Cargando…
Effectiveness of transtracheal lidocaine as an adjunct to general anesthesia in providing patient immobility during total parotidectomy: A comparison with dexmedetomidine infusion
BACKGROUD AND AIMS: Dexmedetomidine and propofol infusions are increasingly being used to ensure intraoperative patient immobility in the absence of muscle relaxants during parotidectomy. The primary aim of our study was to assess the effectiveness of transtracheal block as an adjunct to general ane...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5520591/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28781444 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0970-9185.209752 |
_version_ | 1783251839300403200 |
---|---|
author | Rajan, Sunil Arora, Vineesh Tosh, Pulak Mohan, Prasanth Kumar, Lakshmi |
author_facet | Rajan, Sunil Arora, Vineesh Tosh, Pulak Mohan, Prasanth Kumar, Lakshmi |
author_sort | Rajan, Sunil |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUD AND AIMS: Dexmedetomidine and propofol infusions are increasingly being used to ensure intraoperative patient immobility in the absence of muscle relaxants during parotidectomy. The primary aim of our study was to assess the effectiveness of transtracheal block as an adjunct to general anesthesia in providing patient immobility during total parotidectomy, as compared to dexmedetomidine infusion. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This prospective, randomized study was conducted in 58 patients. Group A patients received a transtracheal injection of 4 ml of 4% lidocaine before induction whereas in Group B, dexmedetomidine 1 mcg/kg was administered intravenously. Following induction and intubation, anesthesia was maintained with oxygen, nitrous oxide, and isoflurane and dexmedetomidine was administered in Group B at a rate of 0.7 mcg/kg/h. In both the groups, if the patient moved, bucked, or if there were signs of inadequate depth of anesthesia, plane of anesthesia was deepened with a bolus of propofol 0.5 mg/kg intravenously. Mann–Whitney U-test and Fisher's exact test were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: The number of patients who moved in the transtracheal group was significantly less as compared to dexmedetomidine group (3 vs. 11). Mean heart rates (HRs) were comparable in both groups till 10 min, but between 15 and 180 min, Group B had significantly low HR. Systolic blood pressure (SBP) was significantly high at 10 min following dexmedetomidine bolus in Group B. Though Group B showed low SBP values as compared to Group A from 10 min following induction, the difference became significant between 45 and 180 min. Changes in mean arterial blood pressures followed a similar trend as with SBP. CONCLUSION: Transtracheal lidocaine ensured patient immobility with hemodynamic stability during total parotidectomy with nerve stimulation studies as compared to intraoperative dexmedetomidine infusion. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5520591 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55205912017-08-04 Effectiveness of transtracheal lidocaine as an adjunct to general anesthesia in providing patient immobility during total parotidectomy: A comparison with dexmedetomidine infusion Rajan, Sunil Arora, Vineesh Tosh, Pulak Mohan, Prasanth Kumar, Lakshmi J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol Original Article BACKGROUD AND AIMS: Dexmedetomidine and propofol infusions are increasingly being used to ensure intraoperative patient immobility in the absence of muscle relaxants during parotidectomy. The primary aim of our study was to assess the effectiveness of transtracheal block as an adjunct to general anesthesia in providing patient immobility during total parotidectomy, as compared to dexmedetomidine infusion. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This prospective, randomized study was conducted in 58 patients. Group A patients received a transtracheal injection of 4 ml of 4% lidocaine before induction whereas in Group B, dexmedetomidine 1 mcg/kg was administered intravenously. Following induction and intubation, anesthesia was maintained with oxygen, nitrous oxide, and isoflurane and dexmedetomidine was administered in Group B at a rate of 0.7 mcg/kg/h. In both the groups, if the patient moved, bucked, or if there were signs of inadequate depth of anesthesia, plane of anesthesia was deepened with a bolus of propofol 0.5 mg/kg intravenously. Mann–Whitney U-test and Fisher's exact test were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: The number of patients who moved in the transtracheal group was significantly less as compared to dexmedetomidine group (3 vs. 11). Mean heart rates (HRs) were comparable in both groups till 10 min, but between 15 and 180 min, Group B had significantly low HR. Systolic blood pressure (SBP) was significantly high at 10 min following dexmedetomidine bolus in Group B. Though Group B showed low SBP values as compared to Group A from 10 min following induction, the difference became significant between 45 and 180 min. Changes in mean arterial blood pressures followed a similar trend as with SBP. CONCLUSION: Transtracheal lidocaine ensured patient immobility with hemodynamic stability during total parotidectomy with nerve stimulation studies as compared to intraoperative dexmedetomidine infusion. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5520591/ /pubmed/28781444 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0970-9185.209752 Text en Copyright: © 2017 Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Rajan, Sunil Arora, Vineesh Tosh, Pulak Mohan, Prasanth Kumar, Lakshmi Effectiveness of transtracheal lidocaine as an adjunct to general anesthesia in providing patient immobility during total parotidectomy: A comparison with dexmedetomidine infusion |
title | Effectiveness of transtracheal lidocaine as an adjunct to general anesthesia in providing patient immobility during total parotidectomy: A comparison with dexmedetomidine infusion |
title_full | Effectiveness of transtracheal lidocaine as an adjunct to general anesthesia in providing patient immobility during total parotidectomy: A comparison with dexmedetomidine infusion |
title_fullStr | Effectiveness of transtracheal lidocaine as an adjunct to general anesthesia in providing patient immobility during total parotidectomy: A comparison with dexmedetomidine infusion |
title_full_unstemmed | Effectiveness of transtracheal lidocaine as an adjunct to general anesthesia in providing patient immobility during total parotidectomy: A comparison with dexmedetomidine infusion |
title_short | Effectiveness of transtracheal lidocaine as an adjunct to general anesthesia in providing patient immobility during total parotidectomy: A comparison with dexmedetomidine infusion |
title_sort | effectiveness of transtracheal lidocaine as an adjunct to general anesthesia in providing patient immobility during total parotidectomy: a comparison with dexmedetomidine infusion |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5520591/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28781444 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0970-9185.209752 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rajansunil effectivenessoftranstracheallidocaineasanadjuncttogeneralanesthesiainprovidingpatientimmobilityduringtotalparotidectomyacomparisonwithdexmedetomidineinfusion AT aroravineesh effectivenessoftranstracheallidocaineasanadjuncttogeneralanesthesiainprovidingpatientimmobilityduringtotalparotidectomyacomparisonwithdexmedetomidineinfusion AT toshpulak effectivenessoftranstracheallidocaineasanadjuncttogeneralanesthesiainprovidingpatientimmobilityduringtotalparotidectomyacomparisonwithdexmedetomidineinfusion AT mohanprasanth effectivenessoftranstracheallidocaineasanadjuncttogeneralanesthesiainprovidingpatientimmobilityduringtotalparotidectomyacomparisonwithdexmedetomidineinfusion AT kumarlakshmi effectivenessoftranstracheallidocaineasanadjuncttogeneralanesthesiainprovidingpatientimmobilityduringtotalparotidectomyacomparisonwithdexmedetomidineinfusion |