Cargando…
Inactivation combined with cell lysis of Pseudomonas putida using a low pressure carbon dioxide microbubble technology
BACKGROUND: Inactivation processes can be classified into non‐thermal inactivation methods such as ethylene oxide and γ‐radiation, and thermal methods such as autoclaving. The ability of carbon dioxide enriched microbubbles to inactivate Pseudomonas putida suspended in physiological saline, as a non...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5518213/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28781404 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jctb.5299 |
_version_ | 1783251449994543104 |
---|---|
author | Mulakhudair, Ali R Al‐Mashhadani, Mahmood Hanotu, James Zimmerman, William |
author_facet | Mulakhudair, Ali R Al‐Mashhadani, Mahmood Hanotu, James Zimmerman, William |
author_sort | Mulakhudair, Ali R |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Inactivation processes can be classified into non‐thermal inactivation methods such as ethylene oxide and γ‐radiation, and thermal methods such as autoclaving. The ability of carbon dioxide enriched microbubbles to inactivate Pseudomonas putida suspended in physiological saline, as a non‐thermal sterilisation method, was investigated in this study with many operational advantages over both traditional thermal and non‐thermal sterilisation methods. RESULTS: Introducing carbon dioxide enriched microbubbles can achieve ∼2‐Log reduction in the bacterial population after 90 min of treatment, addition of ethanol to the inactivation solution further enhanced the inactivation process to achieve 3, 2.5 and 3.5‐Log reduction for 2%, 5% and 10 %( v/v) ethanol, respectively. A range of morphological changes was observed on Pseudomonas cells after each treatment, and these changes extended from changing cell shape from rod shape to coccus shape to severe lesions and cell death. Pseudomonas putida KT 2440 was used as a model of gram‐negative bacteria. CONCLUSION: Using CO(2) enriched microbubbles technology has many advantages such as efficient energy consumption (no heat source), avoidance of toxic and corrosive reagents, and in situ treatment. In addition, many findings from this study could apply to other gram‐negative bacteria. © 2017 The Authors. Journal of Chemical Technology & Biotechnology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society of Chemical Industry. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5518213 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | John Wiley & Sons, Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55182132017-08-03 Inactivation combined with cell lysis of Pseudomonas putida using a low pressure carbon dioxide microbubble technology Mulakhudair, Ali R Al‐Mashhadani, Mahmood Hanotu, James Zimmerman, William J Chem Technol Biotechnol Research Articles BACKGROUND: Inactivation processes can be classified into non‐thermal inactivation methods such as ethylene oxide and γ‐radiation, and thermal methods such as autoclaving. The ability of carbon dioxide enriched microbubbles to inactivate Pseudomonas putida suspended in physiological saline, as a non‐thermal sterilisation method, was investigated in this study with many operational advantages over both traditional thermal and non‐thermal sterilisation methods. RESULTS: Introducing carbon dioxide enriched microbubbles can achieve ∼2‐Log reduction in the bacterial population after 90 min of treatment, addition of ethanol to the inactivation solution further enhanced the inactivation process to achieve 3, 2.5 and 3.5‐Log reduction for 2%, 5% and 10 %( v/v) ethanol, respectively. A range of morphological changes was observed on Pseudomonas cells after each treatment, and these changes extended from changing cell shape from rod shape to coccus shape to severe lesions and cell death. Pseudomonas putida KT 2440 was used as a model of gram‐negative bacteria. CONCLUSION: Using CO(2) enriched microbubbles technology has many advantages such as efficient energy consumption (no heat source), avoidance of toxic and corrosive reagents, and in situ treatment. In addition, many findings from this study could apply to other gram‐negative bacteria. © 2017 The Authors. Journal of Chemical Technology & Biotechnology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society of Chemical Industry. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd 2017-05-12 2017-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5518213/ /pubmed/28781404 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jctb.5299 Text en © 2017 The Authors. Journal of Chemical Technology & Biotechnology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society of Chemical Industry. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Articles Mulakhudair, Ali R Al‐Mashhadani, Mahmood Hanotu, James Zimmerman, William Inactivation combined with cell lysis of Pseudomonas putida using a low pressure carbon dioxide microbubble technology |
title | Inactivation combined with cell lysis of Pseudomonas putida using a low pressure carbon dioxide microbubble technology |
title_full | Inactivation combined with cell lysis of Pseudomonas putida using a low pressure carbon dioxide microbubble technology |
title_fullStr | Inactivation combined with cell lysis of Pseudomonas putida using a low pressure carbon dioxide microbubble technology |
title_full_unstemmed | Inactivation combined with cell lysis of Pseudomonas putida using a low pressure carbon dioxide microbubble technology |
title_short | Inactivation combined with cell lysis of Pseudomonas putida using a low pressure carbon dioxide microbubble technology |
title_sort | inactivation combined with cell lysis of pseudomonas putida using a low pressure carbon dioxide microbubble technology |
topic | Research Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5518213/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28781404 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jctb.5299 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mulakhudairalir inactivationcombinedwithcelllysisofpseudomonasputidausingalowpressurecarbondioxidemicrobubbletechnology AT almashhadanimahmood inactivationcombinedwithcelllysisofpseudomonasputidausingalowpressurecarbondioxidemicrobubbletechnology AT hanotujames inactivationcombinedwithcelllysisofpseudomonasputidausingalowpressurecarbondioxidemicrobubbletechnology AT zimmermanwilliam inactivationcombinedwithcelllysisofpseudomonasputidausingalowpressurecarbondioxidemicrobubbletechnology |