Cargando…
A feasibility study of the Mini-AFTER telephone intervention for the management of fear of recurrence in breast cancer survivors: a mixed-methods study protocol
BACKGROUND: Fear of recurrence (FoR) is a major concern for patients following treatment for primary breast cancer, affecting 60–99% of breast cancer survivors. Mini-AFTER is a brief intervention developed to address this fear, that breast care nurses are ideally placed to deliver. However, their in...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5520363/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28748105 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40814-017-0161-8 |
_version_ | 1783251804455174144 |
---|---|
author | Cruickshank, Susanne Steel, Emma Fenlon, Deborah Armes, Jo Scanlon, Karen Banks, Elspeth Humphris, Gerald |
author_facet | Cruickshank, Susanne Steel, Emma Fenlon, Deborah Armes, Jo Scanlon, Karen Banks, Elspeth Humphris, Gerald |
author_sort | Cruickshank, Susanne |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Fear of recurrence (FoR) is a major concern for patients following treatment for primary breast cancer, affecting 60–99% of breast cancer survivors. Mini-AFTER is a brief intervention developed to address this fear, that breast care nurses are ideally placed to deliver. However, their interest in delivering such an intervention is unknown and crucial to its introduction. This study aims to assess the perceived feasibility of the Mini-AFTER telephone intervention for implementation by breast care nurses to manage moderate levels of fear of recurrence among breast cancer survivors. METHODS: A sequential explanatory mixed-methods design will be used, informed by normalisation process theory (NPT). The design will be guided by the stages of NPT. Specifically, understanding and evaluating the process (implementation) that would enable an intervention, such as the Mini-AFTER, not only to be operationalised and normalised into everyday work (embedded) but also sustained in practice (integration). Phase 1: all members on the UK Breast Cancer Care Nursing Network database (n = 905) will be emailed a link to a web-based survey, designed to investigate how breast cancer survivors’ FoR is identified and managed within current services and their willingness to deliver the Mini-AFTER. Phase 2: a purposive sample of respondents (n = 20) will be interviewed to build upon the responses in phase 1 and explore breast care nurses’ individual views on the importance of addressing fear of recurrence in their clinical consultations, interest in the Mini-AFTER intervention, the content, skills required and challenges to deliver the intervention. DISCUSSION: This study will provide information about the willingness of breast care nurses (BCNs) to provide a structured intervention to manage fear of recurrence. It will identify barriers and facilitators for effective delivery and inform the future design of a larger trial of the Mini-AFTER intervention. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5520363 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55203632017-07-26 A feasibility study of the Mini-AFTER telephone intervention for the management of fear of recurrence in breast cancer survivors: a mixed-methods study protocol Cruickshank, Susanne Steel, Emma Fenlon, Deborah Armes, Jo Scanlon, Karen Banks, Elspeth Humphris, Gerald Pilot Feasibility Stud Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Fear of recurrence (FoR) is a major concern for patients following treatment for primary breast cancer, affecting 60–99% of breast cancer survivors. Mini-AFTER is a brief intervention developed to address this fear, that breast care nurses are ideally placed to deliver. However, their interest in delivering such an intervention is unknown and crucial to its introduction. This study aims to assess the perceived feasibility of the Mini-AFTER telephone intervention for implementation by breast care nurses to manage moderate levels of fear of recurrence among breast cancer survivors. METHODS: A sequential explanatory mixed-methods design will be used, informed by normalisation process theory (NPT). The design will be guided by the stages of NPT. Specifically, understanding and evaluating the process (implementation) that would enable an intervention, such as the Mini-AFTER, not only to be operationalised and normalised into everyday work (embedded) but also sustained in practice (integration). Phase 1: all members on the UK Breast Cancer Care Nursing Network database (n = 905) will be emailed a link to a web-based survey, designed to investigate how breast cancer survivors’ FoR is identified and managed within current services and their willingness to deliver the Mini-AFTER. Phase 2: a purposive sample of respondents (n = 20) will be interviewed to build upon the responses in phase 1 and explore breast care nurses’ individual views on the importance of addressing fear of recurrence in their clinical consultations, interest in the Mini-AFTER intervention, the content, skills required and challenges to deliver the intervention. DISCUSSION: This study will provide information about the willingness of breast care nurses (BCNs) to provide a structured intervention to manage fear of recurrence. It will identify barriers and facilitators for effective delivery and inform the future design of a larger trial of the Mini-AFTER intervention. BioMed Central 2017-07-20 /pmc/articles/PMC5520363/ /pubmed/28748105 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40814-017-0161-8 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Cruickshank, Susanne Steel, Emma Fenlon, Deborah Armes, Jo Scanlon, Karen Banks, Elspeth Humphris, Gerald A feasibility study of the Mini-AFTER telephone intervention for the management of fear of recurrence in breast cancer survivors: a mixed-methods study protocol |
title | A feasibility study of the Mini-AFTER telephone intervention for the management of fear of recurrence in breast cancer survivors: a mixed-methods study protocol |
title_full | A feasibility study of the Mini-AFTER telephone intervention for the management of fear of recurrence in breast cancer survivors: a mixed-methods study protocol |
title_fullStr | A feasibility study of the Mini-AFTER telephone intervention for the management of fear of recurrence in breast cancer survivors: a mixed-methods study protocol |
title_full_unstemmed | A feasibility study of the Mini-AFTER telephone intervention for the management of fear of recurrence in breast cancer survivors: a mixed-methods study protocol |
title_short | A feasibility study of the Mini-AFTER telephone intervention for the management of fear of recurrence in breast cancer survivors: a mixed-methods study protocol |
title_sort | feasibility study of the mini-after telephone intervention for the management of fear of recurrence in breast cancer survivors: a mixed-methods study protocol |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5520363/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28748105 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40814-017-0161-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT cruickshanksusanne afeasibilitystudyoftheminiaftertelephoneinterventionforthemanagementoffearofrecurrenceinbreastcancersurvivorsamixedmethodsstudyprotocol AT steelemma afeasibilitystudyoftheminiaftertelephoneinterventionforthemanagementoffearofrecurrenceinbreastcancersurvivorsamixedmethodsstudyprotocol AT fenlondeborah afeasibilitystudyoftheminiaftertelephoneinterventionforthemanagementoffearofrecurrenceinbreastcancersurvivorsamixedmethodsstudyprotocol AT armesjo afeasibilitystudyoftheminiaftertelephoneinterventionforthemanagementoffearofrecurrenceinbreastcancersurvivorsamixedmethodsstudyprotocol AT scanlonkaren afeasibilitystudyoftheminiaftertelephoneinterventionforthemanagementoffearofrecurrenceinbreastcancersurvivorsamixedmethodsstudyprotocol AT bankselspeth afeasibilitystudyoftheminiaftertelephoneinterventionforthemanagementoffearofrecurrenceinbreastcancersurvivorsamixedmethodsstudyprotocol AT humphrisgerald afeasibilitystudyoftheminiaftertelephoneinterventionforthemanagementoffearofrecurrenceinbreastcancersurvivorsamixedmethodsstudyprotocol AT cruickshanksusanne feasibilitystudyoftheminiaftertelephoneinterventionforthemanagementoffearofrecurrenceinbreastcancersurvivorsamixedmethodsstudyprotocol AT steelemma feasibilitystudyoftheminiaftertelephoneinterventionforthemanagementoffearofrecurrenceinbreastcancersurvivorsamixedmethodsstudyprotocol AT fenlondeborah feasibilitystudyoftheminiaftertelephoneinterventionforthemanagementoffearofrecurrenceinbreastcancersurvivorsamixedmethodsstudyprotocol AT armesjo feasibilitystudyoftheminiaftertelephoneinterventionforthemanagementoffearofrecurrenceinbreastcancersurvivorsamixedmethodsstudyprotocol AT scanlonkaren feasibilitystudyoftheminiaftertelephoneinterventionforthemanagementoffearofrecurrenceinbreastcancersurvivorsamixedmethodsstudyprotocol AT bankselspeth feasibilitystudyoftheminiaftertelephoneinterventionforthemanagementoffearofrecurrenceinbreastcancersurvivorsamixedmethodsstudyprotocol AT humphrisgerald feasibilitystudyoftheminiaftertelephoneinterventionforthemanagementoffearofrecurrenceinbreastcancersurvivorsamixedmethodsstudyprotocol |