Cargando…
The effect of using social pressure in cover letters to improve retention in a longitudinal health study: an embedded randomised controlled retention trial
BACKGROUND: Retention of participants in cohort studies is important for validity. One way to promote retention is by sending a persuasive cover letter with surveys. The study aimed to compare the effectiveness of a covering letter containing social pressure with a standard covering letter on retent...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5520383/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28728603 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-017-2090-5 |
_version_ | 1783251808929447936 |
---|---|
author | Cotterill, Sarah Howells, Kelly Rhodes, Sarah Bower, Peter |
author_facet | Cotterill, Sarah Howells, Kelly Rhodes, Sarah Bower, Peter |
author_sort | Cotterill, Sarah |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Retention of participants in cohort studies is important for validity. One way to promote retention is by sending a persuasive cover letter with surveys. The study aimed to compare the effectiveness of a covering letter containing social pressure with a standard covering letter on retention in a health cohort study. Social pressure involves persuading people to behave in a certain way by the promise that their actions will be made know to others. We implemented a mild form of social pressure, where the recipient was told that information about whether they responded to the current survey would be noted by the research team and printed on future correspondence from the research team to the recipient. METHODS: The design was an embedded randomised controlled retention trial, conducted between July 2015 and April 2016 in Salford, UK. Participants in the host health cohort study were eligible. They received either: (1) a covering letter with two consecutive surveys (sent six and twelve months after recruitment), containing a social pressure intervention; or (2) a matching letter without the social pressure text. The primary outcome was retention in the host study, defined as return of both surveys. Randomisation was computer-generated, with stratification by household size. Participants were blinded to group assignment. Researchers were blinded for outcome ascertainment. RESULTS: Adults (n = 4447) aged over 65 years, with a long-term condition and enrolled in the host study, were randomly allocated to receive a social pressure covering letter (n = 2223) or control (n = 2224). All 4447 participants were included in the analysis. Both questionnaires were returned by 1577 participants (71%) sent the social pressure letters and 1511 (68%) sent control letters, a risk difference of 3 percentage points (adjusted odds ratio = 1.16 (95% confidence interval = 1.02–1.33)). CONCLUSION: A mild form of social pressure made a small but significant improvement in retention of older adults in a health cohort study. Investigation of social pressure across other research contexts and stronger social pressure messages is warranted. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The host cohort study, the Comprehensive Longitudinal Assessment of Salford Integrated Care (CLASSIC) study is associated with the CLASSIC PROTECTs trial, which is registered on the ISRCTN registry. Trial registration number: ISRCTN12286422. Date of registration 19 June 2014. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13063-017-2090-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5520383 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55203832017-07-21 The effect of using social pressure in cover letters to improve retention in a longitudinal health study: an embedded randomised controlled retention trial Cotterill, Sarah Howells, Kelly Rhodes, Sarah Bower, Peter Trials Research BACKGROUND: Retention of participants in cohort studies is important for validity. One way to promote retention is by sending a persuasive cover letter with surveys. The study aimed to compare the effectiveness of a covering letter containing social pressure with a standard covering letter on retention in a health cohort study. Social pressure involves persuading people to behave in a certain way by the promise that their actions will be made know to others. We implemented a mild form of social pressure, where the recipient was told that information about whether they responded to the current survey would be noted by the research team and printed on future correspondence from the research team to the recipient. METHODS: The design was an embedded randomised controlled retention trial, conducted between July 2015 and April 2016 in Salford, UK. Participants in the host health cohort study were eligible. They received either: (1) a covering letter with two consecutive surveys (sent six and twelve months after recruitment), containing a social pressure intervention; or (2) a matching letter without the social pressure text. The primary outcome was retention in the host study, defined as return of both surveys. Randomisation was computer-generated, with stratification by household size. Participants were blinded to group assignment. Researchers were blinded for outcome ascertainment. RESULTS: Adults (n = 4447) aged over 65 years, with a long-term condition and enrolled in the host study, were randomly allocated to receive a social pressure covering letter (n = 2223) or control (n = 2224). All 4447 participants were included in the analysis. Both questionnaires were returned by 1577 participants (71%) sent the social pressure letters and 1511 (68%) sent control letters, a risk difference of 3 percentage points (adjusted odds ratio = 1.16 (95% confidence interval = 1.02–1.33)). CONCLUSION: A mild form of social pressure made a small but significant improvement in retention of older adults in a health cohort study. Investigation of social pressure across other research contexts and stronger social pressure messages is warranted. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The host cohort study, the Comprehensive Longitudinal Assessment of Salford Integrated Care (CLASSIC) study is associated with the CLASSIC PROTECTs trial, which is registered on the ISRCTN registry. Trial registration number: ISRCTN12286422. Date of registration 19 June 2014. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13063-017-2090-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-07-20 /pmc/articles/PMC5520383/ /pubmed/28728603 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-017-2090-5 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Cotterill, Sarah Howells, Kelly Rhodes, Sarah Bower, Peter The effect of using social pressure in cover letters to improve retention in a longitudinal health study: an embedded randomised controlled retention trial |
title | The effect of using social pressure in cover letters to improve retention in a longitudinal health study: an embedded randomised controlled retention trial |
title_full | The effect of using social pressure in cover letters to improve retention in a longitudinal health study: an embedded randomised controlled retention trial |
title_fullStr | The effect of using social pressure in cover letters to improve retention in a longitudinal health study: an embedded randomised controlled retention trial |
title_full_unstemmed | The effect of using social pressure in cover letters to improve retention in a longitudinal health study: an embedded randomised controlled retention trial |
title_short | The effect of using social pressure in cover letters to improve retention in a longitudinal health study: an embedded randomised controlled retention trial |
title_sort | effect of using social pressure in cover letters to improve retention in a longitudinal health study: an embedded randomised controlled retention trial |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5520383/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28728603 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-017-2090-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT cotterillsarah theeffectofusingsocialpressureincoverletterstoimproveretentioninalongitudinalhealthstudyanembeddedrandomisedcontrolledretentiontrial AT howellskelly theeffectofusingsocialpressureincoverletterstoimproveretentioninalongitudinalhealthstudyanembeddedrandomisedcontrolledretentiontrial AT rhodessarah theeffectofusingsocialpressureincoverletterstoimproveretentioninalongitudinalhealthstudyanembeddedrandomisedcontrolledretentiontrial AT bowerpeter theeffectofusingsocialpressureincoverletterstoimproveretentioninalongitudinalhealthstudyanembeddedrandomisedcontrolledretentiontrial AT cotterillsarah effectofusingsocialpressureincoverletterstoimproveretentioninalongitudinalhealthstudyanembeddedrandomisedcontrolledretentiontrial AT howellskelly effectofusingsocialpressureincoverletterstoimproveretentioninalongitudinalhealthstudyanembeddedrandomisedcontrolledretentiontrial AT rhodessarah effectofusingsocialpressureincoverletterstoimproveretentioninalongitudinalhealthstudyanembeddedrandomisedcontrolledretentiontrial AT bowerpeter effectofusingsocialpressureincoverletterstoimproveretentioninalongitudinalhealthstudyanembeddedrandomisedcontrolledretentiontrial |