Cargando…

In Vitro comparison of (213)Bi- and (177)Lu-radiation for peptide receptor radionuclide therapy

BACKGROUND: Absorbed doses for α-emitters are different from those for β-emitters, as the high linear energy transfer (LET) nature of α-particles results in a very dense energy deposition over a relatively short path length near the point of emission. This highly localized and therefore high energy...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chan, Ho Sze, de Blois, Erik, Morgenstern, Alfred, Bruchertseifer, Frank, de Jong, Marion, Breeman, Wouter, Konijnenberg, Mark
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5521788/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28732021
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0181473
_version_ 1783252038807715840
author Chan, Ho Sze
de Blois, Erik
Morgenstern, Alfred
Bruchertseifer, Frank
de Jong, Marion
Breeman, Wouter
Konijnenberg, Mark
author_facet Chan, Ho Sze
de Blois, Erik
Morgenstern, Alfred
Bruchertseifer, Frank
de Jong, Marion
Breeman, Wouter
Konijnenberg, Mark
author_sort Chan, Ho Sze
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Absorbed doses for α-emitters are different from those for β-emitters, as the high linear energy transfer (LET) nature of α-particles results in a very dense energy deposition over a relatively short path length near the point of emission. This highly localized and therefore high energy deposition can lead to enhanced cell-killing effects at absorbed doses that are non-lethal in low-LET type of exposure. Affinities of DOTA-DPhe(1)-Tyr(3)-octreotate (DOTATATE), (115)In-DOTATATE, (175)Lu-DOTATATE and (209)Bi-DOTATATE were determined in the K562-SST2 cell line. Two other cell lines were used for radiation response assessment; BON and CA20948, with a low and high expression of somatostatin receptors, respectively. Cellular uptake kinetics of (111)In-DOTATATE were determined in CA20948 cells. CA20948 and BON were irradiated with (137)Cs, (177)Lu-DTPA, (177)Lu-DOTATATE, (213)Bi-DTPA and (213)Bi-DOTATATE. Absorbed doses were calculated using the MIRDcell dosimetry method for the specific binding and a Monte Carlo model of a cylindrical 6-well plate geometry for the exposure by the radioactive incubation medium. Absorbed doses were compared to conventional irradiation of cells with (137)Cs and the relative biological effect (RBE) at 10% survival was calculated. RESULTS: IC(50) of (labelled) DOTATATE was in the nM range. Absorbed doses up to 7 Gy were obtained by 5.2 MBq (213)Bi-DOTATATE, in majority the dose was caused by α-particle radiation. Cellular internalization determined with (111)In-DOTATATE showed a linear relation with incubation time. Cell survival after exposure of (213)Bi-DTPA and (213)Bi-DOTATATE to BON or CA20948 cells showed a linear-exponential relation with the absorbed dose, confirming the high LET character of (213)Bi. The survival of CA20948 after exposure to (177)Lu-DOTATATE and the reference (137)Cs irradiation showed the typical curvature of the linear-quadratic model. 10% Cell survival of CA20948 was reached at 3 Gy with (213)Bi-DOTATATE, a factor 6 lower than the 18 Gy found for (177)Lu-DOTATATE and also below the 5 Gy after (137)Cs external exposure. CONCLUSION: (213)Bi-DTPA and (213)Bi-DOTATATE lead to a factor 6 advantage in cell killing compared to (177)Lu-DOTATATE. The RBE at 10% survival by (213)Bi-ligand compared to (137)Cs was 2.0 whereas the RBE for (177)Lu-DOTATATE was 0.3 in the CA20948 in vitro model.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5521788
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55217882017-08-07 In Vitro comparison of (213)Bi- and (177)Lu-radiation for peptide receptor radionuclide therapy Chan, Ho Sze de Blois, Erik Morgenstern, Alfred Bruchertseifer, Frank de Jong, Marion Breeman, Wouter Konijnenberg, Mark PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Absorbed doses for α-emitters are different from those for β-emitters, as the high linear energy transfer (LET) nature of α-particles results in a very dense energy deposition over a relatively short path length near the point of emission. This highly localized and therefore high energy deposition can lead to enhanced cell-killing effects at absorbed doses that are non-lethal in low-LET type of exposure. Affinities of DOTA-DPhe(1)-Tyr(3)-octreotate (DOTATATE), (115)In-DOTATATE, (175)Lu-DOTATATE and (209)Bi-DOTATATE were determined in the K562-SST2 cell line. Two other cell lines were used for radiation response assessment; BON and CA20948, with a low and high expression of somatostatin receptors, respectively. Cellular uptake kinetics of (111)In-DOTATATE were determined in CA20948 cells. CA20948 and BON were irradiated with (137)Cs, (177)Lu-DTPA, (177)Lu-DOTATATE, (213)Bi-DTPA and (213)Bi-DOTATATE. Absorbed doses were calculated using the MIRDcell dosimetry method for the specific binding and a Monte Carlo model of a cylindrical 6-well plate geometry for the exposure by the radioactive incubation medium. Absorbed doses were compared to conventional irradiation of cells with (137)Cs and the relative biological effect (RBE) at 10% survival was calculated. RESULTS: IC(50) of (labelled) DOTATATE was in the nM range. Absorbed doses up to 7 Gy were obtained by 5.2 MBq (213)Bi-DOTATATE, in majority the dose was caused by α-particle radiation. Cellular internalization determined with (111)In-DOTATATE showed a linear relation with incubation time. Cell survival after exposure of (213)Bi-DTPA and (213)Bi-DOTATATE to BON or CA20948 cells showed a linear-exponential relation with the absorbed dose, confirming the high LET character of (213)Bi. The survival of CA20948 after exposure to (177)Lu-DOTATATE and the reference (137)Cs irradiation showed the typical curvature of the linear-quadratic model. 10% Cell survival of CA20948 was reached at 3 Gy with (213)Bi-DOTATATE, a factor 6 lower than the 18 Gy found for (177)Lu-DOTATATE and also below the 5 Gy after (137)Cs external exposure. CONCLUSION: (213)Bi-DTPA and (213)Bi-DOTATATE lead to a factor 6 advantage in cell killing compared to (177)Lu-DOTATATE. The RBE at 10% survival by (213)Bi-ligand compared to (137)Cs was 2.0 whereas the RBE for (177)Lu-DOTATATE was 0.3 in the CA20948 in vitro model. Public Library of Science 2017-07-21 /pmc/articles/PMC5521788/ /pubmed/28732021 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0181473 Text en © 2017 Chan et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Chan, Ho Sze
de Blois, Erik
Morgenstern, Alfred
Bruchertseifer, Frank
de Jong, Marion
Breeman, Wouter
Konijnenberg, Mark
In Vitro comparison of (213)Bi- and (177)Lu-radiation for peptide receptor radionuclide therapy
title In Vitro comparison of (213)Bi- and (177)Lu-radiation for peptide receptor radionuclide therapy
title_full In Vitro comparison of (213)Bi- and (177)Lu-radiation for peptide receptor radionuclide therapy
title_fullStr In Vitro comparison of (213)Bi- and (177)Lu-radiation for peptide receptor radionuclide therapy
title_full_unstemmed In Vitro comparison of (213)Bi- and (177)Lu-radiation for peptide receptor radionuclide therapy
title_short In Vitro comparison of (213)Bi- and (177)Lu-radiation for peptide receptor radionuclide therapy
title_sort in vitro comparison of (213)bi- and (177)lu-radiation for peptide receptor radionuclide therapy
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5521788/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28732021
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0181473
work_keys_str_mv AT chanhosze invitrocomparisonof213biand177luradiationforpeptidereceptorradionuclidetherapy
AT debloiserik invitrocomparisonof213biand177luradiationforpeptidereceptorradionuclidetherapy
AT morgensternalfred invitrocomparisonof213biand177luradiationforpeptidereceptorradionuclidetherapy
AT bruchertseiferfrank invitrocomparisonof213biand177luradiationforpeptidereceptorradionuclidetherapy
AT dejongmarion invitrocomparisonof213biand177luradiationforpeptidereceptorradionuclidetherapy
AT breemanwouter invitrocomparisonof213biand177luradiationforpeptidereceptorradionuclidetherapy
AT konijnenbergmark invitrocomparisonof213biand177luradiationforpeptidereceptorradionuclidetherapy