Cargando…
The development of a collective quality system: challenges and lessons learned; a qualitative study
BACKGROUND: The ongoing professionalization of medical education means that quality systems (QSs) aimed at improving medical education also continuously have to improve. The aim of this paper is to describe the development of a collective QS for eight Dutch General Practitioner (GP) specialty traini...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5521152/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28732486 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-017-0946-8 |
_version_ | 1783251927513956352 |
---|---|
author | Buwalda, Nienke Braspenning, Jozé van Dijk, Nynke Visser, Mechteld |
author_facet | Buwalda, Nienke Braspenning, Jozé van Dijk, Nynke Visser, Mechteld |
author_sort | Buwalda, Nienke |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The ongoing professionalization of medical education means that quality systems (QSs) aimed at improving medical education also continuously have to improve. The aim of this paper is to describe the development of a collective QS for eight Dutch General Practitioner (GP) specialty training institutes to provide insights into the considerations that are involved in developing a QS in medical education. METHODS: Experts in the field of GP education and quality assurance developed the QS. They studied the literature, prior QSs and involved stakeholders. The team interviewed the directors, and all meetings and steps in the development process were transcribed. All interviews and relevant documentation were analyzed. Results were checked by the developers. RESULTS: Stakeholders agreed on the goals, the relevance of the resulting domains, and the methods to assess. However, one major theme emerged. To enable benchmarking, the team developed detailed quantifiable indicators. Especially the development of these indicators gave discussion. CONCLUSIONS: Involving stakeholders was crucial as they directed the development of the QS. The framework of the World Federation for Medical Education (WFME) provided guidance in covering all the relevant processes. The major challenge consisted of formulating indicators. Our experience indicates that the process of quantifying indicators is not straightforward. The detailed level of the indicators chosen is perhaps not always suitable for QSs in the field of medical education. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5521152 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55211522017-07-21 The development of a collective quality system: challenges and lessons learned; a qualitative study Buwalda, Nienke Braspenning, Jozé van Dijk, Nynke Visser, Mechteld BMC Med Educ Correspondence BACKGROUND: The ongoing professionalization of medical education means that quality systems (QSs) aimed at improving medical education also continuously have to improve. The aim of this paper is to describe the development of a collective QS for eight Dutch General Practitioner (GP) specialty training institutes to provide insights into the considerations that are involved in developing a QS in medical education. METHODS: Experts in the field of GP education and quality assurance developed the QS. They studied the literature, prior QSs and involved stakeholders. The team interviewed the directors, and all meetings and steps in the development process were transcribed. All interviews and relevant documentation were analyzed. Results were checked by the developers. RESULTS: Stakeholders agreed on the goals, the relevance of the resulting domains, and the methods to assess. However, one major theme emerged. To enable benchmarking, the team developed detailed quantifiable indicators. Especially the development of these indicators gave discussion. CONCLUSIONS: Involving stakeholders was crucial as they directed the development of the QS. The framework of the World Federation for Medical Education (WFME) provided guidance in covering all the relevant processes. The major challenge consisted of formulating indicators. Our experience indicates that the process of quantifying indicators is not straightforward. The detailed level of the indicators chosen is perhaps not always suitable for QSs in the field of medical education. BioMed Central 2017-07-21 /pmc/articles/PMC5521152/ /pubmed/28732486 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-017-0946-8 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Correspondence Buwalda, Nienke Braspenning, Jozé van Dijk, Nynke Visser, Mechteld The development of a collective quality system: challenges and lessons learned; a qualitative study |
title | The development of a collective quality system: challenges and lessons learned; a qualitative study |
title_full | The development of a collective quality system: challenges and lessons learned; a qualitative study |
title_fullStr | The development of a collective quality system: challenges and lessons learned; a qualitative study |
title_full_unstemmed | The development of a collective quality system: challenges and lessons learned; a qualitative study |
title_short | The development of a collective quality system: challenges and lessons learned; a qualitative study |
title_sort | development of a collective quality system: challenges and lessons learned; a qualitative study |
topic | Correspondence |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5521152/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28732486 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-017-0946-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT buwaldanienke thedevelopmentofacollectivequalitysystemchallengesandlessonslearnedaqualitativestudy AT braspenningjoze thedevelopmentofacollectivequalitysystemchallengesandlessonslearnedaqualitativestudy AT vandijknynke thedevelopmentofacollectivequalitysystemchallengesandlessonslearnedaqualitativestudy AT vissermechteld thedevelopmentofacollectivequalitysystemchallengesandlessonslearnedaqualitativestudy AT buwaldanienke developmentofacollectivequalitysystemchallengesandlessonslearnedaqualitativestudy AT braspenningjoze developmentofacollectivequalitysystemchallengesandlessonslearnedaqualitativestudy AT vandijknynke developmentofacollectivequalitysystemchallengesandlessonslearnedaqualitativestudy AT vissermechteld developmentofacollectivequalitysystemchallengesandlessonslearnedaqualitativestudy |