Cargando…

Patient and doctor perspectives on HIV screening in the emergency department: A prospective cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND: The emergency department (ED) is mentioned specifically in the Swiss HIV testing recommendations as a site at which patients can benefit from expanded HIV testing to optimise early HIV diagnosis. At our centre, where local HIV seroprevalence is 0.2–0.4%, 1% of all patients presenting to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: De Rossi, Noemy, Dattner, Nicolas, Cavassini, Matthias, Peters, Solange, Hugli, Olivier, Darling, Katharine E. A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5521743/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28732088
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0180389
_version_ 1783252028696297472
author De Rossi, Noemy
Dattner, Nicolas
Cavassini, Matthias
Peters, Solange
Hugli, Olivier
Darling, Katharine E. A.
author_facet De Rossi, Noemy
Dattner, Nicolas
Cavassini, Matthias
Peters, Solange
Hugli, Olivier
Darling, Katharine E. A.
author_sort De Rossi, Noemy
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The emergency department (ED) is mentioned specifically in the Swiss HIV testing recommendations as a site at which patients can benefit from expanded HIV testing to optimise early HIV diagnosis. At our centre, where local HIV seroprevalence is 0.2–0.4%, 1% of all patients presenting to the ED are tested for HIV. Barriers to HIV testing, from the patient and doctor perspective, and patient acceptability of rapid HIV testing were examined in this study. METHODS: Between October 2014 and May 2015, 100 discrete patient-doctor encounter pairs undertook a survey in the ED of Lausanne University Hospital, Switzerland. Patients completed a questionnaire on HIV risk factors and were offered free rapid HIV testing (INSTI(™)). For every patient included, the treating doctor was asked if HIV testing had 1) been indicated according to the national testing recommendations, 2) mentioned, and 3) offered during the consultation. RESULTS: Of 100 patients, 30 had indications for HIV testing through risk factors or a suggestive presenting complaint (PC). Fifty patients accepted rapid testing; no test was reactive. Of 50 patients declining testing, 82% considered themselves not at risk or had recently tested negative and 16% wished to focus on their PC. ED doctors identified 20 patients with testing indications, mentioned testing to nine and offered testing to six. The main reason for doctors not mentioning or not offering testing was the wish to focus on the PC. DISCUSSION: Patients and doctors at our ED share the testing barrier of wishing to focus on the PC. Rapid HIV testing offered in parallel to the patient-doctor consultation increased the testing rate from 6% (offered by doctors) to 50%. Introducing this service would enable testing of patients not offered tests by their doctors and reduce missed opportunities for early HIV diagnosis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5521743
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55217432017-08-07 Patient and doctor perspectives on HIV screening in the emergency department: A prospective cross-sectional study De Rossi, Noemy Dattner, Nicolas Cavassini, Matthias Peters, Solange Hugli, Olivier Darling, Katharine E. A. PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: The emergency department (ED) is mentioned specifically in the Swiss HIV testing recommendations as a site at which patients can benefit from expanded HIV testing to optimise early HIV diagnosis. At our centre, where local HIV seroprevalence is 0.2–0.4%, 1% of all patients presenting to the ED are tested for HIV. Barriers to HIV testing, from the patient and doctor perspective, and patient acceptability of rapid HIV testing were examined in this study. METHODS: Between October 2014 and May 2015, 100 discrete patient-doctor encounter pairs undertook a survey in the ED of Lausanne University Hospital, Switzerland. Patients completed a questionnaire on HIV risk factors and were offered free rapid HIV testing (INSTI(™)). For every patient included, the treating doctor was asked if HIV testing had 1) been indicated according to the national testing recommendations, 2) mentioned, and 3) offered during the consultation. RESULTS: Of 100 patients, 30 had indications for HIV testing through risk factors or a suggestive presenting complaint (PC). Fifty patients accepted rapid testing; no test was reactive. Of 50 patients declining testing, 82% considered themselves not at risk or had recently tested negative and 16% wished to focus on their PC. ED doctors identified 20 patients with testing indications, mentioned testing to nine and offered testing to six. The main reason for doctors not mentioning or not offering testing was the wish to focus on the PC. DISCUSSION: Patients and doctors at our ED share the testing barrier of wishing to focus on the PC. Rapid HIV testing offered in parallel to the patient-doctor consultation increased the testing rate from 6% (offered by doctors) to 50%. Introducing this service would enable testing of patients not offered tests by their doctors and reduce missed opportunities for early HIV diagnosis. Public Library of Science 2017-07-21 /pmc/articles/PMC5521743/ /pubmed/28732088 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0180389 Text en © 2017 De Rossi et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
De Rossi, Noemy
Dattner, Nicolas
Cavassini, Matthias
Peters, Solange
Hugli, Olivier
Darling, Katharine E. A.
Patient and doctor perspectives on HIV screening in the emergency department: A prospective cross-sectional study
title Patient and doctor perspectives on HIV screening in the emergency department: A prospective cross-sectional study
title_full Patient and doctor perspectives on HIV screening in the emergency department: A prospective cross-sectional study
title_fullStr Patient and doctor perspectives on HIV screening in the emergency department: A prospective cross-sectional study
title_full_unstemmed Patient and doctor perspectives on HIV screening in the emergency department: A prospective cross-sectional study
title_short Patient and doctor perspectives on HIV screening in the emergency department: A prospective cross-sectional study
title_sort patient and doctor perspectives on hiv screening in the emergency department: a prospective cross-sectional study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5521743/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28732088
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0180389
work_keys_str_mv AT derossinoemy patientanddoctorperspectivesonhivscreeningintheemergencydepartmentaprospectivecrosssectionalstudy
AT dattnernicolas patientanddoctorperspectivesonhivscreeningintheemergencydepartmentaprospectivecrosssectionalstudy
AT cavassinimatthias patientanddoctorperspectivesonhivscreeningintheemergencydepartmentaprospectivecrosssectionalstudy
AT peterssolange patientanddoctorperspectivesonhivscreeningintheemergencydepartmentaprospectivecrosssectionalstudy
AT hugliolivier patientanddoctorperspectivesonhivscreeningintheemergencydepartmentaprospectivecrosssectionalstudy
AT darlingkatharineea patientanddoctorperspectivesonhivscreeningintheemergencydepartmentaprospectivecrosssectionalstudy