Cargando…
The disc damage likelihood scale: Diagnostic accuracy and correlations with cup-to-disc ratio, structural tests and standard automated perimetry
Our objective was to compare the diagnostic accuracies of and to determine the correlations between the disc damage likelihood scale (DDLS) and anatomical and functional tests used for glaucoma detection. A total of 54 healthy subjects (54 eyes) and 47 primary open-angle glaucoma patients (47 eyes)...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5519156/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28727836 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0181428 |
_version_ | 1783251587700883456 |
---|---|
author | Kara-José, Andrea C. Melo, Luiz Alberto S. Esporcatte, Bruno L. B. Endo, Angelica T. N. H. Leite, Mauro Toledo Tavares, Ivan Maynart |
author_facet | Kara-José, Andrea C. Melo, Luiz Alberto S. Esporcatte, Bruno L. B. Endo, Angelica T. N. H. Leite, Mauro Toledo Tavares, Ivan Maynart |
author_sort | Kara-José, Andrea C. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Our objective was to compare the diagnostic accuracies of and to determine the correlations between the disc damage likelihood scale (DDLS) and anatomical and functional tests used for glaucoma detection. A total of 54 healthy subjects (54 eyes) and 47 primary open-angle glaucoma patients (47 eyes) were included in this cross-sectional observational study. DDLS scores and cup-to-disc (C/D) ratios were evaluated. Subjects underwent standard automated perimetry (SAP), optic disc and retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) imaging with time and spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (TD and SD-OCT), Heidelberg Retina Tomograph (HRT II), and scanning laser polarimetry (GDx-VCC). Areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AROCs) for DDLS and diagnostic tests parameters were calculated. DDLS correlations (Spearman's rank) among these parameters were analyzed. Fifty-four eyes were healthy and 47 had glaucoma, including 16 preperimetric glaucoma. DDLS, vertical and horizontal C/D ratios had the largest AROCs (0.92, 0.94 and 0.91, respectively). DDLS diagnostic accuracy was better than the accuracies of HRT II parameters, TD and SD-OCT RNFL thicknesses, and SAP mean deviation (MD) index. There were no significant differences between the accuracies of the DDLS and the C/D ratios, TD-OCT vertical (0.89) and horizontal (0.86) C/D ratios, TD-OCT C/D area ratio (0.89), and GDx-VCC NFI (0.81). DDLS showed significant strong correlations with vertical (r = 0.79) and horizontal (0.74) C/D ratios, and with the parameters vertical C/D ratio and C/D area ratio from HRT II (both 0.77) and TD-OCT (0.75 and 0.72, respectively). DDLS had significant moderate correlations with most of the other structural measurements and SAP MD. The optic disc clinical evaluation with DDLS system and C/D ratio demonstrated excellent accuracy in distinguishing glaucomatous from healthy eyes. DDLS had moderate to strong correlations with most structural and functional parameters. These findings stress the importance of optic disc clinical examination to detect glaucoma in a clinical scenario. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5519156 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55191562017-08-07 The disc damage likelihood scale: Diagnostic accuracy and correlations with cup-to-disc ratio, structural tests and standard automated perimetry Kara-José, Andrea C. Melo, Luiz Alberto S. Esporcatte, Bruno L. B. Endo, Angelica T. N. H. Leite, Mauro Toledo Tavares, Ivan Maynart PLoS One Research Article Our objective was to compare the diagnostic accuracies of and to determine the correlations between the disc damage likelihood scale (DDLS) and anatomical and functional tests used for glaucoma detection. A total of 54 healthy subjects (54 eyes) and 47 primary open-angle glaucoma patients (47 eyes) were included in this cross-sectional observational study. DDLS scores and cup-to-disc (C/D) ratios were evaluated. Subjects underwent standard automated perimetry (SAP), optic disc and retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) imaging with time and spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (TD and SD-OCT), Heidelberg Retina Tomograph (HRT II), and scanning laser polarimetry (GDx-VCC). Areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AROCs) for DDLS and diagnostic tests parameters were calculated. DDLS correlations (Spearman's rank) among these parameters were analyzed. Fifty-four eyes were healthy and 47 had glaucoma, including 16 preperimetric glaucoma. DDLS, vertical and horizontal C/D ratios had the largest AROCs (0.92, 0.94 and 0.91, respectively). DDLS diagnostic accuracy was better than the accuracies of HRT II parameters, TD and SD-OCT RNFL thicknesses, and SAP mean deviation (MD) index. There were no significant differences between the accuracies of the DDLS and the C/D ratios, TD-OCT vertical (0.89) and horizontal (0.86) C/D ratios, TD-OCT C/D area ratio (0.89), and GDx-VCC NFI (0.81). DDLS showed significant strong correlations with vertical (r = 0.79) and horizontal (0.74) C/D ratios, and with the parameters vertical C/D ratio and C/D area ratio from HRT II (both 0.77) and TD-OCT (0.75 and 0.72, respectively). DDLS had significant moderate correlations with most of the other structural measurements and SAP MD. The optic disc clinical evaluation with DDLS system and C/D ratio demonstrated excellent accuracy in distinguishing glaucomatous from healthy eyes. DDLS had moderate to strong correlations with most structural and functional parameters. These findings stress the importance of optic disc clinical examination to detect glaucoma in a clinical scenario. Public Library of Science 2017-07-20 /pmc/articles/PMC5519156/ /pubmed/28727836 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0181428 Text en © 2017 Kara-José et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Kara-José, Andrea C. Melo, Luiz Alberto S. Esporcatte, Bruno L. B. Endo, Angelica T. N. H. Leite, Mauro Toledo Tavares, Ivan Maynart The disc damage likelihood scale: Diagnostic accuracy and correlations with cup-to-disc ratio, structural tests and standard automated perimetry |
title | The disc damage likelihood scale: Diagnostic accuracy and correlations with cup-to-disc ratio, structural tests and standard automated perimetry |
title_full | The disc damage likelihood scale: Diagnostic accuracy and correlations with cup-to-disc ratio, structural tests and standard automated perimetry |
title_fullStr | The disc damage likelihood scale: Diagnostic accuracy and correlations with cup-to-disc ratio, structural tests and standard automated perimetry |
title_full_unstemmed | The disc damage likelihood scale: Diagnostic accuracy and correlations with cup-to-disc ratio, structural tests and standard automated perimetry |
title_short | The disc damage likelihood scale: Diagnostic accuracy and correlations with cup-to-disc ratio, structural tests and standard automated perimetry |
title_sort | disc damage likelihood scale: diagnostic accuracy and correlations with cup-to-disc ratio, structural tests and standard automated perimetry |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5519156/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28727836 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0181428 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT karajoseandreac thediscdamagelikelihoodscalediagnosticaccuracyandcorrelationswithcuptodiscratiostructuraltestsandstandardautomatedperimetry AT meloluizalbertos thediscdamagelikelihoodscalediagnosticaccuracyandcorrelationswithcuptodiscratiostructuraltestsandstandardautomatedperimetry AT esporcattebrunolb thediscdamagelikelihoodscalediagnosticaccuracyandcorrelationswithcuptodiscratiostructuraltestsandstandardautomatedperimetry AT endoangelicatnh thediscdamagelikelihoodscalediagnosticaccuracyandcorrelationswithcuptodiscratiostructuraltestsandstandardautomatedperimetry AT leitemaurotoledo thediscdamagelikelihoodscalediagnosticaccuracyandcorrelationswithcuptodiscratiostructuraltestsandstandardautomatedperimetry AT tavaresivanmaynart thediscdamagelikelihoodscalediagnosticaccuracyandcorrelationswithcuptodiscratiostructuraltestsandstandardautomatedperimetry AT karajoseandreac discdamagelikelihoodscalediagnosticaccuracyandcorrelationswithcuptodiscratiostructuraltestsandstandardautomatedperimetry AT meloluizalbertos discdamagelikelihoodscalediagnosticaccuracyandcorrelationswithcuptodiscratiostructuraltestsandstandardautomatedperimetry AT esporcattebrunolb discdamagelikelihoodscalediagnosticaccuracyandcorrelationswithcuptodiscratiostructuraltestsandstandardautomatedperimetry AT endoangelicatnh discdamagelikelihoodscalediagnosticaccuracyandcorrelationswithcuptodiscratiostructuraltestsandstandardautomatedperimetry AT leitemaurotoledo discdamagelikelihoodscalediagnosticaccuracyandcorrelationswithcuptodiscratiostructuraltestsandstandardautomatedperimetry AT tavaresivanmaynart discdamagelikelihoodscalediagnosticaccuracyandcorrelationswithcuptodiscratiostructuraltestsandstandardautomatedperimetry |