Cargando…

Radiation for persistent or recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer: a need for reassessment

PURPOSE: The role of radiotherapy (RT) was largely deserted after the introduction of platinum-based chemotherapy, but still survival rates are disappointingly low. This study focuses on assessing the clinical efficacy of RT in relation to chemotherapy resistance. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From October...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Choi, Noorie, Chang, Ji Hyun, Kim, Suzy, Kim, Hak Jae
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Society for Radiation Oncology 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5518454/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28712280
http://dx.doi.org/10.3857/roj.2017.00213
_version_ 1783251497041002496
author Choi, Noorie
Chang, Ji Hyun
Kim, Suzy
Kim, Hak Jae
author_facet Choi, Noorie
Chang, Ji Hyun
Kim, Suzy
Kim, Hak Jae
author_sort Choi, Noorie
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The role of radiotherapy (RT) was largely deserted after the introduction of platinum-based chemotherapy, but still survival rates are disappointingly low. This study focuses on assessing the clinical efficacy of RT in relation to chemotherapy resistance. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From October 2002 to January 2015, 44 patients were diagnosed with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) and treated with palliative RT for persistent or recurrent EOC. All patients received initial treatment with optimal debulking surgery and adjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy. The biologically effective dose (BED) was calculated with α/β set at 10. Ninety-four sites were treated with RT with a median BED of 50.7 Gy (range 28.0 to 79.2 Gy). The primary end-point was the in-field local control (LC) interval, defined as the time interval from the date RT was completed to the date any progressive or newly recurring disease within the RT field was detected on radiographic imaging. RESULTS: The median follow-up duration was 52.3 months (range 7.7 to 179.0 months). The 1-year and 2-year in-field LC rates were 66.0% and 55.0%, respectively. Comparisons of percent change of in-field tumor response showed similar distribution of responses among chemoresistant and chemosensitive tumors. On multivariate analysis of predictive factors for in-field LC analyzed by sites treated, BED ≥ 50 Gy (hazard ratio, 0.4; confidence interval, 0.2–0.9; p = 0.025) showed better outcomes. CONCLUSION: Regardless of resistance to platinum-based chemotherapy, RT can be a feasible treatment modality for patients with persistent of recurrent EOC. The specific role of RT using updated approaches needs to be reassessed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5518454
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher The Korean Society for Radiation Oncology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55184542017-07-20 Radiation for persistent or recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer: a need for reassessment Choi, Noorie Chang, Ji Hyun Kim, Suzy Kim, Hak Jae Radiat Oncol J Original Article PURPOSE: The role of radiotherapy (RT) was largely deserted after the introduction of platinum-based chemotherapy, but still survival rates are disappointingly low. This study focuses on assessing the clinical efficacy of RT in relation to chemotherapy resistance. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From October 2002 to January 2015, 44 patients were diagnosed with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) and treated with palliative RT for persistent or recurrent EOC. All patients received initial treatment with optimal debulking surgery and adjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy. The biologically effective dose (BED) was calculated with α/β set at 10. Ninety-four sites were treated with RT with a median BED of 50.7 Gy (range 28.0 to 79.2 Gy). The primary end-point was the in-field local control (LC) interval, defined as the time interval from the date RT was completed to the date any progressive or newly recurring disease within the RT field was detected on radiographic imaging. RESULTS: The median follow-up duration was 52.3 months (range 7.7 to 179.0 months). The 1-year and 2-year in-field LC rates were 66.0% and 55.0%, respectively. Comparisons of percent change of in-field tumor response showed similar distribution of responses among chemoresistant and chemosensitive tumors. On multivariate analysis of predictive factors for in-field LC analyzed by sites treated, BED ≥ 50 Gy (hazard ratio, 0.4; confidence interval, 0.2–0.9; p = 0.025) showed better outcomes. CONCLUSION: Regardless of resistance to platinum-based chemotherapy, RT can be a feasible treatment modality for patients with persistent of recurrent EOC. The specific role of RT using updated approaches needs to be reassessed. The Korean Society for Radiation Oncology 2017-06 2017-06-30 /pmc/articles/PMC5518454/ /pubmed/28712280 http://dx.doi.org/10.3857/roj.2017.00213 Text en Copyright © 2017. The Korean Society for Radiation Oncology This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) ) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Choi, Noorie
Chang, Ji Hyun
Kim, Suzy
Kim, Hak Jae
Radiation for persistent or recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer: a need for reassessment
title Radiation for persistent or recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer: a need for reassessment
title_full Radiation for persistent or recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer: a need for reassessment
title_fullStr Radiation for persistent or recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer: a need for reassessment
title_full_unstemmed Radiation for persistent or recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer: a need for reassessment
title_short Radiation for persistent or recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer: a need for reassessment
title_sort radiation for persistent or recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer: a need for reassessment
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5518454/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28712280
http://dx.doi.org/10.3857/roj.2017.00213
work_keys_str_mv AT choinoorie radiationforpersistentorrecurrentepithelialovariancanceraneedforreassessment
AT changjihyun radiationforpersistentorrecurrentepithelialovariancanceraneedforreassessment
AT kimsuzy radiationforpersistentorrecurrentepithelialovariancanceraneedforreassessment
AT kimhakjae radiationforpersistentorrecurrentepithelialovariancanceraneedforreassessment