Cargando…
A meta-analysis of CXCL12 expression for cancer prognosis
BACKGROUND: CXCL12 (SDF1) is reported to promote cancer progression in several preclinical models and this is corroborated by the analysis of human tissue specimens. However, the relationship between CXCL12 expression and cancer survival has not been systematically assessed. METHODS: We conducted a...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5520200/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28535157 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2017.134 |
_version_ | 1783251767395352576 |
---|---|
author | Samarendra, Harsh Jones, Keaton Petrinic, Tatjana Silva, Michael A Reddy, Srikanth Soonawalla, Zahir Gordon-Weeks, Alex |
author_facet | Samarendra, Harsh Jones, Keaton Petrinic, Tatjana Silva, Michael A Reddy, Srikanth Soonawalla, Zahir Gordon-Weeks, Alex |
author_sort | Samarendra, Harsh |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: CXCL12 (SDF1) is reported to promote cancer progression in several preclinical models and this is corroborated by the analysis of human tissue specimens. However, the relationship between CXCL12 expression and cancer survival has not been systematically assessed. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies that evaluated the association between CXCL12 expression and cancer survival. RESULTS: Thirty-eight studies inclusive of 5807 patients were included in the analysis of overall, recurrence-free or cancer-specific survival, the majority of which were retrospective. The pooled hazard ratios (HRs) for overall and recurrence-free survival in patients with high CXCL12 expression were 1.39 (95% CI: 1.17–1.65, P=0.0002) and 1.12 (95% CI: 0.82–1.53, P=0.48) respectively, but with significant heterogeneity between studies. On subgroup analysis by cancer type, high CXCL12 expression was associated with reduced overall survival in patients with oesophagogastric (HR 2.08; 95% CI: 1.31–3.33, P=0.002), pancreatic (HR 1.54; 95% CI: 1.21–1.97, P=0.0005) and lung cancer (HR 1.37; 95% CI: 1.08–1.75, P=0.01), whereas in breast cancer patients high CXCL12 expression conferred an overall survival advantage (HR 0.5; 95% CI: 0.38–0.66, P<0.00001). CONCLUSIONS: Determination of CXCL12 expression has the potential to be of use as a cancer biomarker and adds prognostic information in various cancer types. Prospective or prospective–retrospective analyses of CXCL12 expression in clearly defined cancer cohorts are now required to advance our understanding of the relationship between CXCL12 expression and cancer outcome. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5520200 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55202002018-06-27 A meta-analysis of CXCL12 expression for cancer prognosis Samarendra, Harsh Jones, Keaton Petrinic, Tatjana Silva, Michael A Reddy, Srikanth Soonawalla, Zahir Gordon-Weeks, Alex Br J Cancer Genetics & Genomics BACKGROUND: CXCL12 (SDF1) is reported to promote cancer progression in several preclinical models and this is corroborated by the analysis of human tissue specimens. However, the relationship between CXCL12 expression and cancer survival has not been systematically assessed. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies that evaluated the association between CXCL12 expression and cancer survival. RESULTS: Thirty-eight studies inclusive of 5807 patients were included in the analysis of overall, recurrence-free or cancer-specific survival, the majority of which were retrospective. The pooled hazard ratios (HRs) for overall and recurrence-free survival in patients with high CXCL12 expression were 1.39 (95% CI: 1.17–1.65, P=0.0002) and 1.12 (95% CI: 0.82–1.53, P=0.48) respectively, but with significant heterogeneity between studies. On subgroup analysis by cancer type, high CXCL12 expression was associated with reduced overall survival in patients with oesophagogastric (HR 2.08; 95% CI: 1.31–3.33, P=0.002), pancreatic (HR 1.54; 95% CI: 1.21–1.97, P=0.0005) and lung cancer (HR 1.37; 95% CI: 1.08–1.75, P=0.01), whereas in breast cancer patients high CXCL12 expression conferred an overall survival advantage (HR 0.5; 95% CI: 0.38–0.66, P<0.00001). CONCLUSIONS: Determination of CXCL12 expression has the potential to be of use as a cancer biomarker and adds prognostic information in various cancer types. Prospective or prospective–retrospective analyses of CXCL12 expression in clearly defined cancer cohorts are now required to advance our understanding of the relationship between CXCL12 expression and cancer outcome. Nature Publishing Group 2017-06-27 2017-05-23 /pmc/articles/PMC5520200/ /pubmed/28535157 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2017.134 Text en Copyright © 2017 Cancer Research UK http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ From twelve months after its original publication, this work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-Share Alike 4.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Genetics & Genomics Samarendra, Harsh Jones, Keaton Petrinic, Tatjana Silva, Michael A Reddy, Srikanth Soonawalla, Zahir Gordon-Weeks, Alex A meta-analysis of CXCL12 expression for cancer prognosis |
title | A meta-analysis of CXCL12 expression for cancer prognosis |
title_full | A meta-analysis of CXCL12 expression for cancer prognosis |
title_fullStr | A meta-analysis of CXCL12 expression for cancer prognosis |
title_full_unstemmed | A meta-analysis of CXCL12 expression for cancer prognosis |
title_short | A meta-analysis of CXCL12 expression for cancer prognosis |
title_sort | meta-analysis of cxcl12 expression for cancer prognosis |
topic | Genetics & Genomics |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5520200/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28535157 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2017.134 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT samarendraharsh ametaanalysisofcxcl12expressionforcancerprognosis AT joneskeaton ametaanalysisofcxcl12expressionforcancerprognosis AT petrinictatjana ametaanalysisofcxcl12expressionforcancerprognosis AT silvamichaela ametaanalysisofcxcl12expressionforcancerprognosis AT reddysrikanth ametaanalysisofcxcl12expressionforcancerprognosis AT soonawallazahir ametaanalysisofcxcl12expressionforcancerprognosis AT gordonweeksalex ametaanalysisofcxcl12expressionforcancerprognosis AT samarendraharsh metaanalysisofcxcl12expressionforcancerprognosis AT joneskeaton metaanalysisofcxcl12expressionforcancerprognosis AT petrinictatjana metaanalysisofcxcl12expressionforcancerprognosis AT silvamichaela metaanalysisofcxcl12expressionforcancerprognosis AT reddysrikanth metaanalysisofcxcl12expressionforcancerprognosis AT soonawallazahir metaanalysisofcxcl12expressionforcancerprognosis AT gordonweeksalex metaanalysisofcxcl12expressionforcancerprognosis |