Cargando…

S-1 and oxaliplatin (SOX) plus bevacizumab versus mFOLFOX6 plus bevacizumab as first-line treatment for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: updated overall survival analyses of the open-label, non-inferiority, randomised phase III: SOFT study

OBJECTIVE: The SOFT study previously demonstrated that S-1 and oxaliplatin (SOX) plus bevacizumab was non-inferior to l-leucovorin, fluorouracil and oxaliplatin (mFOLFOX6) plus bevacizumab in terms of the primary end point of progression-free survival (PFS) as first-line chemotherapy for metastatic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Baba, Hideo, Yamada, Yasuhide, Takahari, Daisuke, Matsumoto, Hiroshi, Yoshida, Kazuhiro, Nakamura, Masato, Yoshida, Motoki, Iwamoto, Shigeyoshi, Shimada, Ken, Komatsu, Yoshito, Sasaki, Yasutsuna, Satoh, Taroh, Takahashi, Keiichi, Mishima, Hideyuki, Muro, Kei, Watanabe, Masahiko, Sakata, Yuh, Morita, Satoshi, Shimada, Yasuhiro, Sugihara, Kenichi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: ESMO Open 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5519807/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28761727
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/esmoopen-2016-000135
_version_ 1783251699137249280
author Baba, Hideo
Yamada, Yasuhide
Takahari, Daisuke
Matsumoto, Hiroshi
Yoshida, Kazuhiro
Nakamura, Masato
Yoshida, Motoki
Iwamoto, Shigeyoshi
Shimada, Ken
Komatsu, Yoshito
Sasaki, Yasutsuna
Satoh, Taroh
Takahashi, Keiichi
Mishima, Hideyuki
Muro, Kei
Watanabe, Masahiko
Sakata, Yuh
Morita, Satoshi
Shimada, Yasuhiro
Sugihara, Kenichi
author_facet Baba, Hideo
Yamada, Yasuhide
Takahari, Daisuke
Matsumoto, Hiroshi
Yoshida, Kazuhiro
Nakamura, Masato
Yoshida, Motoki
Iwamoto, Shigeyoshi
Shimada, Ken
Komatsu, Yoshito
Sasaki, Yasutsuna
Satoh, Taroh
Takahashi, Keiichi
Mishima, Hideyuki
Muro, Kei
Watanabe, Masahiko
Sakata, Yuh
Morita, Satoshi
Shimada, Yasuhiro
Sugihara, Kenichi
author_sort Baba, Hideo
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The SOFT study previously demonstrated that S-1 and oxaliplatin (SOX) plus bevacizumab was non-inferior to l-leucovorin, fluorouracil and oxaliplatin (mFOLFOX6) plus bevacizumab in terms of the primary end point of progression-free survival (PFS) as first-line chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). The overall survival (OS) data were immature at the time of the primary analysis. METHODS: A total of 512 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to receive either mFOLFOX6 plus bevacizumab (5 mg/kg of bevacizumab, followed by 200 mg/m(2) of l-leucovorin given simultaneously with 85 mg/m(2) of oxaliplatin, followed by a 400 mg/m(2) bolus of 5-FU on day 1 and then 2400 mg/m(2) of 5-FU as an intravenous infusion over the course of 46 hours, every 2 weeks) or SOX plus bevacizumab (7.5 mg/kg of bevacizumab, 130 mg/m(2) of oxaliplatin on day 1 and 40–60 mg of S-1 two times per day for 2 weeks, followed by a 1-week rest). The primary end point was PFS. After the primary analysis, the follow-up survey was cut-off on 30 September 2013, and the final OS data were analysed. RESULTS: With a median follow-up of 37.7 months, the median survival time (MST) was 29.7 months with mFOLFOX6 plus bevacizumab and 29.6 months with SOX plus bevacizumab (HR, 1.018; 95% CI 0.823 to 1.258). Median PFS was 11.7 months in the mFOLFOX6 plus bevacizumab group and 12.2 months in the SOX plus bevacizumab group (HR, 1.051; 95% CI 0.876 to 1.262; p(non-inferiority)=0.0115). CONCLUSION: Our results reconfirmed that SOX plus bevacizumab is non-inferior to mFOLFOX6 plus bevacizumab in terms of PFS. MST did not differ between the groups. SOX plus bevacizumab is considered an effective regimen for first-line chemotherapy in patients with mCRC and can be used instead of mFOLFOX6 plus bevacizumab. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: JapicCTI-090699.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5519807
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher ESMO Open
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55198072017-07-31 S-1 and oxaliplatin (SOX) plus bevacizumab versus mFOLFOX6 plus bevacizumab as first-line treatment for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: updated overall survival analyses of the open-label, non-inferiority, randomised phase III: SOFT study Baba, Hideo Yamada, Yasuhide Takahari, Daisuke Matsumoto, Hiroshi Yoshida, Kazuhiro Nakamura, Masato Yoshida, Motoki Iwamoto, Shigeyoshi Shimada, Ken Komatsu, Yoshito Sasaki, Yasutsuna Satoh, Taroh Takahashi, Keiichi Mishima, Hideyuki Muro, Kei Watanabe, Masahiko Sakata, Yuh Morita, Satoshi Shimada, Yasuhiro Sugihara, Kenichi ESMO Open Original Research OBJECTIVE: The SOFT study previously demonstrated that S-1 and oxaliplatin (SOX) plus bevacizumab was non-inferior to l-leucovorin, fluorouracil and oxaliplatin (mFOLFOX6) plus bevacizumab in terms of the primary end point of progression-free survival (PFS) as first-line chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). The overall survival (OS) data were immature at the time of the primary analysis. METHODS: A total of 512 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to receive either mFOLFOX6 plus bevacizumab (5 mg/kg of bevacizumab, followed by 200 mg/m(2) of l-leucovorin given simultaneously with 85 mg/m(2) of oxaliplatin, followed by a 400 mg/m(2) bolus of 5-FU on day 1 and then 2400 mg/m(2) of 5-FU as an intravenous infusion over the course of 46 hours, every 2 weeks) or SOX plus bevacizumab (7.5 mg/kg of bevacizumab, 130 mg/m(2) of oxaliplatin on day 1 and 40–60 mg of S-1 two times per day for 2 weeks, followed by a 1-week rest). The primary end point was PFS. After the primary analysis, the follow-up survey was cut-off on 30 September 2013, and the final OS data were analysed. RESULTS: With a median follow-up of 37.7 months, the median survival time (MST) was 29.7 months with mFOLFOX6 plus bevacizumab and 29.6 months with SOX plus bevacizumab (HR, 1.018; 95% CI 0.823 to 1.258). Median PFS was 11.7 months in the mFOLFOX6 plus bevacizumab group and 12.2 months in the SOX plus bevacizumab group (HR, 1.051; 95% CI 0.876 to 1.262; p(non-inferiority)=0.0115). CONCLUSION: Our results reconfirmed that SOX plus bevacizumab is non-inferior to mFOLFOX6 plus bevacizumab in terms of PFS. MST did not differ between the groups. SOX plus bevacizumab is considered an effective regimen for first-line chemotherapy in patients with mCRC and can be used instead of mFOLFOX6 plus bevacizumab. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: JapicCTI-090699. ESMO Open 2017-03-09 /pmc/articles/PMC5519807/ /pubmed/28761727 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/esmoopen-2016-000135 Text en © European Society for Medical Oncology (unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2017. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Original Research
Baba, Hideo
Yamada, Yasuhide
Takahari, Daisuke
Matsumoto, Hiroshi
Yoshida, Kazuhiro
Nakamura, Masato
Yoshida, Motoki
Iwamoto, Shigeyoshi
Shimada, Ken
Komatsu, Yoshito
Sasaki, Yasutsuna
Satoh, Taroh
Takahashi, Keiichi
Mishima, Hideyuki
Muro, Kei
Watanabe, Masahiko
Sakata, Yuh
Morita, Satoshi
Shimada, Yasuhiro
Sugihara, Kenichi
S-1 and oxaliplatin (SOX) plus bevacizumab versus mFOLFOX6 plus bevacizumab as first-line treatment for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: updated overall survival analyses of the open-label, non-inferiority, randomised phase III: SOFT study
title S-1 and oxaliplatin (SOX) plus bevacizumab versus mFOLFOX6 plus bevacizumab as first-line treatment for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: updated overall survival analyses of the open-label, non-inferiority, randomised phase III: SOFT study
title_full S-1 and oxaliplatin (SOX) plus bevacizumab versus mFOLFOX6 plus bevacizumab as first-line treatment for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: updated overall survival analyses of the open-label, non-inferiority, randomised phase III: SOFT study
title_fullStr S-1 and oxaliplatin (SOX) plus bevacizumab versus mFOLFOX6 plus bevacizumab as first-line treatment for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: updated overall survival analyses of the open-label, non-inferiority, randomised phase III: SOFT study
title_full_unstemmed S-1 and oxaliplatin (SOX) plus bevacizumab versus mFOLFOX6 plus bevacizumab as first-line treatment for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: updated overall survival analyses of the open-label, non-inferiority, randomised phase III: SOFT study
title_short S-1 and oxaliplatin (SOX) plus bevacizumab versus mFOLFOX6 plus bevacizumab as first-line treatment for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: updated overall survival analyses of the open-label, non-inferiority, randomised phase III: SOFT study
title_sort s-1 and oxaliplatin (sox) plus bevacizumab versus mfolfox6 plus bevacizumab as first-line treatment for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: updated overall survival analyses of the open-label, non-inferiority, randomised phase iii: soft study
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5519807/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28761727
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/esmoopen-2016-000135
work_keys_str_mv AT babahideo s1andoxaliplatinsoxplusbevacizumabversusmfolfox6plusbevacizumabasfirstlinetreatmentforpatientswithmetastaticcolorectalcancerupdatedoverallsurvivalanalysesoftheopenlabelnoninferiorityrandomisedphaseiiisoftstudy
AT yamadayasuhide s1andoxaliplatinsoxplusbevacizumabversusmfolfox6plusbevacizumabasfirstlinetreatmentforpatientswithmetastaticcolorectalcancerupdatedoverallsurvivalanalysesoftheopenlabelnoninferiorityrandomisedphaseiiisoftstudy
AT takaharidaisuke s1andoxaliplatinsoxplusbevacizumabversusmfolfox6plusbevacizumabasfirstlinetreatmentforpatientswithmetastaticcolorectalcancerupdatedoverallsurvivalanalysesoftheopenlabelnoninferiorityrandomisedphaseiiisoftstudy
AT matsumotohiroshi s1andoxaliplatinsoxplusbevacizumabversusmfolfox6plusbevacizumabasfirstlinetreatmentforpatientswithmetastaticcolorectalcancerupdatedoverallsurvivalanalysesoftheopenlabelnoninferiorityrandomisedphaseiiisoftstudy
AT yoshidakazuhiro s1andoxaliplatinsoxplusbevacizumabversusmfolfox6plusbevacizumabasfirstlinetreatmentforpatientswithmetastaticcolorectalcancerupdatedoverallsurvivalanalysesoftheopenlabelnoninferiorityrandomisedphaseiiisoftstudy
AT nakamuramasato s1andoxaliplatinsoxplusbevacizumabversusmfolfox6plusbevacizumabasfirstlinetreatmentforpatientswithmetastaticcolorectalcancerupdatedoverallsurvivalanalysesoftheopenlabelnoninferiorityrandomisedphaseiiisoftstudy
AT yoshidamotoki s1andoxaliplatinsoxplusbevacizumabversusmfolfox6plusbevacizumabasfirstlinetreatmentforpatientswithmetastaticcolorectalcancerupdatedoverallsurvivalanalysesoftheopenlabelnoninferiorityrandomisedphaseiiisoftstudy
AT iwamotoshigeyoshi s1andoxaliplatinsoxplusbevacizumabversusmfolfox6plusbevacizumabasfirstlinetreatmentforpatientswithmetastaticcolorectalcancerupdatedoverallsurvivalanalysesoftheopenlabelnoninferiorityrandomisedphaseiiisoftstudy
AT shimadaken s1andoxaliplatinsoxplusbevacizumabversusmfolfox6plusbevacizumabasfirstlinetreatmentforpatientswithmetastaticcolorectalcancerupdatedoverallsurvivalanalysesoftheopenlabelnoninferiorityrandomisedphaseiiisoftstudy
AT komatsuyoshito s1andoxaliplatinsoxplusbevacizumabversusmfolfox6plusbevacizumabasfirstlinetreatmentforpatientswithmetastaticcolorectalcancerupdatedoverallsurvivalanalysesoftheopenlabelnoninferiorityrandomisedphaseiiisoftstudy
AT sasakiyasutsuna s1andoxaliplatinsoxplusbevacizumabversusmfolfox6plusbevacizumabasfirstlinetreatmentforpatientswithmetastaticcolorectalcancerupdatedoverallsurvivalanalysesoftheopenlabelnoninferiorityrandomisedphaseiiisoftstudy
AT satohtaroh s1andoxaliplatinsoxplusbevacizumabversusmfolfox6plusbevacizumabasfirstlinetreatmentforpatientswithmetastaticcolorectalcancerupdatedoverallsurvivalanalysesoftheopenlabelnoninferiorityrandomisedphaseiiisoftstudy
AT takahashikeiichi s1andoxaliplatinsoxplusbevacizumabversusmfolfox6plusbevacizumabasfirstlinetreatmentforpatientswithmetastaticcolorectalcancerupdatedoverallsurvivalanalysesoftheopenlabelnoninferiorityrandomisedphaseiiisoftstudy
AT mishimahideyuki s1andoxaliplatinsoxplusbevacizumabversusmfolfox6plusbevacizumabasfirstlinetreatmentforpatientswithmetastaticcolorectalcancerupdatedoverallsurvivalanalysesoftheopenlabelnoninferiorityrandomisedphaseiiisoftstudy
AT murokei s1andoxaliplatinsoxplusbevacizumabversusmfolfox6plusbevacizumabasfirstlinetreatmentforpatientswithmetastaticcolorectalcancerupdatedoverallsurvivalanalysesoftheopenlabelnoninferiorityrandomisedphaseiiisoftstudy
AT watanabemasahiko s1andoxaliplatinsoxplusbevacizumabversusmfolfox6plusbevacizumabasfirstlinetreatmentforpatientswithmetastaticcolorectalcancerupdatedoverallsurvivalanalysesoftheopenlabelnoninferiorityrandomisedphaseiiisoftstudy
AT sakatayuh s1andoxaliplatinsoxplusbevacizumabversusmfolfox6plusbevacizumabasfirstlinetreatmentforpatientswithmetastaticcolorectalcancerupdatedoverallsurvivalanalysesoftheopenlabelnoninferiorityrandomisedphaseiiisoftstudy
AT moritasatoshi s1andoxaliplatinsoxplusbevacizumabversusmfolfox6plusbevacizumabasfirstlinetreatmentforpatientswithmetastaticcolorectalcancerupdatedoverallsurvivalanalysesoftheopenlabelnoninferiorityrandomisedphaseiiisoftstudy
AT shimadayasuhiro s1andoxaliplatinsoxplusbevacizumabversusmfolfox6plusbevacizumabasfirstlinetreatmentforpatientswithmetastaticcolorectalcancerupdatedoverallsurvivalanalysesoftheopenlabelnoninferiorityrandomisedphaseiiisoftstudy
AT sugiharakenichi s1andoxaliplatinsoxplusbevacizumabversusmfolfox6plusbevacizumabasfirstlinetreatmentforpatientswithmetastaticcolorectalcancerupdatedoverallsurvivalanalysesoftheopenlabelnoninferiorityrandomisedphaseiiisoftstudy