Cargando…

Inactivation combined with cell lysis of Pseudomonas putida using a low pressure carbon dioxide microbubble technology

BACKGROUND: Inactivation processes can be classified into non‐thermal inactivation methods such as ethylene oxide and γ‐radiation, and thermal methods such as autoclaving. The ability of carbon dioxide enriched microbubbles to inactivate Pseudomonas putida suspended in physiological saline, as a non...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mulakhudair, Ali R, Al‐Mashhadani, Mahmood, Hanotu, James, Zimmerman, William
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5518213/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28781404
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jctb.5299
_version_ 1783251449994543104
author Mulakhudair, Ali R
Al‐Mashhadani, Mahmood
Hanotu, James
Zimmerman, William
author_facet Mulakhudair, Ali R
Al‐Mashhadani, Mahmood
Hanotu, James
Zimmerman, William
author_sort Mulakhudair, Ali R
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Inactivation processes can be classified into non‐thermal inactivation methods such as ethylene oxide and γ‐radiation, and thermal methods such as autoclaving. The ability of carbon dioxide enriched microbubbles to inactivate Pseudomonas putida suspended in physiological saline, as a non‐thermal sterilisation method, was investigated in this study with many operational advantages over both traditional thermal and non‐thermal sterilisation methods. RESULTS: Introducing carbon dioxide enriched microbubbles can achieve ∼2‐Log reduction in the bacterial population after 90 min of treatment, addition of ethanol to the inactivation solution further enhanced the inactivation process to achieve 3, 2.5 and 3.5‐Log reduction for 2%, 5% and 10 %( v/v) ethanol, respectively. A range of morphological changes was observed on Pseudomonas cells after each treatment, and these changes extended from changing cell shape from rod shape to coccus shape to severe lesions and cell death. Pseudomonas putida KT 2440 was used as a model of gram‐negative bacteria. CONCLUSION: Using CO(2) enriched microbubbles technology has many advantages such as efficient energy consumption (no heat source), avoidance of toxic and corrosive reagents, and in situ treatment. In addition, many findings from this study could apply to other gram‐negative bacteria. © 2017 The Authors. Journal of Chemical Technology & Biotechnology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society of Chemical Industry.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5518213
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55182132017-08-03 Inactivation combined with cell lysis of Pseudomonas putida using a low pressure carbon dioxide microbubble technology Mulakhudair, Ali R Al‐Mashhadani, Mahmood Hanotu, James Zimmerman, William J Chem Technol Biotechnol Research Articles BACKGROUND: Inactivation processes can be classified into non‐thermal inactivation methods such as ethylene oxide and γ‐radiation, and thermal methods such as autoclaving. The ability of carbon dioxide enriched microbubbles to inactivate Pseudomonas putida suspended in physiological saline, as a non‐thermal sterilisation method, was investigated in this study with many operational advantages over both traditional thermal and non‐thermal sterilisation methods. RESULTS: Introducing carbon dioxide enriched microbubbles can achieve ∼2‐Log reduction in the bacterial population after 90 min of treatment, addition of ethanol to the inactivation solution further enhanced the inactivation process to achieve 3, 2.5 and 3.5‐Log reduction for 2%, 5% and 10 %( v/v) ethanol, respectively. A range of morphological changes was observed on Pseudomonas cells after each treatment, and these changes extended from changing cell shape from rod shape to coccus shape to severe lesions and cell death. Pseudomonas putida KT 2440 was used as a model of gram‐negative bacteria. CONCLUSION: Using CO(2) enriched microbubbles technology has many advantages such as efficient energy consumption (no heat source), avoidance of toxic and corrosive reagents, and in situ treatment. In addition, many findings from this study could apply to other gram‐negative bacteria. © 2017 The Authors. Journal of Chemical Technology & Biotechnology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society of Chemical Industry. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd 2017-05-12 2017-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5518213/ /pubmed/28781404 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jctb.5299 Text en © 2017 The Authors. Journal of Chemical Technology & Biotechnology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society of Chemical Industry. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Mulakhudair, Ali R
Al‐Mashhadani, Mahmood
Hanotu, James
Zimmerman, William
Inactivation combined with cell lysis of Pseudomonas putida using a low pressure carbon dioxide microbubble technology
title Inactivation combined with cell lysis of Pseudomonas putida using a low pressure carbon dioxide microbubble technology
title_full Inactivation combined with cell lysis of Pseudomonas putida using a low pressure carbon dioxide microbubble technology
title_fullStr Inactivation combined with cell lysis of Pseudomonas putida using a low pressure carbon dioxide microbubble technology
title_full_unstemmed Inactivation combined with cell lysis of Pseudomonas putida using a low pressure carbon dioxide microbubble technology
title_short Inactivation combined with cell lysis of Pseudomonas putida using a low pressure carbon dioxide microbubble technology
title_sort inactivation combined with cell lysis of pseudomonas putida using a low pressure carbon dioxide microbubble technology
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5518213/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28781404
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jctb.5299
work_keys_str_mv AT mulakhudairalir inactivationcombinedwithcelllysisofpseudomonasputidausingalowpressurecarbondioxidemicrobubbletechnology
AT almashhadanimahmood inactivationcombinedwithcelllysisofpseudomonasputidausingalowpressurecarbondioxidemicrobubbletechnology
AT hanotujames inactivationcombinedwithcelllysisofpseudomonasputidausingalowpressurecarbondioxidemicrobubbletechnology
AT zimmermanwilliam inactivationcombinedwithcelllysisofpseudomonasputidausingalowpressurecarbondioxidemicrobubbletechnology