Cargando…

No abatement of steroid injections for tennis elbow in Australian General Practice: A 15-year observational study with random general practitioner sampling

OBJECTIVE: Evaluate general practitioner (GP) management of tennis elbow (TE) in Australia. METHODS: Data about the management of TE by GPs from 2000 to 2015 were extracted from the Bettering the Evaluation of Care of Health program database. Patient and GP characteristics and encounter management d...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vicenzino, Bill, Britt, Helena, Pollack, Allan J., Hall, Michelle, Bennell, Kim L., Hunter, David J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5519163/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28727755
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0181631
_version_ 1783251589188812800
author Vicenzino, Bill
Britt, Helena
Pollack, Allan J.
Hall, Michelle
Bennell, Kim L.
Hunter, David J.
author_facet Vicenzino, Bill
Britt, Helena
Pollack, Allan J.
Hall, Michelle
Bennell, Kim L.
Hunter, David J.
author_sort Vicenzino, Bill
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Evaluate general practitioner (GP) management of tennis elbow (TE) in Australia. METHODS: Data about the management of TE by GPs from 2000 to 2015 were extracted from the Bettering the Evaluation of Care of Health program database. Patient and GP characteristics and encounter management data were classified by the International Classification of Primary Care, version 2, and reported using descriptive statistics with point estimates and 95% confidence intervals. RESULTS: TE was managed by GPs 242,000 times per year on average. Patients were mainly female (52.3%), aged between 35 and 64 years (mean: 49.3 yrs), had higher relative risks of concomitant disorders (e.g. carpal tunnel syndrome and other tendonitis) and their TE was 10 times more likely to be work related than problems managed for patients who did not have TE. Use of diagnostic tests was low, implying a clinical examination based diagnosis of TE. Management was by procedural treatments (36 per 100 TE problems), advice, education or counselling (25 per 100), and referral to other health care providers (14 per 100, mainly to physiotherapy). The rate of local injection did not change over the 15 years and was performed at similar rates as physiotherapy referral. CONCLUSION: The high risk of comorbidities and work relatedness and no abatement in the reasonably high rate of local injections (which is contrary to the evidence from clinical trials) provides support for the development and dissemination of TE clinical guidelines for GPs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5519163
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55191632017-08-07 No abatement of steroid injections for tennis elbow in Australian General Practice: A 15-year observational study with random general practitioner sampling Vicenzino, Bill Britt, Helena Pollack, Allan J. Hall, Michelle Bennell, Kim L. Hunter, David J. PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVE: Evaluate general practitioner (GP) management of tennis elbow (TE) in Australia. METHODS: Data about the management of TE by GPs from 2000 to 2015 were extracted from the Bettering the Evaluation of Care of Health program database. Patient and GP characteristics and encounter management data were classified by the International Classification of Primary Care, version 2, and reported using descriptive statistics with point estimates and 95% confidence intervals. RESULTS: TE was managed by GPs 242,000 times per year on average. Patients were mainly female (52.3%), aged between 35 and 64 years (mean: 49.3 yrs), had higher relative risks of concomitant disorders (e.g. carpal tunnel syndrome and other tendonitis) and their TE was 10 times more likely to be work related than problems managed for patients who did not have TE. Use of diagnostic tests was low, implying a clinical examination based diagnosis of TE. Management was by procedural treatments (36 per 100 TE problems), advice, education or counselling (25 per 100), and referral to other health care providers (14 per 100, mainly to physiotherapy). The rate of local injection did not change over the 15 years and was performed at similar rates as physiotherapy referral. CONCLUSION: The high risk of comorbidities and work relatedness and no abatement in the reasonably high rate of local injections (which is contrary to the evidence from clinical trials) provides support for the development and dissemination of TE clinical guidelines for GPs. Public Library of Science 2017-07-20 /pmc/articles/PMC5519163/ /pubmed/28727755 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0181631 Text en © 2017 Vicenzino et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Vicenzino, Bill
Britt, Helena
Pollack, Allan J.
Hall, Michelle
Bennell, Kim L.
Hunter, David J.
No abatement of steroid injections for tennis elbow in Australian General Practice: A 15-year observational study with random general practitioner sampling
title No abatement of steroid injections for tennis elbow in Australian General Practice: A 15-year observational study with random general practitioner sampling
title_full No abatement of steroid injections for tennis elbow in Australian General Practice: A 15-year observational study with random general practitioner sampling
title_fullStr No abatement of steroid injections for tennis elbow in Australian General Practice: A 15-year observational study with random general practitioner sampling
title_full_unstemmed No abatement of steroid injections for tennis elbow in Australian General Practice: A 15-year observational study with random general practitioner sampling
title_short No abatement of steroid injections for tennis elbow in Australian General Practice: A 15-year observational study with random general practitioner sampling
title_sort no abatement of steroid injections for tennis elbow in australian general practice: a 15-year observational study with random general practitioner sampling
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5519163/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28727755
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0181631
work_keys_str_mv AT vicenzinobill noabatementofsteroidinjectionsfortenniselbowinaustraliangeneralpracticea15yearobservationalstudywithrandomgeneralpractitionersampling
AT britthelena noabatementofsteroidinjectionsfortenniselbowinaustraliangeneralpracticea15yearobservationalstudywithrandomgeneralpractitionersampling
AT pollackallanj noabatementofsteroidinjectionsfortenniselbowinaustraliangeneralpracticea15yearobservationalstudywithrandomgeneralpractitionersampling
AT hallmichelle noabatementofsteroidinjectionsfortenniselbowinaustraliangeneralpracticea15yearobservationalstudywithrandomgeneralpractitionersampling
AT bennellkiml noabatementofsteroidinjectionsfortenniselbowinaustraliangeneralpracticea15yearobservationalstudywithrandomgeneralpractitionersampling
AT hunterdavidj noabatementofsteroidinjectionsfortenniselbowinaustraliangeneralpracticea15yearobservationalstudywithrandomgeneralpractitionersampling