Cargando…

Sex-Divergent Clinical Outcomes and Precision Medicine: An Important New Role for Institutional Review Boards and Research Ethics Committees

The efforts toward individualized medicine have constantly increased in an attempt to improve treatment options. These efforts have led to the development of small molecules which target specific molecular pathways involved in cancer progression. We have reviewed preclinical studies of sunitinib tha...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Segarra, Ignacio, Modamio, Pilar, Fernández, Cecilia, Mariño, Eduardo L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5519571/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28785221
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2017.00488
_version_ 1783251643260731392
author Segarra, Ignacio
Modamio, Pilar
Fernández, Cecilia
Mariño, Eduardo L.
author_facet Segarra, Ignacio
Modamio, Pilar
Fernández, Cecilia
Mariño, Eduardo L.
author_sort Segarra, Ignacio
collection PubMed
description The efforts toward individualized medicine have constantly increased in an attempt to improve treatment options. These efforts have led to the development of small molecules which target specific molecular pathways involved in cancer progression. We have reviewed preclinical studies of sunitinib that incorporate sex as a covariate to explore possible sex-based differences in pharmacokinetics and drug–drug interactions (DDI) to attempt a relationship with published clinical outputs. We observed that covariate sex is lacking in most clinical outcome reports and suggest a series of ethic-based proposals to improve research activities and identify relevant different sex outcomes. We propose a deeper integration of preclinical, clinical, and translational research addressing statistical and clinical significance jointly; to embed specific sex-divergent endpoints to evaluate possible gender differences objectively during all stages of research; to pay greater attention to sex-divergent outcomes in polypharmacy scenarios, DDI and bioequivalence studies; the clear reporting of preclinical and clinical findings regarding sex-divergent outcomes; as well as to encourage the active role of scientists and the pharmaceutical industry to foster a new scientific culture through their research programs, practice, and participation in editorial boards and Institutional Ethics Review Boards (IRBs) and Research Ethics Committees (RECs). We establish the IRB/REC as the centerpiece for the implementation of these proposals. We suggest the expansion of its competence to follow up clinical trials to ensure that sex differences are addressed and recognized; to engage in data monitoring committees to improve clinical research cooperation and ethically address those potential clinical outcome differences between male and female patients to analyze their social and clinical implications in research and healthcare policies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5519571
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55195712017-08-07 Sex-Divergent Clinical Outcomes and Precision Medicine: An Important New Role for Institutional Review Boards and Research Ethics Committees Segarra, Ignacio Modamio, Pilar Fernández, Cecilia Mariño, Eduardo L. Front Pharmacol Pharmacology The efforts toward individualized medicine have constantly increased in an attempt to improve treatment options. These efforts have led to the development of small molecules which target specific molecular pathways involved in cancer progression. We have reviewed preclinical studies of sunitinib that incorporate sex as a covariate to explore possible sex-based differences in pharmacokinetics and drug–drug interactions (DDI) to attempt a relationship with published clinical outputs. We observed that covariate sex is lacking in most clinical outcome reports and suggest a series of ethic-based proposals to improve research activities and identify relevant different sex outcomes. We propose a deeper integration of preclinical, clinical, and translational research addressing statistical and clinical significance jointly; to embed specific sex-divergent endpoints to evaluate possible gender differences objectively during all stages of research; to pay greater attention to sex-divergent outcomes in polypharmacy scenarios, DDI and bioequivalence studies; the clear reporting of preclinical and clinical findings regarding sex-divergent outcomes; as well as to encourage the active role of scientists and the pharmaceutical industry to foster a new scientific culture through their research programs, practice, and participation in editorial boards and Institutional Ethics Review Boards (IRBs) and Research Ethics Committees (RECs). We establish the IRB/REC as the centerpiece for the implementation of these proposals. We suggest the expansion of its competence to follow up clinical trials to ensure that sex differences are addressed and recognized; to engage in data monitoring committees to improve clinical research cooperation and ethically address those potential clinical outcome differences between male and female patients to analyze their social and clinical implications in research and healthcare policies. Frontiers Media S.A. 2017-07-21 /pmc/articles/PMC5519571/ /pubmed/28785221 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2017.00488 Text en Copyright © 2017 Segarra, Modamio, Fernández and Mariño. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Pharmacology
Segarra, Ignacio
Modamio, Pilar
Fernández, Cecilia
Mariño, Eduardo L.
Sex-Divergent Clinical Outcomes and Precision Medicine: An Important New Role for Institutional Review Boards and Research Ethics Committees
title Sex-Divergent Clinical Outcomes and Precision Medicine: An Important New Role for Institutional Review Boards and Research Ethics Committees
title_full Sex-Divergent Clinical Outcomes and Precision Medicine: An Important New Role for Institutional Review Boards and Research Ethics Committees
title_fullStr Sex-Divergent Clinical Outcomes and Precision Medicine: An Important New Role for Institutional Review Boards and Research Ethics Committees
title_full_unstemmed Sex-Divergent Clinical Outcomes and Precision Medicine: An Important New Role for Institutional Review Boards and Research Ethics Committees
title_short Sex-Divergent Clinical Outcomes and Precision Medicine: An Important New Role for Institutional Review Boards and Research Ethics Committees
title_sort sex-divergent clinical outcomes and precision medicine: an important new role for institutional review boards and research ethics committees
topic Pharmacology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5519571/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28785221
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2017.00488
work_keys_str_mv AT segarraignacio sexdivergentclinicaloutcomesandprecisionmedicineanimportantnewroleforinstitutionalreviewboardsandresearchethicscommittees
AT modamiopilar sexdivergentclinicaloutcomesandprecisionmedicineanimportantnewroleforinstitutionalreviewboardsandresearchethicscommittees
AT fernandezcecilia sexdivergentclinicaloutcomesandprecisionmedicineanimportantnewroleforinstitutionalreviewboardsandresearchethicscommittees
AT marinoeduardol sexdivergentclinicaloutcomesandprecisionmedicineanimportantnewroleforinstitutionalreviewboardsandresearchethicscommittees