Cargando…

The prognostic impact of human papillomavirus status following treatment failure in oropharyngeal cancer

INTRODUCTION: Despite the human papillomavirus conferring a better prognosis in the primary treatment setting, the prognostic impact of viral status after treatment failure in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma patients is poorly understood. METHODS: We retrospectively identified 33 oropharyngeal...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dave, Eesha, Ozbek, Umut, Gupta, Vishal, Genden, Eric, Miles, Brett, Teng, Marita, Posner, Marshall, Misiukiewicz, Krzysztof, Bakst, Richard L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5521776/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28732044
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0181108
_version_ 1783252036226121728
author Dave, Eesha
Ozbek, Umut
Gupta, Vishal
Genden, Eric
Miles, Brett
Teng, Marita
Posner, Marshall
Misiukiewicz, Krzysztof
Bakst, Richard L.
author_facet Dave, Eesha
Ozbek, Umut
Gupta, Vishal
Genden, Eric
Miles, Brett
Teng, Marita
Posner, Marshall
Misiukiewicz, Krzysztof
Bakst, Richard L.
author_sort Dave, Eesha
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Despite the human papillomavirus conferring a better prognosis in the primary treatment setting, the prognostic impact of viral status after treatment failure in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma patients is poorly understood. METHODS: We retrospectively identified 33 oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPC) patients with local and/or distant disease recurrence post-treatment, and looked at metastatic patterns, time to failure and survival patterns by HPV status. RESULTS: Median overall survival following local failure was not significantly different by HPV status (17 months for HPV+ vs. 14 months for HPV-, p = 0.23). However, following distant failures, HPV+ patients lived significantly longer than HPV- patients (median 42 months vs. 11 months, p = 0.004). HPV- patients were more likely to have locoregional failures as compared to HPV+ patients (p = 0.005), but the difference in distant failure between both groups was not significant (p = 0.09). HPV+ patients were more likely to develop metastases to sites other than the lung and bones. CONCLUSION: HPV positivity predicts a favorable prognosis with the potential for long-term survival following distant, not locoregional, failures. These results have important implications for the aggressiveness of treatment and type of surveillance imaging performed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5521776
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55217762017-08-07 The prognostic impact of human papillomavirus status following treatment failure in oropharyngeal cancer Dave, Eesha Ozbek, Umut Gupta, Vishal Genden, Eric Miles, Brett Teng, Marita Posner, Marshall Misiukiewicz, Krzysztof Bakst, Richard L. PLoS One Research Article INTRODUCTION: Despite the human papillomavirus conferring a better prognosis in the primary treatment setting, the prognostic impact of viral status after treatment failure in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma patients is poorly understood. METHODS: We retrospectively identified 33 oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPC) patients with local and/or distant disease recurrence post-treatment, and looked at metastatic patterns, time to failure and survival patterns by HPV status. RESULTS: Median overall survival following local failure was not significantly different by HPV status (17 months for HPV+ vs. 14 months for HPV-, p = 0.23). However, following distant failures, HPV+ patients lived significantly longer than HPV- patients (median 42 months vs. 11 months, p = 0.004). HPV- patients were more likely to have locoregional failures as compared to HPV+ patients (p = 0.005), but the difference in distant failure between both groups was not significant (p = 0.09). HPV+ patients were more likely to develop metastases to sites other than the lung and bones. CONCLUSION: HPV positivity predicts a favorable prognosis with the potential for long-term survival following distant, not locoregional, failures. These results have important implications for the aggressiveness of treatment and type of surveillance imaging performed. Public Library of Science 2017-07-21 /pmc/articles/PMC5521776/ /pubmed/28732044 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0181108 Text en © 2017 Dave et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Dave, Eesha
Ozbek, Umut
Gupta, Vishal
Genden, Eric
Miles, Brett
Teng, Marita
Posner, Marshall
Misiukiewicz, Krzysztof
Bakst, Richard L.
The prognostic impact of human papillomavirus status following treatment failure in oropharyngeal cancer
title The prognostic impact of human papillomavirus status following treatment failure in oropharyngeal cancer
title_full The prognostic impact of human papillomavirus status following treatment failure in oropharyngeal cancer
title_fullStr The prognostic impact of human papillomavirus status following treatment failure in oropharyngeal cancer
title_full_unstemmed The prognostic impact of human papillomavirus status following treatment failure in oropharyngeal cancer
title_short The prognostic impact of human papillomavirus status following treatment failure in oropharyngeal cancer
title_sort prognostic impact of human papillomavirus status following treatment failure in oropharyngeal cancer
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5521776/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28732044
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0181108
work_keys_str_mv AT daveeesha theprognosticimpactofhumanpapillomavirusstatusfollowingtreatmentfailureinoropharyngealcancer
AT ozbekumut theprognosticimpactofhumanpapillomavirusstatusfollowingtreatmentfailureinoropharyngealcancer
AT guptavishal theprognosticimpactofhumanpapillomavirusstatusfollowingtreatmentfailureinoropharyngealcancer
AT gendeneric theprognosticimpactofhumanpapillomavirusstatusfollowingtreatmentfailureinoropharyngealcancer
AT milesbrett theprognosticimpactofhumanpapillomavirusstatusfollowingtreatmentfailureinoropharyngealcancer
AT tengmarita theprognosticimpactofhumanpapillomavirusstatusfollowingtreatmentfailureinoropharyngealcancer
AT posnermarshall theprognosticimpactofhumanpapillomavirusstatusfollowingtreatmentfailureinoropharyngealcancer
AT misiukiewiczkrzysztof theprognosticimpactofhumanpapillomavirusstatusfollowingtreatmentfailureinoropharyngealcancer
AT bakstrichardl theprognosticimpactofhumanpapillomavirusstatusfollowingtreatmentfailureinoropharyngealcancer
AT daveeesha prognosticimpactofhumanpapillomavirusstatusfollowingtreatmentfailureinoropharyngealcancer
AT ozbekumut prognosticimpactofhumanpapillomavirusstatusfollowingtreatmentfailureinoropharyngealcancer
AT guptavishal prognosticimpactofhumanpapillomavirusstatusfollowingtreatmentfailureinoropharyngealcancer
AT gendeneric prognosticimpactofhumanpapillomavirusstatusfollowingtreatmentfailureinoropharyngealcancer
AT milesbrett prognosticimpactofhumanpapillomavirusstatusfollowingtreatmentfailureinoropharyngealcancer
AT tengmarita prognosticimpactofhumanpapillomavirusstatusfollowingtreatmentfailureinoropharyngealcancer
AT posnermarshall prognosticimpactofhumanpapillomavirusstatusfollowingtreatmentfailureinoropharyngealcancer
AT misiukiewiczkrzysztof prognosticimpactofhumanpapillomavirusstatusfollowingtreatmentfailureinoropharyngealcancer
AT bakstrichardl prognosticimpactofhumanpapillomavirusstatusfollowingtreatmentfailureinoropharyngealcancer