Cargando…

Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for the assessment of non‐alcoholic fatty liver disease severity

BACKGROUND & AIMS: The diagnosis of non‐alcoholic steatohepatitis and fibrosis staging are central to non‐alcoholic fatty liver disease assessment. We evaluated multiparametric magnetic resonance in the assessment of non‐alcoholic steatohepatitis and fibrosis using histology as standard in non‐a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pavlides, Michael, Banerjee, Rajarshi, Tunnicliffe, Elizabeth M., Kelly, Catherine, Collier, Jane, Wang, Lai Mun, Fleming, Kenneth A., Cobbold, Jeremy F., Robson, Matthew D., Neubauer, Stefan, Barnes, Eleanor
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5518289/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27778429
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/liv.13284
_version_ 1783251466989862912
author Pavlides, Michael
Banerjee, Rajarshi
Tunnicliffe, Elizabeth M.
Kelly, Catherine
Collier, Jane
Wang, Lai Mun
Fleming, Kenneth A.
Cobbold, Jeremy F.
Robson, Matthew D.
Neubauer, Stefan
Barnes, Eleanor
author_facet Pavlides, Michael
Banerjee, Rajarshi
Tunnicliffe, Elizabeth M.
Kelly, Catherine
Collier, Jane
Wang, Lai Mun
Fleming, Kenneth A.
Cobbold, Jeremy F.
Robson, Matthew D.
Neubauer, Stefan
Barnes, Eleanor
author_sort Pavlides, Michael
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND & AIMS: The diagnosis of non‐alcoholic steatohepatitis and fibrosis staging are central to non‐alcoholic fatty liver disease assessment. We evaluated multiparametric magnetic resonance in the assessment of non‐alcoholic steatohepatitis and fibrosis using histology as standard in non‐alcoholic fatty liver disease. METHODS: Seventy‐one patients with suspected non‐alcoholic fatty liver disease were recruited within 1 month of liver biopsy. Magnetic resonance data were used to define the liver inflammation and fibrosis score (LIF 0‐4). Biopsies were assessed for steatosis, lobular inflammation, ballooning and fibrosis and classified as non‐alcoholic steatohepatitis or simple steatosis, and mild or significant (Activity ≥2 and/or Fibrosis ≥2 as defined by the Fatty Liver Inhibition of Progression consortium) non‐alcoholic fatty liver disease. Transient elastography was also performed. RESULTS: Magnetic resonance success rate was 95% vs 59% for transient elastography (P<.0001). Fibrosis stage on biopsy correlated with liver inflammation and fibrosis (r (s)=.51, P<.0001). The area under the receiver operating curve using liver inflammation and fibrosis for the diagnosis of cirrhosis was 0.85. Liver inflammation and fibrosis score for ballooning grades 0, 1 and 2 was 1.2, 2.7 and 3.5 respectively (P<.05) with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.83 for the diagnosis of ballooning. Patients with steatosis had lower liver inflammation and fibrosis (1.3) compared to patients with non‐alcoholic steatohepatitis (3.0) (P<.0001); area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for the diagnosis of non‐alcoholic steatohepatitis was 0.80. Liver inflammation and fibrosis scores for patients with mild and significant non‐alcoholic fatty liver disease were 1.2 and 2.9 respectively (P<.0001). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of liver inflammation and fibrosis for the diagnosis of significant non‐alcoholic fatty liver disease was 0.89. CONCLUSIONS: Multiparametric magnetic resonance is a promising technique with good diagnostic accuracy for non‐alcoholic fatty liver disease histological parameters, and can potentially identify patients with non‐alcoholic steatohepatitis and cirrhosis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5518289
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55182892017-08-03 Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for the assessment of non‐alcoholic fatty liver disease severity Pavlides, Michael Banerjee, Rajarshi Tunnicliffe, Elizabeth M. Kelly, Catherine Collier, Jane Wang, Lai Mun Fleming, Kenneth A. Cobbold, Jeremy F. Robson, Matthew D. Neubauer, Stefan Barnes, Eleanor Liver Int Metabolic Liver Disease BACKGROUND & AIMS: The diagnosis of non‐alcoholic steatohepatitis and fibrosis staging are central to non‐alcoholic fatty liver disease assessment. We evaluated multiparametric magnetic resonance in the assessment of non‐alcoholic steatohepatitis and fibrosis using histology as standard in non‐alcoholic fatty liver disease. METHODS: Seventy‐one patients with suspected non‐alcoholic fatty liver disease were recruited within 1 month of liver biopsy. Magnetic resonance data were used to define the liver inflammation and fibrosis score (LIF 0‐4). Biopsies were assessed for steatosis, lobular inflammation, ballooning and fibrosis and classified as non‐alcoholic steatohepatitis or simple steatosis, and mild or significant (Activity ≥2 and/or Fibrosis ≥2 as defined by the Fatty Liver Inhibition of Progression consortium) non‐alcoholic fatty liver disease. Transient elastography was also performed. RESULTS: Magnetic resonance success rate was 95% vs 59% for transient elastography (P<.0001). Fibrosis stage on biopsy correlated with liver inflammation and fibrosis (r (s)=.51, P<.0001). The area under the receiver operating curve using liver inflammation and fibrosis for the diagnosis of cirrhosis was 0.85. Liver inflammation and fibrosis score for ballooning grades 0, 1 and 2 was 1.2, 2.7 and 3.5 respectively (P<.05) with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.83 for the diagnosis of ballooning. Patients with steatosis had lower liver inflammation and fibrosis (1.3) compared to patients with non‐alcoholic steatohepatitis (3.0) (P<.0001); area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for the diagnosis of non‐alcoholic steatohepatitis was 0.80. Liver inflammation and fibrosis scores for patients with mild and significant non‐alcoholic fatty liver disease were 1.2 and 2.9 respectively (P<.0001). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of liver inflammation and fibrosis for the diagnosis of significant non‐alcoholic fatty liver disease was 0.89. CONCLUSIONS: Multiparametric magnetic resonance is a promising technique with good diagnostic accuracy for non‐alcoholic fatty liver disease histological parameters, and can potentially identify patients with non‐alcoholic steatohepatitis and cirrhosis. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-05-30 2017-07 /pmc/articles/PMC5518289/ /pubmed/27778429 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/liv.13284 Text en © 2017 The Authors Liver International Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Metabolic Liver Disease
Pavlides, Michael
Banerjee, Rajarshi
Tunnicliffe, Elizabeth M.
Kelly, Catherine
Collier, Jane
Wang, Lai Mun
Fleming, Kenneth A.
Cobbold, Jeremy F.
Robson, Matthew D.
Neubauer, Stefan
Barnes, Eleanor
Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for the assessment of non‐alcoholic fatty liver disease severity
title Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for the assessment of non‐alcoholic fatty liver disease severity
title_full Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for the assessment of non‐alcoholic fatty liver disease severity
title_fullStr Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for the assessment of non‐alcoholic fatty liver disease severity
title_full_unstemmed Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for the assessment of non‐alcoholic fatty liver disease severity
title_short Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for the assessment of non‐alcoholic fatty liver disease severity
title_sort multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for the assessment of non‐alcoholic fatty liver disease severity
topic Metabolic Liver Disease
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5518289/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27778429
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/liv.13284
work_keys_str_mv AT pavlidesmichael multiparametricmagneticresonanceimagingfortheassessmentofnonalcoholicfattyliverdiseaseseverity
AT banerjeerajarshi multiparametricmagneticresonanceimagingfortheassessmentofnonalcoholicfattyliverdiseaseseverity
AT tunnicliffeelizabethm multiparametricmagneticresonanceimagingfortheassessmentofnonalcoholicfattyliverdiseaseseverity
AT kellycatherine multiparametricmagneticresonanceimagingfortheassessmentofnonalcoholicfattyliverdiseaseseverity
AT collierjane multiparametricmagneticresonanceimagingfortheassessmentofnonalcoholicfattyliverdiseaseseverity
AT wanglaimun multiparametricmagneticresonanceimagingfortheassessmentofnonalcoholicfattyliverdiseaseseverity
AT flemingkennetha multiparametricmagneticresonanceimagingfortheassessmentofnonalcoholicfattyliverdiseaseseverity
AT cobboldjeremyf multiparametricmagneticresonanceimagingfortheassessmentofnonalcoholicfattyliverdiseaseseverity
AT robsonmatthewd multiparametricmagneticresonanceimagingfortheassessmentofnonalcoholicfattyliverdiseaseseverity
AT neubauerstefan multiparametricmagneticresonanceimagingfortheassessmentofnonalcoholicfattyliverdiseaseseverity
AT barneseleanor multiparametricmagneticresonanceimagingfortheassessmentofnonalcoholicfattyliverdiseaseseverity