Cargando…

The prognostic value of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI contrast agent transfer constant K(trans) in cervical cancer is explained by plasma flow rather than vessel permeability

BACKGROUND: The microvascular contrast agent transfer constant K(trans) has shown prognostic value in cervical cancer patients treated with chemoradiotherapy. This study aims to determine whether this is explained by the contribution to K(trans) of plasma flow (F(p)), vessel permeability surface-are...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dickie, Ben R, Rose, Chris J, Kershaw, Lucy E, Withey, Stephanie B, Carrington, Bernadette M, Davidson, Susan E, Hutchison, Gillian, West, Catharine M L
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5520098/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28449009
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2017.121
_version_ 1783251753640132608
author Dickie, Ben R
Rose, Chris J
Kershaw, Lucy E
Withey, Stephanie B
Carrington, Bernadette M
Davidson, Susan E
Hutchison, Gillian
West, Catharine M L
author_facet Dickie, Ben R
Rose, Chris J
Kershaw, Lucy E
Withey, Stephanie B
Carrington, Bernadette M
Davidson, Susan E
Hutchison, Gillian
West, Catharine M L
author_sort Dickie, Ben R
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The microvascular contrast agent transfer constant K(trans) has shown prognostic value in cervical cancer patients treated with chemoradiotherapy. This study aims to determine whether this is explained by the contribution to K(trans) of plasma flow (F(p)), vessel permeability surface-area product (PS), or a combination of both. METHODS: Pre-treatment dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) data from 36 patients were analysed using the two-compartment exchange model. Estimates of F(p), PS, K(trans), and fractional plasma and interstitial volumes (v(p) and v(e)) were made and used in univariate and multivariate survival analyses adjusting for clinicopathologic variables tumour stage, nodal status, histological subtype, patient age, tumour volume, and treatment type (chemoradiotherapy vs radiotherapy alone). RESULTS: In univariate analyses, F(p) (HR=0.25, P=0.0095) and K(trans) (HR=0.20, P=0.032) were significantly associated with disease-free survival while PS, v(p) and v(e) were not. In multivariate analyses adjusting for clinicopathologic variables, F(p) and K(trans) significantly increased the accuracy of survival predictions (P=0.0089). CONCLUSIONS: The prognostic value of K(trans) in cervical cancer patients treated with chemoradiotherapy is explained by microvascular plasma flow (F(p)) rather than vessel permeability surface-area product (PS).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5520098
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55200982018-05-23 The prognostic value of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI contrast agent transfer constant K(trans) in cervical cancer is explained by plasma flow rather than vessel permeability Dickie, Ben R Rose, Chris J Kershaw, Lucy E Withey, Stephanie B Carrington, Bernadette M Davidson, Susan E Hutchison, Gillian West, Catharine M L Br J Cancer Translational Therapeutics BACKGROUND: The microvascular contrast agent transfer constant K(trans) has shown prognostic value in cervical cancer patients treated with chemoradiotherapy. This study aims to determine whether this is explained by the contribution to K(trans) of plasma flow (F(p)), vessel permeability surface-area product (PS), or a combination of both. METHODS: Pre-treatment dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) data from 36 patients were analysed using the two-compartment exchange model. Estimates of F(p), PS, K(trans), and fractional plasma and interstitial volumes (v(p) and v(e)) were made and used in univariate and multivariate survival analyses adjusting for clinicopathologic variables tumour stage, nodal status, histological subtype, patient age, tumour volume, and treatment type (chemoradiotherapy vs radiotherapy alone). RESULTS: In univariate analyses, F(p) (HR=0.25, P=0.0095) and K(trans) (HR=0.20, P=0.032) were significantly associated with disease-free survival while PS, v(p) and v(e) were not. In multivariate analyses adjusting for clinicopathologic variables, F(p) and K(trans) significantly increased the accuracy of survival predictions (P=0.0089). CONCLUSIONS: The prognostic value of K(trans) in cervical cancer patients treated with chemoradiotherapy is explained by microvascular plasma flow (F(p)) rather than vessel permeability surface-area product (PS). Nature Publishing Group 2017-05-23 2017-04-27 /pmc/articles/PMC5520098/ /pubmed/28449009 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2017.121 Text en Copyright © 2017 Cancer Research UK http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ From twelve months after its original publication, this work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-Share Alike 4.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
spellingShingle Translational Therapeutics
Dickie, Ben R
Rose, Chris J
Kershaw, Lucy E
Withey, Stephanie B
Carrington, Bernadette M
Davidson, Susan E
Hutchison, Gillian
West, Catharine M L
The prognostic value of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI contrast agent transfer constant K(trans) in cervical cancer is explained by plasma flow rather than vessel permeability
title The prognostic value of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI contrast agent transfer constant K(trans) in cervical cancer is explained by plasma flow rather than vessel permeability
title_full The prognostic value of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI contrast agent transfer constant K(trans) in cervical cancer is explained by plasma flow rather than vessel permeability
title_fullStr The prognostic value of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI contrast agent transfer constant K(trans) in cervical cancer is explained by plasma flow rather than vessel permeability
title_full_unstemmed The prognostic value of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI contrast agent transfer constant K(trans) in cervical cancer is explained by plasma flow rather than vessel permeability
title_short The prognostic value of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI contrast agent transfer constant K(trans) in cervical cancer is explained by plasma flow rather than vessel permeability
title_sort prognostic value of dynamic contrast-enhanced mri contrast agent transfer constant k(trans) in cervical cancer is explained by plasma flow rather than vessel permeability
topic Translational Therapeutics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5520098/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28449009
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2017.121
work_keys_str_mv AT dickiebenr theprognosticvalueofdynamiccontrastenhancedmricontrastagenttransferconstantktransincervicalcancerisexplainedbyplasmaflowratherthanvesselpermeability
AT rosechrisj theprognosticvalueofdynamiccontrastenhancedmricontrastagenttransferconstantktransincervicalcancerisexplainedbyplasmaflowratherthanvesselpermeability
AT kershawlucye theprognosticvalueofdynamiccontrastenhancedmricontrastagenttransferconstantktransincervicalcancerisexplainedbyplasmaflowratherthanvesselpermeability
AT witheystephanieb theprognosticvalueofdynamiccontrastenhancedmricontrastagenttransferconstantktransincervicalcancerisexplainedbyplasmaflowratherthanvesselpermeability
AT carringtonbernadettem theprognosticvalueofdynamiccontrastenhancedmricontrastagenttransferconstantktransincervicalcancerisexplainedbyplasmaflowratherthanvesselpermeability
AT davidsonsusane theprognosticvalueofdynamiccontrastenhancedmricontrastagenttransferconstantktransincervicalcancerisexplainedbyplasmaflowratherthanvesselpermeability
AT hutchisongillian theprognosticvalueofdynamiccontrastenhancedmricontrastagenttransferconstantktransincervicalcancerisexplainedbyplasmaflowratherthanvesselpermeability
AT westcatharineml theprognosticvalueofdynamiccontrastenhancedmricontrastagenttransferconstantktransincervicalcancerisexplainedbyplasmaflowratherthanvesselpermeability
AT dickiebenr prognosticvalueofdynamiccontrastenhancedmricontrastagenttransferconstantktransincervicalcancerisexplainedbyplasmaflowratherthanvesselpermeability
AT rosechrisj prognosticvalueofdynamiccontrastenhancedmricontrastagenttransferconstantktransincervicalcancerisexplainedbyplasmaflowratherthanvesselpermeability
AT kershawlucye prognosticvalueofdynamiccontrastenhancedmricontrastagenttransferconstantktransincervicalcancerisexplainedbyplasmaflowratherthanvesselpermeability
AT witheystephanieb prognosticvalueofdynamiccontrastenhancedmricontrastagenttransferconstantktransincervicalcancerisexplainedbyplasmaflowratherthanvesselpermeability
AT carringtonbernadettem prognosticvalueofdynamiccontrastenhancedmricontrastagenttransferconstantktransincervicalcancerisexplainedbyplasmaflowratherthanvesselpermeability
AT davidsonsusane prognosticvalueofdynamiccontrastenhancedmricontrastagenttransferconstantktransincervicalcancerisexplainedbyplasmaflowratherthanvesselpermeability
AT hutchisongillian prognosticvalueofdynamiccontrastenhancedmricontrastagenttransferconstantktransincervicalcancerisexplainedbyplasmaflowratherthanvesselpermeability
AT westcatharineml prognosticvalueofdynamiccontrastenhancedmricontrastagenttransferconstantktransincervicalcancerisexplainedbyplasmaflowratherthanvesselpermeability