Cargando…
Prioritising action on occupational carcinogens in Europe: a socioeconomic and health impact assessment
BACKGROUND: Work-related cancer is an important public health issue with a large financial impact on society. The key European legislative instrument is the Carcinogens and Mutagens Directive (2004/37/EC). In preparation for updating the Directive, the European Commission commissioned a study to pro...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5520511/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28609433 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2017.161 |
_version_ | 1783251827072958464 |
---|---|
author | Cherrie, J W Hutchings, S Gorman Ng, M Mistry, R Corden, C Lamb, J Sánchez Jiménez, A Shafrir, A Sobey, M van Tongeren, M Rushton, L |
author_facet | Cherrie, J W Hutchings, S Gorman Ng, M Mistry, R Corden, C Lamb, J Sánchez Jiménez, A Shafrir, A Sobey, M van Tongeren, M Rushton, L |
author_sort | Cherrie, J W |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Work-related cancer is an important public health issue with a large financial impact on society. The key European legislative instrument is the Carcinogens and Mutagens Directive (2004/37/EC). In preparation for updating the Directive, the European Commission commissioned a study to provide a socioeconomic, health and environmental impact assessment. METHODS: The evaluation was undertaken for 25 preselected hazardous substances or mixtures. Estimates were made of the number of cases of cancer attributable to workplace exposure, both currently and in the future, with and without any regulatory interventions, and these data were used to estimate the financial health costs and benefits. RESULTS: It was estimated that if no action is taken there will be >700 000 attributable cancer deaths over the next 60 years for the substances assessed. However, there are only seven substances where the data suggest a clear benefit in terms of avoided cancer cases from introducing a binding limit at the levels considered. Overall, the costs of the proposed interventions were very high (up to €34 000 million) and the associated monetised health benefits were mostly less than the compliance costs. CONCLUSIONS: The strongest cases for the introduction of a limit value are for: respirable crystalline silica, hexavalent chromium, and hardwood dust. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5520511 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55205112018-07-11 Prioritising action on occupational carcinogens in Europe: a socioeconomic and health impact assessment Cherrie, J W Hutchings, S Gorman Ng, M Mistry, R Corden, C Lamb, J Sánchez Jiménez, A Shafrir, A Sobey, M van Tongeren, M Rushton, L Br J Cancer Epidemiology BACKGROUND: Work-related cancer is an important public health issue with a large financial impact on society. The key European legislative instrument is the Carcinogens and Mutagens Directive (2004/37/EC). In preparation for updating the Directive, the European Commission commissioned a study to provide a socioeconomic, health and environmental impact assessment. METHODS: The evaluation was undertaken for 25 preselected hazardous substances or mixtures. Estimates were made of the number of cases of cancer attributable to workplace exposure, both currently and in the future, with and without any regulatory interventions, and these data were used to estimate the financial health costs and benefits. RESULTS: It was estimated that if no action is taken there will be >700 000 attributable cancer deaths over the next 60 years for the substances assessed. However, there are only seven substances where the data suggest a clear benefit in terms of avoided cancer cases from introducing a binding limit at the levels considered. Overall, the costs of the proposed interventions were very high (up to €34 000 million) and the associated monetised health benefits were mostly less than the compliance costs. CONCLUSIONS: The strongest cases for the introduction of a limit value are for: respirable crystalline silica, hexavalent chromium, and hardwood dust. Nature Publishing Group 2017-07-11 2017-06-13 /pmc/articles/PMC5520511/ /pubmed/28609433 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2017.161 Text en Copyright © 2017 Cancer Research UK http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ From twelve months after its original publication, this work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-Share Alike 4.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Epidemiology Cherrie, J W Hutchings, S Gorman Ng, M Mistry, R Corden, C Lamb, J Sánchez Jiménez, A Shafrir, A Sobey, M van Tongeren, M Rushton, L Prioritising action on occupational carcinogens in Europe: a socioeconomic and health impact assessment |
title | Prioritising action on occupational carcinogens in Europe: a socioeconomic and health impact assessment |
title_full | Prioritising action on occupational carcinogens in Europe: a socioeconomic and health impact assessment |
title_fullStr | Prioritising action on occupational carcinogens in Europe: a socioeconomic and health impact assessment |
title_full_unstemmed | Prioritising action on occupational carcinogens in Europe: a socioeconomic and health impact assessment |
title_short | Prioritising action on occupational carcinogens in Europe: a socioeconomic and health impact assessment |
title_sort | prioritising action on occupational carcinogens in europe: a socioeconomic and health impact assessment |
topic | Epidemiology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5520511/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28609433 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2017.161 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT cherriejw prioritisingactiononoccupationalcarcinogensineuropeasocioeconomicandhealthimpactassessment AT hutchingss prioritisingactiononoccupationalcarcinogensineuropeasocioeconomicandhealthimpactassessment AT gormanngm prioritisingactiononoccupationalcarcinogensineuropeasocioeconomicandhealthimpactassessment AT mistryr prioritisingactiononoccupationalcarcinogensineuropeasocioeconomicandhealthimpactassessment AT cordenc prioritisingactiononoccupationalcarcinogensineuropeasocioeconomicandhealthimpactassessment AT lambj prioritisingactiononoccupationalcarcinogensineuropeasocioeconomicandhealthimpactassessment AT sanchezjimeneza prioritisingactiononoccupationalcarcinogensineuropeasocioeconomicandhealthimpactassessment AT shafrira prioritisingactiononoccupationalcarcinogensineuropeasocioeconomicandhealthimpactassessment AT sobeym prioritisingactiononoccupationalcarcinogensineuropeasocioeconomicandhealthimpactassessment AT vantongerenm prioritisingactiononoccupationalcarcinogensineuropeasocioeconomicandhealthimpactassessment AT rushtonl prioritisingactiononoccupationalcarcinogensineuropeasocioeconomicandhealthimpactassessment |