Cargando…

The development of a collective quality system: challenges and lessons learned; a qualitative study

BACKGROUND: The ongoing professionalization of medical education means that quality systems (QSs) aimed at improving medical education also continuously have to improve. The aim of this paper is to describe the development of a collective QS for eight Dutch General Practitioner (GP) specialty traini...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Buwalda, Nienke, Braspenning, Jozé, van Dijk, Nynke, Visser, Mechteld
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5521152/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28732486
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-017-0946-8
_version_ 1783251927513956352
author Buwalda, Nienke
Braspenning, Jozé
van Dijk, Nynke
Visser, Mechteld
author_facet Buwalda, Nienke
Braspenning, Jozé
van Dijk, Nynke
Visser, Mechteld
author_sort Buwalda, Nienke
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The ongoing professionalization of medical education means that quality systems (QSs) aimed at improving medical education also continuously have to improve. The aim of this paper is to describe the development of a collective QS for eight Dutch General Practitioner (GP) specialty training institutes to provide insights into the considerations that are involved in developing a QS in medical education. METHODS: Experts in the field of GP education and quality assurance developed the QS. They studied the literature, prior QSs and involved stakeholders. The team interviewed the directors, and all meetings and steps in the development process were transcribed. All interviews and relevant documentation were analyzed. Results were checked by the developers. RESULTS: Stakeholders agreed on the goals, the relevance of the resulting domains, and the methods to assess. However, one major theme emerged. To enable benchmarking, the team developed detailed quantifiable indicators. Especially the development of these indicators gave discussion. CONCLUSIONS: Involving stakeholders was crucial as they directed the development of the QS. The framework of the World Federation for Medical Education (WFME) provided guidance in covering all the relevant processes. The major challenge consisted of formulating indicators. Our experience indicates that the process of quantifying indicators is not straightforward. The detailed level of the indicators chosen is perhaps not always suitable for QSs in the field of medical education.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5521152
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55211522017-07-21 The development of a collective quality system: challenges and lessons learned; a qualitative study Buwalda, Nienke Braspenning, Jozé van Dijk, Nynke Visser, Mechteld BMC Med Educ Correspondence BACKGROUND: The ongoing professionalization of medical education means that quality systems (QSs) aimed at improving medical education also continuously have to improve. The aim of this paper is to describe the development of a collective QS for eight Dutch General Practitioner (GP) specialty training institutes to provide insights into the considerations that are involved in developing a QS in medical education. METHODS: Experts in the field of GP education and quality assurance developed the QS. They studied the literature, prior QSs and involved stakeholders. The team interviewed the directors, and all meetings and steps in the development process were transcribed. All interviews and relevant documentation were analyzed. Results were checked by the developers. RESULTS: Stakeholders agreed on the goals, the relevance of the resulting domains, and the methods to assess. However, one major theme emerged. To enable benchmarking, the team developed detailed quantifiable indicators. Especially the development of these indicators gave discussion. CONCLUSIONS: Involving stakeholders was crucial as they directed the development of the QS. The framework of the World Federation for Medical Education (WFME) provided guidance in covering all the relevant processes. The major challenge consisted of formulating indicators. Our experience indicates that the process of quantifying indicators is not straightforward. The detailed level of the indicators chosen is perhaps not always suitable for QSs in the field of medical education. BioMed Central 2017-07-21 /pmc/articles/PMC5521152/ /pubmed/28732486 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-017-0946-8 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Correspondence
Buwalda, Nienke
Braspenning, Jozé
van Dijk, Nynke
Visser, Mechteld
The development of a collective quality system: challenges and lessons learned; a qualitative study
title The development of a collective quality system: challenges and lessons learned; a qualitative study
title_full The development of a collective quality system: challenges and lessons learned; a qualitative study
title_fullStr The development of a collective quality system: challenges and lessons learned; a qualitative study
title_full_unstemmed The development of a collective quality system: challenges and lessons learned; a qualitative study
title_short The development of a collective quality system: challenges and lessons learned; a qualitative study
title_sort development of a collective quality system: challenges and lessons learned; a qualitative study
topic Correspondence
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5521152/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28732486
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-017-0946-8
work_keys_str_mv AT buwaldanienke thedevelopmentofacollectivequalitysystemchallengesandlessonslearnedaqualitativestudy
AT braspenningjoze thedevelopmentofacollectivequalitysystemchallengesandlessonslearnedaqualitativestudy
AT vandijknynke thedevelopmentofacollectivequalitysystemchallengesandlessonslearnedaqualitativestudy
AT vissermechteld thedevelopmentofacollectivequalitysystemchallengesandlessonslearnedaqualitativestudy
AT buwaldanienke developmentofacollectivequalitysystemchallengesandlessonslearnedaqualitativestudy
AT braspenningjoze developmentofacollectivequalitysystemchallengesandlessonslearnedaqualitativestudy
AT vandijknynke developmentofacollectivequalitysystemchallengesandlessonslearnedaqualitativestudy
AT vissermechteld developmentofacollectivequalitysystemchallengesandlessonslearnedaqualitativestudy