Cargando…

Lung-cancer mortality among Vermont granite workers: factors influencing exposure–response evaluation

OBJECTIVE: To understand why 2 studies relating crystalline silica exposure to lung-cancer mortality in Vermont granite workers yielded conflicting results. METHODS: Data used in the 2 studies were linked to identify discrepancies. Mortality data and employment histories from the earlier study were...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vacek, Pamela M, Callas, Peter W
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5520268/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27821675
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/oemed-2015-103527
_version_ 1783251782658424832
author Vacek, Pamela M
Callas, Peter W
author_facet Vacek, Pamela M
Callas, Peter W
author_sort Vacek, Pamela M
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To understand why 2 studies relating crystalline silica exposure to lung-cancer mortality in Vermont granite workers yielded conflicting results. METHODS: Data used in the 2 studies were linked to identify discrepancies. Mortality data and employment histories from the earlier study were revised based on data obtained in the later study. SMR were computed and Poisson regressions corresponding to those in the earlier study were performed using the original and revised data. Analyses were repeated with the addition of workers omitted from the earlier study. RESULTS: After correction of incomplete mortality and employment information in the original data, the overall SMR for the cohort in the earlier study increased from 1.17 (95% CI 1.03 to 1.36) to 1.39 (95% CI 1.22 to 1.59), and was similar to the SMR of 1.37 observed in the later study (95% CI 1.23 to 1.52). The exposure–response relationship was attenuated, particularly when person-years in all exposure categories were included in the analysis. Inclusion of additional workers had a smaller impact on the SMRs but further attenuated the exposure–response relationship. CONCLUSIONS: Differing results from the 2 studies are partly attributable to incomplete vital status and work history information used in the earlier study, as well as differences in cohort inclusion criteria. However, differences in length of follow-up and other factors likely play a larger role.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5520268
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55202682017-07-31 Lung-cancer mortality among Vermont granite workers: factors influencing exposure–response evaluation Vacek, Pamela M Callas, Peter W Occup Environ Med Methodology OBJECTIVE: To understand why 2 studies relating crystalline silica exposure to lung-cancer mortality in Vermont granite workers yielded conflicting results. METHODS: Data used in the 2 studies were linked to identify discrepancies. Mortality data and employment histories from the earlier study were revised based on data obtained in the later study. SMR were computed and Poisson regressions corresponding to those in the earlier study were performed using the original and revised data. Analyses were repeated with the addition of workers omitted from the earlier study. RESULTS: After correction of incomplete mortality and employment information in the original data, the overall SMR for the cohort in the earlier study increased from 1.17 (95% CI 1.03 to 1.36) to 1.39 (95% CI 1.22 to 1.59), and was similar to the SMR of 1.37 observed in the later study (95% CI 1.23 to 1.52). The exposure–response relationship was attenuated, particularly when person-years in all exposure categories were included in the analysis. Inclusion of additional workers had a smaller impact on the SMRs but further attenuated the exposure–response relationship. CONCLUSIONS: Differing results from the 2 studies are partly attributable to incomplete vital status and work history information used in the earlier study, as well as differences in cohort inclusion criteria. However, differences in length of follow-up and other factors likely play a larger role. BMJ Publishing Group 2017-03 2016-11-07 /pmc/articles/PMC5520268/ /pubmed/27821675 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/oemed-2015-103527 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Methodology
Vacek, Pamela M
Callas, Peter W
Lung-cancer mortality among Vermont granite workers: factors influencing exposure–response evaluation
title Lung-cancer mortality among Vermont granite workers: factors influencing exposure–response evaluation
title_full Lung-cancer mortality among Vermont granite workers: factors influencing exposure–response evaluation
title_fullStr Lung-cancer mortality among Vermont granite workers: factors influencing exposure–response evaluation
title_full_unstemmed Lung-cancer mortality among Vermont granite workers: factors influencing exposure–response evaluation
title_short Lung-cancer mortality among Vermont granite workers: factors influencing exposure–response evaluation
title_sort lung-cancer mortality among vermont granite workers: factors influencing exposure–response evaluation
topic Methodology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5520268/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27821675
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/oemed-2015-103527
work_keys_str_mv AT vacekpamelam lungcancermortalityamongvermontgraniteworkersfactorsinfluencingexposureresponseevaluation
AT callaspeterw lungcancermortalityamongvermontgraniteworkersfactorsinfluencingexposureresponseevaluation