Cargando…
The European Society for Medical Oncology 'Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale' field-tested in infrequent tumour entities: an extended analysis of its feasibility at the Medical University of Vienna
BACKGROUND: The European Society for Medical Oncology Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale (ESMO-MCBS) is a new tool to quantify the clinical benefit that may be anticipated from a novel anticancer treatment. We present here an analysis on the feasibility of the ESMO-MCBS in less frequent tumour enti...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5519788/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28761758 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/esmoopen-2017-000166 |
_version_ | 1783251694551826432 |
---|---|
author | Kiesewetter, Barbara Raderer, Markus Prager, Gerald W Fuereder, Thorsten Marosi, Christine Preusser, Matthias Krainer, Michael Locker, Gottfried J Brodowicz, Thomas Zielinski, Christoph C |
author_facet | Kiesewetter, Barbara Raderer, Markus Prager, Gerald W Fuereder, Thorsten Marosi, Christine Preusser, Matthias Krainer, Michael Locker, Gottfried J Brodowicz, Thomas Zielinski, Christoph C |
author_sort | Kiesewetter, Barbara |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The European Society for Medical Oncology Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale (ESMO-MCBS) is a new tool to quantify the clinical benefit that may be anticipated from a novel anticancer treatment. We present here an analysis on the feasibility of the ESMO-MCBS in less frequent tumour entities. METHODS: This study evaluates the practicability of the ESMO-MCBS for metastatic neuroendocrine tumours (NETs), soft tissue sarcomas, glioblastoma, thyroid cancer, pancreatic cancer, head/neck cancer, urothelial cancer and ovarian cancer at the Medical University Vienna. A three-step approach including data acquisition, assessment of ESMO-MCBS scores and evaluation of results with a focus on clinical feasibility was applied. RESULTS: In NET and thyroid cancer, all analysed trials were very comparable in design and efficacy, and the ESMO-MCBS scores appeared to be consistent with the clinical benefit seen in practice. For pancreatic cancer, it was more difficult to compare first-line trials due to diverging populations included in the respective studies. Concerning soft tissue sarcomas, the ESMO-MCBS was applicable for gastrointestinal stromal tumours(GIST) and ‘non-GIST’ soft tissue sarcoma with respect to data deriving from randomised studies. However, due to the heterogeneity of the disease itself and a limited number of controlled trials, limitations are noted. In ovarian cancer, the ESMO-MCBS supported the use of bevacizumab in high-risk patients. To date, there are only limited data for glioblastoma, head/neck cancer and urothelial cancer but whenever randomised trials were available, the ESMO-MCBS rating supported clinical decisions. Interestingly, nivolumab for salvage treatment of head/neck cancer rated extremely high. CONCLUSION: The ESMO-MCBS scores supported our common treatment strategies and highlight the potential of new immunomodulatory drugs. Our results encourage further development of the ESMO-MCBS. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5519788 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55197882017-07-31 The European Society for Medical Oncology 'Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale' field-tested in infrequent tumour entities: an extended analysis of its feasibility at the Medical University of Vienna Kiesewetter, Barbara Raderer, Markus Prager, Gerald W Fuereder, Thorsten Marosi, Christine Preusser, Matthias Krainer, Michael Locker, Gottfried J Brodowicz, Thomas Zielinski, Christoph C ESMO Open Original Research BACKGROUND: The European Society for Medical Oncology Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale (ESMO-MCBS) is a new tool to quantify the clinical benefit that may be anticipated from a novel anticancer treatment. We present here an analysis on the feasibility of the ESMO-MCBS in less frequent tumour entities. METHODS: This study evaluates the practicability of the ESMO-MCBS for metastatic neuroendocrine tumours (NETs), soft tissue sarcomas, glioblastoma, thyroid cancer, pancreatic cancer, head/neck cancer, urothelial cancer and ovarian cancer at the Medical University Vienna. A three-step approach including data acquisition, assessment of ESMO-MCBS scores and evaluation of results with a focus on clinical feasibility was applied. RESULTS: In NET and thyroid cancer, all analysed trials were very comparable in design and efficacy, and the ESMO-MCBS scores appeared to be consistent with the clinical benefit seen in practice. For pancreatic cancer, it was more difficult to compare first-line trials due to diverging populations included in the respective studies. Concerning soft tissue sarcomas, the ESMO-MCBS was applicable for gastrointestinal stromal tumours(GIST) and ‘non-GIST’ soft tissue sarcoma with respect to data deriving from randomised studies. However, due to the heterogeneity of the disease itself and a limited number of controlled trials, limitations are noted. In ovarian cancer, the ESMO-MCBS supported the use of bevacizumab in high-risk patients. To date, there are only limited data for glioblastoma, head/neck cancer and urothelial cancer but whenever randomised trials were available, the ESMO-MCBS rating supported clinical decisions. Interestingly, nivolumab for salvage treatment of head/neck cancer rated extremely high. CONCLUSION: The ESMO-MCBS scores supported our common treatment strategies and highlight the potential of new immunomodulatory drugs. Our results encourage further development of the ESMO-MCBS. BMJ Publishing Group 2017-07-16 /pmc/articles/PMC5519788/ /pubmed/28761758 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/esmoopen-2017-000166 Text en © European Society for Medical Oncology (unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2017. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Original Research Kiesewetter, Barbara Raderer, Markus Prager, Gerald W Fuereder, Thorsten Marosi, Christine Preusser, Matthias Krainer, Michael Locker, Gottfried J Brodowicz, Thomas Zielinski, Christoph C The European Society for Medical Oncology 'Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale' field-tested in infrequent tumour entities: an extended analysis of its feasibility at the Medical University of Vienna |
title | The European Society for Medical Oncology 'Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale' field-tested in infrequent tumour entities: an extended analysis of its feasibility at the Medical University of Vienna |
title_full | The European Society for Medical Oncology 'Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale' field-tested in infrequent tumour entities: an extended analysis of its feasibility at the Medical University of Vienna |
title_fullStr | The European Society for Medical Oncology 'Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale' field-tested in infrequent tumour entities: an extended analysis of its feasibility at the Medical University of Vienna |
title_full_unstemmed | The European Society for Medical Oncology 'Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale' field-tested in infrequent tumour entities: an extended analysis of its feasibility at the Medical University of Vienna |
title_short | The European Society for Medical Oncology 'Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale' field-tested in infrequent tumour entities: an extended analysis of its feasibility at the Medical University of Vienna |
title_sort | european society for medical oncology 'magnitude of clinical benefit scale' field-tested in infrequent tumour entities: an extended analysis of its feasibility at the medical university of vienna |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5519788/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28761758 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/esmoopen-2017-000166 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kiesewetterbarbara theeuropeansocietyformedicaloncologymagnitudeofclinicalbenefitscalefieldtestedininfrequenttumourentitiesanextendedanalysisofitsfeasibilityatthemedicaluniversityofvienna AT raderermarkus theeuropeansocietyformedicaloncologymagnitudeofclinicalbenefitscalefieldtestedininfrequenttumourentitiesanextendedanalysisofitsfeasibilityatthemedicaluniversityofvienna AT pragergeraldw theeuropeansocietyformedicaloncologymagnitudeofclinicalbenefitscalefieldtestedininfrequenttumourentitiesanextendedanalysisofitsfeasibilityatthemedicaluniversityofvienna AT fuerederthorsten theeuropeansocietyformedicaloncologymagnitudeofclinicalbenefitscalefieldtestedininfrequenttumourentitiesanextendedanalysisofitsfeasibilityatthemedicaluniversityofvienna AT marosichristine theeuropeansocietyformedicaloncologymagnitudeofclinicalbenefitscalefieldtestedininfrequenttumourentitiesanextendedanalysisofitsfeasibilityatthemedicaluniversityofvienna AT preussermatthias theeuropeansocietyformedicaloncologymagnitudeofclinicalbenefitscalefieldtestedininfrequenttumourentitiesanextendedanalysisofitsfeasibilityatthemedicaluniversityofvienna AT krainermichael theeuropeansocietyformedicaloncologymagnitudeofclinicalbenefitscalefieldtestedininfrequenttumourentitiesanextendedanalysisofitsfeasibilityatthemedicaluniversityofvienna AT lockergottfriedj theeuropeansocietyformedicaloncologymagnitudeofclinicalbenefitscalefieldtestedininfrequenttumourentitiesanextendedanalysisofitsfeasibilityatthemedicaluniversityofvienna AT brodowiczthomas theeuropeansocietyformedicaloncologymagnitudeofclinicalbenefitscalefieldtestedininfrequenttumourentitiesanextendedanalysisofitsfeasibilityatthemedicaluniversityofvienna AT zielinskichristophc theeuropeansocietyformedicaloncologymagnitudeofclinicalbenefitscalefieldtestedininfrequenttumourentitiesanextendedanalysisofitsfeasibilityatthemedicaluniversityofvienna AT kiesewetterbarbara europeansocietyformedicaloncologymagnitudeofclinicalbenefitscalefieldtestedininfrequenttumourentitiesanextendedanalysisofitsfeasibilityatthemedicaluniversityofvienna AT raderermarkus europeansocietyformedicaloncologymagnitudeofclinicalbenefitscalefieldtestedininfrequenttumourentitiesanextendedanalysisofitsfeasibilityatthemedicaluniversityofvienna AT pragergeraldw europeansocietyformedicaloncologymagnitudeofclinicalbenefitscalefieldtestedininfrequenttumourentitiesanextendedanalysisofitsfeasibilityatthemedicaluniversityofvienna AT fuerederthorsten europeansocietyformedicaloncologymagnitudeofclinicalbenefitscalefieldtestedininfrequenttumourentitiesanextendedanalysisofitsfeasibilityatthemedicaluniversityofvienna AT marosichristine europeansocietyformedicaloncologymagnitudeofclinicalbenefitscalefieldtestedininfrequenttumourentitiesanextendedanalysisofitsfeasibilityatthemedicaluniversityofvienna AT preussermatthias europeansocietyformedicaloncologymagnitudeofclinicalbenefitscalefieldtestedininfrequenttumourentitiesanextendedanalysisofitsfeasibilityatthemedicaluniversityofvienna AT krainermichael europeansocietyformedicaloncologymagnitudeofclinicalbenefitscalefieldtestedininfrequenttumourentitiesanextendedanalysisofitsfeasibilityatthemedicaluniversityofvienna AT lockergottfriedj europeansocietyformedicaloncologymagnitudeofclinicalbenefitscalefieldtestedininfrequenttumourentitiesanextendedanalysisofitsfeasibilityatthemedicaluniversityofvienna AT brodowiczthomas europeansocietyformedicaloncologymagnitudeofclinicalbenefitscalefieldtestedininfrequenttumourentitiesanextendedanalysisofitsfeasibilityatthemedicaluniversityofvienna AT zielinskichristophc europeansocietyformedicaloncologymagnitudeofclinicalbenefitscalefieldtestedininfrequenttumourentitiesanextendedanalysisofitsfeasibilityatthemedicaluniversityofvienna |