Cargando…

Closed incision prophylactic negative pressure wound therapy in patients undergoing major complex abdominal wall repair

PURPOSE: To evaluate if incisional prophylactic negative pressure wound therapy (pNPWT) reduces wound infections and other wound complications in high-risk patients undergoing major complex ventral abdominal wall repair. METHODS: Retrospective before–after comparison nested in a consecutive series o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: de Vries, F. E. E., Atema, J. J., Lapid, O., Obdeijn, M. C., Boermeester, M. A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Paris 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5517612/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28534258
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10029-017-1620-0
_version_ 1783251325654401024
author de Vries, F. E. E.
Atema, J. J.
Lapid, O.
Obdeijn, M. C.
Boermeester, M. A.
author_facet de Vries, F. E. E.
Atema, J. J.
Lapid, O.
Obdeijn, M. C.
Boermeester, M. A.
author_sort de Vries, F. E. E.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To evaluate if incisional prophylactic negative pressure wound therapy (pNPWT) reduces wound infections and other wound complications in high-risk patients undergoing major complex ventral abdominal wall repair. METHODS: Retrospective before–after comparison nested in a consecutive series of patients undergoing elective major complex abdominal wall repair. Starting January 2014, pNPWT was applied on the closed incisional wound for a minimum of 5 days. To minimize selection bias, we compared two periods of 14 months before and after January 2014. Wound infections according to the Centre for Disease Control Surgical Site Infection classification as well as other wound complications were recorded. RESULTS: Thirty-two patients were included in the pNPWT group and 34 in the control group. The study group involved clean-contaminated and contaminated operations due to enterocutaneous fistula, enterostomies or infected mesh. Median duration of pNPWT was 5 days (IQR 5–7). Overall wound infection rate was 35%. pNPWT was associated with a significant decrease in postoperative wound infection rate (24 versus 51%; p = 0.029, OR 0.30 (95% CI 0.10–0.90)). Incisional wound infection rates dropped from 48 to 7% (p < 0.01, OR 0.08 (95% CI 0.16–0.39), whereas the number of subcutaneous abscesses was comparable in both groups. Moreover, less interventions were needed in the pNPWT group (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Closed incision pNPWT seems a promising solution to reduce the incidence of wound infections in complex abdominal wall surgery. Randomized controlled trials are needed to estimate more precisely the value and cost-effectiveness of pNPWT in this high-risk setting.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5517612
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Springer Paris
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55176122017-08-03 Closed incision prophylactic negative pressure wound therapy in patients undergoing major complex abdominal wall repair de Vries, F. E. E. Atema, J. J. Lapid, O. Obdeijn, M. C. Boermeester, M. A. Hernia Original Article PURPOSE: To evaluate if incisional prophylactic negative pressure wound therapy (pNPWT) reduces wound infections and other wound complications in high-risk patients undergoing major complex ventral abdominal wall repair. METHODS: Retrospective before–after comparison nested in a consecutive series of patients undergoing elective major complex abdominal wall repair. Starting January 2014, pNPWT was applied on the closed incisional wound for a minimum of 5 days. To minimize selection bias, we compared two periods of 14 months before and after January 2014. Wound infections according to the Centre for Disease Control Surgical Site Infection classification as well as other wound complications were recorded. RESULTS: Thirty-two patients were included in the pNPWT group and 34 in the control group. The study group involved clean-contaminated and contaminated operations due to enterocutaneous fistula, enterostomies or infected mesh. Median duration of pNPWT was 5 days (IQR 5–7). Overall wound infection rate was 35%. pNPWT was associated with a significant decrease in postoperative wound infection rate (24 versus 51%; p = 0.029, OR 0.30 (95% CI 0.10–0.90)). Incisional wound infection rates dropped from 48 to 7% (p < 0.01, OR 0.08 (95% CI 0.16–0.39), whereas the number of subcutaneous abscesses was comparable in both groups. Moreover, less interventions were needed in the pNPWT group (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Closed incision pNPWT seems a promising solution to reduce the incidence of wound infections in complex abdominal wall surgery. Randomized controlled trials are needed to estimate more precisely the value and cost-effectiveness of pNPWT in this high-risk setting. Springer Paris 2017-05-23 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5517612/ /pubmed/28534258 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10029-017-1620-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Article
de Vries, F. E. E.
Atema, J. J.
Lapid, O.
Obdeijn, M. C.
Boermeester, M. A.
Closed incision prophylactic negative pressure wound therapy in patients undergoing major complex abdominal wall repair
title Closed incision prophylactic negative pressure wound therapy in patients undergoing major complex abdominal wall repair
title_full Closed incision prophylactic negative pressure wound therapy in patients undergoing major complex abdominal wall repair
title_fullStr Closed incision prophylactic negative pressure wound therapy in patients undergoing major complex abdominal wall repair
title_full_unstemmed Closed incision prophylactic negative pressure wound therapy in patients undergoing major complex abdominal wall repair
title_short Closed incision prophylactic negative pressure wound therapy in patients undergoing major complex abdominal wall repair
title_sort closed incision prophylactic negative pressure wound therapy in patients undergoing major complex abdominal wall repair
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5517612/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28534258
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10029-017-1620-0
work_keys_str_mv AT devriesfee closedincisionprophylacticnegativepressurewoundtherapyinpatientsundergoingmajorcomplexabdominalwallrepair
AT atemajj closedincisionprophylacticnegativepressurewoundtherapyinpatientsundergoingmajorcomplexabdominalwallrepair
AT lapido closedincisionprophylacticnegativepressurewoundtherapyinpatientsundergoingmajorcomplexabdominalwallrepair
AT obdeijnmc closedincisionprophylacticnegativepressurewoundtherapyinpatientsundergoingmajorcomplexabdominalwallrepair
AT boermeesterma closedincisionprophylacticnegativepressurewoundtherapyinpatientsundergoingmajorcomplexabdominalwallrepair