachypacing for 3 days. RV pacing compromised, while LV-based pacing modes markedly enhanced cardiac performance. Changes in LV performance were associated with prominent compensatory changes in arterial resistance. Sustained RV tachypacing increased the electrocardiogram QTc interval by 7.9 ± 3.1 ms (n = 6, p < 0.05), dispersed refractoriness between the right and left pacing sites and induced important molecular changes mainly in the early-activated septal tissue. These effects were not observed during biventricular tachypacing (n = 6). Our results demonstrate that the rat is an attractive new model to study the biological consequences of LV dyssynchrony and resynchronization. Nature Publishing Group UK 2017-07-19 /pmc/articles/PMC5517524/ /pubmed/28725029 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-06197-w Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Mulla, Wesam
Etzion, Sharon
Elyagon, Sigal
Gillis, Roni
Murninkas, Michael
Konstantino, Yuval
Mannhardt, Ingra
Eschenhagen, Thomas
Liel-Cohen, Noah
Etzion, Yoram
Prominent differences in left ventricular performance and myocardial properties between right ventricular and left ventricular-based pacing modes in rats
title Prominent differences in left ventricular performance and myocardial properties between right ventricular and left ventricular-based pacing modes in rats
title_full Prominent differences in left ventricular performance and myocardial properties between right ventricular and left ventricular-based pacing modes in rats
title_fullStr Prominent differences in left ventricular performance and myocardial properties between right ventricular and left ventricular-based pacing modes in rats
title_full_unstemmed Prominent differences in left ventricular performance and myocardial properties between right ventricular and left ventricular-based pacing modes in rats
title_short Prominent differences in left ventricular performance and myocardial properties between right ventricular and left ventricular-based pacing modes in rats
title_sort prominent differences in left ventricular performance and myocardial properties between right ventricular and left ventricular-based pacing modes in rats
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5517524/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28725029
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-06197-w
work_keys_str_mv AT mullawesam prominentdifferencesinleftventricularperformanceandmyocardialpropertiesbetweenrightventricularandleftventricularbasedpacingmodesinrats
AT etzionsharon prominentdifferencesinleftventricularperformanceandmyocardialpropertiesbetweenrightventricularandleftventricularbasedpacingmodesinrats
AT elyagonsigal prominentdifferencesinleftventricularperformanceandmyocardialpropertiesbetweenrightventricularandleftventricularbasedpacingmodesinrats
AT gillisroni prominentdifferencesinleftventricularperformanceandmyocardialpropertiesbetweenrightventricularandleftventricularbasedpacingmodesinrats
AT murninkasmichael prominentdifferencesinleftventricularperformanceandmyocardialpropertiesbetweenrightventricularandleftventricularbasedpacingmodesinrats
AT konstantinoyuval prominentdifferencesinleftventricularperformanceandmyocardialpropertiesbetweenrightventricularandleftventricularbasedpacingmodesinrats
AT mannhardtingra prominentdifferencesinleftventricularperformanceandmyocardialpropertiesbetweenrightventricularandleftventricularbasedpacingmodesinrats
AT eschenhagenthomas prominentdifferencesinleftventricularperformanceandmyocardialpropertiesbetweenrightventricularandleftventricularbasedpacingmodesinrats
AT lielcohennoah prominentdifferencesinleftventricularperformanceandmyocardialpropertiesbetweenrightventricularandleftventricularbasedpacingmodesinrats
AT etzionyoram prominentdifferencesinleftventricularperformanceandmyocardialpropertiesbetweenrightventricularandleftventricularbasedpacingmodesinrats