Cargando…

The disc damage likelihood scale: Diagnostic accuracy and correlations with cup-to-disc ratio, structural tests and standard automated perimetry

Our objective was to compare the diagnostic accuracies of and to determine the correlations between the disc damage likelihood scale (DDLS) and anatomical and functional tests used for glaucoma detection. A total of 54 healthy subjects (54 eyes) and 47 primary open-angle glaucoma patients (47 eyes)...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kara-José, Andrea C., Melo, Luiz Alberto S., Esporcatte, Bruno L. B., Endo, Angelica T. N. H., Leite, Mauro Toledo, Tavares, Ivan Maynart
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5519156/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28727836
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0181428
_version_ 1783251587700883456
author Kara-José, Andrea C.
Melo, Luiz Alberto S.
Esporcatte, Bruno L. B.
Endo, Angelica T. N. H.
Leite, Mauro Toledo
Tavares, Ivan Maynart
author_facet Kara-José, Andrea C.
Melo, Luiz Alberto S.
Esporcatte, Bruno L. B.
Endo, Angelica T. N. H.
Leite, Mauro Toledo
Tavares, Ivan Maynart
author_sort Kara-José, Andrea C.
collection PubMed
description Our objective was to compare the diagnostic accuracies of and to determine the correlations between the disc damage likelihood scale (DDLS) and anatomical and functional tests used for glaucoma detection. A total of 54 healthy subjects (54 eyes) and 47 primary open-angle glaucoma patients (47 eyes) were included in this cross-sectional observational study. DDLS scores and cup-to-disc (C/D) ratios were evaluated. Subjects underwent standard automated perimetry (SAP), optic disc and retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) imaging with time and spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (TD and SD-OCT), Heidelberg Retina Tomograph (HRT II), and scanning laser polarimetry (GDx-VCC). Areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AROCs) for DDLS and diagnostic tests parameters were calculated. DDLS correlations (Spearman's rank) among these parameters were analyzed. Fifty-four eyes were healthy and 47 had glaucoma, including 16 preperimetric glaucoma. DDLS, vertical and horizontal C/D ratios had the largest AROCs (0.92, 0.94 and 0.91, respectively). DDLS diagnostic accuracy was better than the accuracies of HRT II parameters, TD and SD-OCT RNFL thicknesses, and SAP mean deviation (MD) index. There were no significant differences between the accuracies of the DDLS and the C/D ratios, TD-OCT vertical (0.89) and horizontal (0.86) C/D ratios, TD-OCT C/D area ratio (0.89), and GDx-VCC NFI (0.81). DDLS showed significant strong correlations with vertical (r = 0.79) and horizontal (0.74) C/D ratios, and with the parameters vertical C/D ratio and C/D area ratio from HRT II (both 0.77) and TD-OCT (0.75 and 0.72, respectively). DDLS had significant moderate correlations with most of the other structural measurements and SAP MD. The optic disc clinical evaluation with DDLS system and C/D ratio demonstrated excellent accuracy in distinguishing glaucomatous from healthy eyes. DDLS had moderate to strong correlations with most structural and functional parameters. These findings stress the importance of optic disc clinical examination to detect glaucoma in a clinical scenario.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5519156
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55191562017-08-07 The disc damage likelihood scale: Diagnostic accuracy and correlations with cup-to-disc ratio, structural tests and standard automated perimetry Kara-José, Andrea C. Melo, Luiz Alberto S. Esporcatte, Bruno L. B. Endo, Angelica T. N. H. Leite, Mauro Toledo Tavares, Ivan Maynart PLoS One Research Article Our objective was to compare the diagnostic accuracies of and to determine the correlations between the disc damage likelihood scale (DDLS) and anatomical and functional tests used for glaucoma detection. A total of 54 healthy subjects (54 eyes) and 47 primary open-angle glaucoma patients (47 eyes) were included in this cross-sectional observational study. DDLS scores and cup-to-disc (C/D) ratios were evaluated. Subjects underwent standard automated perimetry (SAP), optic disc and retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) imaging with time and spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (TD and SD-OCT), Heidelberg Retina Tomograph (HRT II), and scanning laser polarimetry (GDx-VCC). Areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AROCs) for DDLS and diagnostic tests parameters were calculated. DDLS correlations (Spearman's rank) among these parameters were analyzed. Fifty-four eyes were healthy and 47 had glaucoma, including 16 preperimetric glaucoma. DDLS, vertical and horizontal C/D ratios had the largest AROCs (0.92, 0.94 and 0.91, respectively). DDLS diagnostic accuracy was better than the accuracies of HRT II parameters, TD and SD-OCT RNFL thicknesses, and SAP mean deviation (MD) index. There were no significant differences between the accuracies of the DDLS and the C/D ratios, TD-OCT vertical (0.89) and horizontal (0.86) C/D ratios, TD-OCT C/D area ratio (0.89), and GDx-VCC NFI (0.81). DDLS showed significant strong correlations with vertical (r = 0.79) and horizontal (0.74) C/D ratios, and with the parameters vertical C/D ratio and C/D area ratio from HRT II (both 0.77) and TD-OCT (0.75 and 0.72, respectively). DDLS had significant moderate correlations with most of the other structural measurements and SAP MD. The optic disc clinical evaluation with DDLS system and C/D ratio demonstrated excellent accuracy in distinguishing glaucomatous from healthy eyes. DDLS had moderate to strong correlations with most structural and functional parameters. These findings stress the importance of optic disc clinical examination to detect glaucoma in a clinical scenario. Public Library of Science 2017-07-20 /pmc/articles/PMC5519156/ /pubmed/28727836 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0181428 Text en © 2017 Kara-José et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Kara-José, Andrea C.
Melo, Luiz Alberto S.
Esporcatte, Bruno L. B.
Endo, Angelica T. N. H.
Leite, Mauro Toledo
Tavares, Ivan Maynart
The disc damage likelihood scale: Diagnostic accuracy and correlations with cup-to-disc ratio, structural tests and standard automated perimetry
title The disc damage likelihood scale: Diagnostic accuracy and correlations with cup-to-disc ratio, structural tests and standard automated perimetry
title_full The disc damage likelihood scale: Diagnostic accuracy and correlations with cup-to-disc ratio, structural tests and standard automated perimetry
title_fullStr The disc damage likelihood scale: Diagnostic accuracy and correlations with cup-to-disc ratio, structural tests and standard automated perimetry
title_full_unstemmed The disc damage likelihood scale: Diagnostic accuracy and correlations with cup-to-disc ratio, structural tests and standard automated perimetry
title_short The disc damage likelihood scale: Diagnostic accuracy and correlations with cup-to-disc ratio, structural tests and standard automated perimetry
title_sort disc damage likelihood scale: diagnostic accuracy and correlations with cup-to-disc ratio, structural tests and standard automated perimetry
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5519156/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28727836
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0181428
work_keys_str_mv AT karajoseandreac thediscdamagelikelihoodscalediagnosticaccuracyandcorrelationswithcuptodiscratiostructuraltestsandstandardautomatedperimetry
AT meloluizalbertos thediscdamagelikelihoodscalediagnosticaccuracyandcorrelationswithcuptodiscratiostructuraltestsandstandardautomatedperimetry
AT esporcattebrunolb thediscdamagelikelihoodscalediagnosticaccuracyandcorrelationswithcuptodiscratiostructuraltestsandstandardautomatedperimetry
AT endoangelicatnh thediscdamagelikelihoodscalediagnosticaccuracyandcorrelationswithcuptodiscratiostructuraltestsandstandardautomatedperimetry
AT leitemaurotoledo thediscdamagelikelihoodscalediagnosticaccuracyandcorrelationswithcuptodiscratiostructuraltestsandstandardautomatedperimetry
AT tavaresivanmaynart thediscdamagelikelihoodscalediagnosticaccuracyandcorrelationswithcuptodiscratiostructuraltestsandstandardautomatedperimetry
AT karajoseandreac discdamagelikelihoodscalediagnosticaccuracyandcorrelationswithcuptodiscratiostructuraltestsandstandardautomatedperimetry
AT meloluizalbertos discdamagelikelihoodscalediagnosticaccuracyandcorrelationswithcuptodiscratiostructuraltestsandstandardautomatedperimetry
AT esporcattebrunolb discdamagelikelihoodscalediagnosticaccuracyandcorrelationswithcuptodiscratiostructuraltestsandstandardautomatedperimetry
AT endoangelicatnh discdamagelikelihoodscalediagnosticaccuracyandcorrelationswithcuptodiscratiostructuraltestsandstandardautomatedperimetry
AT leitemaurotoledo discdamagelikelihoodscalediagnosticaccuracyandcorrelationswithcuptodiscratiostructuraltestsandstandardautomatedperimetry
AT tavaresivanmaynart discdamagelikelihoodscalediagnosticaccuracyandcorrelationswithcuptodiscratiostructuraltestsandstandardautomatedperimetry