Cargando…

Alternate Access to Care: A Cross Sectional Survey of Low Acuity Emergency Department Patients

Introduction Patients with low-acuity (Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale level IV and V) complaints use the emergency department (ED) to access care. This has often been attributed to lack of a primary care provider. However, simply being registered with a primary care provider may not prevent low ac...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: MacKay, Jacqueline, Atkinson, Paul, Palmer, Erin, Fraser, Jacqueline, Vaillancourt, Elise, Howlett, Michael, Stoica, George, Powell, Maria
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cureus 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5522016/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28775925
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.1385
_version_ 1783252080498049024
author MacKay, Jacqueline
Atkinson, Paul
Palmer, Erin
Fraser, Jacqueline
Vaillancourt, Elise
Howlett, Michael
Stoica, George
Powell, Maria
author_facet MacKay, Jacqueline
Atkinson, Paul
Palmer, Erin
Fraser, Jacqueline
Vaillancourt, Elise
Howlett, Michael
Stoica, George
Powell, Maria
author_sort MacKay, Jacqueline
collection PubMed
description Introduction Patients with low-acuity (Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale level IV and V) complaints use the emergency department (ED) to access care. This has often been attributed to lack of a primary care provider. However, simply being registered with a primary care provider may not prevent low acuity ED presentation. There is some evidence that a lack of timely access to primary care may contribute to low acuity ED presentations. The Wait Time Alliance, a group of Canadian physicians and their respective professional associations, has recently set a benchmark of same day access to family doctors. It is unclear if this benchmark has been achieved in all jurisdictions.  Methods We performed linked cross sectional surveys to quantify the number of people presenting to the ED for nonurgent problems who felt unable to access primary care. Primary care practices were also surveyed to assess access using the metric of time to third next available appointment.  Results In the patient survey, 381 of 580 patients consented to participate. Of the 89 patients who met eligibility criteria, 100% completed the survey. 32 (35.9%) reported that the wait to see their primary care provider was “too long”. 45 (50.5%) patients did not contact their primary care provider’s office prior to ED presentation. 45 of 72 physician surveys were returned; a response rate of 62.5%. Most (77%) physicians estimated their wait time for a standard appointment to be greater than 48 hours. The mean calculated time to third next available appointment in the region was 6.6 (95% CI 4.6-8.7) days. Conclusions Approximately half of low acuity patients do not attempt to access their primary care provider prior to ED presentation. The benchmark of same day access to primary care has not been achieved in many practices in our region. Further education regarding primary care access would likely be beneficial to both patients and providers.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5522016
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Cureus
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55220162017-08-03 Alternate Access to Care: A Cross Sectional Survey of Low Acuity Emergency Department Patients MacKay, Jacqueline Atkinson, Paul Palmer, Erin Fraser, Jacqueline Vaillancourt, Elise Howlett, Michael Stoica, George Powell, Maria Cureus Quality Improvement Introduction Patients with low-acuity (Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale level IV and V) complaints use the emergency department (ED) to access care. This has often been attributed to lack of a primary care provider. However, simply being registered with a primary care provider may not prevent low acuity ED presentation. There is some evidence that a lack of timely access to primary care may contribute to low acuity ED presentations. The Wait Time Alliance, a group of Canadian physicians and their respective professional associations, has recently set a benchmark of same day access to family doctors. It is unclear if this benchmark has been achieved in all jurisdictions.  Methods We performed linked cross sectional surveys to quantify the number of people presenting to the ED for nonurgent problems who felt unable to access primary care. Primary care practices were also surveyed to assess access using the metric of time to third next available appointment.  Results In the patient survey, 381 of 580 patients consented to participate. Of the 89 patients who met eligibility criteria, 100% completed the survey. 32 (35.9%) reported that the wait to see their primary care provider was “too long”. 45 (50.5%) patients did not contact their primary care provider’s office prior to ED presentation. 45 of 72 physician surveys were returned; a response rate of 62.5%. Most (77%) physicians estimated their wait time for a standard appointment to be greater than 48 hours. The mean calculated time to third next available appointment in the region was 6.6 (95% CI 4.6-8.7) days. Conclusions Approximately half of low acuity patients do not attempt to access their primary care provider prior to ED presentation. The benchmark of same day access to primary care has not been achieved in many practices in our region. Further education regarding primary care access would likely be beneficial to both patients and providers. Cureus 2017-06-23 /pmc/articles/PMC5522016/ /pubmed/28775925 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.1385 Text en Copyright © 2017, MacKay et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Quality Improvement
MacKay, Jacqueline
Atkinson, Paul
Palmer, Erin
Fraser, Jacqueline
Vaillancourt, Elise
Howlett, Michael
Stoica, George
Powell, Maria
Alternate Access to Care: A Cross Sectional Survey of Low Acuity Emergency Department Patients
title Alternate Access to Care: A Cross Sectional Survey of Low Acuity Emergency Department Patients
title_full Alternate Access to Care: A Cross Sectional Survey of Low Acuity Emergency Department Patients
title_fullStr Alternate Access to Care: A Cross Sectional Survey of Low Acuity Emergency Department Patients
title_full_unstemmed Alternate Access to Care: A Cross Sectional Survey of Low Acuity Emergency Department Patients
title_short Alternate Access to Care: A Cross Sectional Survey of Low Acuity Emergency Department Patients
title_sort alternate access to care: a cross sectional survey of low acuity emergency department patients
topic Quality Improvement
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5522016/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28775925
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.1385
work_keys_str_mv AT mackayjacqueline alternateaccesstocareacrosssectionalsurveyoflowacuityemergencydepartmentpatients
AT atkinsonpaul alternateaccesstocareacrosssectionalsurveyoflowacuityemergencydepartmentpatients
AT palmererin alternateaccesstocareacrosssectionalsurveyoflowacuityemergencydepartmentpatients
AT fraserjacqueline alternateaccesstocareacrosssectionalsurveyoflowacuityemergencydepartmentpatients
AT vaillancourtelise alternateaccesstocareacrosssectionalsurveyoflowacuityemergencydepartmentpatients
AT howlettmichael alternateaccesstocareacrosssectionalsurveyoflowacuityemergencydepartmentpatients
AT stoicageorge alternateaccesstocareacrosssectionalsurveyoflowacuityemergencydepartmentpatients
AT powellmaria alternateaccesstocareacrosssectionalsurveyoflowacuityemergencydepartmentpatients