Cargando…
Systematic review: Outcome reporting bias is a problem in high impact factor neurology journals
BACKGROUND: Selective outcome reporting is a significant methodological concern. Comparisons between the outcomes reported in clinical trial registrations and those later published allow investigators to understand the extent of selection bias among trialists. We examined the possibility of selectiv...
Autores principales: | Howard, Benjamin, Scott, Jared T., Blubaugh, Mark, Roepke, Brie, Scheckel, Caleb, Vassar, Matt |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5519049/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28727834 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0180986 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Evidence of selective reporting bias in hematology journals: A systematic review
por: Wayant, Cole, et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
Is publication bias present in gastroenterological research? An analysis of abstracts presented at an annual congress
por: Meyer, Chase, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
An Evaluation of Publication Bias in High-Impact Orthopaedic Literature
por: Scott, Jared, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Citation bias in otolaryngology systematic reviews
por: Vassar, Matt, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Shoulder Arthroplasty Trials Are Infrequently Registered: A Systematic Review of Trials
por: Sims, Matthew Thomas, et al.
Publicado: (2016)