Cargando…

GP participation in increasing uptake in a national bowel cancer screening programme: the PEARL project

BACKGROUND: The NHS Bowel Cancer Screening Programme (BCSP) in England does not involve general practitioners (GPs). Uptake is ∼58%. The Practice Endorsed Additional Reminder Letter (PEARL) study piloted a GP-endorsed reminder letter. METHODS: General practices in Wessex with uptake <55% (prevale...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Benton, Sally C, Butler, Piers, Allen, Katy, Chesters, Michelle, Rickard, Sally, Stanley, Sally, Roope, Richard, Vulkan, Daniel, Duffy, Stephen W
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5518858/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28524157
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2017.129
_version_ 1783251545413910528
author Benton, Sally C
Butler, Piers
Allen, Katy
Chesters, Michelle
Rickard, Sally
Stanley, Sally
Roope, Richard
Vulkan, Daniel
Duffy, Stephen W
author_facet Benton, Sally C
Butler, Piers
Allen, Katy
Chesters, Michelle
Rickard, Sally
Stanley, Sally
Roope, Richard
Vulkan, Daniel
Duffy, Stephen W
author_sort Benton, Sally C
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The NHS Bowel Cancer Screening Programme (BCSP) in England does not involve general practitioners (GPs). Uptake is ∼58%. The Practice Endorsed Additional Reminder Letter (PEARL) study piloted a GP-endorsed reminder letter. METHODS: General practices in Wessex with uptake <55% (prevalent invitations) were invited to participate. Subjects who had been invited for screening, sent a standard 28-day BCSP reminder letter but had not returned a test kit within 30 days of the standard reminder were sent a second reminder letter bearing the GP’s letterhead and signature. Uptake was compared between PEARL and non-PEARL practices by standardised uptake ratio (standardised for prior prevalent uptake and other confounders). In addition, 25 non-PEARL practices were matched with PEARL practices for prior prevalent uptake and number of invitees. RESULTS: Twenty-five practices agreed to participate. A total of 3149 GP-endorsed reminders were sent. Uptake in the PEARL practices was 54% compared with 51% in the matched-control practices. The adjusted RR for uptake was 1.08 (95% CI: 1.05, 1.11, P<0.001) for all invitees and 2.18 (1.79, 2.66, P<0.001) for invitees who had not returned a kit following the standard reminder. CONCLUSIONS: The GP-endorsed reminder was associated with significantly increased uptake among subjects not responding to the standard reminder letter.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5518858
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55188582017-07-24 GP participation in increasing uptake in a national bowel cancer screening programme: the PEARL project Benton, Sally C Butler, Piers Allen, Katy Chesters, Michelle Rickard, Sally Stanley, Sally Roope, Richard Vulkan, Daniel Duffy, Stephen W Br J Cancer Clinical Study BACKGROUND: The NHS Bowel Cancer Screening Programme (BCSP) in England does not involve general practitioners (GPs). Uptake is ∼58%. The Practice Endorsed Additional Reminder Letter (PEARL) study piloted a GP-endorsed reminder letter. METHODS: General practices in Wessex with uptake <55% (prevalent invitations) were invited to participate. Subjects who had been invited for screening, sent a standard 28-day BCSP reminder letter but had not returned a test kit within 30 days of the standard reminder were sent a second reminder letter bearing the GP’s letterhead and signature. Uptake was compared between PEARL and non-PEARL practices by standardised uptake ratio (standardised for prior prevalent uptake and other confounders). In addition, 25 non-PEARL practices were matched with PEARL practices for prior prevalent uptake and number of invitees. RESULTS: Twenty-five practices agreed to participate. A total of 3149 GP-endorsed reminders were sent. Uptake in the PEARL practices was 54% compared with 51% in the matched-control practices. The adjusted RR for uptake was 1.08 (95% CI: 1.05, 1.11, P<0.001) for all invitees and 2.18 (1.79, 2.66, P<0.001) for invitees who had not returned a kit following the standard reminder. CONCLUSIONS: The GP-endorsed reminder was associated with significantly increased uptake among subjects not responding to the standard reminder letter. Nature Publishing Group 2017-06-06 2017-05-18 /pmc/articles/PMC5518858/ /pubmed/28524157 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2017.129 Text en Copyright © 2017 The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Clinical Study
Benton, Sally C
Butler, Piers
Allen, Katy
Chesters, Michelle
Rickard, Sally
Stanley, Sally
Roope, Richard
Vulkan, Daniel
Duffy, Stephen W
GP participation in increasing uptake in a national bowel cancer screening programme: the PEARL project
title GP participation in increasing uptake in a national bowel cancer screening programme: the PEARL project
title_full GP participation in increasing uptake in a national bowel cancer screening programme: the PEARL project
title_fullStr GP participation in increasing uptake in a national bowel cancer screening programme: the PEARL project
title_full_unstemmed GP participation in increasing uptake in a national bowel cancer screening programme: the PEARL project
title_short GP participation in increasing uptake in a national bowel cancer screening programme: the PEARL project
title_sort gp participation in increasing uptake in a national bowel cancer screening programme: the pearl project
topic Clinical Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5518858/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28524157
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2017.129
work_keys_str_mv AT bentonsallyc gpparticipationinincreasinguptakeinanationalbowelcancerscreeningprogrammethepearlproject
AT butlerpiers gpparticipationinincreasinguptakeinanationalbowelcancerscreeningprogrammethepearlproject
AT allenkaty gpparticipationinincreasinguptakeinanationalbowelcancerscreeningprogrammethepearlproject
AT chestersmichelle gpparticipationinincreasinguptakeinanationalbowelcancerscreeningprogrammethepearlproject
AT rickardsally gpparticipationinincreasinguptakeinanationalbowelcancerscreeningprogrammethepearlproject
AT stanleysally gpparticipationinincreasinguptakeinanationalbowelcancerscreeningprogrammethepearlproject
AT rooperichard gpparticipationinincreasinguptakeinanationalbowelcancerscreeningprogrammethepearlproject
AT vulkandaniel gpparticipationinincreasinguptakeinanationalbowelcancerscreeningprogrammethepearlproject
AT duffystephenw gpparticipationinincreasinguptakeinanationalbowelcancerscreeningprogrammethepearlproject