Cargando…
Mutation status among patients with sinonasal mucosal melanoma and its impact on survival
BACKGROUND: Sinonasal mucosal melanoma (SNMM) comprises <1% of all melanomas and lacks well-characterised molecular markers. Our aim was to determine the frequencies of common mutations and examine their utility as molecular markers in a large series of primary SNMMs. METHODS: SNMM patients seen...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5518854/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28494469 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2017.125 |
_version_ | 1783251544432443392 |
---|---|
author | Amit, Moran Tam, Samantha Abdelmeguid, Ahmed S Roberts, Dianna B Takahashi, Yoko Raza, Shaan M Su, Shirley Y Kupferman, Michael E DeMonte, Franco Hanna, Ehab Y |
author_facet | Amit, Moran Tam, Samantha Abdelmeguid, Ahmed S Roberts, Dianna B Takahashi, Yoko Raza, Shaan M Su, Shirley Y Kupferman, Michael E DeMonte, Franco Hanna, Ehab Y |
author_sort | Amit, Moran |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Sinonasal mucosal melanoma (SNMM) comprises <1% of all melanomas and lacks well-characterised molecular markers. Our aim was to determine the frequencies of common mutations and examine their utility as molecular markers in a large series of primary SNMMs. METHODS: SNMM patients seen at our institution from August 1991 through July 2016 were identified. Genomic DNA was extracted from 66 formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumours and screened for mutations by direct sequencing. We investigated the association of mutations with clinicopathological features and survival outcomes. RESULTS: Overall, 41% (27 out of 66) of the SNMMs harboured mutations. BRAF and KIT mutations were identified in 8% (five patients) and 5% (three patients) of SNMMs, respectively, whereas NRAS mutations were detected in 30% (20 patients) of SNMMs. Mutation rates in these oncogenes were similar between SNMMs located in the paranasal sinuses and those in the nasal cavity (30% and 13%, respectively, P=0.09). In a multivariate analysis, patients with negative margins had significantly better overall survival (hazard ratio 5.43, 95% confidence interval 1.44–21.85, P=0.01) and disease-specific survival (hazard ratio 21.9, 95% confidence interval 3.71–180, P=0.0004). The mutation status of the tumours showed no association with survival outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: In SNNM, mutation status does not affect survival outcomes, but NRAS mutations are relatively frequent and could be targeted in this disease by MEK inhibitors. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5518854 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55188542018-06-06 Mutation status among patients with sinonasal mucosal melanoma and its impact on survival Amit, Moran Tam, Samantha Abdelmeguid, Ahmed S Roberts, Dianna B Takahashi, Yoko Raza, Shaan M Su, Shirley Y Kupferman, Michael E DeMonte, Franco Hanna, Ehab Y Br J Cancer Molecular Diagnostics BACKGROUND: Sinonasal mucosal melanoma (SNMM) comprises <1% of all melanomas and lacks well-characterised molecular markers. Our aim was to determine the frequencies of common mutations and examine their utility as molecular markers in a large series of primary SNMMs. METHODS: SNMM patients seen at our institution from August 1991 through July 2016 were identified. Genomic DNA was extracted from 66 formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumours and screened for mutations by direct sequencing. We investigated the association of mutations with clinicopathological features and survival outcomes. RESULTS: Overall, 41% (27 out of 66) of the SNMMs harboured mutations. BRAF and KIT mutations were identified in 8% (five patients) and 5% (three patients) of SNMMs, respectively, whereas NRAS mutations were detected in 30% (20 patients) of SNMMs. Mutation rates in these oncogenes were similar between SNMMs located in the paranasal sinuses and those in the nasal cavity (30% and 13%, respectively, P=0.09). In a multivariate analysis, patients with negative margins had significantly better overall survival (hazard ratio 5.43, 95% confidence interval 1.44–21.85, P=0.01) and disease-specific survival (hazard ratio 21.9, 95% confidence interval 3.71–180, P=0.0004). The mutation status of the tumours showed no association with survival outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: In SNNM, mutation status does not affect survival outcomes, but NRAS mutations are relatively frequent and could be targeted in this disease by MEK inhibitors. Nature Publishing Group 2017-06-06 2017-05-11 /pmc/articles/PMC5518854/ /pubmed/28494469 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2017.125 Text en Copyright © 2017 Cancer Research UK http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ From twelve months after its original publication, this work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-Share Alike 4.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Molecular Diagnostics Amit, Moran Tam, Samantha Abdelmeguid, Ahmed S Roberts, Dianna B Takahashi, Yoko Raza, Shaan M Su, Shirley Y Kupferman, Michael E DeMonte, Franco Hanna, Ehab Y Mutation status among patients with sinonasal mucosal melanoma and its impact on survival |
title | Mutation status among patients with sinonasal mucosal melanoma and its impact on survival |
title_full | Mutation status among patients with sinonasal mucosal melanoma and its impact on survival |
title_fullStr | Mutation status among patients with sinonasal mucosal melanoma and its impact on survival |
title_full_unstemmed | Mutation status among patients with sinonasal mucosal melanoma and its impact on survival |
title_short | Mutation status among patients with sinonasal mucosal melanoma and its impact on survival |
title_sort | mutation status among patients with sinonasal mucosal melanoma and its impact on survival |
topic | Molecular Diagnostics |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5518854/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28494469 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2017.125 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT amitmoran mutationstatusamongpatientswithsinonasalmucosalmelanomaanditsimpactonsurvival AT tamsamantha mutationstatusamongpatientswithsinonasalmucosalmelanomaanditsimpactonsurvival AT abdelmeguidahmeds mutationstatusamongpatientswithsinonasalmucosalmelanomaanditsimpactonsurvival AT robertsdiannab mutationstatusamongpatientswithsinonasalmucosalmelanomaanditsimpactonsurvival AT takahashiyoko mutationstatusamongpatientswithsinonasalmucosalmelanomaanditsimpactonsurvival AT razashaanm mutationstatusamongpatientswithsinonasalmucosalmelanomaanditsimpactonsurvival AT sushirleyy mutationstatusamongpatientswithsinonasalmucosalmelanomaanditsimpactonsurvival AT kupfermanmichaele mutationstatusamongpatientswithsinonasalmucosalmelanomaanditsimpactonsurvival AT demontefranco mutationstatusamongpatientswithsinonasalmucosalmelanomaanditsimpactonsurvival AT hannaehaby mutationstatusamongpatientswithsinonasalmucosalmelanomaanditsimpactonsurvival |