Cargando…
The prognostic value of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI contrast agent transfer constant K(trans) in cervical cancer is explained by plasma flow rather than vessel permeability
BACKGROUND: The microvascular contrast agent transfer constant K(trans) has shown prognostic value in cervical cancer patients treated with chemoradiotherapy. This study aims to determine whether this is explained by the contribution to K(trans) of plasma flow (F(p)), vessel permeability surface-are...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5520098/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28449009 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2017.121 |
_version_ | 1783251753640132608 |
---|---|
author | Dickie, Ben R Rose, Chris J Kershaw, Lucy E Withey, Stephanie B Carrington, Bernadette M Davidson, Susan E Hutchison, Gillian West, Catharine M L |
author_facet | Dickie, Ben R Rose, Chris J Kershaw, Lucy E Withey, Stephanie B Carrington, Bernadette M Davidson, Susan E Hutchison, Gillian West, Catharine M L |
author_sort | Dickie, Ben R |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The microvascular contrast agent transfer constant K(trans) has shown prognostic value in cervical cancer patients treated with chemoradiotherapy. This study aims to determine whether this is explained by the contribution to K(trans) of plasma flow (F(p)), vessel permeability surface-area product (PS), or a combination of both. METHODS: Pre-treatment dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) data from 36 patients were analysed using the two-compartment exchange model. Estimates of F(p), PS, K(trans), and fractional plasma and interstitial volumes (v(p) and v(e)) were made and used in univariate and multivariate survival analyses adjusting for clinicopathologic variables tumour stage, nodal status, histological subtype, patient age, tumour volume, and treatment type (chemoradiotherapy vs radiotherapy alone). RESULTS: In univariate analyses, F(p) (HR=0.25, P=0.0095) and K(trans) (HR=0.20, P=0.032) were significantly associated with disease-free survival while PS, v(p) and v(e) were not. In multivariate analyses adjusting for clinicopathologic variables, F(p) and K(trans) significantly increased the accuracy of survival predictions (P=0.0089). CONCLUSIONS: The prognostic value of K(trans) in cervical cancer patients treated with chemoradiotherapy is explained by microvascular plasma flow (F(p)) rather than vessel permeability surface-area product (PS). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5520098 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55200982018-05-23 The prognostic value of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI contrast agent transfer constant K(trans) in cervical cancer is explained by plasma flow rather than vessel permeability Dickie, Ben R Rose, Chris J Kershaw, Lucy E Withey, Stephanie B Carrington, Bernadette M Davidson, Susan E Hutchison, Gillian West, Catharine M L Br J Cancer Translational Therapeutics BACKGROUND: The microvascular contrast agent transfer constant K(trans) has shown prognostic value in cervical cancer patients treated with chemoradiotherapy. This study aims to determine whether this is explained by the contribution to K(trans) of plasma flow (F(p)), vessel permeability surface-area product (PS), or a combination of both. METHODS: Pre-treatment dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) data from 36 patients were analysed using the two-compartment exchange model. Estimates of F(p), PS, K(trans), and fractional plasma and interstitial volumes (v(p) and v(e)) were made and used in univariate and multivariate survival analyses adjusting for clinicopathologic variables tumour stage, nodal status, histological subtype, patient age, tumour volume, and treatment type (chemoradiotherapy vs radiotherapy alone). RESULTS: In univariate analyses, F(p) (HR=0.25, P=0.0095) and K(trans) (HR=0.20, P=0.032) were significantly associated with disease-free survival while PS, v(p) and v(e) were not. In multivariate analyses adjusting for clinicopathologic variables, F(p) and K(trans) significantly increased the accuracy of survival predictions (P=0.0089). CONCLUSIONS: The prognostic value of K(trans) in cervical cancer patients treated with chemoradiotherapy is explained by microvascular plasma flow (F(p)) rather than vessel permeability surface-area product (PS). Nature Publishing Group 2017-05-23 2017-04-27 /pmc/articles/PMC5520098/ /pubmed/28449009 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2017.121 Text en Copyright © 2017 Cancer Research UK http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ From twelve months after its original publication, this work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-Share Alike 4.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Translational Therapeutics Dickie, Ben R Rose, Chris J Kershaw, Lucy E Withey, Stephanie B Carrington, Bernadette M Davidson, Susan E Hutchison, Gillian West, Catharine M L The prognostic value of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI contrast agent transfer constant K(trans) in cervical cancer is explained by plasma flow rather than vessel permeability |
title | The prognostic value of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI contrast agent transfer constant K(trans) in cervical cancer is explained by plasma flow rather than vessel permeability |
title_full | The prognostic value of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI contrast agent transfer constant K(trans) in cervical cancer is explained by plasma flow rather than vessel permeability |
title_fullStr | The prognostic value of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI contrast agent transfer constant K(trans) in cervical cancer is explained by plasma flow rather than vessel permeability |
title_full_unstemmed | The prognostic value of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI contrast agent transfer constant K(trans) in cervical cancer is explained by plasma flow rather than vessel permeability |
title_short | The prognostic value of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI contrast agent transfer constant K(trans) in cervical cancer is explained by plasma flow rather than vessel permeability |
title_sort | prognostic value of dynamic contrast-enhanced mri contrast agent transfer constant k(trans) in cervical cancer is explained by plasma flow rather than vessel permeability |
topic | Translational Therapeutics |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5520098/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28449009 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2017.121 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dickiebenr theprognosticvalueofdynamiccontrastenhancedmricontrastagenttransferconstantktransincervicalcancerisexplainedbyplasmaflowratherthanvesselpermeability AT rosechrisj theprognosticvalueofdynamiccontrastenhancedmricontrastagenttransferconstantktransincervicalcancerisexplainedbyplasmaflowratherthanvesselpermeability AT kershawlucye theprognosticvalueofdynamiccontrastenhancedmricontrastagenttransferconstantktransincervicalcancerisexplainedbyplasmaflowratherthanvesselpermeability AT witheystephanieb theprognosticvalueofdynamiccontrastenhancedmricontrastagenttransferconstantktransincervicalcancerisexplainedbyplasmaflowratherthanvesselpermeability AT carringtonbernadettem theprognosticvalueofdynamiccontrastenhancedmricontrastagenttransferconstantktransincervicalcancerisexplainedbyplasmaflowratherthanvesselpermeability AT davidsonsusane theprognosticvalueofdynamiccontrastenhancedmricontrastagenttransferconstantktransincervicalcancerisexplainedbyplasmaflowratherthanvesselpermeability AT hutchisongillian theprognosticvalueofdynamiccontrastenhancedmricontrastagenttransferconstantktransincervicalcancerisexplainedbyplasmaflowratherthanvesselpermeability AT westcatharineml theprognosticvalueofdynamiccontrastenhancedmricontrastagenttransferconstantktransincervicalcancerisexplainedbyplasmaflowratherthanvesselpermeability AT dickiebenr prognosticvalueofdynamiccontrastenhancedmricontrastagenttransferconstantktransincervicalcancerisexplainedbyplasmaflowratherthanvesselpermeability AT rosechrisj prognosticvalueofdynamiccontrastenhancedmricontrastagenttransferconstantktransincervicalcancerisexplainedbyplasmaflowratherthanvesselpermeability AT kershawlucye prognosticvalueofdynamiccontrastenhancedmricontrastagenttransferconstantktransincervicalcancerisexplainedbyplasmaflowratherthanvesselpermeability AT witheystephanieb prognosticvalueofdynamiccontrastenhancedmricontrastagenttransferconstantktransincervicalcancerisexplainedbyplasmaflowratherthanvesselpermeability AT carringtonbernadettem prognosticvalueofdynamiccontrastenhancedmricontrastagenttransferconstantktransincervicalcancerisexplainedbyplasmaflowratherthanvesselpermeability AT davidsonsusane prognosticvalueofdynamiccontrastenhancedmricontrastagenttransferconstantktransincervicalcancerisexplainedbyplasmaflowratherthanvesselpermeability AT hutchisongillian prognosticvalueofdynamiccontrastenhancedmricontrastagenttransferconstantktransincervicalcancerisexplainedbyplasmaflowratherthanvesselpermeability AT westcatharineml prognosticvalueofdynamiccontrastenhancedmricontrastagenttransferconstantktransincervicalcancerisexplainedbyplasmaflowratherthanvesselpermeability |