Cargando…

Bedside selection of positive end-expiratory pressure by electrical impedance tomography in hypoxemic patients: a feasibility study

BACKGROUND: Positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) is a key element of mechanical ventilation. It should optimize recruitment, without causing excessive overdistension, but controversy exists on the best method to set it. The purpose of the study was to test the feasibility of setting PEEP with ele...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Eronia, Nilde, Mauri, Tommaso, Maffezzini, Elisabetta, Gatti, Stefano, Bronco, Alfio, Alban, Laura, Binda, Filippo, Sasso, Tommaso, Marenghi, Cristina, Grasselli, Giacomo, Foti, Giuseppe, Pesenti, Antonio, Bellani, Giacomo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5519511/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28730554
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13613-017-0299-9
_version_ 1783251629051478016
author Eronia, Nilde
Mauri, Tommaso
Maffezzini, Elisabetta
Gatti, Stefano
Bronco, Alfio
Alban, Laura
Binda, Filippo
Sasso, Tommaso
Marenghi, Cristina
Grasselli, Giacomo
Foti, Giuseppe
Pesenti, Antonio
Bellani, Giacomo
author_facet Eronia, Nilde
Mauri, Tommaso
Maffezzini, Elisabetta
Gatti, Stefano
Bronco, Alfio
Alban, Laura
Binda, Filippo
Sasso, Tommaso
Marenghi, Cristina
Grasselli, Giacomo
Foti, Giuseppe
Pesenti, Antonio
Bellani, Giacomo
author_sort Eronia, Nilde
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) is a key element of mechanical ventilation. It should optimize recruitment, without causing excessive overdistension, but controversy exists on the best method to set it. The purpose of the study was to test the feasibility of setting PEEP with electrical impedance tomography in order to prevent lung de-recruitment following a recruitment maneuver. We enrolled 16 patients undergoing mechanical ventilation with PaO(2)/FiO(2) <300 mmHg. In all patients, under constant tidal volume (6–8 ml/kg) PEEP was set based on the PEEP/FiO(2) table proposed by the ARDS network (PEEP(ARDSnet)). We performed a recruitment maneuver and monitored the end-expiratory lung impedance (EELI) over 10 min. If the EELI signal decreased during this period, the recruitment maneuver was repeated and PEEP increased by 2 cmH(2)O. This procedure was repeated until the EELI maintained a stability over time (PEEP(EIT)). RESULTS: The procedure was feasible in 87% patients. PEEP(EIT) was higher than PEEP(ARDSnet) (13 ± 3 vs. 9 ± 2 cmH(2)O, p < 0.001). PaO(2)/FiO(2) improved during PEEP(EIT) and driving pressure decreased. Recruited volume correlated with the decrease in driving pressure but not with oxygenation improvement. Finally, regional alveolar hyperdistention and collapse was reduced in dependent lung layers and increased in non-dependent lung layers. CONCLUSIONS: In hypoxemic patients, a PEEP selection strategy aimed at stabilizing alveolar recruitment guided by EIT at the bedside was feasible and safe. This strategy led, in comparison with the ARDSnet table, to higher PEEP, improved oxygenation and reduced driving pressure, allowing to estimate the relative weight of overdistension and recruitment. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13613-017-0299-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5519511
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55195112017-08-02 Bedside selection of positive end-expiratory pressure by electrical impedance tomography in hypoxemic patients: a feasibility study Eronia, Nilde Mauri, Tommaso Maffezzini, Elisabetta Gatti, Stefano Bronco, Alfio Alban, Laura Binda, Filippo Sasso, Tommaso Marenghi, Cristina Grasselli, Giacomo Foti, Giuseppe Pesenti, Antonio Bellani, Giacomo Ann Intensive Care Research BACKGROUND: Positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) is a key element of mechanical ventilation. It should optimize recruitment, without causing excessive overdistension, but controversy exists on the best method to set it. The purpose of the study was to test the feasibility of setting PEEP with electrical impedance tomography in order to prevent lung de-recruitment following a recruitment maneuver. We enrolled 16 patients undergoing mechanical ventilation with PaO(2)/FiO(2) <300 mmHg. In all patients, under constant tidal volume (6–8 ml/kg) PEEP was set based on the PEEP/FiO(2) table proposed by the ARDS network (PEEP(ARDSnet)). We performed a recruitment maneuver and monitored the end-expiratory lung impedance (EELI) over 10 min. If the EELI signal decreased during this period, the recruitment maneuver was repeated and PEEP increased by 2 cmH(2)O. This procedure was repeated until the EELI maintained a stability over time (PEEP(EIT)). RESULTS: The procedure was feasible in 87% patients. PEEP(EIT) was higher than PEEP(ARDSnet) (13 ± 3 vs. 9 ± 2 cmH(2)O, p < 0.001). PaO(2)/FiO(2) improved during PEEP(EIT) and driving pressure decreased. Recruited volume correlated with the decrease in driving pressure but not with oxygenation improvement. Finally, regional alveolar hyperdistention and collapse was reduced in dependent lung layers and increased in non-dependent lung layers. CONCLUSIONS: In hypoxemic patients, a PEEP selection strategy aimed at stabilizing alveolar recruitment guided by EIT at the bedside was feasible and safe. This strategy led, in comparison with the ARDSnet table, to higher PEEP, improved oxygenation and reduced driving pressure, allowing to estimate the relative weight of overdistension and recruitment. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13613-017-0299-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2017-07-20 /pmc/articles/PMC5519511/ /pubmed/28730554 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13613-017-0299-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Research
Eronia, Nilde
Mauri, Tommaso
Maffezzini, Elisabetta
Gatti, Stefano
Bronco, Alfio
Alban, Laura
Binda, Filippo
Sasso, Tommaso
Marenghi, Cristina
Grasselli, Giacomo
Foti, Giuseppe
Pesenti, Antonio
Bellani, Giacomo
Bedside selection of positive end-expiratory pressure by electrical impedance tomography in hypoxemic patients: a feasibility study
title Bedside selection of positive end-expiratory pressure by electrical impedance tomography in hypoxemic patients: a feasibility study
title_full Bedside selection of positive end-expiratory pressure by electrical impedance tomography in hypoxemic patients: a feasibility study
title_fullStr Bedside selection of positive end-expiratory pressure by electrical impedance tomography in hypoxemic patients: a feasibility study
title_full_unstemmed Bedside selection of positive end-expiratory pressure by electrical impedance tomography in hypoxemic patients: a feasibility study
title_short Bedside selection of positive end-expiratory pressure by electrical impedance tomography in hypoxemic patients: a feasibility study
title_sort bedside selection of positive end-expiratory pressure by electrical impedance tomography in hypoxemic patients: a feasibility study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5519511/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28730554
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13613-017-0299-9
work_keys_str_mv AT eronianilde bedsideselectionofpositiveendexpiratorypressurebyelectricalimpedancetomographyinhypoxemicpatientsafeasibilitystudy
AT mauritommaso bedsideselectionofpositiveendexpiratorypressurebyelectricalimpedancetomographyinhypoxemicpatientsafeasibilitystudy
AT maffezzinielisabetta bedsideselectionofpositiveendexpiratorypressurebyelectricalimpedancetomographyinhypoxemicpatientsafeasibilitystudy
AT gattistefano bedsideselectionofpositiveendexpiratorypressurebyelectricalimpedancetomographyinhypoxemicpatientsafeasibilitystudy
AT broncoalfio bedsideselectionofpositiveendexpiratorypressurebyelectricalimpedancetomographyinhypoxemicpatientsafeasibilitystudy
AT albanlaura bedsideselectionofpositiveendexpiratorypressurebyelectricalimpedancetomographyinhypoxemicpatientsafeasibilitystudy
AT bindafilippo bedsideselectionofpositiveendexpiratorypressurebyelectricalimpedancetomographyinhypoxemicpatientsafeasibilitystudy
AT sassotommaso bedsideselectionofpositiveendexpiratorypressurebyelectricalimpedancetomographyinhypoxemicpatientsafeasibilitystudy
AT marenghicristina bedsideselectionofpositiveendexpiratorypressurebyelectricalimpedancetomographyinhypoxemicpatientsafeasibilitystudy
AT grasselligiacomo bedsideselectionofpositiveendexpiratorypressurebyelectricalimpedancetomographyinhypoxemicpatientsafeasibilitystudy
AT fotigiuseppe bedsideselectionofpositiveendexpiratorypressurebyelectricalimpedancetomographyinhypoxemicpatientsafeasibilitystudy
AT pesentiantonio bedsideselectionofpositiveendexpiratorypressurebyelectricalimpedancetomographyinhypoxemicpatientsafeasibilitystudy
AT bellanigiacomo bedsideselectionofpositiveendexpiratorypressurebyelectricalimpedancetomographyinhypoxemicpatientsafeasibilitystudy