Cargando…

The European Society for Medical Oncology 'Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale' field-tested in infrequent tumour entities: an extended analysis of its feasibility at the Medical University of Vienna

BACKGROUND: The European Society for Medical Oncology Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale (ESMO-MCBS) is a new tool to quantify the clinical benefit that may be anticipated from a novel anticancer treatment. We present here an analysis on the feasibility of the ESMO-MCBS in less frequent tumour enti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kiesewetter, Barbara, Raderer, Markus, Prager, Gerald W, Fuereder, Thorsten, Marosi, Christine, Preusser, Matthias, Krainer, Michael, Locker, Gottfried J, Brodowicz, Thomas, Zielinski, Christoph C
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5519788/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28761758
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/esmoopen-2017-000166
_version_ 1783251694551826432
author Kiesewetter, Barbara
Raderer, Markus
Prager, Gerald W
Fuereder, Thorsten
Marosi, Christine
Preusser, Matthias
Krainer, Michael
Locker, Gottfried J
Brodowicz, Thomas
Zielinski, Christoph C
author_facet Kiesewetter, Barbara
Raderer, Markus
Prager, Gerald W
Fuereder, Thorsten
Marosi, Christine
Preusser, Matthias
Krainer, Michael
Locker, Gottfried J
Brodowicz, Thomas
Zielinski, Christoph C
author_sort Kiesewetter, Barbara
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The European Society for Medical Oncology Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale (ESMO-MCBS) is a new tool to quantify the clinical benefit that may be anticipated from a novel anticancer treatment. We present here an analysis on the feasibility of the ESMO-MCBS in less frequent tumour entities. METHODS: This study evaluates the practicability of the ESMO-MCBS for metastatic neuroendocrine tumours (NETs), soft tissue sarcomas, glioblastoma, thyroid cancer, pancreatic cancer, head/neck cancer, urothelial cancer and ovarian cancer at the Medical University Vienna. A three-step approach including data acquisition, assessment of ESMO-MCBS scores and evaluation of results with a focus on clinical feasibility was applied. RESULTS: In NET and thyroid cancer, all analysed trials were very comparable in design and efficacy, and the ESMO-MCBS scores appeared to be consistent with the clinical benefit seen in practice. For pancreatic cancer, it was more difficult to compare first-line trials due to diverging populations included in the respective studies. Concerning soft tissue sarcomas, the ESMO-MCBS was applicable for gastrointestinal stromal tumours(GIST) and ‘non-GIST’ soft tissue sarcoma with respect to data deriving from randomised studies. However, due to the heterogeneity of the disease itself and a limited number of controlled trials, limitations are noted. In ovarian cancer, the ESMO-MCBS supported the use of bevacizumab in high-risk patients. To date, there are only limited data for glioblastoma, head/neck cancer and urothelial cancer but whenever randomised trials were available, the ESMO-MCBS rating supported clinical decisions. Interestingly, nivolumab for salvage treatment of head/neck cancer rated extremely high. CONCLUSION: The ESMO-MCBS scores supported our common treatment strategies and highlight the potential of new immunomodulatory drugs. Our results encourage further development of the ESMO-MCBS.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5519788
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55197882017-07-31 The European Society for Medical Oncology 'Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale' field-tested in infrequent tumour entities: an extended analysis of its feasibility at the Medical University of Vienna Kiesewetter, Barbara Raderer, Markus Prager, Gerald W Fuereder, Thorsten Marosi, Christine Preusser, Matthias Krainer, Michael Locker, Gottfried J Brodowicz, Thomas Zielinski, Christoph C ESMO Open Original Research BACKGROUND: The European Society for Medical Oncology Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale (ESMO-MCBS) is a new tool to quantify the clinical benefit that may be anticipated from a novel anticancer treatment. We present here an analysis on the feasibility of the ESMO-MCBS in less frequent tumour entities. METHODS: This study evaluates the practicability of the ESMO-MCBS for metastatic neuroendocrine tumours (NETs), soft tissue sarcomas, glioblastoma, thyroid cancer, pancreatic cancer, head/neck cancer, urothelial cancer and ovarian cancer at the Medical University Vienna. A three-step approach including data acquisition, assessment of ESMO-MCBS scores and evaluation of results with a focus on clinical feasibility was applied. RESULTS: In NET and thyroid cancer, all analysed trials were very comparable in design and efficacy, and the ESMO-MCBS scores appeared to be consistent with the clinical benefit seen in practice. For pancreatic cancer, it was more difficult to compare first-line trials due to diverging populations included in the respective studies. Concerning soft tissue sarcomas, the ESMO-MCBS was applicable for gastrointestinal stromal tumours(GIST) and ‘non-GIST’ soft tissue sarcoma with respect to data deriving from randomised studies. However, due to the heterogeneity of the disease itself and a limited number of controlled trials, limitations are noted. In ovarian cancer, the ESMO-MCBS supported the use of bevacizumab in high-risk patients. To date, there are only limited data for glioblastoma, head/neck cancer and urothelial cancer but whenever randomised trials were available, the ESMO-MCBS rating supported clinical decisions. Interestingly, nivolumab for salvage treatment of head/neck cancer rated extremely high. CONCLUSION: The ESMO-MCBS scores supported our common treatment strategies and highlight the potential of new immunomodulatory drugs. Our results encourage further development of the ESMO-MCBS. BMJ Publishing Group 2017-07-16 /pmc/articles/PMC5519788/ /pubmed/28761758 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/esmoopen-2017-000166 Text en © European Society for Medical Oncology (unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2017. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Original Research
Kiesewetter, Barbara
Raderer, Markus
Prager, Gerald W
Fuereder, Thorsten
Marosi, Christine
Preusser, Matthias
Krainer, Michael
Locker, Gottfried J
Brodowicz, Thomas
Zielinski, Christoph C
The European Society for Medical Oncology 'Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale' field-tested in infrequent tumour entities: an extended analysis of its feasibility at the Medical University of Vienna
title The European Society for Medical Oncology 'Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale' field-tested in infrequent tumour entities: an extended analysis of its feasibility at the Medical University of Vienna
title_full The European Society for Medical Oncology 'Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale' field-tested in infrequent tumour entities: an extended analysis of its feasibility at the Medical University of Vienna
title_fullStr The European Society for Medical Oncology 'Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale' field-tested in infrequent tumour entities: an extended analysis of its feasibility at the Medical University of Vienna
title_full_unstemmed The European Society for Medical Oncology 'Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale' field-tested in infrequent tumour entities: an extended analysis of its feasibility at the Medical University of Vienna
title_short The European Society for Medical Oncology 'Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale' field-tested in infrequent tumour entities: an extended analysis of its feasibility at the Medical University of Vienna
title_sort european society for medical oncology 'magnitude of clinical benefit scale' field-tested in infrequent tumour entities: an extended analysis of its feasibility at the medical university of vienna
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5519788/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28761758
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/esmoopen-2017-000166
work_keys_str_mv AT kiesewetterbarbara theeuropeansocietyformedicaloncologymagnitudeofclinicalbenefitscalefieldtestedininfrequenttumourentitiesanextendedanalysisofitsfeasibilityatthemedicaluniversityofvienna
AT raderermarkus theeuropeansocietyformedicaloncologymagnitudeofclinicalbenefitscalefieldtestedininfrequenttumourentitiesanextendedanalysisofitsfeasibilityatthemedicaluniversityofvienna
AT pragergeraldw theeuropeansocietyformedicaloncologymagnitudeofclinicalbenefitscalefieldtestedininfrequenttumourentitiesanextendedanalysisofitsfeasibilityatthemedicaluniversityofvienna
AT fuerederthorsten theeuropeansocietyformedicaloncologymagnitudeofclinicalbenefitscalefieldtestedininfrequenttumourentitiesanextendedanalysisofitsfeasibilityatthemedicaluniversityofvienna
AT marosichristine theeuropeansocietyformedicaloncologymagnitudeofclinicalbenefitscalefieldtestedininfrequenttumourentitiesanextendedanalysisofitsfeasibilityatthemedicaluniversityofvienna
AT preussermatthias theeuropeansocietyformedicaloncologymagnitudeofclinicalbenefitscalefieldtestedininfrequenttumourentitiesanextendedanalysisofitsfeasibilityatthemedicaluniversityofvienna
AT krainermichael theeuropeansocietyformedicaloncologymagnitudeofclinicalbenefitscalefieldtestedininfrequenttumourentitiesanextendedanalysisofitsfeasibilityatthemedicaluniversityofvienna
AT lockergottfriedj theeuropeansocietyformedicaloncologymagnitudeofclinicalbenefitscalefieldtestedininfrequenttumourentitiesanextendedanalysisofitsfeasibilityatthemedicaluniversityofvienna
AT brodowiczthomas theeuropeansocietyformedicaloncologymagnitudeofclinicalbenefitscalefieldtestedininfrequenttumourentitiesanextendedanalysisofitsfeasibilityatthemedicaluniversityofvienna
AT zielinskichristophc theeuropeansocietyformedicaloncologymagnitudeofclinicalbenefitscalefieldtestedininfrequenttumourentitiesanextendedanalysisofitsfeasibilityatthemedicaluniversityofvienna
AT kiesewetterbarbara europeansocietyformedicaloncologymagnitudeofclinicalbenefitscalefieldtestedininfrequenttumourentitiesanextendedanalysisofitsfeasibilityatthemedicaluniversityofvienna
AT raderermarkus europeansocietyformedicaloncologymagnitudeofclinicalbenefitscalefieldtestedininfrequenttumourentitiesanextendedanalysisofitsfeasibilityatthemedicaluniversityofvienna
AT pragergeraldw europeansocietyformedicaloncologymagnitudeofclinicalbenefitscalefieldtestedininfrequenttumourentitiesanextendedanalysisofitsfeasibilityatthemedicaluniversityofvienna
AT fuerederthorsten europeansocietyformedicaloncologymagnitudeofclinicalbenefitscalefieldtestedininfrequenttumourentitiesanextendedanalysisofitsfeasibilityatthemedicaluniversityofvienna
AT marosichristine europeansocietyformedicaloncologymagnitudeofclinicalbenefitscalefieldtestedininfrequenttumourentitiesanextendedanalysisofitsfeasibilityatthemedicaluniversityofvienna
AT preussermatthias europeansocietyformedicaloncologymagnitudeofclinicalbenefitscalefieldtestedininfrequenttumourentitiesanextendedanalysisofitsfeasibilityatthemedicaluniversityofvienna
AT krainermichael europeansocietyformedicaloncologymagnitudeofclinicalbenefitscalefieldtestedininfrequenttumourentitiesanextendedanalysisofitsfeasibilityatthemedicaluniversityofvienna
AT lockergottfriedj europeansocietyformedicaloncologymagnitudeofclinicalbenefitscalefieldtestedininfrequenttumourentitiesanextendedanalysisofitsfeasibilityatthemedicaluniversityofvienna
AT brodowiczthomas europeansocietyformedicaloncologymagnitudeofclinicalbenefitscalefieldtestedininfrequenttumourentitiesanextendedanalysisofitsfeasibilityatthemedicaluniversityofvienna
AT zielinskichristophc europeansocietyformedicaloncologymagnitudeofclinicalbenefitscalefieldtestedininfrequenttumourentitiesanextendedanalysisofitsfeasibilityatthemedicaluniversityofvienna