Cargando…
GP participation in increasing uptake in a national bowel cancer screening programme: the PEARL project
BACKGROUND: The NHS Bowel Cancer Screening Programme (BCSP) in England does not involve general practitioners (GPs). Uptake is ∼58%. The Practice Endorsed Additional Reminder Letter (PEARL) study piloted a GP-endorsed reminder letter. METHODS: General practices in Wessex with uptake <55% (prevale...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5518858/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28524157 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2017.129 |
_version_ | 1783251545413910528 |
---|---|
author | Benton, Sally C Butler, Piers Allen, Katy Chesters, Michelle Rickard, Sally Stanley, Sally Roope, Richard Vulkan, Daniel Duffy, Stephen W |
author_facet | Benton, Sally C Butler, Piers Allen, Katy Chesters, Michelle Rickard, Sally Stanley, Sally Roope, Richard Vulkan, Daniel Duffy, Stephen W |
author_sort | Benton, Sally C |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The NHS Bowel Cancer Screening Programme (BCSP) in England does not involve general practitioners (GPs). Uptake is ∼58%. The Practice Endorsed Additional Reminder Letter (PEARL) study piloted a GP-endorsed reminder letter. METHODS: General practices in Wessex with uptake <55% (prevalent invitations) were invited to participate. Subjects who had been invited for screening, sent a standard 28-day BCSP reminder letter but had not returned a test kit within 30 days of the standard reminder were sent a second reminder letter bearing the GP’s letterhead and signature. Uptake was compared between PEARL and non-PEARL practices by standardised uptake ratio (standardised for prior prevalent uptake and other confounders). In addition, 25 non-PEARL practices were matched with PEARL practices for prior prevalent uptake and number of invitees. RESULTS: Twenty-five practices agreed to participate. A total of 3149 GP-endorsed reminders were sent. Uptake in the PEARL practices was 54% compared with 51% in the matched-control practices. The adjusted RR for uptake was 1.08 (95% CI: 1.05, 1.11, P<0.001) for all invitees and 2.18 (1.79, 2.66, P<0.001) for invitees who had not returned a kit following the standard reminder. CONCLUSIONS: The GP-endorsed reminder was associated with significantly increased uptake among subjects not responding to the standard reminder letter. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5518858 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55188582017-07-24 GP participation in increasing uptake in a national bowel cancer screening programme: the PEARL project Benton, Sally C Butler, Piers Allen, Katy Chesters, Michelle Rickard, Sally Stanley, Sally Roope, Richard Vulkan, Daniel Duffy, Stephen W Br J Cancer Clinical Study BACKGROUND: The NHS Bowel Cancer Screening Programme (BCSP) in England does not involve general practitioners (GPs). Uptake is ∼58%. The Practice Endorsed Additional Reminder Letter (PEARL) study piloted a GP-endorsed reminder letter. METHODS: General practices in Wessex with uptake <55% (prevalent invitations) were invited to participate. Subjects who had been invited for screening, sent a standard 28-day BCSP reminder letter but had not returned a test kit within 30 days of the standard reminder were sent a second reminder letter bearing the GP’s letterhead and signature. Uptake was compared between PEARL and non-PEARL practices by standardised uptake ratio (standardised for prior prevalent uptake and other confounders). In addition, 25 non-PEARL practices were matched with PEARL practices for prior prevalent uptake and number of invitees. RESULTS: Twenty-five practices agreed to participate. A total of 3149 GP-endorsed reminders were sent. Uptake in the PEARL practices was 54% compared with 51% in the matched-control practices. The adjusted RR for uptake was 1.08 (95% CI: 1.05, 1.11, P<0.001) for all invitees and 2.18 (1.79, 2.66, P<0.001) for invitees who had not returned a kit following the standard reminder. CONCLUSIONS: The GP-endorsed reminder was associated with significantly increased uptake among subjects not responding to the standard reminder letter. Nature Publishing Group 2017-06-06 2017-05-18 /pmc/articles/PMC5518858/ /pubmed/28524157 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2017.129 Text en Copyright © 2017 The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Clinical Study Benton, Sally C Butler, Piers Allen, Katy Chesters, Michelle Rickard, Sally Stanley, Sally Roope, Richard Vulkan, Daniel Duffy, Stephen W GP participation in increasing uptake in a national bowel cancer screening programme: the PEARL project |
title | GP participation in increasing uptake in a national bowel cancer screening programme: the PEARL project |
title_full | GP participation in increasing uptake in a national bowel cancer screening programme: the PEARL project |
title_fullStr | GP participation in increasing uptake in a national bowel cancer screening programme: the PEARL project |
title_full_unstemmed | GP participation in increasing uptake in a national bowel cancer screening programme: the PEARL project |
title_short | GP participation in increasing uptake in a national bowel cancer screening programme: the PEARL project |
title_sort | gp participation in increasing uptake in a national bowel cancer screening programme: the pearl project |
topic | Clinical Study |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5518858/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28524157 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2017.129 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bentonsallyc gpparticipationinincreasinguptakeinanationalbowelcancerscreeningprogrammethepearlproject AT butlerpiers gpparticipationinincreasinguptakeinanationalbowelcancerscreeningprogrammethepearlproject AT allenkaty gpparticipationinincreasinguptakeinanationalbowelcancerscreeningprogrammethepearlproject AT chestersmichelle gpparticipationinincreasinguptakeinanationalbowelcancerscreeningprogrammethepearlproject AT rickardsally gpparticipationinincreasinguptakeinanationalbowelcancerscreeningprogrammethepearlproject AT stanleysally gpparticipationinincreasinguptakeinanationalbowelcancerscreeningprogrammethepearlproject AT rooperichard gpparticipationinincreasinguptakeinanationalbowelcancerscreeningprogrammethepearlproject AT vulkandaniel gpparticipationinincreasinguptakeinanationalbowelcancerscreeningprogrammethepearlproject AT duffystephenw gpparticipationinincreasinguptakeinanationalbowelcancerscreeningprogrammethepearlproject |