Cargando…

‘Opt-out’ referrals after identifying pregnant smokers using exhaled air carbon monoxide: impact on engagement with smoking cessation support

BACKGROUND: In the UK, free smoking cessation support is available to pregnant women; only a minority accesses this. ‘Opt-out’ referrals to stop smoking services (SSS) are recommended by UK guidelines. These involve identifying pregnant smokers using exhaled carbon monoxide (CO) and referring them f...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Campbell, Katarzyna A, Cooper, Sue, Fahy, Samantha J, Bowker, Katharine, Leonardi-Bee, Jo, McEwen, Andy, Whitemore, Rachel, Coleman, Tim
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5520259/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27225017
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2015-052662
_version_ 1783251780756307968
author Campbell, Katarzyna A
Cooper, Sue
Fahy, Samantha J
Bowker, Katharine
Leonardi-Bee, Jo
McEwen, Andy
Whitemore, Rachel
Coleman, Tim
author_facet Campbell, Katarzyna A
Cooper, Sue
Fahy, Samantha J
Bowker, Katharine
Leonardi-Bee, Jo
McEwen, Andy
Whitemore, Rachel
Coleman, Tim
author_sort Campbell, Katarzyna A
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In the UK, free smoking cessation support is available to pregnant women; only a minority accesses this. ‘Opt-out’ referrals to stop smoking services (SSS) are recommended by UK guidelines. These involve identifying pregnant smokers using exhaled carbon monoxide (CO) and referring them for support unless they object. METHODS: To assess the impact of ‘opt-out’ referrals for pregnant smokers on SSS uptake and effectiveness, we conducted a ‘before–after’ service development evaluation. In the 6-month ‘before’ period, there was a routine ‘opt-in’ referral system for self-reported smokers at antenatal ‘booking’ appointments. In the 6-month ‘after’ period, additional ‘opt-out’ referrals were introduced at the 12-week ultrasound appointments; women with CO≥4 ppm were referred to, and outcome data were collected from, local SSS. RESULTS: Approximately 2300 women attended antenatal care in each period. Before the implementation, 536 (23.4%) women reported smoking at ‘booking’ and 290 (12.7%) were referred to SSS. After the implementation, 524 (22.9%) women reported smoking at ‘booking’, an additional 156 smokers (6.8%) were identified via the ‘opt-out’ referrals and, in total, 421 (18.4%) were referred to SSS. Over twice as many women set a quit date with the SSS after ‘opt-out’ referrals were implemented (121 (5.3%, 95% CI 4.4% to 6.3%) compared to 57 (2.5%, 95% CI 1.9% to 3.2%) before implementation) and reported being abstinent 4 weeks later (93 (4.1%, 95% CI 3.3% to 4.9%) compared to 46 (2.0%, 1.5% to 2.7%) before implementation). CONCLUSIONS: In a hospital with an ‘opt-in’ referral system, adding CO screening with ‘opt-out’ referrals as women attended ultrasound examinations doubled the numbers of pregnant smokers setting quit dates and reporting smoking cessation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5520259
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55202592017-07-31 ‘Opt-out’ referrals after identifying pregnant smokers using exhaled air carbon monoxide: impact on engagement with smoking cessation support Campbell, Katarzyna A Cooper, Sue Fahy, Samantha J Bowker, Katharine Leonardi-Bee, Jo McEwen, Andy Whitemore, Rachel Coleman, Tim Tob Control Research Paper BACKGROUND: In the UK, free smoking cessation support is available to pregnant women; only a minority accesses this. ‘Opt-out’ referrals to stop smoking services (SSS) are recommended by UK guidelines. These involve identifying pregnant smokers using exhaled carbon monoxide (CO) and referring them for support unless they object. METHODS: To assess the impact of ‘opt-out’ referrals for pregnant smokers on SSS uptake and effectiveness, we conducted a ‘before–after’ service development evaluation. In the 6-month ‘before’ period, there was a routine ‘opt-in’ referral system for self-reported smokers at antenatal ‘booking’ appointments. In the 6-month ‘after’ period, additional ‘opt-out’ referrals were introduced at the 12-week ultrasound appointments; women with CO≥4 ppm were referred to, and outcome data were collected from, local SSS. RESULTS: Approximately 2300 women attended antenatal care in each period. Before the implementation, 536 (23.4%) women reported smoking at ‘booking’ and 290 (12.7%) were referred to SSS. After the implementation, 524 (22.9%) women reported smoking at ‘booking’, an additional 156 smokers (6.8%) were identified via the ‘opt-out’ referrals and, in total, 421 (18.4%) were referred to SSS. Over twice as many women set a quit date with the SSS after ‘opt-out’ referrals were implemented (121 (5.3%, 95% CI 4.4% to 6.3%) compared to 57 (2.5%, 95% CI 1.9% to 3.2%) before implementation) and reported being abstinent 4 weeks later (93 (4.1%, 95% CI 3.3% to 4.9%) compared to 46 (2.0%, 1.5% to 2.7%) before implementation). CONCLUSIONS: In a hospital with an ‘opt-in’ referral system, adding CO screening with ‘opt-out’ referrals as women attended ultrasound examinations doubled the numbers of pregnant smokers setting quit dates and reporting smoking cessation. BMJ Publishing Group 2017-05 2016-05-25 /pmc/articles/PMC5520259/ /pubmed/27225017 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2015-052662 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt and build upon this work, for commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Research Paper
Campbell, Katarzyna A
Cooper, Sue
Fahy, Samantha J
Bowker, Katharine
Leonardi-Bee, Jo
McEwen, Andy
Whitemore, Rachel
Coleman, Tim
‘Opt-out’ referrals after identifying pregnant smokers using exhaled air carbon monoxide: impact on engagement with smoking cessation support
title ‘Opt-out’ referrals after identifying pregnant smokers using exhaled air carbon monoxide: impact on engagement with smoking cessation support
title_full ‘Opt-out’ referrals after identifying pregnant smokers using exhaled air carbon monoxide: impact on engagement with smoking cessation support
title_fullStr ‘Opt-out’ referrals after identifying pregnant smokers using exhaled air carbon monoxide: impact on engagement with smoking cessation support
title_full_unstemmed ‘Opt-out’ referrals after identifying pregnant smokers using exhaled air carbon monoxide: impact on engagement with smoking cessation support
title_short ‘Opt-out’ referrals after identifying pregnant smokers using exhaled air carbon monoxide: impact on engagement with smoking cessation support
title_sort ‘opt-out’ referrals after identifying pregnant smokers using exhaled air carbon monoxide: impact on engagement with smoking cessation support
topic Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5520259/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27225017
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2015-052662
work_keys_str_mv AT campbellkatarzynaa optoutreferralsafteridentifyingpregnantsmokersusingexhaledaircarbonmonoxideimpactonengagementwithsmokingcessationsupport
AT coopersue optoutreferralsafteridentifyingpregnantsmokersusingexhaledaircarbonmonoxideimpactonengagementwithsmokingcessationsupport
AT fahysamanthaj optoutreferralsafteridentifyingpregnantsmokersusingexhaledaircarbonmonoxideimpactonengagementwithsmokingcessationsupport
AT bowkerkatharine optoutreferralsafteridentifyingpregnantsmokersusingexhaledaircarbonmonoxideimpactonengagementwithsmokingcessationsupport
AT leonardibeejo optoutreferralsafteridentifyingpregnantsmokersusingexhaledaircarbonmonoxideimpactonengagementwithsmokingcessationsupport
AT mcewenandy optoutreferralsafteridentifyingpregnantsmokersusingexhaledaircarbonmonoxideimpactonengagementwithsmokingcessationsupport
AT whitemorerachel optoutreferralsafteridentifyingpregnantsmokersusingexhaledaircarbonmonoxideimpactonengagementwithsmokingcessationsupport
AT colemantim optoutreferralsafteridentifyingpregnantsmokersusingexhaledaircarbonmonoxideimpactonengagementwithsmokingcessationsupport