Cargando…

A feasibility study of the Mini-AFTER telephone intervention for the management of fear of recurrence in breast cancer survivors: a mixed-methods study protocol

BACKGROUND: Fear of recurrence (FoR) is a major concern for patients following treatment for primary breast cancer, affecting 60–99% of breast cancer survivors. Mini-AFTER is a brief intervention developed to address this fear, that breast care nurses are ideally placed to deliver. However, their in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cruickshank, Susanne, Steel, Emma, Fenlon, Deborah, Armes, Jo, Scanlon, Karen, Banks, Elspeth, Humphris, Gerald
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5520363/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28748105
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40814-017-0161-8
_version_ 1783251804455174144
author Cruickshank, Susanne
Steel, Emma
Fenlon, Deborah
Armes, Jo
Scanlon, Karen
Banks, Elspeth
Humphris, Gerald
author_facet Cruickshank, Susanne
Steel, Emma
Fenlon, Deborah
Armes, Jo
Scanlon, Karen
Banks, Elspeth
Humphris, Gerald
author_sort Cruickshank, Susanne
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Fear of recurrence (FoR) is a major concern for patients following treatment for primary breast cancer, affecting 60–99% of breast cancer survivors. Mini-AFTER is a brief intervention developed to address this fear, that breast care nurses are ideally placed to deliver. However, their interest in delivering such an intervention is unknown and crucial to its introduction. This study aims to assess the perceived feasibility of the Mini-AFTER telephone intervention for implementation by breast care nurses to manage moderate levels of fear of recurrence among breast cancer survivors. METHODS: A sequential explanatory mixed-methods design will be used, informed by normalisation process theory (NPT). The design will be guided by the stages of NPT. Specifically, understanding and evaluating the process (implementation) that would enable an intervention, such as the Mini-AFTER, not only to be operationalised and normalised into everyday work (embedded) but also sustained in practice (integration). Phase 1: all members on the UK Breast Cancer Care Nursing Network database (n = 905) will be emailed a link to a web-based survey, designed to investigate how breast cancer survivors’ FoR is identified and managed within current services and their willingness to deliver the Mini-AFTER. Phase 2: a purposive sample of respondents (n = 20) will be interviewed to build upon the responses in phase 1 and explore breast care nurses’ individual views on the importance of addressing fear of recurrence in their clinical consultations, interest in the Mini-AFTER intervention, the content, skills required and challenges to deliver the intervention. DISCUSSION: This study will provide information about the willingness of breast care nurses (BCNs) to provide a structured intervention to manage fear of recurrence. It will identify barriers and facilitators for effective delivery and inform the future design of a larger trial of the Mini-AFTER intervention.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5520363
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55203632017-07-26 A feasibility study of the Mini-AFTER telephone intervention for the management of fear of recurrence in breast cancer survivors: a mixed-methods study protocol Cruickshank, Susanne Steel, Emma Fenlon, Deborah Armes, Jo Scanlon, Karen Banks, Elspeth Humphris, Gerald Pilot Feasibility Stud Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Fear of recurrence (FoR) is a major concern for patients following treatment for primary breast cancer, affecting 60–99% of breast cancer survivors. Mini-AFTER is a brief intervention developed to address this fear, that breast care nurses are ideally placed to deliver. However, their interest in delivering such an intervention is unknown and crucial to its introduction. This study aims to assess the perceived feasibility of the Mini-AFTER telephone intervention for implementation by breast care nurses to manage moderate levels of fear of recurrence among breast cancer survivors. METHODS: A sequential explanatory mixed-methods design will be used, informed by normalisation process theory (NPT). The design will be guided by the stages of NPT. Specifically, understanding and evaluating the process (implementation) that would enable an intervention, such as the Mini-AFTER, not only to be operationalised and normalised into everyday work (embedded) but also sustained in practice (integration). Phase 1: all members on the UK Breast Cancer Care Nursing Network database (n = 905) will be emailed a link to a web-based survey, designed to investigate how breast cancer survivors’ FoR is identified and managed within current services and their willingness to deliver the Mini-AFTER. Phase 2: a purposive sample of respondents (n = 20) will be interviewed to build upon the responses in phase 1 and explore breast care nurses’ individual views on the importance of addressing fear of recurrence in their clinical consultations, interest in the Mini-AFTER intervention, the content, skills required and challenges to deliver the intervention. DISCUSSION: This study will provide information about the willingness of breast care nurses (BCNs) to provide a structured intervention to manage fear of recurrence. It will identify barriers and facilitators for effective delivery and inform the future design of a larger trial of the Mini-AFTER intervention. BioMed Central 2017-07-20 /pmc/articles/PMC5520363/ /pubmed/28748105 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40814-017-0161-8 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Cruickshank, Susanne
Steel, Emma
Fenlon, Deborah
Armes, Jo
Scanlon, Karen
Banks, Elspeth
Humphris, Gerald
A feasibility study of the Mini-AFTER telephone intervention for the management of fear of recurrence in breast cancer survivors: a mixed-methods study protocol
title A feasibility study of the Mini-AFTER telephone intervention for the management of fear of recurrence in breast cancer survivors: a mixed-methods study protocol
title_full A feasibility study of the Mini-AFTER telephone intervention for the management of fear of recurrence in breast cancer survivors: a mixed-methods study protocol
title_fullStr A feasibility study of the Mini-AFTER telephone intervention for the management of fear of recurrence in breast cancer survivors: a mixed-methods study protocol
title_full_unstemmed A feasibility study of the Mini-AFTER telephone intervention for the management of fear of recurrence in breast cancer survivors: a mixed-methods study protocol
title_short A feasibility study of the Mini-AFTER telephone intervention for the management of fear of recurrence in breast cancer survivors: a mixed-methods study protocol
title_sort feasibility study of the mini-after telephone intervention for the management of fear of recurrence in breast cancer survivors: a mixed-methods study protocol
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5520363/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28748105
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40814-017-0161-8
work_keys_str_mv AT cruickshanksusanne afeasibilitystudyoftheminiaftertelephoneinterventionforthemanagementoffearofrecurrenceinbreastcancersurvivorsamixedmethodsstudyprotocol
AT steelemma afeasibilitystudyoftheminiaftertelephoneinterventionforthemanagementoffearofrecurrenceinbreastcancersurvivorsamixedmethodsstudyprotocol
AT fenlondeborah afeasibilitystudyoftheminiaftertelephoneinterventionforthemanagementoffearofrecurrenceinbreastcancersurvivorsamixedmethodsstudyprotocol
AT armesjo afeasibilitystudyoftheminiaftertelephoneinterventionforthemanagementoffearofrecurrenceinbreastcancersurvivorsamixedmethodsstudyprotocol
AT scanlonkaren afeasibilitystudyoftheminiaftertelephoneinterventionforthemanagementoffearofrecurrenceinbreastcancersurvivorsamixedmethodsstudyprotocol
AT bankselspeth afeasibilitystudyoftheminiaftertelephoneinterventionforthemanagementoffearofrecurrenceinbreastcancersurvivorsamixedmethodsstudyprotocol
AT humphrisgerald afeasibilitystudyoftheminiaftertelephoneinterventionforthemanagementoffearofrecurrenceinbreastcancersurvivorsamixedmethodsstudyprotocol
AT cruickshanksusanne feasibilitystudyoftheminiaftertelephoneinterventionforthemanagementoffearofrecurrenceinbreastcancersurvivorsamixedmethodsstudyprotocol
AT steelemma feasibilitystudyoftheminiaftertelephoneinterventionforthemanagementoffearofrecurrenceinbreastcancersurvivorsamixedmethodsstudyprotocol
AT fenlondeborah feasibilitystudyoftheminiaftertelephoneinterventionforthemanagementoffearofrecurrenceinbreastcancersurvivorsamixedmethodsstudyprotocol
AT armesjo feasibilitystudyoftheminiaftertelephoneinterventionforthemanagementoffearofrecurrenceinbreastcancersurvivorsamixedmethodsstudyprotocol
AT scanlonkaren feasibilitystudyoftheminiaftertelephoneinterventionforthemanagementoffearofrecurrenceinbreastcancersurvivorsamixedmethodsstudyprotocol
AT bankselspeth feasibilitystudyoftheminiaftertelephoneinterventionforthemanagementoffearofrecurrenceinbreastcancersurvivorsamixedmethodsstudyprotocol
AT humphrisgerald feasibilitystudyoftheminiaftertelephoneinterventionforthemanagementoffearofrecurrenceinbreastcancersurvivorsamixedmethodsstudyprotocol