Cargando…
Bedside selection of positive end-expiratory pressure by electrical impedance tomography in hypoxemic patients: a feasibility study
BACKGROUND: Positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) is a key element of mechanical ventilation. It should optimize recruitment, without causing excessive overdistension, but controversy exists on the best method to set it. The purpose of the study was to test the feasibility of setting PEEP with ele...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5519511/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28730554 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13613-017-0299-9 |
_version_ | 1783251629051478016 |
---|---|
author | Eronia, Nilde Mauri, Tommaso Maffezzini, Elisabetta Gatti, Stefano Bronco, Alfio Alban, Laura Binda, Filippo Sasso, Tommaso Marenghi, Cristina Grasselli, Giacomo Foti, Giuseppe Pesenti, Antonio Bellani, Giacomo |
author_facet | Eronia, Nilde Mauri, Tommaso Maffezzini, Elisabetta Gatti, Stefano Bronco, Alfio Alban, Laura Binda, Filippo Sasso, Tommaso Marenghi, Cristina Grasselli, Giacomo Foti, Giuseppe Pesenti, Antonio Bellani, Giacomo |
author_sort | Eronia, Nilde |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) is a key element of mechanical ventilation. It should optimize recruitment, without causing excessive overdistension, but controversy exists on the best method to set it. The purpose of the study was to test the feasibility of setting PEEP with electrical impedance tomography in order to prevent lung de-recruitment following a recruitment maneuver. We enrolled 16 patients undergoing mechanical ventilation with PaO(2)/FiO(2) <300 mmHg. In all patients, under constant tidal volume (6–8 ml/kg) PEEP was set based on the PEEP/FiO(2) table proposed by the ARDS network (PEEP(ARDSnet)). We performed a recruitment maneuver and monitored the end-expiratory lung impedance (EELI) over 10 min. If the EELI signal decreased during this period, the recruitment maneuver was repeated and PEEP increased by 2 cmH(2)O. This procedure was repeated until the EELI maintained a stability over time (PEEP(EIT)). RESULTS: The procedure was feasible in 87% patients. PEEP(EIT) was higher than PEEP(ARDSnet) (13 ± 3 vs. 9 ± 2 cmH(2)O, p < 0.001). PaO(2)/FiO(2) improved during PEEP(EIT) and driving pressure decreased. Recruited volume correlated with the decrease in driving pressure but not with oxygenation improvement. Finally, regional alveolar hyperdistention and collapse was reduced in dependent lung layers and increased in non-dependent lung layers. CONCLUSIONS: In hypoxemic patients, a PEEP selection strategy aimed at stabilizing alveolar recruitment guided by EIT at the bedside was feasible and safe. This strategy led, in comparison with the ARDSnet table, to higher PEEP, improved oxygenation and reduced driving pressure, allowing to estimate the relative weight of overdistension and recruitment. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13613-017-0299-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5519511 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55195112017-08-02 Bedside selection of positive end-expiratory pressure by electrical impedance tomography in hypoxemic patients: a feasibility study Eronia, Nilde Mauri, Tommaso Maffezzini, Elisabetta Gatti, Stefano Bronco, Alfio Alban, Laura Binda, Filippo Sasso, Tommaso Marenghi, Cristina Grasselli, Giacomo Foti, Giuseppe Pesenti, Antonio Bellani, Giacomo Ann Intensive Care Research BACKGROUND: Positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) is a key element of mechanical ventilation. It should optimize recruitment, without causing excessive overdistension, but controversy exists on the best method to set it. The purpose of the study was to test the feasibility of setting PEEP with electrical impedance tomography in order to prevent lung de-recruitment following a recruitment maneuver. We enrolled 16 patients undergoing mechanical ventilation with PaO(2)/FiO(2) <300 mmHg. In all patients, under constant tidal volume (6–8 ml/kg) PEEP was set based on the PEEP/FiO(2) table proposed by the ARDS network (PEEP(ARDSnet)). We performed a recruitment maneuver and monitored the end-expiratory lung impedance (EELI) over 10 min. If the EELI signal decreased during this period, the recruitment maneuver was repeated and PEEP increased by 2 cmH(2)O. This procedure was repeated until the EELI maintained a stability over time (PEEP(EIT)). RESULTS: The procedure was feasible in 87% patients. PEEP(EIT) was higher than PEEP(ARDSnet) (13 ± 3 vs. 9 ± 2 cmH(2)O, p < 0.001). PaO(2)/FiO(2) improved during PEEP(EIT) and driving pressure decreased. Recruited volume correlated with the decrease in driving pressure but not with oxygenation improvement. Finally, regional alveolar hyperdistention and collapse was reduced in dependent lung layers and increased in non-dependent lung layers. CONCLUSIONS: In hypoxemic patients, a PEEP selection strategy aimed at stabilizing alveolar recruitment guided by EIT at the bedside was feasible and safe. This strategy led, in comparison with the ARDSnet table, to higher PEEP, improved oxygenation and reduced driving pressure, allowing to estimate the relative weight of overdistension and recruitment. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13613-017-0299-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2017-07-20 /pmc/articles/PMC5519511/ /pubmed/28730554 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13613-017-0299-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Research Eronia, Nilde Mauri, Tommaso Maffezzini, Elisabetta Gatti, Stefano Bronco, Alfio Alban, Laura Binda, Filippo Sasso, Tommaso Marenghi, Cristina Grasselli, Giacomo Foti, Giuseppe Pesenti, Antonio Bellani, Giacomo Bedside selection of positive end-expiratory pressure by electrical impedance tomography in hypoxemic patients: a feasibility study |
title | Bedside selection of positive end-expiratory pressure by electrical impedance tomography in hypoxemic patients: a feasibility study |
title_full | Bedside selection of positive end-expiratory pressure by electrical impedance tomography in hypoxemic patients: a feasibility study |
title_fullStr | Bedside selection of positive end-expiratory pressure by electrical impedance tomography in hypoxemic patients: a feasibility study |
title_full_unstemmed | Bedside selection of positive end-expiratory pressure by electrical impedance tomography in hypoxemic patients: a feasibility study |
title_short | Bedside selection of positive end-expiratory pressure by electrical impedance tomography in hypoxemic patients: a feasibility study |
title_sort | bedside selection of positive end-expiratory pressure by electrical impedance tomography in hypoxemic patients: a feasibility study |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5519511/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28730554 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13613-017-0299-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT eronianilde bedsideselectionofpositiveendexpiratorypressurebyelectricalimpedancetomographyinhypoxemicpatientsafeasibilitystudy AT mauritommaso bedsideselectionofpositiveendexpiratorypressurebyelectricalimpedancetomographyinhypoxemicpatientsafeasibilitystudy AT maffezzinielisabetta bedsideselectionofpositiveendexpiratorypressurebyelectricalimpedancetomographyinhypoxemicpatientsafeasibilitystudy AT gattistefano bedsideselectionofpositiveendexpiratorypressurebyelectricalimpedancetomographyinhypoxemicpatientsafeasibilitystudy AT broncoalfio bedsideselectionofpositiveendexpiratorypressurebyelectricalimpedancetomographyinhypoxemicpatientsafeasibilitystudy AT albanlaura bedsideselectionofpositiveendexpiratorypressurebyelectricalimpedancetomographyinhypoxemicpatientsafeasibilitystudy AT bindafilippo bedsideselectionofpositiveendexpiratorypressurebyelectricalimpedancetomographyinhypoxemicpatientsafeasibilitystudy AT sassotommaso bedsideselectionofpositiveendexpiratorypressurebyelectricalimpedancetomographyinhypoxemicpatientsafeasibilitystudy AT marenghicristina bedsideselectionofpositiveendexpiratorypressurebyelectricalimpedancetomographyinhypoxemicpatientsafeasibilitystudy AT grasselligiacomo bedsideselectionofpositiveendexpiratorypressurebyelectricalimpedancetomographyinhypoxemicpatientsafeasibilitystudy AT fotigiuseppe bedsideselectionofpositiveendexpiratorypressurebyelectricalimpedancetomographyinhypoxemicpatientsafeasibilitystudy AT pesentiantonio bedsideselectionofpositiveendexpiratorypressurebyelectricalimpedancetomographyinhypoxemicpatientsafeasibilitystudy AT bellanigiacomo bedsideselectionofpositiveendexpiratorypressurebyelectricalimpedancetomographyinhypoxemicpatientsafeasibilitystudy |