Cargando…

Eribulin for metastatic breast cancer (MBC) treatment: a retrospective, multicenter study based in Campania, south Italy (Eri-001 trial)

BACKGROUND: On the basis of the results of two pivotal phase III clinical trials, eribulin mesylate is currently approved in EU for the treatment of advanced breast cancer (aBC) in patients who have previously received an anthracycline and a taxane in either the adjuvant or the metastatic setting, a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Orditura, Michele, Gravina, Adriano, Riccardi, Ferdinando, Diana, Anna, Mocerino, Carmela, Leopaldi, Luigi, Fabozzi, Alessio, Giordano, Guido, Nettuno, Raffaele, Incoronato, Pasquale, Barzelloni, Maria Luisa, Caputo, Roberta, Pisano, Agata, Grimaldi, Giuseppe, Genua, Geppino, Montesarchio, Vincenzo, Barbato, Enrico, Iodice, Giovanni, Lieto, Eva, Procaccini, Eugenio, Mabilia, Roberto, Febbraro, Antonio, Laurentiis, Michelino De, Ciardiello, Fortunato
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5519815/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28761747
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/esmoopen-2017-000176
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: On the basis of the results of two pivotal phase III clinical trials, eribulin mesylate is currently approved in EU for the treatment of advanced breast cancer (aBC) in patients who have previously received an anthracycline and a taxane in either the adjuvant or the metastatic setting, and at least one chemotherapeutic regimen for metastatic disease. METHODS: In our study, we investigated the efficacy and tolerability of eribulin as second or further line chemotherapy in 137 women affected by aBC. RESULTS: Eribulin as monotherapy provided benefit in terms of progression-free survival (PFS), response rate (RR) and disease control rate (DCR) independently of its use as second or late-line therapy. The overall RR and DCR were 17.5% and 64%, respectively. In particular, DCR and overall RR were 50% and 13.6%, 65.4% and 21.1%, 70.4% and 14.8% and 66.7% and 16.7% in second, third, fourth and further lines of treatment, respectively. Median PFS (mPFS) according to the line of therapy was 5.7, 6.3, 4.5 and 4.0 months in patients treated with eribulin in second, third, fourth and over the fourth line, respectively. No significant difference in terms of mPFS was found between the various BC subtypes. Overall, eribulin resulted safe and most adverse events were of grade 1 or 2 and easily manageable. Grades 3–4 toxicities were neutropaenia and neurotoxicity. CONCLUSIONS: With the limitations due to the observational nature of our findings, eribulin was shown to be an effective and safe therapeutic option in heavily pretreated patients with aBC.